/l/ - The Lounge

Off-topic discussion

All users of /b/: read >>>/meta/3253
[Make a Post]
[X]





Passions Nanonymous No.7791 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>7845 >>7851 >>8213
File: 2090f3a2c692c1cde09c4998d3808d395635bfdcea66d2651f09e59170fb0f98.jpg (dl) (75.26 KiB)

What are you nanons really passionate about? What's are some thing's that you could just talk about for hours and remain content?
Could you discuss them in this thread?

Nanonymous No.7809 [D] >>7811

>What are some things that you could just talk about for hours and remain content?
hmm... good question. Nothing, really. Maybe I could spend a long time explaining factual knowledge to someone less knowledgeable, but otherwise all my discussions IRL are short.

Nanonymous No.7811 [D] >>7842

>>7809
Ah, same here.
I've had the pleasure of peacefully debating the Holocaust with someone in real life before. I was impressed by the amount of respect this person had for me despite being a (((leftist))); it wasn't like they were on the fence or right leaning to begin with. I'll treasure that conversation forever, because the likelihood of a similarly peaceful debate is unlikely.

Nanonymous No.7813 [D][U][F]
File: 1f3df883dbd096e82855d4c39b915abfac92350220314e96421a76e7b1af810a.png (dl) (58.48 KiB)

I'm not really passionate about anything, but I'm still pretty happy. I just live for the little things. I guess I enjoy vidya and animu/visual novels but I wouldn't say I'm passionate about them.

Nanonymous No.7842 [D] >>8217

>>7811
that's me on the left
Sounds like a rare and beautiful occasion. Having intelligent and respectful debate over controversial topics is a thing rare to find, even on the internet.

Nanonymous No.7843 [D] >>7844

nanochan - Catchers in the Rye

Nanonymous No.7844 [D]

>>7843
>turbo-autism: the book

Nanonymous No.7845 [D]

>>7791
Anime apparently.

Nanonymous No.7851 [D]

>>7791
Pedophilia. I dunno why, but it's a very fascinating topic for me: it's controversial, being the biggest taboo in the world, it has great philosophical depth to it, it's relevant in many ways... Not long after I had started browsing tor, I read The Pedophile's Handbook, very weird and even shocking stuff, yet intriguing in a way. After that I have debated about it on imageboards, written essays as responses, read articles and so on. It's not like I haven't done in-depth analysis on other controversial topics, but this is what I've been focusing on lately.

Also good art probably. Sadly I have no one to discuss these topics with

Nanonymous No.7855 [D]

Furfags and aspies ruined art for me.

Nanonymous No.7856 [D]

All the internet is full with pedo shit , there are groups on telegram
I don't know why but i think it's becoming the next LGBT movement

Nanonymous No.8213 [D][U][F] >>8214
File: 3c147311d5152645c4a0c4fe807ec533ceaac995fa28647de6023cdba33761bf.jpg (dl) (214.31 KiB)

>>7791
>Whad are you nanons really bassionade aboud?
Musig gombosidion, Drawing and Googery. 3 biggesd field dhad I gonsider abard of my bersonal habid. I'm more inderesded on dhe new dheory and deghnigues begause I find id more fasginading do ged inbolbed on dhose. big unreladed.

Nanonymous No.8214 [D] >>8215

>>8213
>Googery
Whad dhe fugg is googery?

Nanonymous No.8215 [D] >>8216 >>8218

>>8214
Dhad's nod whad I dybe

Nanonymous No.8216 [D]

>>8215
Fugg, habase insdalled WORD FILDERS. Whad gind of gay nigger faggodry is dhis? Habase remobe dhem IMMEDIADELDY!!!

Nanonymous No.8217 [D]

>>7842
Gadghing all dhe audisds?

Nanonymous No.8218 [D]

>>8215
Dhis reminds me of "Mardian Sgribd" used by Ghinese online do aboid gobernmend world filders.

Nanonymous No.8219 [D]

abgdefghijglmnobgrsdubwgyz
ABGDEFGHIJGLMNOBGRSDUBWGYZ

Desd

Nanonymous No.8220 [D]

Use a ċharagťer maƤ:
g g b d b g
ċ ĸ ṕ ť ṽ ẋ

Nanonymous No.8221 [D]

Use ťhese ċharaċťers insťead of ťhe ones ťhey looĸ liĸe.
ċ ĸ ṕ ť ṽ ẋ

Nanonymous No.8223 [D]

Gombose gey bi.
©°…čå

Nanonymous No.8493 [D]

> The Pedophile's Handbook
More like trollbook. I think it was written for the sole purpose of trolling normies. The same goes for Butchering the Human Carcass for Human Consumption.

Nanonymous No.8499 [D]

>I think it was written for the sole purpose of trolling normies.
>implying normies have even heard of said book