/g/ - Technology

install openbsd

[Make a Post]
[X]





Technological Dystopia General Nanonymous No.3342 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>3344 >>3349
File: 4a91d9d365805fa058707c6819d6a2fb445ef5ebdc0051070c088df0df6866ac.gif (dl) (43.13 KiB)

Discussion thread about the technological dystopia we're getting toward to and everything related to it. Post news/happenings, problems, solutions, resources, organize operations.

Nanonymous No.3343 [D][U][F] >>3357
File: 871944e196adbdb160fd25db57e201e58a407ad0984a160de669ff8326a9258f.webm (dl) (10.55 MiB)

I'll start with this: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-newzealand-shooting-australia-laws/new-australia-law-threatens-social-media-firms-with-fines-jail-over-violent-content-idUSKCN1RG06O
>Australia will fine social media and web hosting companies up to 10 percent of their annual global turnover and imprison executives for up to three years if violent content is not removed “expeditiously” under a new law.
In Australia they can now arrest you just for having content deemed "unappropriate" on your website and even if you remove it you could still be liable if you don't do it fast enough and this goes up to the web hosting company, so to the least don't use Australian web companies/servers, i expect this kind of laws to get passed also in the UK, Germany and Canada. Even if you serve your website via Tor if they know your identity they could still arrest you, stay safe Hapase.

Nanonymous No.3349 [D][U][F]
File: e04ced322980292d49813428cfb98d7098564d9cff49c60696dc307e834b0d79.png (dl) (1.72 MiB)

>>3342
>solutions
For software, only use software you build yourself. Unironically consider a source-based distribution like gentoo. Take control back - at least be certain exactly what code you are running rather than downloading someone else's precompiled binaries.

Avoid any software that requires a EULA, has a dependence on internet connectivity, or has any other restriction on the way that you use it. Contribute back to FOSS projects to make this a more viable choice.

Nanonymous No.3357 [D] >>3358

>>3343
That link looks dead.
Here's another one:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/apr/04/australia-passes-social-media-law-penalising-platforms-for-violent-content

Just reading that news story makes my blood boil. All I pick up on is that corporations, government and media don't want you to choose for yourself if you want to see what happened. In the end, the only people that will actually be average people. Corporations and media will have immunity written into the law. Complete bullshit, it's easy to forget that this is supposed to be the "free world".

Nanonymous No.3358 [D][U][F] >>3370
File: 9b40aa5e6cce210839006d935b0fe4a371a2483c334b6b012561b16c737e0a2f.png (dl) (284.60 KiB)

>>3357
Link is actually still on, i didn't realize that reuters blocks Tor -_- i should have used an archive here it is http://archivecaslytosk.onion/XlCVZ
>In the end, the only people that will actually be average people.
Yes big companies already have effective censorship AIs, they can claim that they are already doing their best to block stuff and they have all the money to fight this in court, this kind of law is made to target small forums/boards owners that refuse to take down content like the kiwi farms admin(pic related).

Nanonymous No.3370 [D][U][F] >>3377
File: cc82b636b0f8e2f5adb23100750396ad6bce211798ca76c0261fb172a7db7c0c.gif (dl) (461.66 KiB)

>>3358
That correspondence is hilarious. It appears that Officer NZ didn't know he walked into a troll farm.

Nanonymous No.3377 [D] >>3380

>>3370
props to John, he realized his error and didn't further make a fool of himself.
i had to listen to family saying "so they should just block the video", why can't Facebook just take down videos like that?" and that shit. Theyre the same people who thought that the government should "block the dark web". They're being feed that crap straight from sensationalist news shows filled with ignorance.

Nanonymous No.3380 [D][U][F] >>3381
File: 0e76caf9af6d90675c74acfb8a2c47c4f39f0da83aa2962ca7eba13dc57d2890.jpg (dl) (50.78 KiB)

>>3377
Yeah, there really isn't any way to "win" what he walked into and he chose the least damaging way to exit.

It looks like NZ Police were able to get the NZ media to take a shot at Josh:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12214017

Nanonymous No.3381 [D]

>>3380
>in Florida, where he shares a home with his mother
Damn. They aren't going easy

Nanonymous No.3383 [D][U][F] >>3384 >>3387 >>3389 >>3531 >>3598
File: 0403d9ed6cbae2fb118c9b80b6b7935b79575bcebca5dc2ad2be48d6d8d50d81.jpg (dl) (1.82 MiB)

>i expect this kind of laws to get passed also in the UK, Germany and Canada.
Seems that i was fucking prophetic: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/04/07/uk-unveils-sweeping-plan-penalize-facebook-google-harmful-online-content
(archive is in pic related cause WS website sucks)
>The aggressive, new plan — drafted by the United Kingdom’s leading consumer-protection authorities and blessed by Prime Minister Theresa May — targets a wide array of web content, including child exploitation, false news, terrorist activity and extreme violence.
>The document offers a litany of potential areas of concern, including hate speech, coercive behavior and underage exposure to illegal content such as dating apps that are meant for people over age 18.
Here is the paper published by th U.K. government
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paper/online-harms-white-paper-executive-summary--2
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/K2VFP (archive)
>Social media platforms use algorithms which can lead to ‘echo chambers’ or ‘filter bubbles’, where a user is presented with only one type of content instead of seeing a range of voices and opinions.
Really ironic since they want to regulate what you're allowed to say and share.
>Other online behaviours or content, even if they may not be illegal in all circumstances, can also cause serious harm.
Doesn't even need to be illegal.
>We propose that the regulatory framework should apply to companies that allow users to share or discover user-generated content or interact with each other online.
This applies to every kind of website or server provider, this includes small forums and is not only about Facebook or big companies. So do you have a loicense for that livestream mate? The memes write themselves.

Nanonymous No.3384 [D][U][F] >>3387 >>3388
File: 413795824e98e7d6e855a56fe99af7a58dc81402fa911c1fa7cd61388bab3057.jpg (dl) (34.21 KiB)

>>3383
>sajid javid
>British politician and former Managing Director at Deutsche Bank
>As long as I am in government, as long as I am in politics, I promise you that I will do everything within my power to fight back against those who seek to isolate and undermine Israel
>My own family's heritage is Muslim. Myself and my four brothers were brought up to believe in God, but I do not practise any religion. My wife is a practising Christian and the only religion practised in my house is Christianity.
Not that it matters, he's first and foremost capitalist. Reading his wikipedia article is more than he's worth.

Nanonymous No.3387 [D][U][F]
File: a8e257b4005ea040ce31f3eaf01a5a142fe6744816f9d9d743799e899bad7c03.jpg (dl) (132.11 KiB)

>>3383
>>3384
also related:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-introduce-world-first-online-safety-laws
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/HOf22

Nanonymous No.3388 [D]

>>3384
>hapas
<not superior race
LMAO

Nanonymous No.3389 [D] >>3391 >>3392

>>3383
Russia does aim to do the same shit BTW.
Like, I think we already have a law that doesn't allow you to insult authorities, and against "fake news" or something.
I swear to Christ, they are all the same.

inb4 nobody cares about Russia

Nanonymous No.3391 [D][U][F]
File: fcb3f22b239d572c192bb25836f83a528e82be1754535e74db2e0aa45e80e3fe.jpg (dl) (615.93 KiB)

>>3389
Semi-conscious europeans do, just like they care about china, india and us. EU is copycat and usually copies the worst. This doesn't matter too.

