/meta/ - Board Meta

[Make a Post]
[X]





Streamchan Nanonymous No.1984 [D][S][L][A][C] >>1985 >>1994 >>2002

I like the idea of having a tor only imageboard, but hapase's bad moderation is killing it. She shills everywhere even on pigchan and once on 4chan. Then when it becomes popular, she tries to impose arbitrary rules on /b/ of all boards. And the new mod she appointed is deleting threads on /b/ for "degeneracy". I don't think she's going to change.
I propose a new Nanochan, one with more emphasis on freedom of speech. I will remove all boards and threads except for one cyclical thread, the /stream/, which will be totally unmoderated and even allow cp and spam.
If there is enough interest I will make this.

Nanonymous No.1985 [D]

>>1984
>allow cp
no

Nanonymous No.1986 [D]

sigh

Nanonymous No.1988 [D]

so basicakly, a crppy watrires clonr

Nanonymous No.1989 [D]

>deleting threads for degeneracy
absolutely based

Nanonymous No.1994 [D]

>>1984
>wah wah my CP thread got purged
Once you're done setting it up, buy enough server time/bandwidth so it lasts a year or two and then do the world a favor by killing yourself, faggot. That's the only way no have true lack of moderation.

hakase ## 4chan Administrator No.1996 [D]

It was degenerate filth, but the new mod is a shit. did more than one person apply?

Nanonymous No.1999 [D] >>2000

This place is shit anyway, like all the other imageboards. I wouldn't spend another second here if I had some friends to spend time with.

Nanonymous No.2000 [D][U][F] >>2001
File: 6ede946dafef5c31409011fe15124ee04f5129604a6076ea700f04a0e04cdbaa.jpg (dl) (444.77 KiB)

>>1999
I have "friends", but they are all homoshit like internets.
move to east, gruzia, armenia, tajikistan and stay there; comfy, mountainous countries with communities and sovereign style of life

Nanonymous No.2001 [D] >>2005

>>2000
Aren't you afraid of the Lyme disease bioweapon?

Nanonymous No.2002 [D] >>2003 >>2007

>>1984
Hakase is not entirely to blame for the poor state of this imageboard. It's the users too.
The creation of a new Tor-only imageboard, which truly upholds freedom of speech is a good idea. However, only a single thread and no moderation is a bad idea. Discussions can't be had in a 'stream': it'll end up looking less like an imageboard and more like a chatroom. CP is fine and fends off normals, shitposters and others who are against freedom of speech, but blatant spam, advertisement and shitposting purposefully discourage discussion and thus the use of the imageboard. Such posts are insincere -- lies, if you will -- and it is not for freedom of speech to respect lies.

Nanonymous No.2003 [D] >>2004

>>2002
You only have so much freedom until you pry onto the freedom of another person. In this case, the victims are the children that is subject to sexual abuse thanks to low life niggers like you. Please just kill yourself in the most painful way possible and do the rest of the humanity favor.

Nanonymous No.2004 [D][U][F] >>2006 >>2787 >>2815
File: 1971c00ee892161a2be7ac384b131eb1dcf9a44c5858ca29eb0260b95750ad0c.png (dl) (170.35 KiB)

>>2003
>You only have so much freedom until you pry onto the freedom of another person.
<We should all kill ourselves because we are part of the white oppression.
You are violating freedoms of other people by just paying taxes so that your elected representatives can murder, rape and stake children, men and women in yemen, syria, palestine, sudan, mali, lybia, uganda, somalia, kenya, iraq, niger, nigeria, cameroon, mexico, philippines and god knows where else. Please just kill yourself in the most painful way possible and do the rest of the humanity favor.

Nanonymous No.2005 [D]

>>2001
>Lyme disease bioweapon
never heard of it

Nanonymous No.2006 [D]

>>2004
I'm not thankfully living in a corrupt imperialistic country that incites violence in Middle East, funds terrorist organizations and then turns around to blame Islam for it.

My point still stands. Pedophiles shouldn't be considered eligible for human rights and discarded as garbage for the common good.

Nanonymous No.2007 [D] >>2009

>>2066
Unless you live in asia(except china and far east usa colonies) you are contributing by paying taxes. I guess you are. And, well, you are still paying police which enforce laws. Goverment consists of people, therefore same rules should apply then. Even then, you will still be violationg freedoms of others in some way. Freedom as you described it doesn't exist and is not natural in any way.

While I don't consider pedophiles humane, it's the price you have to pay for anonymity. But >>2002 idea
>CP is fine and fends off normals
is shit because pedophiles are shit, they are no better than shitposters.

