/meta/ - Board Meta

[Make a Post]
[X]





making nano porn-free Nanonymous No.3197 [D][S][L][A][C] >>3208 >>3230 >>3249

What about making nano porn-free site? It will affect quality of posts and our minds in a positive way.
Nice article why porn is bad https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/miscellaneous-resources/start-here-evolution-has-not-prepared-your-brain-for-todays-porn/
Banning porn isn't violating free of speech as some try to imply.
Do you want a better tomorrow for imageboards? Let's do this together!

Nanonymous No.3198 [D][U][F]
File: 887bb2fad01249fd4ef49ea54f04d555bf12007c56157de065ddd9b1bac576f5.jpg (dl) (37.54 KiB)

I forgot pic

Nanonymous No.3199 [D] >>3200

Porn is not a problem for nano currently, there is a loli thread and that's it, i disagree with proibiting certain topics if it's not necessary. (also use the global meta thread for these kind of things)

Nanonymous No.3200 [D]

>>3199
Posts like >>>b/9950/ >>>g/3715/ >>>b/9591 are actually pornographic and appear in normal threads.

Nanonymous No.3201 [D]

>>>/b/9950 >>>/g/3715 >>>/b/9591

Nanonymous No.3202 [D]

nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/b/9918.html#post9950
http://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/b/9530.html#post9591
http://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/g/1873.html#post3715

Nanonymous No.3203 [D][U][F] >>3204
File: 014ee51fdd3e501f798ad2f52636242a3998d445416d7edfdc8eef96178d541c.jpg (dl) (244.58 KiB)

no they're not if you're this sensible why are you even here? go back to reddit and youtube

Nanonymous No.3204 [D] >>3206 >>3207

>>3203
I'm trying to eliminate porn from my life and such pics certainly don't help me. It's like trying to quit vodka but drinking small amounts of beer.
They don't serve any meaning for quality imageboards in fact all shit sites like 4cuck or pigchan have enormous number of pornography. SFW is the way to go.
>no they're not
Yes they are. Read what pornography means and if you still imply it's alright then fuck off to already mentioned places where it's acceptable.

Nanonymous No.3205 [D][U][F]
File: 84e3923dc734098fb2237721746186e338fb974fdfb39b45d6c4813307a24241.png (dl) (1.44 MiB)

yes it's alright in an IM, this is your problem not ours, you can go back to "safer" parts of the internet like sfw reddit and youtube and keeping being a cuck there or grow some self control like everybody else, no post quality is not influenced by the image but mostly by the text.

Nanonymous No.3206 [D] >>3223 >>3249

>>3204
>buys into nofap meme
>wants to restrict everyone else's freedom because of it
Then go away. If you consider pic related to be porn you are a serious faggot.
>>http://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/b/9530.html#post9591

Nanonymous No.3207 [D] >>3223

>>3204
If I was trying to eliminate anime from my life should we ban all anime girls? You're exactly the same as a faggot who thinks his hatred of his own penis means everyone else should have to take dicks in their ass. Everyone else here is able to have a normal, healthy relationship with pornography, if you can't manage that then you should be in an institution not shitposting on imageboards.

Nanonymous No.3208 [D][U][F] >>3209 >>3223
File: 14896d7e5cfa62fe7f6d9422a1fc2682fc6d9500bfb14a8f01df46cbf6736c7b.jpg (dl) (74.59 KiB)

>>3197
Let's have a test.
Does this pic turn you on?

Nanonymous No.3209 [D][U][F]
File: ce39889f3753d0525e6370243ff5ac23ef453dedc8e45155b98e8197f16a4c65.jpg (dl) (72.74 KiB)

>>3208
leeeewd 9.82% of her skin is exposed! where is her integral burka?! hakase delete this CP!!!

sage sage No.3210 [D]

>I personally get triggerd by thing
>ban thing for everyone!
sage

Nanonymous No.3213 [D]

I support this motion. Porn is readily available already.

Nanonymous No.3214 [D][U][F] >>3223
File: 203e28ad3aedcf5d551a4fc7085e8d5f5dd21d1f2085f8e227102b33a7b9b3ce.jpg (dl) (189.56 KiB)

How about no. I really like porn. Yourbrainonporn is a propaganda site. Humanity has always had some form of pornagraphy---paintings, drawings, statues, figurines, 1-800-wet-tits, etc..

Nanonymous No.3215 [D] >>3218

I don't think porn and other degeneracy should be prohibited across the site, we are not puritans. A better idea might be to bumplock certain boards from automatically rising to the top in the overboard.