Nanonymous No.3392 [D][U][F] >>3393 >>3403 >>3598
File: 7655cf4b51861a425e61dd2d8d7b4b935ffdd0ac36c8e9a4ac07354510249057.gif (dl) (2.92 MiB)

>>3389
Tell me more about Russian internet nanon

Nanonymous No.3393 [D] >>3394

>>3392
They don't like weebs who ask retarded questions. xP

Nanonymous No.3394 [D][U][F] >>3395
File: f5f115b99da9e845d87eb0e0f0b094aa589d74456008583e899b81d0325433ba.gif (dl) (747.07 KiB)

>>3393
I was sure that russia was weebland with all the russian cosplayers and hentai as the most searched porn category

Nanonymous No.3395 [D] >>3396 >>3398

>>3394
There is so much wrong with your reasoning I don't even know where to start:
1) Audience of some random-ass porn site doesn't mean shit as far as general picture is concerned; that just might mean Russian masterbaitors tend to like weeb shit; that wouldn't say anything about Russian chads, boomers etc etc; Russian kids do become exposed to anime though, yes, and Russian kids like cartoons
2) Same goes for cosplayers, like, they are not exactly mainstream; I wouldn't call them underground either, at least not yet, but the scene is not nearly as large as the Japanese Comiket or whatever
3) You suggest I would know much stuff about Internet in a country with like 140M population, a multicultural, multiethnic society, huh; well, tell you what, I do know some stuff, but it's really all over the place and it's not subject of like one post; let's just say Russian Internet is pretty much inspired by Western socially and technically, in the 90s if was free as fuck, now not so much, but the government filters and govermnent itself are retarded pretty much like everywhere else; I do personally tend to think that globalization is real and very much natural - there will be no vast difference between Russia and West unless something radical happens

Nanonymous No.3396 [D][U][F] >>3397 >>3403
File: 4c61b33a190783a939c2522972e546bf8f85c885d4a418659100323b5e74f96e.jpg (dl) (69.06 KiB)

>>3395
>There is so much wrong with your reasoning I don't even know where to start
Well i did ask first and then i tried to provoke a response, anyway i was not implying that it was mainstream in Russia, anime is not really that mainstream even in Japan.
>in the 90s if was free as fuck, now not so much
My impression it's always been that it was more free that in the rest of the world, now every country is censoring torrent websites and if i want to find stuff i have to go to russian websites, but you're right it seems it's changing .. sadly, articles related(in the last month):
https://torrentfreak.com/russia-holds-talks-to-enshrine-landmark-anti-piracy-agreement-into-law-190308/
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/AgC0M
https://torrentfreak.com/russia-plans-to-block-pirate-sites-without-trial-de-anonymize-operators-190315/
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/M5ids
https://torrentfreak.com/russia-orders-major-vpn-providers-to-block-banned-sites-or-face-blocking-themselves-190328/
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/ouCON

Nanonymous No.3397 [D]

>>3396
>now every country is censoring torrent websites and if i want to find stuff i have to go to russian websites
Well, unless your government actually blocks Russian sites, you have nothing to worry about, right? Russian sites do tend to go international, see Rutracker or even VK.
>articles related
Again, it's funny, but this shit does more harm to legal Russian IT sphere than to anything else. Foreign VPNs are not subject to Russian law, and neither are foreign domain registrars/hosters, so a lot of Russian stuff just flees, and TBH, the stuff that remains isn't that much interesting.

Nanonymous No.3398 [D][U][F] >>3402
File: bcafad69427e0212ae5a6e1257c29e7c121fc1ed49adb56bd7afd5e5a69c5d35.png (dl) (925.33 KiB)

>>3395
How known is he in russia?

Nanonymous No.3399 [D] >>3402 >>3404

>Russia
>censorship
How can you be so ignorant. Russian internet is mostly unregulated, you can do pretty much anything that isn't critising Putin, but it's also punished in "democratic" countries like Poland to tell shit on President. Tor isn't blocked (Russia is second biggest country in terms of users, only behind US) I2P or other anonymizing tools. In terms of real life I heard hikers can sleep anywhere you want, not like in US where there are special areas for it. If Russia is a regime then I don't know what China or North Korea is.
In some things Russia resembles US in freedom, or surpasses it. USSR is gone, learn it boomers, zoomers or whoever fuck you are idiots.

Nanonymous No.3402 [D] >>3438

>>3398
No idea who that is.
Though probably Russians are aware of whoever that is, I wouldn't know.

>>3399
>Russian internet is mostly unregulated
Roskomnadzor has been blocking sites for like, I don't remember, 5 years now? It blocks for PM everything the law wants, and Russian law is pretty weird: extremism, suicide tips (telling how to properly open your veins is illegal here my dude), various copyright infridgement, child porn (lolicon (drawn weeb pics) = child porn in Russia, I am pretty certain; and not by a strict definiton, but a rather vague one), list goes on and is expandable. Though about 8 years ago you would be very right.
>Tor isn't blocked (Russia is second biggest country in terms of users, only behind US) I2P or other anonymizing tools
>In terms of real life I heard hikers can sleep anywhere
That is true.
>If Russia is a regime then I don't know what China or North Korea is.
>USSR is gone, learn it boomers, zoomers or whoever fuck you are idiots.
I think even when USSR was still a thing, it was more free than China and North Korea. Basically, people still have concentration camps in NK, and China, well, I don't know much about China, but Mao's regime was pretty totalitarian, and with a higher population density that could only mean that it was oppressive as fuck.
But modern Russia gradually becomes less "free" in terms of freedom of speech, expression, business or whatever. Our culture is authoritarian, but not to the degree Chinese is, and we have various "freedom" artifacts, I guess.

Nanonymous No.3403 [D] >>3405

>>3392
Like China, but without the firewall (that's most likely on the way). Meaning, if you don't upset whatever plans the kike oligarchs have, it's about as free as it can get. But everything gets archived and, in case of you breaking the above rule, it will be used against you whether it's illegal or not. Obviously the Internet is also subject to the anti-discrimination laws that mention "social groups", but never give a clear legal definition of what they are. Again, refer to what I wrote before, everything is designed for kangaroo courts and you'd be wise to avoid ending up in one.

On the topic of anons, anonymity is a fringe thing even on imageboards (where people tripfag and reveal personal information very easily) and even more lacking in the general population. If you think you've met the worst "LMAO JUST DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO HIDE" retard, you'd be very wrong. It's a cultural effect (post-gommunism) combined with just being handed the WWW without a slowly developed culture that you had in the West. There's also more post-demoralization argument tactics in every conversation across websites, to the point where you can actually tell if the English-made post is one of your own if you've seen it enough. Yuri would be proud.

>>3396
>it seems it's changing
A matter of enforcement. The law is there, but people might be too lazy or inept to keep to it. Plus, the way they "block" websites is on the DNS level, which is easily circumvented with, for example, mirror links. If shit does hit the fan, you still have the rest of Eastern Europe on the post-USSR territory.

Nanonymous No.3404 [D][U][F] >>3408
File: ac800879cd779d7296ca8ffcdb80f5ee59be1c21688636e7bedcd9574463c313.png (dl) (845.42 KiB)

>>3399
democracy≠liberté
It never implied that.

Nanonymous No.3405 [D] >>3406

>>3403
>Meaning, if you don't upset whatever plans the kike oligarchs have, it's about as free as it can get.
It's kinda like that, but not really.
I mean, you are unlikely to get into trouble for copyright infridgement or even P2P'ing CP in clearnet (though it might change, I suppose), but man, RKN is working, it really does.
>Plus, the way they "block" websites is on the DNS level
Not true. Maybe some ISPs are like that, but in general you see traffic forging in the unencrypted connections (like, you can get redirected to a web page by your ISP that says shit is blocked), Certificate forging in ServerHello for HTTPS (it often works based on SNI in your ClientHello) which renders the site unconnectable to, and they also can plain out firewall-block you (no packets shall go to blocked IP addresses).
With that said, it's easily circumvented with even a proxy, so the DPI is not that sophisticated, but in most cases you HAVE to do it, which means average retard will stay in the containment Internet, and that does matter, as you may imagine.

Nanonymous No.3406 [D]

>>3405
>RKN is working, it really does
For the time being, VPNs are an option. But I don't have a lot of hope for the far future.
>which means average retard will stay in the containment Internet, and that does matter, as you may imagine
Actually, if the normalniggers have no access to those parts of the Internet, they're less likely to attract attention from the government. It's a bit of a silver lining to sinking into a web dystopia.

Nanonymous No.3408 [D] >>3410

>>3404
What's that image from?


