Smoke and fire is seen leaping from the top of Notre Dame. The blaze is engulfing the spire between its bell towers.
The fire broke out in the cathedral on Monday afternoon.
>>3304 Are you French or why would you care?
Like, sure, it's not good all things considered, but consider the mood, the historical moment.
And some people just want to see the world burn.
>>3306 >>3304 >Are you French or why would you care?
Don't worry that there will be not enough wood for you.
You will probably die clubbed to death with some lead pipe.
>>3310 That shit is a vital part of French history altogether, hence my question about that nanon being French or not.
Though for me it's pretty much just a tourist trap.
However, on the second thought, it was going through (((renovation))), and probably has gone through one more than once since e.g. Victor's "Notre-Dame de Paris", meaning that little has left since that time.
It's still shit that it sustained that much structural damage, but they will fix it most probably.
>Holy Monday celebrates when the pharisees questioned Jesus' authority after he expelled the merchants and money changers from the temple
>protests going on for months against the bankers in France
đ€
Christianity is Jewish and it is responsible for destroying a great part of European culture.None of you can argue against that.Now go ahead and whine about a building that is centuries younger than native French pagan temples which were destroyed by Jews.
>Disgraceful that @CatholicLeague president #BillDonohue got cut off by Neil Cavuto on @FoxNews for raising the very real possibility of arson at #NotreDame.
>Meanwhile, Fox & other TV journalists engaging in plenty of conjecture themselves about fire dept incompetence.
https://twitter.com/MacArdghail/status/1117883963144429569
>YouTube Flags Notre-Dame Fire as 9/11 Conspiracy, Says System Made âWrong Callâ >Soon after a fire engulfed Notre-Dame cathedral in Paris on Monday, news outlets began streaming live broadcasts on YouTube. Below several of the clips was an odd box of text: A snippet from Encyclopedia Britannica about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-15/youtube-flags-notre-dame-fire-as-9-11-conspiracy-in-wrong-call
>WHY IT ISN'T AN ACCIDENT
>>No electricity during renovations to avoid accidents
>>No workers in the Cathedrale at the time of the fire
>>The Cathedrale was already evacuated TWO TIMES 1hour before the fire. We still don't know why
>>The fire started in two different places
>>pic related we see a man on the roof
>>a month after Christchurch
>>a bunch of churches have already been desecrated (the last one was yesterday in Lyon)
>>first day of the Holy Week
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/210056166/#210065979
>>3322 >YouTube Flags Notre-Dame Fire as 9/11 Conspiracy, Says System Made âWrong Callâ
They think all the same. There were several attempts on this church.
The result of the investigation is already fix - work accident - regardless if true or not.
>>3324 >WHY IT ISN'T AN ACCIDENT
What I found remarkable was how weak the fire fighting was. Just 2 or 3 pathetic streams of water.
Some commenters tried to explain it away with "water damage", while the whole building was threatening to collapse due to the fire.
"Water damaged" things can be rebuild, recovered. Burned and crushed ones not.
It's unfortunate, the building is beautiful and probably has irreplaceable artifacts damaged inside.
I must admit, the photos of it on fire are beautiful too.
>>3316 He's right, you know.
It is also responsible for creating a lot of modern European culture which is still valuable, but not worth the price.
>>3328 >What I found remarkable was how weak the fire fighting was. Just 2 or 3 pathetic streams of water.
The Jews will eventually destroy all old buildings to build large housing towers that can hold thousands of shitskins each.It's the obvious future of overpopulation in Europe.
>>3329 >It is also responsible for creating a lot of modern European culture which is still valuable, but not worth the price.
Modern European culture inspired by christianity is weak and anti European.While i don't like to see the building burn i care slightly less for what it symbolizes.A conquest of our people.
I see the Notre Dame burning as both a beginning and an end.
1) Hopefully symbolizes the end to cuckstianity, may that desert poison be gone.
>inb4 d&c
I realise its importance to some people in that it contains whiteness in it. It itself is not inherently 'white'. The cross is just a broken swasi; it has no teeth on it.
2) More proof Europe is under attack. Normalniggers still won't do shit though, but more fire to harden the steel that will remove all the semitic nigger trash and build an even better, whiter, world. probably
>>3325 I have no idea what the context of that picture is sadly.
Pic attached is a screencap of Paul Joseph Twatson (I think) regarding something a TIME Journalist might have said on Twitter, original tweet was deleted within minutes supposedly.
