Are wordfilters good tools for identifying newfags and preventing them from effectively posting or reading posts until they have lurked for a sufficient amount of time?
Certainly, wordfilters can impede proper discussion. For this type of scheme to work, the wordfilters should be properly chosen not to overlap with each other and/or transform the meaning of a text into ambiguity.
I know Lainchan's userbase is shit, but some of their wordfilters are occasionally good for identifying newfags. Unfortunately lainniggers also use wordfilters to censor political discussion in favor of their communist, anarchist and/or lolberg opinions.
>>7431 >t. piece of crap who just blew in from pigchan
Discussion cannot be had with a group of retards who do not understand board culture, history, customs, or even what is being discussed. If you want a board with a bunch of redditors on it you can go to 4channel.org or 8ch.net.
If newfags are welcomed with too much vigour they will eventually replace all the dedicated users. Board quality will suffer greatly a la pigchan.
>>7432 Someone's ego has been hurt it seems. Create your own offline imageboard where only you, absolute oldfag, will post. You can form your board culture, history, customs, or even what is being discussed. People like you ruin the concept of anonymous forums that are designed to discuss stuff not based on who is on the other end of cable.
Word filters get in the way of clear communication. I hate having to carefully consider every single word I write to ensure my post will actually say what I want it to say. Reading post without knowing if they actually show what the poster wrote is even worse.
>I know Lainchan's userbase is shit, but some of their wordfilters are occasionally good for identifying newfags. Unfortunately lainniggers also use wordfilters to censor political discussion in favor of their communist, anarchist and/or lolberg opinions.
I could say the same about 4chan/8chan, you can't practically speak from any political perspective other than the one that is prevalent there. Nobody is willing to tolerate a contradictory opinion, god forbid that would imply the possibility that they might be wrong.
I just wish there were more imageboards that are completely detached from political discussion.
>>7432 >If you want a board with a bunch of redditors on it you can go to 4channel.org or 8ch.net.
It's ironic because this cycle of thinking just goes on and on. 4chan lurkerks despise redditors and tell someone go back to reddit if they post in a certain way. Never lurked 8chan,but I'd assume it's the same there with anons telling other anons to go back to 4chan. Then here anons tell other anons to go back to pigchan or cuckchan or whatever. It's so fucking childish. If something, the word combination "go back to" should be blacklisted
We have to ignore toxic users, they will eventually go away.
They are not going to play our game. Popular boards users don't (want) to understand that civiliced people don't socialize the same way as an autistic 7 years old boy will do.
No need to implement wordfilters or other types of automatic censorship.
We will have to deal with new users that not fit the community when someone advertises the hakase harem elsewhere. But it's not going to be more than a temporary nuisance.
>>7454 I'm not concerned about toxic new users so much as those who pull seniority and oldfag on a board just 6 months old. Because oldfags are never wrong, pretend to able to recognize everyone they're talking to, and have nothing to learn from their (presumed) juniors, they also can't recognize when they're part of the problem and that a site is actually better off without them. They tend to stick to good places like a barnacle to a ship.
>>7461 >They tend to stick to good places
The only reason those places are good is oldfags. Newfags can only break things, unless they lurk for long enough to become oldfags.
Everyone who claims to be a super ebin ultra turbo oldfag is probably hapase, since she's practically the only user (spare maybe one or two early mewchers) who has been on nanochan for its entire existence.
>>7437 That's why the wordfilters have to be carefully chosen not to completely change the meaning of words.
>>7445 No u
>>7449 >If something, the word combination "go back to" should be blacklisted
<oy vey, don't employ sensible wordfilters that repel redditors, use outright bans to censor people's thoughts from each other!
lainnigger detected
>>7467 >mewchers
Oh wow. So the ebic oldgags are from a namefagging discordnigger den with a retarded owner who would ban Torposters when he had a bad day.
>>7470 >oy vey, don't employ sensible wordfilters that repel redditors
if anything it encourages them more because muh top sekrit club or whatever
>lainnigger
kill yourself
>>7474 >muh dicksock!!! muh g00n!
Either way, they gave an initial direction to nanochan. Their impacts upon early history are visible. They are polite, unlike the pigchanners (one of whom botspammed so much that hapase had to add a captcha. Only pigchanners can force that kind of cancer to be created.). Lainniggers also spammed because they didn't like /pol/ being a natsoc board. Don't forget that mewch is the first website that hapase announced this board on.
When redditors see people trying to keep them away, they will actually fuck off. They will go back to their reddit safe space and circlejerk about how nanochan is such a meanie place and how it's so elitist and boring and FASHIST unlike their favorite lgbt subreddit. Nanochan has already been posted on reddit once, on some shitty anarchy board. They were too scared to come here for fear of CP and/or racism, despite hapase being stricter on CP than pigchan is.
