/g/ - Technology

install openbsd

[Make a Post]
[X]





Saying it is a Honeypot doesn't make it one Nanonymous No.2774 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>2775 >>2777 >>2786 >>2810
File: 132dcf5fcb981fc4db22aac0651ccd2ad25449a45e59670d20f2437b96d375f6.png (dl) (86.97 KiB)

>don't use X service it's a honeypot
>trusting x, an actual honeypot
>is X a honeypot

Unless there is proof that whatever your saying is actually a trap (what honeypots are) then the claim is equivalent to saying that an unmeasured object exists.

If you are actually worried if service or application X is a honeypot do your own research and see if there were any examples if that service being used to prosecute someone.

Also if your going to claim something is a honeypot it would be more constructive to say what would make you trust service X as not a honeypot like it being opensource or something.

Seriously getting really annoyed how everyone is getting super paranoid over anything including opensource projects.

Nanonymous No.2775 [D] >>2777

>>2774
In security, trusting your hunches is quite valid. You can save yourself worlds of difficulties doing this. But that's hardly fact (as you said), and it would be better to at least describe why one is leery of them rather than falling straight into the honeypot meme.

I do think some services (eg, ProtonMail, many VPNs) offer plenty of reasons to be wary, though.

Nanonymous No.2776 [D][U][F]
File: daa5621df78b783b64d3b13abb6fc72b82d85c6a32afea241ad7e710e3ac5e4f.jpg (dl) (65.91 KiB)

NANOCHAN LANGUAGE POLICE HAS ARRIVED BETTER WATCH OUT!!!
In all seriousness OP is right but he's a faggot for making a thread rather than simply criticizing the specific posts when they appear.

Nanonymous No.2777 [D] >>2778

>>2774
Tor is a honey-pot because it is ineffective against attackers who can see both incoming and outgoing connections, and the majority of funding has come from the U.S. government.

ProtonMail is a honey-pot because it has a single private key (thus providing no future secrecy), generated in the browser, encrypted with a shitty password and stored in the cloud. Also the main company behind ProtonVPN is (or was?) a data mining company.

DuckDuckGo is a honey-pot because it is hosted on Amazon, mainly.

Signal is a honey-pot because it requires you to run proprietary software and also uses Amazon.

But you're right in that saying something is a honey-pot doesn't make it a honey-pot. Same goes for the example above. I'm just guessing.

>>2775
>In security, trusting your hunches is quite valid
That depends on how knowledgeable you are in that field, though some things should be obvious to all (fishy people, organizations, etc).

Nanonymous No.2778 [D] >>2780

>>2777
>MUH HONEYPOT
Those are just deficiencies in the software, or the software is simply shitty software. Whether or not something is a honeypot isn't relevant and it's not something that you can find out. For all you know everything is a honeypot because the nsa can spy on you with satellites when you're using it.
"Honeypot" has been relegated to buzzword status mostly by pig/tech/ faggots.

Nanonymous No.2779 [D] >>2830

before pigchan
>this service is run by kikes
>this software is proprietary
>this website requires javashit
>this encryption is insecure
after pigchan
<honeypot
<honeypot
<honeypot
<honeypot

Nanonymous No.2780 [D]

>>2778
>Those are just deficiencies in the software
That's true, I haven't really used that term that often. Nevertheless it's worth pointing out these flaws in software.

Nanonymous No.2786 [D]

>>2774 Most of them are MEMEs or LARPers.

Nanonymous No.2810 [D] >>2811

>>2774
maybe it is something that is only activated when they need it. if it was obvious then people would stop using it.

Nanonymous No.2811 [D]

>>2810
What people?

Nanonymous No.2824 [D] >>2830

I bet OP uses Discord.

Nanonymous No.2830 [D] >>2831 >>2868

>>2824
Not an argument.
>>2779
>muh pigchan
Where did you come from, lad?

Nanonymous No.2831 [D] >>2845

>>2830
I know you are likely one of the pigchan haters and feel supercool using nanochan originated term for 8chan, but there are still good boards there that were not hit by cuckchanners neither anyone else.

Nanonymous No.2845 [D][U][F]
File: 3df2b0d83a8a3feb921c2235873849787f64aae7bb86874c96db06a69a1cd3ef.png (dl) (304.45 KiB)

>>2831
>it's perfectly ok, the part of the ship I'm standing on hasn't sunk yet!
If you feel the need to defend pigchan anywhere, then you need to go back. If you still use pigchan with all its obnoxious tor-related restrictions (or worse still, enable javascript and/or cucknet to use it), then you also need to go back.
It was a mistake for hapase to advertise there, and she herself admitted it. There are plenty of nanons who haven't come from the pigsty.