Transcript:
A Jesuit friend in Paris who works in #NotreDame told me cathedral staff said the fire was intentionally set.
[12:20 PM - 15 Apr 2019]
>I should note he has zero evidence beyond what the staff said. So qualify this in an unsubstantiated rumor.
>>3334 Judaism of course, Muslims gonna be surprised after destroying Europe that they and their children are enslaved by the Jew.
>>3335 It's obvious, really. The cathedral has lasted hundreds of years and we're expected to believe some careless frog contractor tossed his gauloise and the entire place was set alight. Renovation projects of that scope are meticulous and carried out by artisans, not border-jumping Guatemalans throwing up stucco row-housing.
>>3315 >Christianity is Jewish and it is responsible for destroying a great part of European culture
You are an ignorant. Reason for your ignorance is most probably retardation.
I understand that, several generation have left school now, without more education or knowledge than some African nigger. Don't discount that as some old farts rants. You know it is true, just reading the many public utterings in forums, comments etc prove that. Not only that the great unwashed masses can reach the interwebs, but that masses are dumb as a brick and are lacking basic knowledge in all, including the bases of western civilization.
Western civilization was, still is the most successful civilization that ever was. A civilization that really, undeniably shaped the earth, where all other civilization have adopted it voluntarily or not. Shitskins, third world nigger, chinks know it, are envious and resentful, that is a fact I think we don't need to debate.
Another fact is, that western civilization reached his apex while being through and through Christian. As well that the decline of western civilization is synchronous with the decline of Christianity in the West.
Further, the "Jews" is a group of people whose self revolves around how much they hate Christianity. That is something that is nowhere official taught, for obvious reason. Even among self declared "anti-Semites" is this basic fact about the object of their hate not really present, acknowledged. For jews of all variants it is their daily bread. Jews are that kind of envious shitskins that in recognizing their general inferiority to everybody else went insane and their sole raison dâĂȘtre became tearing down those that a better, more beautiful then they self. Jews are that pathetic, they couldn 't even build their houses of worship by them selves, their temple was build by that hated goyims.
>>3329 >creating a lot of modern European culture which is still valuable, but not worth the price.
Anyway if you are devious jew or a retard, your place is not France or Europe. You have to disappear from our place. Do us a favor piss off, so we don't have to remove you.
>>3332 >Modern European culture inspired by christianity is weak and anti European.While i don't like to see the building burn i care slightly less for what it symbolizes.A conquest of our people.
I don't care for your people, you have no justified place in Europe, evacuate yourself from the premises.
>>3333 >Notre Dame
>not inherently 'white'.
You bastard aren't, "white" mutts have no place among Europeans.
>>3337 >I understand that, several generation have left school now, without more education or knowledge than some African nigger. Don't discount that as some old farts rants.
Tell me this: Who was overseeing the education system when it was degraded into a jewish slave production facility? And don't for a second think of telling me "it was the jews". Jews told you to do things, and you did them. If I told someone to kill himself over the internet, would you really blame me if he did it?
> 'Have a nice day': ISIS fanatics revel in Notre Dame's destruction days before Easter as they describe the inferno as 'retribution and punishment' > ISIS affiliated propaganda group made a heartless poster of the inferno in Paris
> It was accompanied by a cruel message bidding 'au revoir' to Notre Dame
> The world mourned as the 850-year-old cathedral erupted in flames on Monday
> Prosecutors said they are treating it as an accident, ruling out terror for now
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6927101/Have-nice-day-ISIS-fanatics-revel-Notre-Dames-destruction-describing-punishment.html
>>3337 >Not inherently white
<Notre Dame
It was in reference to cuckstianity. Because white people built something in the name of something else doesn't make that creation non-white.
Anyway, the larppagan and cuckstian d&c is going to be great. Glad both parties agree on the eradication of all jews, shitskins, degenerates and bug people of all varieties.
... Right? :^)
Either way, take away that a white creation was destroyed in a single day that took many generations to build. Whether it was for a jewish religion adapted to white people or not, it still stood as a testament to what whites can do... but all christians and pagans have to die first you see as whites are the problem. Fucking white cucks can't even breed and spend more time helping niggers than themselves. Who would want that race around anyway? smdh tbqh
>>3339 >>3337 >Who was overseeing the education system when it was degraded into a jewish slave production facility?
Is this a trick question? You are answering your own question.