Nanonymous No.3410 [D][U][F] >>3433
File: 49b699c0c983ca44f70e37e7f506d914c741e9a540a6e2ff3e135a1ab6111e0e.mp4 (dl) (15.87 MiB)

>>3408
Burning
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:dcd94faa74d2a4912de69b8769ca82fa80d3d579&dn=Burning.2018.KOREAN.720p.BluRay.x264.DTS-FGT%5BEtHD%5D&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.cyberia.is%3A6969%2Fannounce

Nanonymous No.3411 [D][U][F] >>3412 >>3431 >>3438
File: 3ee3e496b621f008c28276ca4b27338676ecce89e28795b3e965d6ebb89eddf4.jpg (dl) (24.67 KiB)

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190410/14580641973/eu-tells-internet-archive-that-much-site-is-terrorist-content.shtml
>In the past week, the Internet Archive has received a series of email notices from Europol’s European Union Internet Referral Unit (EU IRU) falsely identifying hundreds of URLs on archive.org as “terrorist propaganda”. At least one of these mistaken URLs was also identified as terrorist content in a separate take down notice from the French government’s L’Office Central de Lutte contre la Criminalité liée aux Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication (OCLCTIC).
>Included in the list of takedown demands are a bunch of the Archive's "collection pages" including the entire Project Gutenberg page of public domain texts, its collection of over 15 million freely downloadable texts, the famed Prelinger Archive of public domain films and the Archive's massive Grateful Dead collection. Oh yeah, also a page of CSPAN recordings.
>The French agency told the Archive it needed to take down that content within 24 hours or the Archive may get blocked in France.
When if not now?
there is no longer any other language than that of bombs, barricades, and all that follows

Nanonymous No.3412 [D] >>3413

>>3411
Original proposal:
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/soteu2018-preventing-terrorist-content-online-regulation-640_en.pdf
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/iyHQM
>size of the wesite is not important
>1 hour takedown
>terrorism is defined as information which is used to incite and glorify the commission of
terrorist offences, encouraging the contribution to and providing instructions for committing
terrorist offences as well as promoting participation in terrorist groups.
>providing instructions for committing
terrorist offences
This could this be used to take down from repositories with code for anonymous communication(source code could be considered instructions), instructions to build all kind of electronics devices, war footage ... it only gets worse does it?

Nanonymous No.3413 [D][U][F] >>3431
File: 6b95d7dd98d46ecdb8b7300f85738cf08c60f3f6553b73f57ae0a1124b511e43.jpg (dl) (202.50 KiB)

>>3412
DIES ATER
Philosophy should be forbidden. Burn the books. Kill the intelligentsia, kill the polymathes.
Ban the music. Destroy the instruments. Cripple the hands.
Freedom is idol. Destroy it with hammer. Take away the remaining means. Turn men into machines.
Just do it.

I can't even use page down
>The Commission conducted an open public consultation on measures to improve the effectiveness of tackling illegal content, receiving 8,961 replies, of which 8,749 were from individuals, 172 from organisations, 10 from public administrations, and 30 from other categories of respondents. In parallel, a Eurobarometer survey was conducted with a random sample of 33,500 EU residents on illegal content online. The Commission also consulted Member States’ authorities as well as hosting service providers throughout May and June 2018 with regards to specific measures to tackle terrorist content online.
>By and large, most stakeholders expressed that terrorist content online is a serious societal problem affecting internet users and business models of hosting service providers. More generally, 65% of respondent to the Eurobarometer survey considered that the internet is not safe for its users and 90% of the respondents consider it important to limit the spread of illegal content online.
'terrorist content' means:
>inciting or advocating, including by glorifying, the commission of terrorist offences, thereby causing a danger that such acts be committed
>encouraging the contribution to terrorist offences
>instructing on methods or techniques for the purpose of committing terrorist offences
I would like to say homo sum, nil humani a me alienum puto, but I can't.

You know what's worst about it? That it wasn't massive, day to day change. It was slow, so every time they now do shit, it seems normal. it was fast, but today is everything much faster Media, as always, are the worst, because everything is doomsday or second coming of jesus for them. How can Joe tell one thing from the other?

Nanonymous No.3431 [D] >>3439

>>3411
Public domain texts and videos/CSPAN like this need to be hosted on Freenet or I2P. I'm not saying that my alternative is absolutely safe from censorship, but it's safer than the clearnet.

>>3413
>It was slow, so every time they now do shit
I'll try to keep it tech-related, since this is /g/. But it only got easier to do this with the speed at which information travels thanks to modern technology. If you take the metaphor of the boiling frog, the controlling parties now can adjust the temperature at which it boils with much more precision and allow themselves more room for mistakes. You strip the freedoms very slowly, with little increments, and if there's pushback - you retreat. But then advance as soon as everybody forgot about it. And thanks to the amount of news we're being fed today, that window is smaller than before. AI and neural nets were used in the legal sphere to make clerical tasks at law firms easier, because they could get through mountains of paperwork that people would usually handle. At this point, trying to get useful information out of a collection of news stories and reports across the entire timeline is about as complicated.

Nanonymous No.3433 [D] >>3439

>>3410
Thanks, amigo!

Nanonymous No.3438 [D] >>3439

>>3402
>Roskomnadzor has been blocking sites for like, I don't remember, 5 years now?
Sites like rutracker and it didn't affect its popularity.
>suicide tips (telling how to properly open your veins is illegal here my dude)
You have population crisis, I'm not surprised government tries to censor it. High suicide rate doesn't help.
>child porn (lolicon (drawn weeb pics) = child porn in Russia
In Poland and most of the world actually.
>I think even when USSR was still a thing, it was more free than China and North Korea
I wonder how USSR would look in 21th century with common access to Internet and such. Even when it was still a thing it was better country to be born than like 2/3 of the world but Westerners won't tell you this.
Western media tries to tell you you live in a regime when the same thing happens on their territory >>3411
I have more in common with you than with Western Europe but propaganda is telling it's otherwise.

Nanonymous No.3439 [D][U][F] >>3441 >>3442 >>3479
File: 94736c8b2722fe795cefdd4646f1b1b9f17debe92777c6ca803f7ccff2ae6336.png (dl) (10.77 KiB)

>>3431
.onion domains and torrents are partial solution too.
>thanks to the amount of news we're being fed
Tbh, I'm completely with Buñuel on this topic. There should be one completely independent newspaper that would act as an actual overseer that would be published max weekly, with only the essential informations. Note that he said that decades ago, the overexposure and consistent numbing of mind, societal divisionism and politicization of every possible topic is there long time. Wilde too hated informationism and newspapers for similar reasons. I hate informationism and newspapers too. Information industry is cancer. It's inhuman.
Is it even possible these days with internet without censorship or soemthing? You can easily detach yourself from said blasphemies, but even then, if you work with people, you are still part of that retarded system.
>>3438
>you have population crisis, I'm not surprised government tries to censor it
Trying to censor "suicide tips" isn't new.
>Werther-Effekt
<both the novel and the Werther clothing style were banned in Leipzig in 1775; the novel was also banned in Denmark and Italy
>propaganda
What is propaganda? Serious question.
>>3433
The actress disappears in the half of the movie. I'll just say it suffers from everything that haunts contemporary cinema, both commercial and independent.
It's also wayyyyy too much japanese for south korean movie. Coin Locker Girl was also like that. They are both based on japanese novels, so it makes some sense, but still.

