/l/ - The Lounge

Off-topic discussion

All users of /b/: read >>>/meta/3253
[Make a Post]
[X]





Nanonymous No.9733 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>10169
File: c015389425227e456dd4adc1da21e8851375bced3bd6df2a5f221283b00bf027.jpg (dl) (16.18 KiB)

Vlogging in the worst form of self obsession observed in nigger cattle.
Even when a person is vlogging about his travels to a rarely visited country he has to insert himself all the time. His stupid nigger ape face takes up 1/2 of the screen, how the fuck are we suppose to see the scenery that way? I didn't click on video to see your dumb nigger face making dumb nigger expressions. Your nigger antics are not entertaining and i do not care about you. You are just a part of the nigger cattle being herded across the cotton fields by CIA NIGGERS. YIPI KAY NIGGER WOHOOO WE GOT A NIGGER CATTLE, THEY ARE SO DOCILE AND STUPID AND THEY THINK THEY'RE SPECIAL. WOOP WOOP NIGGER

Nanonymous No.9794 [D] >>9800

Expressing your gay opinions on an imageboard where no one gives a shit is a close second.

Nanonymous No.9800 [D]

>>9794
most iroNic poast OAT

Nanonymous No.10169 [D] >>10203

>>9733
Yeah the era of Web 2.0 might as well be called the era of digital narcissism. At no other point in history have people been so obsessed with their image.

Having said that, I can't deny that I've followed some vloggers and come to respect them. There's something I enjoy about hearing a person just unload their personal thoughts and perspective on the world. It's like getting drunk with someone at a bar, without the need to go out. Gotta take the good with the bad I guess.

Nanonymous No.10203 [D] >>10368

>>10169
there's a huge difference between genuine personal accounts and posing, clickbaiter e-personalities. it's like comparing the autobiography of ben franklin to the audacity of this nigger, and why op will continue to squeal and shit in his porkie-provided niggercattle playpen.
GIT ALONG LITTLE ZOGGIE, SOOIE!

Nanonymous No.10368 [D] >>10380

>>10203
There's also a big difference between those that focus on a specific hobby or subject and those that just vlog about themselves. The latter are extremely vain and their videos are inane. The ironic thing is that they also tend to be the most popular. Looking at "what's trending" on Youtube will give you stage IV cancer. Niggers got a lot of words to say, yo. Especially long streams of them that only make sense when you lower your IQ to <60.

Nanonymous No.10379 [D][U][F]
File: 695775f57e4b5d1aa34955b15ed56b2fb1da4736aed036f7500e93e0f744f8ad.png (dl) (8.62 KiB)

Where do you guys get energy to talk about shit like that? Like, who cares about serfs?

Nanonymous No.10380 [D] >>10384 >>10411

>>10368
hobby videos are garbage and literally 99.99999% of them are STILL just clickbait and made solely for ad revenue. also 100% of them could have just been expressed in a single paragraph instead of wasting your time on a piece of shit website waiting for a video to load

Nanonymous No.10384 [D]

>>10380
>100% of them could have just been expressed in a single paragraph
So very much this.

Nanonymous No.10411 [D] >>10416

>>10380
That's a pretty broad claim. While that's true for textual things like CLI howtos and test results, for something that uses spacial reference like changing an axle on a vehicle, watching a video of someone doing it would be better. Otherwise you're trying to interpret someones written description and recreate a picture in your mind. While this is not impossible to do, it opens up the possibility of misinterpretation, whereas video significantly lowers the risk of that.

So in other words, Linus Techtips is retarded, and you're a retard if you watch him.

Nanonymous No.10416 [D] >>10417

>>10411
This is a good point. Video does help for expressing technical details. But if it's on Youtube it's probably crap. The proper way to make technical content on the internet is to make a web page and embed some <video> <audio> <img> etc for parts that can be expressed better without text.

Nanonymous No.10417 [D] >>10516

>>10416
for that you need to have iq >60

Nanonymous No.10516 [D] >>10519 >>10529

>>10417
Many people just use it for hosting videos because it's pretty much free. You can usually find videos of technical conference speakers like Blackhat, Defcon, etc. on there and they usually are not crap.

A good way to judge quality is if in the video they say anything similar to "Don't forget to subscribe, like, and comment below." That's a red flag that they're a Youtuber and not just someone using it for video hosting.

Nanonymous No.10519 [D] >>10529

>>10516
>because it's pretty much free
the reason everything's going to shit. as free as refugee welfare.

Nanonymous No.10529 [D] >>10545

>>10516
hax0r conf videos are shit. so are their "papers". infosec is one big meme on top of a dying computer industry.
>>10519
No retard. It's not free if there are ads. It's literally no different than something made by a corporation except the guy is a smaller company. The quality is about the same. The capitalist cock sucking contest cannot produce anything of value.

Nanonymous No.10545 [D]

>>10529
>not installing an ad blocker
I haven't seen an ad on the internet since before I started posting on imageboards. If you still see ads then U R A moran.