BTW the denigrating of European values started right with the end of second World War. It was the "you'd been living on trees when others (brown people) did something" of reeducation and "Frankfurt school" (schould have been (((New York shul))) ) courtesy of US administration.
Check on Youtube the old "reeducative films" for the Germans. It is the same hebrew argumentation then, than today's just more universal "white" one.
>>3350 >one is white and other is black
I would like to be retarded too. 'Pagans' are just as cucked as 'christians' the way they mistake paganism with religion tbqh. You in politics or something?
>what whites can do
>not could
That's the problem. Destroying and repurposing ill-minded heritage is good thing either way.
>>3351 im rob
>>3355 jokes on you, i live in 99% "white" country with no criminality except state-run, the retards listening top 100 brainwashed by tv will probably kill me for expressing different opinion before ill ever see a black with my own two eyes
Probably some (((mossad))) agent posed as a muzzie and rounded up a few low IQ muzzies to throw some petrol in Notre Dame for a few shekels.
Who benefits from people hating muzzies when Israel is having a hard time getting the public behind a war for Greater Israel in the middle east?
This event will benefit the kikes if a muzzie is found to have started the fire.
>>3356 >>3355 >jokes on you, i live in 99% "white" country with no criminality except state-run,
You jews better leave for that sandy shit hole you did crawl out.
It has been shown that who ever touch the churches are the scum of the earth. Be it the iconoclasts, the protestants, the French revolutionaries, the Bolsheviks or Spanish reds, all disgusting misanthropes enemies of everything good and moral, of culture and civilization.
>>3361 Some have soft spot for libraries, some for churches.
I'm more than open to burning down buildings of current sacrosanct caste though, ie churches of scientism and it would please me way more than "burning" relict that serves as tourist attraction. In the end, burning down buildings will change nothing, it will not solve total cultural impotency of capitalism and populism and such.
I'm just glad something is burning, I'm glad for any and every change if it fuels fire.
Investigators already "know the cause" of the fire:
Investigators believe that an electrical short-circuit likely caused the fire that partially destroyed Parisâ iconic Notre Dame Cathedral, a French official has said. An earlier investigation too found no evidence of foul play.
Speaking to the Associated Press, the judicial police official said that investigators are still unable to search through rubble inside the cathedral for safety reasons.
A preliminary investigation of the scene on Tuesday found no immediate signs of arson, the cityâs public prosecutor said. More than 50 people are still investigating the fire, which broke out while the landmark cathedral was under reconstruction.
>>3369 And synagogues of course, but (((they))) are hardly practicing jews. As a symbol why the fuck not, the ones in west are fuckin hideous too.
>>3382 pig/leftypol/ actually delivers
>Not pointing fingers, but the Church itself ran out of money for the renovations, had to borrow money from the French Government, and nobody knows yet but they suspect they ran out of that money too a days before the fire. And the statues and artifacts were are conveniently moved for one reason or another. Again, not calling names but I don't like the Pope's hat and my local priest gives me weird looks sometimes. Also the Church is the biggest landowner in the world and fuck them they didn't run out of money.
>Considering the yellow vest movement has continued with support and solidarity the fire at the Notre Dame might be the fire at Reichstag moment. I find it funny that a sizable number of posters dismissed a conspiracy and false flag. Yet the fire at the Reichstag was the conspiracy of the time.
>I donât get it, are you people for real? Itâs not like the Library of Alexandria burned down. The church is still sitting there, the roof is just gone. Itâs not even as broken as the Colloseum.
>And furthermore itâs just a fucking tourist attraction. Itâs a monument to the power of the Catholic Church. You can find academic, amateur and professional photos of large scale of every inch of it. We know the thing inside and out, you could walk through it for hundreds of years and you will still be able to in a couple of years. The random people acting like theyâre devastated by this is like some of the most inane snowflake shit Iâve ever been unable to understand. I get /pol/ crying because they get emotional about everything that is âmuh white cultureâ, even if they arenât actually Christian. To them their family photo album caught on fire, or at least the book theyâve had it in for 20 years just get water damage and the photos are on fine. But itâs just performative wailing about the death of civilization or whatever. For Christians itâs a big symbol or whatever, they cry at Christian rock concerts about gods presence or some shit. Everybody else I donât get it, just go to Disneyland instead. You can spend a week in the louvre, chill out.
