/g/ - Technology

install openbsd

[Make a Post]
[X]





Fixing tech Nanonymous No.3305 [D][S][L][A][C]

How could we fix the problems within the tech industry? Which threats should be prioritized? Digital threats can usually be worked around with enough programmers, but physical threats require much more effort to mitigate. Physical threats include DNA recording, anti-tor policies, CCTV, and ISP control. So far, the best plan I've thought of would be educating more people so that they vote better people into power. Should a revolution break out, we'd need people to support the revolution and resist suppression.

Nanonymous No.3306 [D] >>3330

The modern education system would need a drastic change in order for it to not become a burden on society, let alone for it to educate people on anonymity and privacy. And why do you think that anyone in power would be a good idea.

Nanonymous No.3307 [D] >>3330

All things you stated as threats are linked to strong state FUCKING FINALLY noticing the Internet, which they have been ignoring (because they be boomers) for good 20 years LOL.
It was fun while it lasted, but it's going to get only worse. State probably won't go all the way to command and control it, as it is counterproductive, but the masses will be granted their informational bubble where they will reside in as long as state will spend resourses to support it and the lemmings be willing to stay deluded.
So, if you want Internet anarchy to survive, in my opinion, you gotta bring that shit IRL and actually make it work (as scarse examples of IRL libertarianism/anarchism didn't end very well). And I wouldn't advocate for that unless something big happens, like, I dunno, technological singularity or some other dystopian shit, rendering state irrelevant, as you cannot control or fight that beast, really. To outsmart it would be a wiser choice. That means to strike without any warning, without any plot to overthrow the power or to start a revolution (it's impossible with the amount of surveillance nowadays), etc. Educating to subvert the system most probably won't work: democracy isn't real because of how the system works - it is based on authority figures making the decisions for you, and the actual force belongs to the army commanders. Educating on how to break away from the system might work, but as there are no known ways to overthrow a state without creating one, this post is just my power fantasies.

Nanonymous No.3311 [D] >>3314

Modern computing is pretty much fucked (for the time being) since certain technologies have monopolized and offer centralized choke points for surveillance traps. Consumer computing has been reduced to pretty much just ARM and X86 architectures if you want to use any mainstream software. The cuckweb is quickly being reduced to JS only websites that only work with a few webbrowsers compiled for those processor architectures.

Like most here, you've probably come to the realization that in things are not well in the open and that's why you sought this place out.

Nanonymous No.3312 [D][U][F] >>3318 >>3341
File: 8c4a1e269915a666a6ea29e1802ffa72f9e0539f87020aa117b55e6146c5f3f1.png (dl) (139.50 KiB)

https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=19/03/28/0943249
http://archivecaslytosk.onion/2019.03.28-211035/https://www.euractiv.com/section/automated-vehicles/news/european-drivers-may-be-wary-of-cars-that-stop-them-from-speeding/
http://archivecaslytosk.onion/2019.03.28-211351/https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/cars/article-6851299/All-new-cars-fitted-mandatory-speed-limiters-2022-shock-EU-rules.html

The EU is moving forward with legislation to require ISA, Intelligent Speed Assistance, in all new cars starting in 2022. This system will use GPS, map databases, and speed limit reading cameras to limit speed. Speed limiting will be accomplished by limiting engine power. Drivers can temporarily override the system by pressing down hard on the accelerator. It seems that, at least to start, the system will have an off button. Other requirements of the legislation include a system to monitor the driver for drowsiness, and inattention, as well as standard hookups for in car breathalysers. It seems the driver monitoring systems may include in car cameras pointed at the driver.

Revolution when?

Nanonymous No.3314 [D][U][F] >>3316
File: b0dfe80a94fbecd3a040b3c47fece2d2e5d59798e5ade1383aa9356e011c0bc0.webm (dl) (946.32 KiB)

The only way to save technology is to make it as decentralized as possible, as >>3311 said a big problem is hardware, we need open-source hardware and we need to make decentralized/distributed networks more popular, if we have a secure framework of tools and protocols and they cannot link your online identity to your physical one things like DNA recording and CCTV become useless.