Nanonymous No.3440 [D][U][F]
File: a204a06264c50487bf66afede6807d10cf9f601383d6bf0604c83aa2ec2fba4d.jpg (dl) (118.13 KiB)

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange faces 12 months in jail and possible extradition to US
http://archivecaslytosk.onion/2019.04.12-161502/https://www.itv.com/news/2019-04-11/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-arrested-at-ecuadorian-embassy/
>The British government has told us that the constitution of Great Britain bars extradition of a person to a place where his life is in danger or he faces the death penalty
flip
The extradition of Julian Assange to the US for exposing evidence of atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan should be opposed by the British government. - Jeremy Corbyn
Asshole. Nothing against the complete fuckery that is rape allegation. No better than random porkie. He could have won political points.
I know nothing really about him - Drumpf
Today, I announce that the discourteous and aggressive behaviour of Mr Julian Assange, the hostile and threatening declaration of its allied organisation, against Ecuador, and especially the transgression of international treaties, have led the situation to a point where the asylum of Mr Assange is unsustainable and no longer viable - Lenin Moreno
>Mr Moreno said Ecuador's patience had run out over Assange's behaviour inside the embassy which included blocking security cameras, installing electronic equipment, mistreating guards and accessing security files.
>Moreno reversed several key pieces of legislation, passed by the Correa administration, that targeted wealthy individuals and banks and established the Consejo de Participación Ciudadana y Control Social which has supra-constitutional powers
>Since the creation of the supra-constitutional CPCCS-T, Moreno has used it to oust and replace significant government officials, provincial judges, the judicial council, and the National Electoral Council (CNE)
>friend with fag Pence and tries to be friends with 'murica

http://archivecaslytosk.onion/2019.04.11-121601/https://defend.wikileaks.org/2019/04/03/ecuador-twists-embarrassing-ina-papers-into-pretext-to-oust-assange/
>The INA papers are a collection of documents that were leaked and published in February. The documents allegedly uncovered the operations of INA Investment Corp., an offshore tax haven created by Moreno's brother. The trove of emails, phone communications and bank receipts have supposedly linked the Ecuadorian president and his family to a money laundering scheme and offshore bank accounts. The revelation sparked a congressional corruption probe into Moreno.
He's a symbol, that's the only reason of this post.

Nanonymous No.3441 [D] >>3442 >>3444

>>3439
>What is propaganda? Serious question
Spreading false information and manipulation people into believing it.
Poland is in Western sphere of influence so naturally they tell us Russia is our greatest enemy, big undeveloped mafia state and the reason why we should "unite" with West. We were never on good terms with Russia but culturally, mentally, linguistically we're literally brothers. We're getting fucked by West without most of people realizing this.

Nanonymous No.3442 [D] >>3445

>>3439
>There should be one completely independent newspaper that would act as an actual overseer that would be published max weekly
It would have to be completely based on volunteers though. Otherwise, just look at Wikileaks (disappearing journalists/employees and now Assange) or Gab. Gab, in particular, was fucked not only by its hosting provider but also by the payment processors as well. A newspaper digest like this would benefit from being spread via cloud-based providers or with P2P, having cross-platform reading programs so your website going down won't affect the readership.
>What is propaganda? Serious question.
The spreading of information, derived from the verb "propagate". It is how the ruling class everywhere controls its population: by controlling the flow. In a way, what you propose will also be propaganda, but the word itself is not necessarily bad - the contents are. I may be beating a dead horse, but listen to Yuri Bezmenov's interview or lecture for a starter.

>>3441
>We were never on good terms with Russia but culturally, mentally, linguistically we're literally brothers. We're getting fucked by West without most of people realizing this.
You're living in what can be called the barrier country. In fact, it's one of the best places to live outside of Asia to really get yourself redpilled. Russia wants your alliance because of a simple geographical fact - a large portion of it before the Ural mountains is very flat, almost no natural obstacles. Very easy to invade, so you need these kinds of barriers to be friendly post-USSR. The other party wants the opposite, as it gives them a political advantage. The reality is, everybody is trying to fuck you and it takes strength to survive.

Nanonymous No.3444 [D][U][F] >>3446
File: f42384f260c8e55959d237e79860af2c82705e4b6b4bd38322f243bc448e9cc7.jpg (dl) (45.11 KiB)

>>3441
>brothers
whatever you kike there are already threads touching that subject but youre completely retarded for buying into muh I must choose side but not mine
ruskies savages fucked half of the europe into ass, burgers the second
some never learn

Nanonymous No.3445 [D][U][F] >>3452 >>3470 >>3479
File: 6019d670214e98ae5850f4805b47bb6575a9e67d86f87d78c3c89f7158340090.png (dl) (2.65 KiB)

>>3442
>there should be one
I forgot to add the only one. But I guess it was implied. On the other hand, I believe in restrictive freedom, so I have no problem at all carrying out the act of depoliticization via censorship, violence or severe repressions if it means people will actually talk about things that do matter, act on beliefs, morals and not self-absorb themselves in petty talks over pint of beer.
But the idea of decentralized, coherent, factual, searchable in its entirety and written in concrete, informal language néapedíon is very good. It's anti-propaganda. Thinking is haram for way too long.
>gab
Webshit for insufferable normans which doesn't even load without javashit? They could have just forked reddit.
>hosting provider
haha
>payment processors
haha

Nanonymous No.3446 [D] >>3447

>>3444
>muh I must choose side but not mine
We're too weak to act on our own.
>ruskies savages fucked half of the europe into ass
Government there was always fucked, but normal citizens also suffered. Comparing leaders to inhabitants is foolish.

Nanonymous No.3447 [D] >>3449

>>3446
>too weak to act on our own
seek alliance with former allies or at least in europe
youre already in visegrad four break the eu and you have alliance
france should be included too as means to counter snowniggers
>foolish
not at all
the government represents mentality no matter how much you want it to be different

Nanonymous No.3448 [D]

>>2384
>sajid javid
>British politician
His uncle in Pakistan is running a emigration agency, supporting brown people to come to Europe.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5695297/Claims-new-Home-Secretary-Sajid-Javids-family-swindled-Pakistan-migrants-Visa-scandal.html

>As long as I am in government,
Non European immigration to UK is at an all time high.

While it’s true that immigration from inside the EU is sharply down, this has nothing to do with the Government. Meanwhile, non-EU immigration is running at a 15-year high.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-6909455/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Uncontrolled-immigration-helped-trigger-Brexit.html


>Deutsche Bank
Is a jewish bank (check it!) that has put on "Deutsche" as mimicry.


Nanonymous No.3449 [D]

>>3447
>alliance
>france
Hon Hon

Nanonymous No.3452 [D] >>3468

>>3445
>Webshit for insufferable normans which doesn't even load without javashit?
Isn't that the entire point? You need to provide an alternative that deprograms normalfaggots, the same people that can't figure out what uMatrix is. People who can find even this place are rare. Don't forget that graceful degradation is also a mostly forgotten web coding standard.
>haha
How will you pay your journalists? Or take any funds to make your infrastructure run? People who are willing to put in long hours for free are either very dedicated and motivated, which is rare, or they have an agenda of their own to stay with you.

Nanonymous No.3468 [D] >>3474

>>3452
>deprograms normalfaggots
How will you do it if they'll deal only with each other? They don't know any better. Javashit barrier is real and intended imo. If they targeted that crowd they know.
>how..
Since when various cryptocurrencies require payment processors? Cheques exist too. If it's problem for the people who seek haven there then gabe doesn't have purpose.
>an agenda of their own to stay with you
Being journalist, an overseer, is to be dedicated.

Nanonymous No.3470 [D] >>3471 >>3474

>>3445
>muh gab
>Gab and by extension Dissenter are fucking shit. The audience is clearly supposed to be disgruntled boomers and FB whores who got banned or are otherwise angry and it absolutely shows. There are no meaningful conversations there. You can get better responses from fucking /pol/. It's also in no way anonymous because again the audience doesn't even know what anonymity means.
>a twitter clone for MAGApede boomers
>The layout for Gab is one of the worst I've seen in a while. Worse than Facebook, worse than Reddit.
>boomer containment pit
>I wouldn't trust that maga faggot torba

Nanonymous No.3471 [D] >>3474

>>3470
He's a jew too, according to ED https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Gab.ai

Nanonymous No.3473 [D]

What is the effectiveness of using tech companies' attempts to appear virtuous against them? Amazon started accepting cash at their stores because their supptorters saw that minorities typically don't have credit cards. Some tech leftists have also started unionizing. A carefully crafted redpill that conforms to their safe space ideals could possibly harness their desire to do what they're told is good, forcing companies to turn down the heat or risk their image of virtuosity. Essencially, beat them at their own game. However, this would need to be planned carefully to avoid it turning into the Mozilla Foundation.

Nanonymous No.3474 [D]

>>3468
>How will you do it if they'll deal only with each other?
By making easy to access resources that don't bombard you with constant information, yet provide enough of a perspective to keep up with global news.
>Javashit barrier is real and intended imo.
For filtering out retards, yes. But, to have an effect on the world, you will need to make some of them think.
>Since when various cryptocurrencies require payment processors? Cheques exist too.
In most countries, you cannot live on just crypto (especially outside 5/9/14 Eyes). And there will be large-nosed obstacles waiting for you at any step of converting it to fiat.