>If somebody burned it down on purpose it's basically low level terrorism, and the response to that is: rebuild the it as display of defiance, maybe add a fire-suppression system that is less destructive to art.
>If it was an accident, well it's the same really, rebuild the thing and add a fire suppression system that is less destructive to art, but this time regard it as a lesson learned about storing irreplaceable artefacts.
>>3384 >>3382 pig/leftypol/ actually delivers
>Not pointing fingers, but the Church itself ran out of money for the renovations, had to borrow money from the French Government
That church is property of the French government.
So no this convenient conspiracy theory is just bull shit
>>3384 >Considering the yellow vest movement has continued with support and solidarity the fire at the Notre Dame might be the fire at Reichstag moment. I find it funny that a sizable number of posters dismissed a conspiracy and false flag. Yet the fire at the Reichstag was the conspiracy of the time.
Hmmm, maybe because it wasn't a Nazi conspiracy, but a deranged lefty that wanted to accelerate things to something?
It will only be rebuilt for tourism and money. The church of God is dead in Europe, and we have killed it.
Isaiah 26:21 - For, behold, the LORD cometh out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity: the earth also shall disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain.
>>3382 >How bias free will be this "investigation"?
They might as well not even bother running one. Should evidence of arson be discovered they would never admit it, because such an admission would throw "multicultural" Europe into turmoil. And many know that to be the case. They understand that whatever 'official' line they're sold, there's a non-negligible likelihood that it is false; thus no matter what explanation is given them, it won't be believed.
>>3393 >>3382 >How bias free will be this "investigation"?
>thus no matter what explanation is given them, it won't be believed.
That is the fate of notorious liars. Them bad liars too, nothing to boost their credibility, already announcing the result of their "investigations".
>>3384 >Considering the yellow vest movement
Cui Bono? It sure was convenient for Macron. Replacing the yellow vest protest as number one topic. He didn't have to held a speech and explain what he will do to appease the protesters, improve the country. Instead Macron can appear statesman like, appeal to national unity in the tragedy.
He promised to make the century old church "even better"
Wonder how the result of such a contest might look.
Maybe like the pyramid slapped into the front facade of the historic royal palace of the Louvre for the 200th anniversary of the French revolution?
>>3383 >The Ăle-de-France region announced it would allocate âŹ10 million, and the City of Paris declared it would make âŹ50 million available.
That's all french state gave.
Also
>the cathedral is visited by 13 million people per year
>>3386 >property
>While the building itself is owned by the state, the Catholic Church is the designated beneficiary, having the exclusive right to use it for religious purposes in perpetuity. The archdiocese is responsible for paying the employees, for security, heating and cleaning, and for ensuring that the cathedral is open free to visitors. The archdiocese does not receive subsidies from the French state.
So yes, but at the same time no.
> In 2014, the Ministry of Culture estimated needed renovations at âŹ150 million, and in 2016 the Archdiocese of Paris launched an appeal to raise âŹ100 million over the following five to ten years.
http://archivecaslytosk.onion/2019.04.17-141535/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/notre-dame-cathedral-fire-notre-dame-68-million-renovation-massive-fire-today/ >In the backyard of the cathedral there were stones that had either fallen off the structure or were at risk of falling off. There were hundreds of them piled up, in the hopes they can be fixed and put back. But the Archdiocese of Paris said it can't afford all the repairs, which was estimated at $185 million.
>The French government, which owns the cathedral, had pledged around $50 million over the next decade, leaving a bill of $135 million. To cover the rest, Picaud helped launch the Friends of Notre-Dame of Paris Foundation. It worked to find private donors both in France and across the Atlantic.
>many French people feel that by paying taxes they are already doing enough to help the church
absolute state of christcuck delusion
>Monseigneur Patrick Chauvet is opposed to charging a fee to raise funds. He says it's because the cathedral is not a museum, it's an active, living church -- a place of grace.
Do at least some research next time.
>>3388 pic related
>>3391 >tourism and money
For the purpose it served about century or two, or, if you want, since ever.
>>3396 >convenient for macrofuck
Yes.
>>3397 >>3386 >property
>While the building itself is owned by the state, the Catholic Church is the designated beneficiary, having the exclusive right to use it for religious purposes in perpetuity.
So what?
So nothing off "Also the Church is the biggest landowner in the world and fuck them they didn't run out of money", which is nonsense in it self because the Catholic Church is no cooperation and the pope is no CEO.