Redditors are scared of any sort of unironic racism, and just as long as you are less cucked than thedonald you will be free of them and their cancer. Redditors are not the main problem for us, it is pigchanners and cuckchanners who are the problem. For example, that avatarfagging mod who hapase removed a few weeks ago for refusing to stop avatarfagging came from pigchan.
>Oy vey goy, lain is epik and based
Lainchan is not epik and based. They are wannabe script kiddies. They're gay anarchists and if you want me to I can immediately go and find at least 5 examples from their website.
>>7518 exhibit 2
>lainniggers are interested in learning pajeetscript
>lainchan website also makes super heavy use of javascript for no apparent reason, even more than pigchan, website runs way faster without it
>>7518 exhibit 9
>another lainnigger NEET mentally ill degenerate gets addicted to weed, drinks cough syrup, gets friendzoned by a tinder slut, and wants to an hero
>>7518 exhibit 10
>degenerate lainnigger takes drugs for mentall illness prescribed by a (((doctor))), gets addicted and gets "scared"
Lainchan, not even once.
that's all for now.
>>7533 >the absolute state of lainniggers
How's it like chugging cough syrup and smoking weed (YEAH goy! 420 BLAEZ IT XDDDD) while watching a big strong black bull ream out your wife's pussy, all the while thinking you're intellectually superior to all other members of the human race species?
>>7545 I wouldn't know but you seem to be obsessed with interracial cuck porn apparently. Are you sure you don't secretly crave the big black cock you can't spend a minute not talking about?
>>7550 >HYUUURRRR DURRRR if you dont like something you must secretly like it
I wouldn't know but you seem to be obsessed with the (((alt right))) apparently. Are you sure you don't secretly crave orange cock in your ass that you can't spend a minute not talking about?
>>7574 >if you don't like something that means you must be obsessed with it
Answer that lainnigger. I thought you pseudo-intellectuals and the rest of your ilk regarded your "intelligence" highly.
As a side story, a (literal) bluehair landwhale once overheard me calling a politician a faggot when I was with friends:
<Anon, why are you so homophobic? Don't you know that being obsessed with hating gays means you're probably gay and trying to hide it?
I told her that if women speak out against rape then they must secretly enjoy it. She fucked off after that.
>>7575 <if you don't like something that means you must be obsessed with it
It's the other way around.
>Answer that lainnigger.
Answer what?
>I thought you pseudo-intellectuals and the rest of your ilk regarded your "intelligence" highly.
<Ad hominem, short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
>As a side story, a (literal) bluehair landwhale once overheard me calling a politician a faggot when I was with friends:
<Anon, why are you so homophobic? Don't you know that being obsessed with hating gays means you're probably gay and trying to hide it?
She is not wrong though:
>Homophobes should consider a little self-reflection, suggests a new study finding those individuals who are most hostile toward gays and hold strong anti-gay views may themselves have same-sex desires, albeit undercover ones.
>The prejudice of homophobia may also stem from authoritarian parents, particularly those with homophobic views as well, the researchers added.
>"This study shows that if you are feeling that kind of visceral reaction to an out-group, ask yourself, 'Why?'" co-author Richard Ryan, a professor of psychology at the University of Rochester, said in a statement. "Those intense emotions should serve as a call to self-reflection."
>The research, published in the April 2012 issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, reveals the nuances of prejudices like homophobia, which can ultimately have dire consequences. [The 10 Most Destructive Human Behaviors]
>"Sometimes people are threatened by gays and lesbians because they are fearing their own impulses, in a sense they 'doth protest too much,'" Ryan told LiveScience. "In addition, it appears that sometimes those who would oppress others have been oppressed themselves, and we can have some compassion for them too, they may be unaccepting of others because they cannot be accepting of themselves."
>I told her that if women speak out against rape then they must secretly enjoy it.
The ones who argue that all men are apparently rapists are also usually the ones who are deprived from sexual interaction the most, similar to how incels argue that all women are whores. So in a way, this is probably true.
Are wordfilters good tools for identifying newfags and preventing them from effectively posting or reading posts until they have lurked for a sufficient amount of time?
Certainly, wordfilters can impede proper discussion. For this type of scheme to work, the wordfilters should be properly chosen not to overlap with each other and/or transform the meaning of a text into ambiguity.
I know Lainchan's userbase is shit, but some of their wordfilters are occasionally good for identifying newfags. Unfortunately lainniggers also use wordfilters to censor political discussion in favor of their communist, anarchist and/or lolberg opinions.