Since nanochan is a relatively low traffic chan, most users simply sit on the overboard rather than their preferred niche boards to check updates. The problem with this is that shitty /b/ and /a/ threads constantly flood to the top and there is a potential for abuse to slide/drown out threads from other boards during crucial habbenings and what not. The user pool is small but does appear to be growing slowly, and this could be an issue someday.

Just a consideration.

Nanonymous No.3217 [D] >>3218 >>3219

>itt gay wigger-boomer /pol/ycephalous faggots try to ban everything because muh symbolism and muh natsock
why don't we just ban the /poL/GBT community instead? the users of this board are completely tech-illiterate morons and not even being on an onion site changes that. not only that, they get offended just as easily as feminists and tumblrtards, just on different topics. Collectively they have failed to achieve anything of significance in the real world, claiming the achievements of eveyrone else as their own.
Deleting /pol/ would improve the quality of this site greatly.

Nanonymous No.3218 [D][U][F] >>3219 >>3220
File: 925528f181edfbf9796d5ad8e1c7446c4974f5a8990cb8fcc0bf0cf9e1a0d546.jpg (dl) (190.57 KiB)

>>3215
If you want to filter NSFW from the /overboard/ either you filter entire boards, or you set up a tag system, booru style, your problem is that hakase is really lazy and this will never happen.
>>3217
You're a newfag that doesn't know that /pol/ is supposed to be a containment board, that's literally how 4/pol/ was born, delete it and they're gonna spread everywhere(and contaminate threads even worse than now).

Nanonymous No.3219 [D][U][F]
File: c580cf8720f571b58639570a7a7cad0541725cd6510ef9caa658f5bd87fe00da.jpg (dl) (142.54 KiB)

>>3217
>>3218
If hapase doesn't want to delete /pol/, as she probably doesn't, she could at least exclude it from overboard.

Nanonymous No.3220 [D] >>3221

>>3218
>/pol/ is supposed to be a containment board
This is /pol/yp propaganda to stop people from deleting them. There is literally nowhere for /pol/niggers to go, since every major imageboard with /pol/ is owned by asians or hapas, including this one. Wiggers can't into tech. They are almost as bad as pajeets. Yet they deny the fact that hapas are superior to whites.
>delete it and they're gonna spread everywhere
No. Hapase has managed to completely purge other types of cancer in the past. I trust that she is able to do it now, as well.

Nanonymous No.3221 [D][U][F] >>3222
File: 0b56840725deb1b937a69dcd4742198639a2129bd7c80ffb7f9880ec6c202f15.jpg (dl) (65.84 KiB)

>>3220
>This is /pol/yp propaganda to stop people from deleting them.
I couldn't give a single fuck about /pol/, as a matter of fact it is a containment board to not shit up every thread on other boards(you are already starting to make this thread political with your hapa narrative therefore demostrating the need to have a /pol/ board good job retard).
>managed to completely purge other types of cancer in the past.
Not true, just a week ago she failed to moderate the hapa spammer(which may as well be you judging by your typing patterns) and since she is clearly biased toward natsoc politics i definitely don't trust her in moderating political discussion, just leave things as they are.

Nanonymous No.3222 [D][U][F] >>3225
File: 8377c17e9f86c5126a3fad2187dd5bc215cbf3f1ca317d693d4deb0774ecf2c9.png (dl) (279.13 KiB)

>>3221
>I couldn't give a single fuck about /pol/
Then delete it.
>it is a containment board
Stop spouting your "containment board" bullshit. Cancer must be purged, not tolerated.
>you are already starting to make this thread political with your hapa narrative
This thread is a shitty /poL/GBT thread which should be removed. Nothing I post in it will have a negative impact.
>she failed to moderate the hapa spammer
I don't see any spam anywhere. Hapa-spammer-kun only spams in 8chode.
>she is clearly biased toward natsoc politics
People who are biased towards NEETsock politics would generally call the hapa supremacist poster a "spammer" and remove all his posts. I believe that hapase intends to split off /poo/ from the rest of nanochan, but that's just a wild guess based on the fact that she wants to elect a new board owner.
>just leave things as they are
Stupid conservacuck.

Nanonymous No.3223 [D] >>3224 >>3225 >>3232

>>3206
Maybe I went too far, yesterday I was really horny.
>restrict everyone else's freedom
Haha you're a faggot actually. Learn difference between harming yourself and having freedom.
>>3207
>Everyone else here is able to have a normal, healthy relationship with pornography
>healthy
>pornography
choose one
>>3208
No, it's supposed to be cute, not arousing.
>>3214
>it's been so old so it's fine
Suicide is even older than Jews, does that mean it's ok?