>absolute state of christcuck delusion
>Monseigneur Patrick Chauvet is opposed to charging a fee to raise funds. He says it's because the cathedral is not a museum, it's an active, living church -- a place of grace.
So where is the delusion?
That the Catholic Church doesn't charge entrance and service fees? This is not the USA and their (((Mega-Churches))), pseudo-religious Walmarts.
>Do at least some research next time.
Considering that you were totally wrong, it would have been better for to be quiet, but following the jewish playbook you trumps up and declares victory.
>>3399 The post was about
>but the Church itself ran out of money for the renovations
which is probably true
I was merely informing on the fact that french government pledged 50 million eurodollars and the rest have been laid on shoulders of catholic church(archdiocese of paris) which probably (would) "run" out of money or wouldn't raise the 100 million eurodollars, maybe.
Can't deny that the burning of almost nothing came in handy to both french government and torture cult, if the price won't be stupid-big billions of eurodollars. Don't forget they will get money from eu too.
also
>the government is overwhelmed with other monuments that need maintenance
>decay
which is good posture since france is big and many feel that the paris is privileged and paris itself not being much religious
They are doing better job than the church.
>delusion
It's a museum for americans. They close churches everywhere they can, majority of them is closed, ignoring servile rednecks and nosy pseudointellectuals in backwaters, the backbone of catholic church, yet they consider tourist attraction in the centre of a fuckin paris a place of grace. Who do you think own the giftshops?
>>3400 >>3399 >but the Church itself ran out of money for the renovations
>Can't deny that the burning of almost nothing came in handy to both french government and torture cult, if the price won't be stupid-big billions of eurodollars. Don't forget they will get money from eu too.
So they have a cathedral that needs some maintenance, the spire has to be renovated.
You are suggesting they had "the great idea" of "why not burn the whole thing down" afterwards we have money out of pity? For a "torture cult" that should be a reasonable thought or?
Paris not religious? I guess muslims are not very Catholic?
>Who do you think own the giftshops?
Do you think a gift shop pays for the upkeep of a cathedral? But on the other hand, that is the country that trashed its churches during their glorious revolution, they fetishy about.
People were "not very religious in the Soviet Union" either. On the other hand, those wanting to experience Catholic Christianity wont find that in the community of the Anti-Pope Francis. If one cares so much about melting pole caps, making a home for niggers in white countries, those are going straight to the Green party, bypassing some faggy Communists in frocks.
>>3401 >implying
I wasn't and am not implying anything. It's just possibility and I wasn't and am not advocating for it, just like macron or jewish psyops are possibility, I'm too not advocating for it, if I didn't make myself clear earlier. Don't know if they were insured of it is even possible to ensure notre-dame.
>better job
No, I didn't mean it that way. I meant the french state is actually helping the church when they kinda neglect notre-dame and instead focus on villages and towns, which always were catholic strongholds, not cities, especially paris.
>muslims
In 2011 paris had 7% of their population muslim. Not every brownie is muslim and I don't know exact numbers, but let's say 70% of brownies are muslims and brownies constitute circa 25% of parisians. They now have twice(19) the number of mosques than they had in 1991, 8?. For comparison, there's 74 evangelical churches and suprisingly high number of synagogues, 83(really high considering there's only 300 000 of them).
~20% of parisians is muslim and let's say half is die-hard(possibly exageration, coran isn't actually much more harsher than bible; depends). I wouldn't call paris religious because of it. It only gets magnified because goverment (said secularity itself doesn't work against them, but capitalism, democracy and supposed "freedoms" and "tolerancy" along with non-national fundamental principles does, not the means) listens to them and media, both tabloid and "serious", inform about every single brap they make. They are vocal minority and it has imo little to do with secularity. This is primarly fundamental national problem and not religious.
It's generally not a good idea to have separate, organized entity with very strong and solipistic agenda decide about and influence your nation.
>giftshops
Matthew 21:12â17, they probably have some bookstores(really bad) around too and other shit. Don't know if specifically notre-dame, but it's not uncommon across europe, even less if the "sacral" place is frequented. It just strikes me they consider it "a place of grace" while literally being jews. Place of grace is cold, silent yet noisy, relentless, where only God and you exist; the true Temple of God, not some opulent and heavily frequented church in the center of godlessness.