Nanonymous No.3316 [D][U][F] >>3318
File: a2b668728bf03f258e94ff661885decda97d3485009c7a02d812e5c6b12ae03a.jpg (dl) (307.15 KiB)

>>3314
just like you know dethrone the king and its done simple like that famalam xoxo #yangwave

Nanonymous No.3318 [D][U][F] >>3321
File: 3cb9602949c0f2f0984d3ea9e0d746869558db69bd41816baf36569cfcbaf92c.gif (dl) (382.30 KiB)

>>3316
didn't want to sound like i was oversimplifying, i don't have all the answers for example i have no idea how to solve what >>3312 mentioned, but the only way that i can think of fixing this shit is to shift control from centralized entities(like governments and corporations) to individuals, the methods i described in my post achieve part of it, if you have better ideas post them istead of being a faggot :)

Nanonymous No.3321 [D][U][F] >>3324 >>3326
File: 511067058b2987a06ef738a228c0a8b5be19c4f6ace7a0395c4588144bcb65f4.jpg (dl) (25.52 KiB)

>>3318
It's circlejerk thread and was there numerous times. It always boils down to the system, decentralization and open hardware, yet many people will never start unless others start, be it hactivism, killing ordinary people, illegalism, bombing parliments, beating random people and graffiting, wearing aesthetic clothes, creating subversive art, wasting all you can on expense of others, and it'll go like that forever. Do what you preach and spread the word by actual work otherwise it will never change. That's it. Making thread about it every week is retarded.

Nanonymous No.3324 [D] >>3338 >>3340

I'm thinking on setting up a pirate box somebody here has experience with it?
>>3321
Acting is better than talking, but talking is better than succumbing in silence, this is a discussion board about technology what's the problem in talking about the current state?

Nanonymous No.3326 [D][U][F]
File: 05ebdc0da8e1da98db18e2db63b75821810ff3a39be41042f3af7e86b25c6f2c.jpg (dl) (56.18 KiB)

>>3321
We already have more than enough threads about that and there are always the same conclusions. It could be made /general/ for related news, breakthrougs etc. 8/tech/ was also full of it.
I'm not opposed to posting problem and (partial) solution or organizing against [insert].

Nanonymous No.3330 [D]

>>3307
It is still possible for the army commanders to turn on the state, which is usually how revolutions occur. Since the state fears this, they will likely turn down the flames if public outcry grows.
>>3306
I doubt the education system will ever spearhead change; privacy and anonymity education will most likely come from books that are spread.

Nanonymous No.3338 [D]

>>3324
That Pirate Box idea is interesting. Perhaps making something like it, but instead having it tunnel to Tor would be useful. You could probably hide it in a lamp, power strip, or something like that and plug it in at a semi-public place where it won't stand out and use public wifi. As a way to avoid attracting attention, bandwidth usage could be limited or disabled during business hours.

You'd probably want to use hardware that can be scavenged for free, bought on the secondary market (thrift store/yard sale) or if new, bought in a way that can't be traced back to you (small independent shop, cash, no cameras. Don't carry a glowphone, like a stupid nigger would do).

Nanonymous No.3340 [D][U][F]
File: 3b30c0bc80d3c4b214b884eaabaf783e1dba44d1995117c7936d1e47f454286c.png (dl) (259.43 KiB)

>>3324
Damn, pirate box must be packing extra braincells in there.

Nanonymous No.3341 [D] >>3348

>>3312
I'm planning to learn how to ride a motorcycle. I'm sure they'll be botnetted eventually, but for now I think self-driving, botnet motorcycles are farther into the future than self-driving, botnet cars.

Nanonymous No.3344 [D][U][F] >>3345 >>3390
File: 3aca3fa09cad92997ac90c1b78f9b85cf6128755ef46516fae8f55ece40cd94c.jpg (dl) (63.85 KiB)

>3326
In retrospect i think you are right, dispersing information in multiple threads goes against our cause, i made a general here >>3342 hope people will use it.

Nanonymous No.3345 [D] >>3353

>>3344
no cross thread on nano didn't know that, i meant here https://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/g/3342.html

Nanonymous No.3348 [D]

>>3341
They will probably be forbidden to use because they are too dangerous.

Nanonymous No.3353 [D]

>>3345
There actually is, I think. Only works for threads though, not posts
>>>/g/3342

Nanonymous No.3390 [D]

>>3344
Originally it looked like your thread was mainly about the problems, which is why I created this thread. Now I realize I'm dumb, I should of just bumped >>>/g/3342.