Sure I might overreact cause I fail to quit porn for some time now. It's even more humiliating I could abstain from masturbating for a year and now 3 days is difficult to achieve. Nano is SFW compared to 4cuck but why can't we take it further? I see people here are more interested in quality discussion than brainless image spam. We could promote such ideas and be trendsetting Tor-only imageboard, the one that will inspire next generations of anons. Why don't you want to create a better place, safe haven for all anonymous users? If someone decides to leave nano just cause it doesn't have porn means he was shit user from day one. Please reconsider.

Nanonymous No.3224 [D][U][F] >>3232
File: 67535cb54faaf5e1c5df1e4ba798746fb62217aaba823b23ff09a220403eb3a3.jpg (dl) (44.51 KiB)

>>3223
>butthurt /pol/wigger can't control himself
I bet you jizz your pants when a girl brushes against you by accident you pathetic beta.
/pol/ needs to be deleted ASAP.

Nanonymous No.3225 [D][U][F] >>3227 >>3228
File: ecbf5a87090f0b8c9ccbed83f447a71c2103665fb19cb0d13cc992a5782e16d6.png (dl) (771.86 KiB)

>>3222
Ok since you seem to not understand, let me explain why an imageboard needs different boards, first it's necessary to have multiple boards to focus the discussion, imagine if everything was clusterfucked in /b/, with multiple boards i'm certain that if i want to talk about politics i go to /pol/, second is order if everything was stuffed on /b/ every thread would be derailed into some political banter, now if hakase was to delete /pol/ the same people that you hate would infiltrate every thread on /b/.
>I believe that hapase intends to split off /poo/ from the rest of nanochan
From the rest of nanochan i don't whink so, i think she wants to create a /natsoc/ board and them make /pol/ rules less strict, so it can function as a true containment(do it hakase), this is my speculation though.
>>3223
Ok, since i'm starting to feel pity towards you let me give a couple of advices, first you need to understand that this is YOUR problem, not mine, not of nanochan, YOURS, second you need to get off this victim mentality and understand that is not the world that needs to change, but you need to change. I understand that this is a problem for you and i'm sorry but we can't help you, your best bet is staying outside the internet and seek professional help.

Nanonymous No.3227 [D] >>3229

>>3225
>the same people that you hate would infiltrate every thread on /b/
Then just delete them when they show up, same as the Eris spammer. They will go away eventually. It's imageboard chemotherapy, except with far fewer negative effects.

Nanonymous No.3228 [D] >>3229

>>3225
>if i want to talk about politics i go to /pol/
What a stupid waste of time that would be. If you want endless virtue signalling about how extreme someone is than you you go to /pol/. If you want to talk about politics then you should find a non-imageboard place to do it, since all imageboards have been ruined by the influence of /pol/.

Nanonymous No.3229 [D][U][F] >>3233
File: ffeec1d38f4ecaf7cc52bb804a8065e644c95cc8c0d261ead9933755783efa2f.jpg (dl) (38.62 KiB)

>>3227
We have only one mod/admin, hakase, if you look at the logs it become obvious what hakase's timezone is and there are lot of unprotected hours where you could spam how much you wanted, even if we had more mods you're basically proposing to make this place more like 4cuck, no thanks you.
>>3228
You just proved my point. So you hate /pol/ and don't want to have anything to do with it. Let's do the opposite example, if you don't want to go to /pol/ right now you just don't do there. If there was no /pol/ poltards would everywhere and you couldn't avoid them. It's a containment, you open the quarantine and everywhere gets infected capishe?

Nanonymous No.3230 [D]

>>3197
Install uMatrix, block images, profit(?), it's the same method i use tu make the page load faster

Nanonymous No.3232 [D]

>>3223
>suicide
>>3224
Yes.

When I’m with thee, strife and need!
So I on my travels started;
Yet my life, when from thee parted,
Is no life, but death indeed.

Nanonymous No.3233 [D]

>>3229
>If there was no /pol/ poltards would everywhere and you couldn't avoid them.
Every other forum in existence proves you wrong. Poltards are everywhere - already - because of /pol/. Get rid of /pol/ and they would leave for greener pastures (after a brief period of interminable whining).
>It's a containment
It's a shit containment. There are a number of threads on every other board that are clearly made by retard /pol/ denizens. They come to the site for /pol/, they spam there for a while, get bored, and move to the other boards and spam there too. Get rid of /pol/, get rid of the /pol/tards, get rid of the /pol/spam.