"Among the arguments of the Rebbe Satmar[anti-Zionist] against returning to the land of Israel is the command to burn the churches there and the idea that not doing so is a transgression" - with the logic that Jews, who do not wish to set churches on fire, cannot therefore consider immigrating to Israel.
Aviner also added that burning churches was not a solution to be retained since, in so doing, the perpetrators of the disaster unconsciously opened the door to reconstruction.
Building a church on the land of Israel "is a more important transgression than leaving it intact," he said.
In recent years, there has been a series of acts of vandalism targeting Christian churches in Israel, committed by suspected Jewish extremists and terrorists. They have been widely condemned by Israeli and other officials, but attempts to identify and prosecute the perpetrators - allegedly belonging to small groups of far-right militants - have so far been unsuccessful.
In February 2015, for example, officials at Dormition Abbey in Jerusalem found part of the seminary burned and Hebrew hate slogans sprayed on the walls. Among these messages, "death to Christians", "death to Arabs" and "Jesus is a monkey".
>>3427 You sperg out about christian church no one cares in paris, very probably are advocate for bombing mosques and synagogues, yet you feel pity over some luxury hotels and churches on sri lanka, where christianity is comletely alien.
Get your act together, troglodyte.
Notre-Dame was one of the most important jewels of all human history. It started the âGothicâ architecture revolution, that was, from 12th to 15th century called âfrancigenum opusâ (âFrench artâ) before being called âgothicâ by the Italians. Itâs the epitome of Western civilization and christian art. The framing of the roof, which was one of the biggest masterpieces of human carpentry, is permanently destroyed. The stained glasses (biggest and most ancient rose windows in Europe) are probably saved.
Some other information :
1) the workers who were refurbishing the roof of Notre-Dame are among the best specialized craftsmen in the world, concerning the restauration of medieval monuments (their title is âMeilleur Ouvrier de Franceâ).They love their work, and take all the necessary precautions. They have worked in many rooms of the Castle of Versailles, they have restored many churches and cathedrals. For example, they worked during more than 20 years on the marvelous Strasbourg cathedral (I lived in Strasbourg and saw their progress), and there was never a single problem.
2) the workers stopped at 6:00 PM, the fire started at 6:50 PM, near scaffoldings, used to climb there.
3) no electricity was allowed near the roof, because it was made in wood and as a matter of security, every inflamable thing was banned too. So, to have a fire there, someone needed to bring something.
This is an update about what we know today about the fire that destroyed the roof and parts of the vaults of Notre-Dame:
1) Restoration work hadnât started on the roof. The scaffolding were still being put in place. The architect in chief of the âMonuments Historiquesâ (âHistorical Monumentsâ, the administration that maintains and repairs monuments in France), Philippe Villeneuve, who was responsible for the refurbishing of the spire of Notre-Dame, has stated that : âWork had not started yet, scaffoldings were still being builtâ.
2) Everything was done to avoid any source of heat near the wood of the roof. No electrical plug, no welding were allowed. So, Philippe Villeneuve says : âThe hot spot hypothesis is therefore not the right oneâ.
3) The head of the company that was building the scaffoldings (Europe Echafaudage) (Europe Scaffolding), Julien Le Bras, was interviewed by a French TV (BFM) : âAll I can say for the time being is that at the moment of the fire, absolutely none of the employees of my company was present on siteâ.
4) He added : âAll safety procedures on the Notre-Dame de Paris site have been respectedâ.
5) One of my friend sent me an email concerning the security on the roof of Notre-Dame. She has a diploma in Art history and studied in the âEcole du Louvreâ (âLouvre Schoolâ, were students learn art history and restoration processes) : âI visited the framing of Notre Dame with architects of the âBĂątiments de Franceâ (âBuildings of Franceâ, the highest rank for an architect in France), some years ago. This 13th century timber frame was extremely protected. Each intervention is always accompanied by historians, architects, experts; no work is envisaged without extreme caution; no source of heat, no torch, no electrical apparatus is allowed; a high-performance alarm system is in place; and very strict supervision of all people allowed there. I think we will eventually learn that this was arson.â
6) So, as I said yesterday, with all these security measures, to have a fire on the roof of Notre-Dame, someone had to bring something there, and lit it up.
The fire is criminal (the fire started at least in 2 different places, according to LCI, a French TV) ! (during 9 centuries, there was never a single fire in Notre-Dame!)