>>3470
>>3471
The point is, if they go after a controlled opposition kike this hard, think about the resources that might be thrown your way.

Nanonymous No.3479 [D] >>3482

>>3439
>There should be one completely independent newspaper
I think that in the 21st century the concept of a newspaper is completely obsolete, the best way to share information is with unedited bulletins/clips of happenings(with factual information, not opinions), you can perfectly do that in imageboards(if you tell bullshit people are gonna call you out), nobody needs journalists and their faggot opinions anymore, newspapers are just tools of controls useful only to politicians.
>>3445
>I believe in restrictive freedom, if it means people will actually talk about things that do matter
>But the idea of decentralized, coherent, factual, searchable in its entirety and written in concrete, informal language néapedíon is very good.
You're contrading yourself, the moment you restrict the freedom of the people that should write on this platform and you try to control them to write on "things that do matter"(whatever that means) it automatically becomes centralized and therefore encourages the same divisive and polarizing behaviors that you seem to want to fight(moderation would still be necessary thou).

Nanonymous No.3480 [D] >>3482

But what about Glen Gaywald?

Nanonymous No.3481 [D]

Does Glen Gaywald also have faggot opinions?

Nanonymous No.3482 [D]

>>3479
>I think that in the 21st century the concept of a newspaper is completely obsolete,
In a superficial way that is right

>the best way to share information is with unedited bulletins/clips of happenings(with factual information, not opinions), you can perfectly do that in imageboards(if you tell bullshit people are gonna call you out), nobody needs journalists
The main purpose of journos is that of gate keeper. To control the flow of information reaching normal fags.

I had this epiphany when I first visited the news room of a newspaper. In the mid were the teleprinter spooling off the news. Journos were only rewording them, a selected few of them. That was some time ago, you can guess.

>newspapers are just tools of controls useful only to politicians.
That is why (((they))) are going to create newspaper analogs.
I think facebook and twitter are on their way to that. Another outfit for that purpose is wikipedia.

>>3480
>But what about Glen Gaywald?
A gate keeper, or do you think you can't do a crt-f, grep on the "wiki-leaks" for yourself?


Nanonymous No.3483 [D][U][F] >>3484 >>3485
File: c3ef5595f548f607bdb1293314f479462d897c68d3d9929043a8336775f229c4.png (dl) (35.31 KiB)

Demonoid Founder ‘Deimos’ is Believed to Have Passed Away
https://torrentfreak.com/demonoid-founder-deimos-is-believed-to-have-passed-away-190416/
>The founder of Demonoid, one of the most iconic torrent trackers in history, is believed to have passed away. Deimos suddenly disappeared without a trace last summer. According to information reviewed by Demonoid's staff, he was likely the victim of a tragic accident.
>"accident"

>After the initial disappearance, there were reports that someone logged in to the site under his account. In hindsight, phaze1G believes that this may have been a friend or family member, who wiped the server, perhaps after making a backup.
>“It was someone with enough tech skills such as friends, family or Umlauf, so currently there is at least one person who holds the database of Demonoid and if it ever comes back that person will not be Deimos,” phaze1G notes.
Now they kill tracker operators? That's new.

Nanonymous No.3484 [D]

>>3483
>this may have been a friend or family member, who wiped the server, perhaps after making a backup.
Yeah, most likely. Who hasn't tech savvy relatives that can administrate your server?


fuck cianiggers Nanonymous No.3485 [D]

>>3483
First Terry dies in an accident, now Deimos, next Assange is gonna die in an accident in prison mark my words, place bets on who's next...

Nanonymous No.3486 [D][U][F] >>3488 >>3490 >>3492 >>3493
File: 9361df5981a736bbdad1c5e6ce3b95755ca4e8ff8e06769413a6e5cd2daa37ea.jpg (dl) (34.03 KiB)

The Russian parliament has approved a law creating a separate, domestic network, separate from the Internet
http://archivecaslytosk.onion/2019.04.16-092245/https://www.dw.com/en/russias-parliament-votes-to-unplug-internet-from-world/a-48334411
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=19/04/17/1142232
>Concerns increase that this move will be used more for control of content and even just plain censorship, and make any attempts at circumventing restrictions much more difficult. The law is expected to take effect November 1st. Russia has already banned certain programs, such as Telegram.
>The idea of increasing the government's control over the internet is part of a more long-term national policy trend. In 2017, officials said they wanted 95% of internet traffic to be routed locally by 2020. Since 2016, a law has required social networks to store data about Russian users on servers within the country. The law was officially presented as an anti-terrorism measure
>It aims to regulate the routes of online traffic and define internet exchange points. Russia's national telecom watchdog, Roskomnadzor, will act as the central monitoring organ, essentially taking charge of the internet in case of an attack. All internet providers will report to Roskomnadzor on the flow of their traffic and on their clients, according to the lawmakers.
>Government representatives have repeatedly denied that the comparison with internet restrictions in China is justified.
>Andrei Klishas contends that the internet needs to be protected from outside influence because it is increasingly important as a "public space" in modern Russia — and "many infrastructure facilities [in Russia] are connected to the internet."
>"Russia in no way wants to shut itself off, or isolate itself from the world — that would be pointless and impossible," the speaker of the Federation Council, Valentina Matvienko, said.

Nanonymous No.3488 [D]

>>3486
>телега
+15

Nanonymous No.3490 [D]

>>3486
>The Russian parliament has approved a law creating a separate, domestic network, separate from the Internet
Remember that when the internet becomes fractured enough, it ceases to merely be them splitting off from us, and equally becomes us splitting off from them. Russia has always been a great place to find seeders for torrents, to host content western governments deem illegal. When they shut down the internet, all that will be gone. Do not ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee.

Nanonymous No.3492 [D] >>3493

>>3486
I have said it before and I will say it again - this looks very much pointless to me.
All they will be getting from this is "the big red button" to shut the Internet off in case of emergency (which seems very much pointless, because in the case when quick action is required, whoeverthefuck they fear can just use Russian servers) and to add one more layer of DPI/filters on top of what already exists, at those exchange points (some of which have been functioning and subjected by FSB like forever at this point, like the one in Moscow).
Like, sure, it gives them a little bit more centralization and ability to monitor, but that shouldn't come as a surprise, because they have been already doing it for like a decade, and they were actually pretty bad at it.

They are actually afraid of what the Internet could bring as it seems. I think most of the bullshit came online after those series of Arab protests umbrella'd as Arab Spring.

Nanonymous No.3493 [D] >>3494

>>3486
This won't change mush in the short term, but is definitely a clue to what is gonna happen next, this new infrastructure is gonna cost lot of money so they have some kind of plan to use it, probably in the future if some kind of happenings happens(like Christchurch or an election that goes wrong) they're gonna push the button and make it like China(they could even cause a false flag to justify it), time to stock on russian torrents while you can.
I wonder if the future is gonna be American Internet, European Intranet, Russian Intranet, Chinese Intranet and Indian Intranet, i could see Europe and India being next with the kind of laws they're passing.
>>3492
Do you think this is a political move by Putin cause he fears next election(don't want to get too political but want an opinion)?

Nanonymous No.3494 [D] >>3495 >>3598

>>3493
>they're gonna push the button and make it like China
This exactly also seems kinda pointless. They always could use the armed forces to just cut off all the cables, yaknow? It certainly would be a major operation, and possibly illegal and unpopular, but they could do it. They did it in Crimea LOL.
Also making anything "like China" is essentially fucking nothing. For a Tor user, anyway.

>Do you think this is a political move by Putin cause he fears next election
Man, I don't understand politics.
Putin, like, personally, has no reasons to fear the next election, because he's on his second term, and he will obey the law and not go for the third. I am pretty certain of that.
There are other people who are basically in bed with him, so they can "fill the gap" while he's out of the chair.
Literally only person I know that he could be afraid of is Navalny, and Navalny will not win election ever, he's just too shit and probably controlled opposition as well at this point.
And I have no idea what the following 5 years could bring. Absolutely none. Most probably things will continue to go as they go. The world, prepare for more Russian immigrants LMAO.