Nanonymous No.3234 [D]

>hates /pol/
>pushes that meme hapa narrative, uses the word "wigger" at least semi-ironically and does other fun /pol/ stuff
LMAO
If you get b& by the proposed rule, I'm actually for it.

Nanonymous No.3235 [D][U][F] >>3243
File: f0c0566efa9aed4b6096aff3a2a9160a7a67371082faa5265eb1baf95abf0033.png (dl) (107.03 KiB)

share OCs/semi-OCs

Nanonymous No.3236 [D][U][F]
File: 27fe925c6460be7382df18078c67b0ee325a60cb5b974cb62fcdee123cac9854.png (dl) (9.75 KiB)



Nanonymous No.3237 [D] >>3238 >>3239

I remember when hakase specifically advertised or at least had nanochan cater to 8/pol/'s userbase as chodechimp was trying to turn /pol/ into a lolbert board. The "/pol/ is explicitly natsoc" rule was created as a result of that drama, too. Anyone on this site even remember this anymore?
Hakase, I'm not sure if you even care about keeping the community healthy anymore, or you're just leaving everything but /pol/ up to whatever the users want it to become. If you even care about your website anymore, step back and take a look. Where's the threads about interesting people with weird thoughts looking to spark an outlandish but fun and intriguing discussion?
I don't like using pigchan as a comparison, but look at the hapa spammer. Or the /pol/ whiner, or the eris spammer. It's like the unix hater of /tech/, they derail every single thread with their bullshit, trying their best to tie everything up to their inane rants to further their bullshit agenda. Even worse with the former two, since politics make easy bait and they have an easier time derailing threads. It gets really tiring, to have almost every thread lead to the same disappointment.
Just take a look at this one. Compare the intensity of the /pol/ whining to previous threads that got derailed with it; there's almost no resistance to it now. Maybe we've all just been played and you were part of the hapa/*oomer spammer all along, but right now I still don't have any reason to believe you aren't at least neutral to /pol/, so this is my last plea. I've read and took in every single godforsaken post in this place, and the change in culture and tone isn't just huge, it's a trainwreck at this point.
/pol/'s still okay and safe from all the cancer, but I don't even like visiting that board. The tech purists/larpers will hate me for this, and the discord trannies will ridicule me, but with how things are going, going back to eight or even half wouldn't be that much of a downgrade from this place in the future. It's just such a shame looking at how this place turned out, and what it could've been. Maybe it's already too late, and I wrote this out for nothing. Maybe this is the fate of all imageboards on the nu-internet, and the exceptional ones can only delay that fact. Maybe there's even a way to save it all, but I don't think we're in good company anymore. I can only anticipate 4cuck-esque replies for any suggestion I can give right now.
The clearnet ban was nice though. It really did save our ass for quite a while.

Nanonymous No.3238 [D][U][F] >>3241
File: 430e848aa23e37e8eefafcf476b057278f0c97d7feb382cd4075c567dea4842b.png (dl) (4.06 KiB)

>>3237
I don't get your post.
What's your point? Who's /pol/ whiner? What is lolbert? We have no hapa spammer but dedicated polhapa. Eris spammer existed for few days. At least the one lifter spouting dotr in every thread left.
>change in culture and tone isn't just huge, it's a trainwreck at this point
I'm here for months and it's more or less the same. If there's thread or topic worth long posts, there are long posts, if there's shitpost thread then people shitpost.

Nanonymous No.3239 [D] >>3240 >>3244 >>3248

>>3237
TPH for the past half day is at 0.0 for the whole site. Most boards have less than 16 posts in the past day. A single person can still completely shift the culture of a board just by making good posts. The whiners and shitposters only serve to mask that a board doesn't have enough good posts, and eventually even they get bored and leave. If you look at 8/tech/ recently, you'll see that practically nothing is being posted, and even the pseudo-tripfags have stopped posting. I don't know how to make good threads, but somebody needs to if you want to save the board.

Nanonymous No.3240 [D]

>>3239
>/8/tech
8chan was reduced to two boards: /b2/ and /pol/.