Nanonymous No.2868 [D]

>>2830
>Not an argument.
You actually use can Discord?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
What a lamer faggot. Enjoy your honeypot retard.

Nanonymous No.2897 [D] >>2898

please tell me americucks, why so many pajeets in your country? What went wrong?

Nanonymous No.2898 [D][U][F] >>2900
File: 2224326f9e865e96940ad7b6b5593bd25b626286533fb88f97cddc236451d06f.jpg (dl) (244.01 KiB)

>>2897
>What went wrong?
it's actually simple: there was a collective desire to have a million IT monkeys at a million typewriters to build the economy of tomorrow, but these companies learned that they could shape immigration policy so they wouldn't have to pay for these monkeys after the dot-com crash.

Nanonymous No.2900 [D] >>2902

>>2898
Pajeet coders are cheaper than nigger prisoner programmers in jail!

Nanonymous No.2902 [D] >>2922

>>2900
too many people do not understand how immigration policies today are shaped foremost to destroy viable employment for a country's citizens. the destruction of culture comes mostly incidentally and after the fact, and it is almost always considered acceptable collateral damage by those who worship money. if nigger prisoners could program, they would have certainly used them.

Nanonymous No.2906 [D] >>2907 >>2910 >>2917

>obnoxious tor-related restrictions
+ no captcha
- no images
comes out even imo. compare nanochan:
+ no captcha
+ no image restrictions
- no users
>There are plenty of nanons who haven't come from the pigsty.
Where'd they come from? In this thread: >>>/b/2039 everyone named a bunch of memechans then admitted to being from 8ch. *inb4 its a secret*

Nanonymous No.2907 [D]

>>2906
Most everyone had to come from somewhere, including 8ch. What I don't like are the pretenders to the oldfag throne who seem bent on bringing the same shitty 8ch experience here that claim they left behind. Fortunately there are just a small handful of those here.

Nanonymous No.2910 [D]

>>2906
Everyone on pigchan came from 4cuck originally. Does that mean pigchan should embrace 4cuck culture because "durr its where you came from 3 years ago xdd"? That's what pigchan ends up doing, but it's certainly suboptimal.

Nanonymous No.2917 [D] >>2919

>>2906
I come from Nichan. TBH, never been to 8chan, but it seems cancerous.

Nanonymous No.2918 [D]

>if you can't prove something is a honeypot, it isn't
It doesn't work like that, nigger.

Nanonymous No.2919 [D] >>2920

>>2917
Nichan userbase looks like of a bunch of retards straight out some youtube deebweb video that tells how everyoen is crazy on the "dark part of the web".
Absolute shit.

Nanonymous No.2920 [D] >>2921

>>2919
>Nichan userbase
Non-existent.
I agree, it is absolute shit, that is why I am here now. Still better than being an 8chan migrant though.

Nanonymous No.2921 [D][U][F]
File: 13f63781fd4fca7ee849b46ba1b9200be6f903e2e3060ccbb77443ea7c494737.png (dl) (376.80 KiB)

>>2920
I'm migrant from 8ch/film/ who once checked /tech/. I'm glad I'm here and I still go to /film/ as there's nothing even close to it, nowhere. /film/ has high-quality posts(although it has been invaded by /tv/ and cuckchanners), intelligent userbase and forbids speaking about shit.

Facebook wants prisoner coders Nanonymous No.2922 [D][U][F] >>3181 >>4207
File: 374a24f265602f57e8be74c92ac7e5c32460ff5c7bc85edac86764f7409bff87.jpg (dl) (16.14 KiB)

>>2902
Why Priscilla Chan wants to turn inmates into coders
February 20, 2019

Priscilla Chan wants to turn inmates into coders. The founder of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and wife of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg believes it's not only possible, but that tech companies would be willing to hire felons.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/priscilla-chan-mark-zuckerberg-wife-wants-to-teach-inmates-how-to-code/

Nanonymous No.3181 [D]

>>2922
Willing to hire inmates because no-one else would want to hire them.

Nanonymous No.4207 [D]

>>2922
Sounds like the point, companies like it when they know you're stuck. It means your bullshit threshold will be higher and you'll be less likely to jump ship if they mistreat you.