Nanonymous No.3495 [D] >>3496

>>3494
>Also making anything "like China" is essentially fucking nothing. For a Tor user, anyway.
They can't stop people like us, but that's not their aim, look at Christchurch and how NZ blocked the video and manifesto, of course it was still possible to get it with Tor or even just a VPN, but 99% of the people didn't, countermeasures like this new russian law or the Chinese firewall wan't to control the flow of information that normal people get(we are already irredemable in the eyes of the government, we're not even the target of this) and i think that they work pretty well at that, how many chinese people use internet services outside china?

Nanonymous No.3496 [D] >>3497

>>3495
>to control the flow of information that normal people get
Exactly.
And that is also kinda pointless.
Any fucking Russian who is not a fucking retard will know how to circumvent this or will have an aquaintance or two who will help him to do it.
If you know the state of Russian political discourse, you will see that shit everywhere. People unironically are aware of the most shit government pulls off and what can be done. And there is little that actually can be done by common folk. Russia is a controlled oligarchy at this point. The only way something happens is if some oligarchs betray the center.

Nanonymous No.3497 [D] >>3498 >>3598

>>3496
>Any fucking Russian who is not a fucking retard will know how to circumvent this or will have an aquaintance or two who will help him to do it.
Did the political situation make russian people more tech savvy? That would be pretty hilarious. In the contry i live on(first world) 99% does not know what Tor or a VPN is, and we have plenty of corruption too. Maybe Russians could be the exception but usually people adapt to this kind of stuff, as i said in my other post Chinese people adapted to the closed internet, they use their internet chats, social network etc, in Russia you already have your own search, social etc already setup, i think most people would consider that to be enough and won't go to the lenghts of learning how to setup TOR/VPN.

Nanonymous No.3498 [D] >>3499

>>3497
>Did the political situation make russian people more tech savvy?
Just lookup "обход блокировок" (without quotes you nigger, though you probably could do with quotes too) on yandex.ru to see the amount of unblocked information about that shit. If you want to learn, you will learn. And if you don't, well, nothing can help you, in my opinion.

Nanonymous No.3499 [D] >>3500

>>3498
Russians are smart at bypassing things due to centuries of authoritarianism. I don't worry about you as you always find your way out of censorship, niggers from US or Europe never knew full story about you. No wonder Western media is so Russophobic.

Nanonymous No.3500 [D]

>>3499
What's the full story?

Nanonymous No.3508 [D][U][F]
File: 21b14c70da7637121ec2596484eb5500bde51c064b5d12b5006187696db4d21c.jpg (dl) (61.60 KiB)

Matriarchal power structures ingrained in Code of Conducts. Trannies included in the matriarchy.

Nanonymous No.3531 [D]

>>3383
>Online Harms
only the UK can make gay legislation while sounding like retards talking about it

Nanonymous No.3586 [D] >>3605

The Austrian government releases a plan to eliminate internet anonymity by 2020
http://archivecaslytosk.onion/2019.04.22-161809/https://hub.packtpub.com/the-austrian-government-releases-a-plan-to-eliminate-internet-anonymity-by-2020/
>Last week, the Austrian government released plans to eliminate internet anonymity. Austrian users will now have to provide operators with their true identities or they might be fined in millions.
>Users will now have to provide their first name, last name and address to platform operators, as per the government’s new draft law on Diligence and Responsibility on the Web. The operators will have to supply that information to government agencies or, in some cases, to private people in cases of insult or defamation for investigation purpose.
>This law is applicable to platforms that either have more than 100,000 registered users; or who earn more than 500,000 euros in annual revenues; or the ones that receive government press subsidies of more than 50,000 euros. Per the draft law, the platforms would also have a responsibility to determine if the ID information provided by users is accurate.
>All the SIM cards in Austria need to be registered with a photo ID by the beginning of the next year. Even the web platforms who would be responsible for making information about the platform are required to appoint a liaison in Austria. If the regulation is not followed, then the person will be fined up to 100,000 euros.
>The fines could even reach as high as 500,000 euros to a million euros depending upon the severity of the violation. The Austrian Communications Authority also known as KommAustria is responsible for enforcement of the law. This law exempts e-commerce platforms as they are the platforms that earn no revenues from their content or from advertising.
>Media Minister Gernot Blümel, of the center-right Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP, christian democrats), said at a press conference, “The legal requirements that are valid in the analog world must also be valid in the digital world. That is why there is now an abundance of resolutions to make the correction.” He further added, “The so-called digital anonymity ban is an additional step in that direction.”

>If passed and cleared by the EU, the law would take effect in 2020.

Nanonymous No.3592 [D] >>3611 >>3614

How depressing. I'm glad I live in Canada. I wish there was some way to connect any computer in the world to any other without wires/EM waves being required, so that it would be truly invisible to governments and corps, like though wormholes or someshit. Then cyberspace would truly start to fulfill its promise as a new independent realm. Of course they would ban owning computers and servers then.

Nanonymous No.3598 [D] >>3605

>>3383
Notice how the article talks about Facebook and Google being affected, while in reality this is gonna be used to kill off any competition in the market.

>>3392
You post porn or something mocking church, religion or say blacks on vk (facebook clone), then 4 years later the police comes after you. Doesn't happen to everyone though.
You post something on 2ch (by far the most popular imageboard), then years later you may notice that your interlocutors on imageboards know what your posted. People also get visited by the police for posting there.
You can torrent anything but cp. Although even then, I heard, it's possible to get off the hook sometimes. But I also read about people getting troubles with the police for torrenting regular porn.
One guy got a visit from the police for merely using tor.

>>3494
>Also making anything "like China" is essentially fucking nothing.
It's not. People use only your local services = you get to do whatever the fuck you want.
Russians probably won't do this though. Not in the near future at least.
>For a Tor user, anyway.
The vast majority of users aren't tor users. Tor is slow and boring.

>>3497
They have been more tech savvy all along, I guess. Until recently very few would even think of buying movies, games or music, so a lot of people had to learn to download torrents. To do that you at least have understand what a file is. To e.g. use an iThingie you don't.
And now that the no-so-great Russian firewall is there, random sites get blocked unintentionally, and it's often a necessity to be able to circumvent the blocking even for the purest of normies.
(Yes, you read it correctly, random sites get blocked. Moreover even the site of the department responsible for blocking sites got blocked once.)
>Chinese people adapted to the closed internet
China's internet has been closed all along. The Chinese never got to use foreign websites in the first place. And the Great Chinese Firewall is more well-made.



Nanonymous No.3605 [D][U][F]
File: 12c5c1e6d1afa71c0f4515055ca1ab7b1e713ba531028c3ac1009f00a842acff.gif (dl) (492.79 KiB)

>>3586
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19698003
Some idiots in Europe want to get into a fistfight with the weather. Hackernews gets into an argument about which countries are going to try to deanonymize the internet next, which countries have laws that would prevent idiocy on this scale, and which countries don't have such laws but are populated with such superior people that nobody would even consider it. Other Hackernews, who have read too many Robert Ludlum novels, tell each other campfire stories about hiding from the government.
>>3598
>russia resembles usa
So the sweet spot is south and eastern europe?

Nanonymous No.3611 [D] >>3614

>>3592
That may be difficult considering how computers work. One thing that might be of interest to use is this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-space_optical_communication
Doesn't use wires and doesn't use RF. It's probably possible to hide-in-plain-sight if the glowers aren't looking for it.

Anyone remember not too long ago some sort of atmospheric laser test on the East Coast of the USA?

Nanonymous No.3614 [D] >>3615

>>3592
>>3611
Interesting but not really reliable, it would be impossible to make a global network, it's really easy to block and track(put something in front of it and it's blocked, follow the direction of the laser and you get to the next guy to arrest :)), light it's the lamest of radiations. Our best bet is to hack existing infrastructure or to build a network on top of it and hide it with cryptography, you may also want to check out Pirate Boxes.
>Anyone remember not too long ago some sort of atmospheric laser test on the East Coast of the USA?
Elaborate.

power-line chan is just so cute Nanonymous No.3615 [D][U][F]
File: 2f68f2e9d5a2346f98049c162ae230271133a346d8319ab1342b70f165541ff7.png (dl) (836.90 KiB)

>>3614
I want to add that it would be possible to create some kind of network with lot of mirrors, for example in a big city with skyscrapers, but you would still need to resort to cables/wifi/bluetooth to distribute the signal inside the skyscraper.

