Use this thread to post reports for posts which violate either the global rules stated on the main page, or the board rules of the board it is posted on.
When making a report be sure to include:
* A link to the post in question
* A short description, and context if applicable, of why you think that post should be removed.
I would like to append: Any post in this thread which is not either a report or discussion about a report will be removed since it is derailing.
no, this post doesn't count lol
>>>/b/3351 Already a pedo thread here >>>/b/2075 that serves an identical purpose. Pedo support threads at all are pretty fucked, but at the very least I think the debate should be contained to a single thread so they can't just memory hole the last thread every time their logical inconsistencies gets exposed.
This thread seems too dumb to not be a shill post. The author claims that /pol/ opinions are mainstream on Russian tv including the fact that Jews run the world.
Anti Jewish sentiment cannot be found on Russian tv and this guy is an obvious shill.
>>1732 >it's these fags again
From the rules thread:
>nano/pol/ is an explicitly National Socialist board. Promotion of anti-white ideologies or pro-jewish ideologies is not permitted.
If you don't like this, go to 8chan where they have """(((free speech)))""" on their /pol/.
>erisposter (separate guy from the spammer) and pedoposters autosaged or nuked outright
>obvious shitstirrer in three separate threads needs his freeze peach
Sends a bad message, but that's your call.
>>2926 Well, since we have flagrant abuse of this rule, I'm going to amend it. I think two levels of dereferencing are reasonable.
>Child pornography is not permitted. Links to child pornography are not permitted either,and neither are links to websites which contain a significant number of direct links to CP.
Goddammit, mods. I repeat: post >>2885 in thread >>>/g/2826 violates rule 1. Specifically, the second link links to at least 15 direct links to CP (a significant number, no?)
>>2941 this is what you should have posted the first time. the link in question was a directory of hundreds of random onions. but thanks for clicking them all to find out which ones are cp, for your research i guess?
>>2942 You are right, but I don't sense that the purpose of the post was cp (unlike the earlier "flagrant abuse" cited earlier by hakase >>2927, which was willful). I say leave it up at the mod's discretion.
>>2944 So you think the post shouldn't have been deleted because the posting of a link to links to CP was unintentional, while the other one was intentional? Intentional or unintentional, flagrant abuse or accident, it is no less or no more lawful.
>>2945 No, I'm arguing that the indirect cp links were not the majority of the list and also not intentional. no matter, the post was deleted anyway.
>it is no less or no more lawful.
adhering to the spirit of the law is often a better guideline than its letter.
>>2945 >unlawful
This is a hidden service, hapase can enforce whatever she wants to. The only reason we disallow cp is because it's degenerate, not because it's un(((law)))ful.
I think we should use our (((common sense))) regarding the reports. If it's not a direct link or if there is no intention to link to CP content, I don't see why it has to be censored.
We are using a hidden service after all, CP and drugs are everywhere. We all agree that it's something made for degenerates and weak people and since we don't want to attract that kind of users, censorship is the only weapon we have.
A further reminder that posts ITT which derail the thread are NOT PERMITTED and will be deleted. This is a reports thread, not a site meta thread. The only discussion which is permitted is about whether the reported post(s) break global or board rules. See >>1130 for precedent.
Use this thread to post reports for posts which violate either the global rules stated on the main page, or the board rules of the board it is posted on.
When making a report be sure to include:
* A link to the post in question
* A short description, and context if applicable, of why you think that post should be removed.