Nanonymous No.3241 [D] >>3242

>>3238
>I don't get your post. What's your point?
You know damn well what my point is, fag.
>Who's /pol/ whiner?
The discordfag that tries to frame the drop in quality on /pol/, like they aren't the reason for the quality drop in the first place. It's obnoxious in how dumb the whole idea is.
>What is lolbert?
lolbergs*, libertarians
>We have no hapa spammer but dedicated polhapa.
What does polhapa mean? Is it because you dislike the spammer connotation?
>Eris spammer existed for few days.
Only because hakase wiped them out. It's what gave me hope that maybe you scum can eventually leave
>At least the one lifter spouting dotr in every thread left.
They aren't the same thing. One of them has dotr as his catchphrase without changing the topic, the other actively draws attention to his stupid opinions in tangential-at-best discussions.
>If there's thread or topic worth long posts, there are long posts, if there's shitpost thread then people shitpost.
I'm not saying shitposts are bad, they keep the place less tense and helps us not take ourselves too seriously. Long posts do not mean quality posts, go check out one of the niche chans and you can find 10k word blogposts about shit no one cares about.
Shitposting under a shitpost OP isn't what I meant with the drop in quality anyways, I'm talking about useless posts in otherwise quality threads. The only board spared from this type of cancer is /pol/. It's what makes this sad, hakase has the ability to keep the site clean, but doesn't want to, because of muh freeze peach.

Nanonymous No.3242 [D] >>3244

>>3241
>You know damn well what my point is, fag.
If I knew I woulnd't be asking.
>discordfag
You mean the one who told the catholic to read a bible?
>polhapa
Spam is what was on 8chan. His every post here is unique.

Nanonymous No.3243 [D]

>>3235
>anarcho-tyranny
>freedom

Nanonymous No.3244 [D] >>3252

>>3239
New threads won't help much now that there's already ongoing discussion, which users would naturally gravitate towards. Board specific pph doesn't matter when everything happens in the overboard regardless. Making good threads/posts won't guarantee the fact that your discussion wouldn't be derailed, and leaving the crap up only gives the newfags the go ahead to smear their own flavor of cancer all over /b/ and /meta/.

>>3242
You seemed sarcastic when you asked that, sorry. I first warned about the slippery slope of ignoring the declining state of non-/pol/ boards here https://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/meta/1122.html#post1885 , and my post above was just asking hakase to finally do something about it before it really is too late.
I'm referring to the post on /b/ a week or so ago where some guy said he found a link to nano from a discord server. Take a look at the recent influx of posts in the desktop thread too, they seem like /g/ users from 4chan
>His every post here is unique
Unix hater's posts were unique too, what do you mean?

Nanonymous No.3245 [D] >>3246

ITT: Faggots not knowing hapase was a mod on pig/pol/ and made nanochan after realizing just how shit codenigger was and pig/pol/ coudn't be saved through some good old tyranny.
Also ITT: one hell of a derailment

Nanonymous No.3246 [D]

>>3245
I thought that was just a theory, it's why I didn't mention it in my post. There were a couple theories about hakase then, the only one that stuck around was hapase

Nanonymous No.3247 [D][U][F] >>3250 >>3399
File: 70b4440c075a81998ccea4decfe135244ddd77569b3d0d5520d8130edc99e9f2.png (dl) (6.36 MiB)

Japanese shitposters enter every single thread on /b/ and start talking about how Japan is superior to all other countries, which derails the conversation.
Japanese shitposters are destroying this site. We need to ban Japanese shitposting now.

Nanonymous No.3248 [D]

>>3239
>If you look at 8/tech/ recently, you'll see that practically nothing is being posted, and even the pseudo-tripfags have stopped posting
O rly? That's interesting. Maybe Nanochan siphoned off all the good users.

Nanonymous No.3249 [D] >>3251

>>3206
You and many others in this thread are just rationalizing your inability to control yourself and be productive.
>>3197
That would take immense effort from the moderators, and would also make an easy excuse to delete posts. If you can't muster the self control required overnight, then you could refrain from browsing /b/.


Nanonymous No.3250 [D]

>>3247
There are no Japanese posters, just a guy with a inferiority complex.

Nanonymous No.3251 [D]

>>3249
>and would also make an easy excuse to delete posts
As if the precedent isn't already set, lol. Check out https://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/meta/8.html#post3170

Nanonymous No.3252 [D] >>3280

>>3244
>what do you mean?
That she can't be considered spammer because she doesn't produce spam.

Nanonymous No.3280 [D]

>>3252
I guess, I just used 'spammer' because that's what I saw others called her.

Nanonymous No.3399 [D]

>>3247
thats just one guy nigger and he says hapa which means hawaiian or some shit, its not even clear what hes trying to say, and hes probably white