Nanonymous No.3670 [D] >>3671 >>3675

I've considered trying to design a dirt cheap point to point laser mesh network system using cheapo (ala CD drive) laser diodes but I realized the bandwidth would be shit without more soffisticated techniques that would raise cost, although I supposed one could just cluster diodes if they're nice and small.
What I would really like someone to invent (again not cheap) would be a purely optical router in which the change from light to charge in Si for conventional CMOS processors and back to light is not required, using optical computing.
Add on the fly encryption to the optical routing in a I2P stype setup and people could just lay fiber to their neighbours in secret.

Nanonymous No.3671 [D] >>3675 >>3725

>>3670
Just have an array of 9 lasers, 8 data bits + 1 strobe bit. Parallel communication without any of the downsides of traditional (wire-based) parallel communication. Then you also need 9 photoresistors or whatever the fuck you want to use at the other end, plus a precise alignment mechanism for long-distance communication.
From there, anyone could code up arduino or whatever code to translate laser signals to data and vice versa.
Would laser pointers work? They probably would but maybe not at high speeds. Just replace the push button with a transistor.

Nanonymous No.3673 [D][U][F]
File: 53156d1739ed0ba47e4a9f15d602ebb3835c1c5fefa85cc4e415662b51f6864b.jpg (dl) (324.39 KiB)

nice opinion article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/13/opinion/china-internet-privacy.html
http://archivecaslytosk.onion/PrTrJ
is this the answer? is the only way to escape the botnet unplugging? opinions?

Nanonymous No.3675 [D] >>3676

>>3670
>>3671
Just use fiber optic cables secretely buried underground, connecting house to thouse, with standard optical routing equipment (wait for the next major industry upgrade and buy their used stuff).
It won't be dirt cheap, but if enough wealthy individuals who are aware of the botnet threat pitch in, it could easily be done.
The question is how many such individuals exist...

Nanonymous No.3676 [D]

>>3675
Fiber optic stuff is hard to use and expensive, even second hand. Burying things underground is absolutely NOT possible without drawing a lot of attention. Your idea is unrealistic.
The laser idea was better. At least that's actually feasible.

Nanonymous No.3678 [D] >>3680

It's a little dated, but someone has already done the optical thing 20 years ago:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RONJA
It looks like some companies have pushed the idea further and improved the performance, but those do not look like open plans, so not DIY. That RONJA system is 10Mb/s, getting it up to 1Gb/s would be ideal.

Nanonymous No.3680 [D][U][F]
File: aa469f63daaf33dfe70427ac797f99131a3af24b7d69e204258ae04a9230eb8d.gif (dl) (478.99 KiB)

>>3678
That is such a cool project, i like in particular the Ronja Inferno: 10 Mbps banwidth, up to 1.25 km distance and is infrared, which means it's harder for glowniggers to find it:
http://ronja.twibright.com/inferno/


Nanonymous No.3685 [D] >>3704 >>3718 >>3753

The glowers could probably just use night vision devices to spot them (if looking for them). Videos from the US wars in the Middle East show IR laser designators being used in combination with NV so IR detection could probably be done in a similar way. Although, I wonder how well that would work during daylight hours.

Nanonymous No.3687 [D]

>>3689
No, getting it up to 10 or 100 Gbit/s would be ideal if a I2P type system were to be built into it.

Nanonymous No.3704 [D][U][F]
File: 7df3d262c59dadfd921553d2ec5dbc13fbaa28183009f709597b53f3ef4afe6d.png (dl) (132.47 KiB)

A couple of good blogs, with news, guides, resources:
https://digdeeper.neocities.org/
https://rainheaven.neocities.org/
>>3685
You could put some IR emitters in a bunch of places near the ronja to mask it's position, it's still better than radio. But yeah in yeah end glowers gotta glow, in this case it's infrared glowing.

Nanonymous No.3718 [D]

>>3685
>IR laser designators being used in combination with NV
Can someone explain what this means? Or at least NV? Lasers are supposed to go in straight lines, they should only be detectable if you get in their way.

Nanonymous No.3725 [D] >>3729

>>3671
do you have a license for that laser pointer goy? unlicensed telecommunication is illegal and laser pointers can be used to implement it so they are also illegal

Nanonymous No.3729 [D] >>3738

>>3725
Really depends by country refer to this for more:
http://ronja.twibright.com/inferno/legal.php

but the glowers would have really an hard time to make a case against you(if they go by legal means), like let's imagine that i go to my balcony with a flashlight and i turn it off and on for some time, am i committing a federal crime for tring to comunicate binary information?

Nanonymous No.3730 [D][U][F] >>3732 >>3739
File: 8c6856ead92959cfe7d4e7793647fbea7e0ec1209e0563b957de3c3871f29647.jpg (dl) (700.81 KiB)

I heard, in Russia mayors (forces-tachi) can observe almost all people with HTML5 interface. Their moving, messaging, android app updating, they marks people who uses anonymizers.

Nanonymous No.3732 [D] >>3735

>>3730
Do you mind sharing your sources? It is difficult to look it up in russian for me.

Nanonymous No.3734 [D][U][F] >>3737
File: 292d6e0906958cc4051d4aac40ad40ab079ea6a2dec4ffe30b07c64136605d48.pdf (dl) (1.02 MiB)

My sources is russian imageboards.
I also got pdfrelated.
https://mega.nz/#F!GR8AVYqS!xNWBHEA7b2ciTNN3Qtk_wQ is files.
https://twitter.com/D1G1R3V — hackers.
I don't have full sources.

Nanonymous No.3735 [D][U][F] >>3737
File: 1b50e3734c8786a17ac8ac89675ce266edbda9e65a17180b601481aeb037b59c.pdf (dl) (13.55 MiB)

>>3732
Also full version.

Nanonymous No.3736 [D][U][F] >>3737
File: 46d9b5588868eed45f0112302eed4aec9a032f64cab07fce98451e6c0a5ee5c4.png (dl) (244.98 KiB)

>Graf formed with YeGRYuL base, allowing to get hidden relations of legal entities. Example Sberbank Rossii.
>[i]img[/i]
>Graf of friends of a user in Vkontakte network. Model of grafik built from physikal model and shows friendship relations in the social network. Graf is interactive and clasterrizes by itself to stable groups.
>[i]img[/i]

Nanonymous No.3737 [D]

>>3734
>>3735
>>3736
thanks fren

Nanonymous No.3738 [D] >>3740

>>3729
>am i committing a federal crime for tring to comunicate binary information?
yes goy. free speech has limitations

Nanonymous No.3739 [D]

>>3730
yes, they're using a botnet distributed by a metamorphics virus written in HTML5

Nanonymous No.3740 [D]

>>3738
be careful nanons if you leave Christmas lights outside your house the glowers will get you!!!
>>3789
you're a retard, it's the dashboard front-end in HTML5(which is a way of saying browser-based) the backend is another story

Nanonymous No.3753 [D] >>3767

>>3685
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_sight#Firearms
(second paragraph)
Also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_designator

I'm not sure if the visual beam could be decoded just by observing it from the side, or if sensors would need to be in the actual beam path. Either way, the beam would still be visible (with Night Vision equipment) and the end points would be known to glowers on the lookout.

