/g/ - Technology

install openbsd

[Make a Post]
[X]





Deniable encryption with OpenBSD Nanonymous No.1725 [D][S][L][A][C] >>1726 >>1731

How?
On linux we have plain dm-crypt and luks (given that we can safely conceal the header).
And on OpenBSD?

Nanonymous No.1726 [D] >>1727 >>1728 >>1822 >>1826

>>1725
>Deniable encryption
That is useless bloat. Just have a device which physically destroys your storage medium whenever a certain condition is fulfilled.
With a HDD you could have a device which punches holes in the platters.
With a SSD it's easy because you can just fry the chips with high voltage.

Nanonymous No.1727 [D] >>1732

>>1726
>HUR DUR DAS A BLOAT
>JUS DO UR CALCULATIONS ON PAPER
>BECAUSE COMPUTER IZ A BLOAT
OpenBullShitDicks niggers never change

Nanonymous No.1728 [D][U][F] >>1732
File: e501742d33f0983386c18663daa250a53fb11ff3b3ee2e98838d720b5a2df621.png (dl) (229.00 KiB)

>>1726
>That is useless bloat. Just have a device which physically destroys your storage medium whenever a certain condition is fulfilled.


Nanonymous No.1731 [D]

>>1725
VeraCrypt

Nanonymous No.1732 [D] >>1734 >>1736

>>1727
>no argument
>>1728
>no argument

Nanonymous No.1734 [D] >>1736

>>1732
>no argument

Nanonymous No.1736 [D] >>1737 >>1738 >>1743

>>1732
>>1734
Why has Nanochan become a massive fucking cuckchan trash heap.
Where are the pre-Conclusion glory days, y'know with the spammerfag and the ERPing faggots on /a/, and the actually good tech discussions.

Nanonymous No.1737 [D] >>1738

>>1736
Maybe because it has been shilled on boards with child pornography (e.g., Lolifox).
>pre-Conclusion glory days
Nanochan is only a few months old is it not?

Nanonymous No.1738 [D]

>>1736
Blame hakase the retarded nonwhite hapa bitch female pigchanner with known mental issues who shilled on jewch, lainchan, and pigchan.
>>1737
Pretty sure he's referring to that time when hapase's mental state deteriorated (due to an influx of bot spam) and he shut down the whole site for several days.
Before that the site was kind of comfy.

Nanonymous No.1743 [D]

>>1736
impossible without overbearing moderation due to the eternal lumpengoon. further, if you want better content, you're welcome to make it.

Nanonymous No.1822 [D] >>1823 >>1828

OpenBSD supports FDE, it's just not compatible with other operating systems.
>>1726
Alphabet agencies can still recover data if you do that.

Nanonymous No.1823 [D] >>1824

>>1822
You could have a high power alternating electromagnet that activates when you press a button, for example. Who could recover data after that?

Nanonymous No.1826 [D] >>1827

>>1726
t. Mastrubating monkey

Nanonymous No.1827 [D][U][F] >>1828
File: cda05b7b4ccb07dee3019af6f366707267606ee682dd2e18499811d0e5a21533.png (dl) (437.25 KiB)

>>1826
>t. guy whose shitty OS is infected by shitstormdicks, pissaudio, kiketel and macroshit
>t. guy whose OS was taken over by the NSA
Must I post this image yet again?

Nanonymous No.1828 [D]

>>1822
No one asked if OpenBSD supports FDE, obviously it does. OP asked about plausible deniability. Apparently OpenBSD fags don't even know what that is and/or are incapable of understanding even simple questions.
>>1827
>reee bloat
>reee letter soup
His OS is capable of what OP is talking about, yours isn't. Disk encryption is often useless without plausible deniability. Obviously you can do without it in your mommas basement or at your unimportant workplace in a first world country.