Nanonymous No.2008 [D]

>Thread is autosaged.
Says a lot about the moderation! Go ahead, OP, start your imageboard. I want to be out of this shithole as soon as possible.

Nanonymous No.2009 [D]

>>2007
>watching CP and paying taxes are similar in the sense that both violates someone's freedom

Police is the necessary evil to maintain a sense of order in the society and ensure that others can't infringe on your freedom and property. And if they do, its police's job to catch them.
Surely there are lots of corrupt cops but that obviously doesn't outweigh the benefits they offer.

Are there any benefits of CP consumption for the common good? Does watching CP make our daily life safer and ensure that democratic structure is in place?
No. It doesn't. It promotes infringing on the rights of adolescents who have yet to develop a mature mindset to decide whether if they can consent.

I believe conforming to pedophiles isn't a price we have to pay when volunteers can remove offending posts, and users can actively participate in the moderation system to ensure that Tor network is not associated with criminal activities, but rather, advancing human rights and freedom by promoting free speech.

Raping kids isn't fucking free speech.

Nanonymous No.2012 [D] >>2787

I have you a joke:
How to spot an American?
He gets butthurt about pedos and misunderstands the concept of freedom.

Nanonymous No.2787 [D] >>2811

>>2012
That wasn't a joke, that was just a statement. Are inability to grasp humor and crippling retardation prerequisites for being a pedo?

>>2004
Great topic hopping by the way. You can't judge me for wanting to rape kids, look at all the shitty things those people do! :^) Kill yourself and record proof, faggot.

Nanonymous No.2811 [D] >>2835

>>2787
I doubt I would be able to use a computer were I crippling retarded. I understand humor well, though that was not meant to be a joke but a mock. The statement is the punchline. Sorry, that I most explain this to you.

Pedophiles do not want to rape kids, in the same manner as normal teleiophiles do not want to rape adults. Pedophiles want to have a loving and romantic relationship with a child. You are psychotic if you believe this involves rape or physical harm.

Nanonymous No.2815 [D]

>>2004
>whataboutism
Nice argument there

Nanonymous No.2835 [D] >>2837 >>2838

>>2811
Thanks to technological (((progress))), retards can now use the Internet as well. Case in point, "teleiophiles". No, you mean normal functioning people. Your kike-tier normalization attempts do not work. Adults have a notion of consent and are less prone to be peer-pressured into submission by a person viewed as an authority figure - as opposed to kids. Hang yourself and make the world a better place.

Nanonymous No.2837 [D]

>>2835
Pedophiles are normal functioning people as much as any teleiophile is. I am not trying to normalize pedophilia. I don't think it should be normalized, and it simply won't ever be normalized. Nonetheless, pedos don't deserve all the hate they receive, since there isn't really any reason to hate them, and I do think they serve valuable roles in society. I believe that most people who work with children, such as teachers, pediatricians, day-care workers, etc. are pedophiles. Three of the four pedophiles I know personally are teachers.

>Adults have a notion of consent
Assuming your an adult, I would like you to tell me about this 'notion of consent', which children cannot have.

>peer-pressured into submission by a person viewed as an authority figure
It is not peer-pressure if it is done by an authoritative figure: an authoritative figure is not a peer. Pedophiles tend to see adults and children as equals. Thus there is no authoritative figure, nor any submission. And again, just as pedophiles don't wont to rape children, neither do they want to put them into submission. You seem to believe every pedophile wants to harm children, which, as you should be educated enough to know, is a lie spread by the (((media))). In fact, in a pedophilic child-adult relationship, it is often the child who is the authoritative figure and holds the adult in submission. Besides, though I appose it, children are 'pressured into submission' by non-pedophiles daily. Rather, they are not pressured into submission, they exist in submission. Childhood is spent in submission by parents and other adults. According to non-pedophiles, every adult knows better than a child, and every adult is greater respected than a child. Anyone with a critical eye would know that 'adults' are no better than children! Children are heavily oppressed in society. Children grow up to be adults, and an oppressed child is an (((oppressed))) adult.

Why make enemies of the pedophile, when there is no other, who wants to secure the future for beautiful white children more than the pedophile?

Nanonymous No.2838 [D]

>>2835
Also, according to you, I am a crippled retard. Am I not, then, being both mentally retarded and physically crippled by my retardation, equal (or nearly equal) in mental capacity and physical strength to a child? That being the case, what are your objections to my having a romantic relationship with a child?

>2837
>though I appose it
Meant oppose.

Nanonymous No.2973 [D] >>2993

>Waaaaaah, I want my CP
Neck yourself.

Nanonymous No.2993 [D]

>>2973
Why?