Nanonymous No.3767 [D]

>>3753
if it can be picked up by video it can be decoded. but why does it matter, just use crypto as normal

Nanonymous No.3878 [D][U][F] >>3903 >>3908
File: 67a3ae716cc91499492f704e6274fdaf2e325a8d19f5c465c3d267c8d74b643b.gif (dl) (94.29 KiB)

https://rainheaven.neocities.org/news/2019.04.28-cameras-that-guess-your-age-and-sex.html
https://rainheaven.neocities.org/news/2019.04.27-facial-recognition-creeps-on-passenger.html
So i think we should talk about physical surveillance, it's getting to a point where Minority Report doesn't seem like sci-fi anymore, cameras that can guess your emotions are already a reality and you can bet that with the excuse of mass shootings in the future if an AI through a camera thinks that you look weird it's gonna automatically call the police on you. Unlike with online surveillance there's no way of preventing it(masks and using infrared emitters will just make you more suspicious and police is gonna get called right away, covering your face in public is already illegal in many countries and using infrared emitters on ways to fool AI like special makeup is gonna be made illegal in the future once crimial starts using them), you're face is already in your government database since birth(passports and IDs), so in short we're pretty much fucked, welcome to the physical botnet frens, where the Matrix becomes real.

Nanonymous No.3903 [D] >>3905

>>3878
We can no longer be passive. We need to physically and remotely break surveillance tech such as cameras.

Nanonymous No.3905 [D] >>3916

>>3903
It's fun if you have gf.

Nanonymous No.3908 [D][U][F] >>3917 >>3927
File: 12209b33b4656fa0ec31e8f4d0bf2c02122c8c54d53c9468dbff06e5391175d0.jpg (dl) (6.93 KiB)

>>3878
When you say special makeup, do you mean people that add duplicate eyes and mouth to their face so they look like this picture?

Drones are pretty creepy, it's just like that movie "They Live" where they can be hovering above you. I remember seeing one hovering in my neighborhood, but couldn't figure out where the pilot was. Luckily I could hear it, but I imagine glowers have access to quiet ones.

Nanonymous No.3916 [D]

>>3905
>gf
gluten free?

Nanonymous No.3917 [D] >>3949

>>3908
>couldn't figure out where the pilot was
Blast it with emp and/or shoot it down. Then watch who comes to inspect what's happening.

Nanonymous No.3918 [D] >>3927

clown makeup & noses. ironic clown posse. or those joke store glasses with fake nose.

Nanonymous No.3927 [D] >>3928 >>3929 >>3931

>>3908
>>3918
With special makeup i meant this(pic related): https://cvdazzle.com/
Cool project but probably not really that effective, plus it will make you super noticeable by humans.
The future is drone surveillance by police, i'm actually really surprised police still don't use them, military already uses them a lot.

Nanonymous No.3928 [D][U][F] >>3931
File: a58f6adfdb72e98e0712d29b11f5a83fd804df56861760866b917d9c109c42b6.jpg (dl) (23.27 KiB)

>>3927
Forgot pic

Nanonymous No.3929 [D]

>>3927
Style Tips for Reclaiming Privacy

1 Makeup

Avoid enhancers: They amplify key facial features. This makes your face easier to detect. Instead apply makeup that contrasts with your skin tone in unusual tones and directions: light colors on dark skin, dark colors on light skin.

2 Nose Bridge

Partially obscure the nose-bridge area: The region where the nose, eyes, and forehead intersect is a key facial feature. This is especially effective against OpenCV's face detection algorithm.

3 Eyes

Partially obscure one of the ocular regions: The position and darkness of eyes is a key facial feature.

4 Masks

Avoid wearing masks as they are illegal in some cities. Instead of concealing your face, modify the contrast, tonal gradients, and spatial relationship of dark and light areas using hair, makeup, and/or unique fashion accessories.

5 Head

Research from Ranran Feng and Balakrishnan Prabhakaran at University of Texas, shows that obscuring the elliptical shape of a head can also improve your ability to block face detection. Link: Facilitating fashion camouflage art

6 Asymmetry

Facial-recognition algorithms expect symmetry between the left and right sides of the face. By developing an asymmetrical look, you may decrease your probability of being detected.

Nanonymous No.3931 [D]

>>3927
>>3928
so just dress like a zoomer and cameras wont recognize you

Nanonymous No.3936 [D] >>3941

If I was a city politician, I would inject many cameras on houses and in one place display "Shows Who Are You", that displays name, age and more information, and near signs with advices how to be anonymity.
People come to display, see that they aren't anonimyty, they make hard makeup and cameras doesn't recognize them. I take many GPUs and with these train neural networks to recognize such people. Few days/months later they again come to display and sees that they again recognizable. New advices is wear uniform black with mask. Half of city wear identical suits with masks. I take more GPUs, buy TPUs, NPUs and train recurrent neural network to recognize gait and some few features. They again come to display and sees that they recognizable again. New advice is to change gait and wear tall boots. Now thay all are identical with almost all features. But I earlier bought some new computational resources, thermal imagers, hypersensitive radiowave scanners and sensitive kinetical/air sensors. I already know association each personality to each body.
I track every step, even in buildings.
Only way to get anonymized is go to far far away with few people for 200 km and go back, then personalities will be mixed up.

Nanonymous No.3941 [D]

>>3936
>If I was a city politician,
You are not and if you would, you would something diferent
This whole thread is about technological solutions for political problems
Typical tech retardation, no wonder antifa took over the Pirate Party


... Nanonymous No.3947 [D][U][F] >>3948 >>3950 >>3952 >>4127
File: 853850fc8600bda6e8e1e30867c9f633c8593f822f6959f9b89beaae24d94baf.png (dl) (906.84 KiB)

And so it begins...
https://www.fastcompany.com/90346224/microsoft-word-is-getting-politically-correct
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/oyJuB
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/05/07/microsoft-word-will-change-words-gender-inclusive/
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/BnoHh
>Microsoft will soon preview a version of Word that will use artificial intelligence to make your writing not just grammatically but politically correct.
I don't even know what to say anymore, this is a setting now, but how much time until they make it impossible to disable, hoe much time until it's integrated in the OS and in every corporate website and software? We're not provided with tools anymore, but intead with services over whom we don't have control anymore. We're just getting started with this mark my words.
>If you tend to say “mailman” or Congressman” in the generic, it might suggest you use “mailperson” or “Congressperson.” If you use the term “gentlemen’s agreement,” it may suggest you use “unspoken agreement” instead.
>If you describe someone as a “disabled person” the AI would suggest “person with a disability.” Person-first terminology is preferred because it portrays the person as more important than the disability.

...

Nanonymous No.3948 [D]

>>3947
That's what you get for authorities.

Nanonymous No.3949 [D]

>>3917
Think I remember reading somewhere that this is considered a serious crime,as in felony, because they're legally considered aircraft. So shooting them down would be viewed the same as shooting down a real aircraft.
Seems kind of retarded, if true. Using some sort of microwave/directed energy gun may be difficult to detect so would probably be the best method of repelling one without leaving physical damage.

Nanonymous No.3950 [D][U][F] >>3951
File: 759eebb316e59d0eaf02c31740e78567cc2f348dfd7e6b69264053b8b8a6f527.jpg (dl) (618.42 KiB)

>>3947
Will it change "retard" to "person with an intellectual disability" or "poor" to "people with an economic impairment"?

The West has become a giant circus.

Nanonymous No.3951 [D]

>>3950
You think you are an audience? lol

Nanonymous No.3952 [D]

>>3947
software already died a long time ago. the SJW infection only affects dead flesh

Another Step Nanonymous No.4115 [D] >>4129

Christchurch Call
https://www.christchurchcall.com/christchurch-call.pdf
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6004545-Christchurch-Call.html
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/RwFDP
Tech companies and 17 govts sign up to Christchurch Call
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/389297/tech-companies-and-17-govts-sign-up-to-christchurch-call
http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/6f686

Limitations on livestreaming incoming, probably posts and videos are gonna need approval unless you're "verified" in the future.
Censorship on gore incoming cause it's best for you to not look at that stuff amirite?
Search engines redirecting you to "socialism" when you search "nazism" incoming.
You might think USA are based for not signing, but they had no reason to sign cause they already have the Patriot Act which does the same thing and how many terrorist act did that stop?

Another Step towards the dystopia.

Nanonymous No.4127 [D]

>>3947
we should already start working on the opposite technology, possibly as a browser addon and then use some 0days to spread it

Nanonymous No.4129 [D][U][F]
File: a2fa06c0a792150d8406f4a5e0125dde500d7e5b45dda2910b26fa98af2c4a02.png (dl) (61.44 KiB)

>>4115
>patriot act
god I hate patriots, based voltaire