Itâs a very big probability that this crime, in the middle of the Christian Holy Week, was committed by jihadis
CBN: Across Europe, there has been a growing rise in attacks on churches. Countries like France and Germany have seen a spike in violent vandalism, desecrating cherished churches and Christian symbols in recent months and years.
According to the German news site PI-News, every day in France, two churches are desecrated. They report 1,063 attacks on Christian churches or symbols like crucifixes, icons, and statues in France in 2018, marking a 17 percent increase from the year before.
The Middle East Forum reports that attacks on Catholic churches in France since the start of the year have included smashed statues, broken crosses, and demolished tabernacles.
More fro Lepante:
More than 2 churches vandalized each day in France in 2018. This fire is probably a criminal fire. We will see what the experts will say. But I remind you that Hollande and the media orchestrated a coverup, after the Muslim terrorist attack in the Bataclan, to hide the fact that many civilians had been beheaded, eviscerated, emasculated, their eyes torn out, etc.
Of course, the media and Macron will try to pretend that this was an accident, but we know that churches donât burn âall by themselvesâ.
According to the French Interior Ministry, there were 1063 anti-Christian crimes in 2018 (and 541 anti-Jewish crimes) in France. In average, each day 2 churches are desecrated and vandalized. When the perpretators are found, they are usually Muslims (and a small minority are anti-Christian âpagansâ or âsatanistsâ).
https://fr.euronews.com/2019/02/14/1036-actes-antichretiens-en-france-en-2018 Compared to this, there were only 100 anti-Muslim incidents in 2018 in France, and I say deliberately âincidentsâ and not âcrimesâ, because the police report a âhate crimeâ when an imam receives a slice of ham in the mail, or when someone writes, on the wall of a mosque, âcheers to the pigsâ, and other banal jokes.
>>3430 >3) no electricity was allowed near the roof, because it was made in wood and as a matter of security, every inflamable thing was banned too. So, to have a fire there, someone needed to bring something.
The electricity was cut off on the construction site and roof when the worker had left, so the logs show.
So much to "short circuit"
>>3431 >very big probability that this crime, in the middle of the Christian Holy Week, was committed by jihadis
There are several suspects. the muslims last, IS gloated but didn't claim it.
Main suspects are jews and masons (basicaliy the same, their golems).
Jews have already divulged their motivation.
>>3406 >>3404 As for burning churches. Jews feel obligated to destroy the places of worship of idiolators and kill all idiolators.
Idolators are all that are not jewish and don't follow the "Noahide laws". "Noahide laws" is something the jews have begun to push onto retarded evangelicals.
In short "Noahide law" demand monotheism. Muslims are Nohides without a doubt by jews. Christians in contrast, are "debated if Noahide" among jews. Jewish tradition, Talmud, tell them that Christians are idolaters, jew wont speak that out because subterfuge. Anyone believing in Trinity is for jews an idiolator, because for them that is not monotheism.
From an jewish perspective, killing of Chrisians and destroying their churches is absoute justified and even mandated (more than so for the muslims). The reason why you don't hear about that is first the obvious, second jewish reasoning "is it good for the jews", fearing retribution if caught. Since the jews feel now secured and in power; expect much more burning churches and call for the killing Christians and Whites. You can already witness the radicalization of the jewish controlled press and media, call for killing all "whites" and destruction of Christianity.
Mark my words, they will push some masonic imagery onto the rebuild of Notre Dame.
>>3337 You're actually wrong about the jews being envious towards us. Infact its the opposite they see us as nothing more than animals that should be enslaved to them since they consider themselves to be God's chosen people. When people bring up the their is neither jew nor greek quote from the bible. They usually use it to state that everyone is the same and equal. However I believe this is false doctrine first i'll give you the entire verse.
Galatians 3-26-29
26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
This is clearly false doctrine consider this if we were all truly the same then why is homosexuality punishable by death in the bible? This is where you can easily dismantle the entire argument because they focus specifically on the "their is neither jew nor greek" while explicitly ignoring the rest of the passage in order to push a specific agenda. In fact you could make the argument that this is strong evidence for homogeneity as it lists their race along with their gender. Which we know that the bible takes pretty seriously. As cross dressing is a sin in the bible as well as homosexuality. You will normally see people trying to pervert the message of this passage in that everyone is spiritually equal or at least a spritually equal starting point and somehow correlate that to everyone is equal physically when throughout the entire bible it stresses the differences between the flesh and the spiritual. Here is the verse on homosexuality.
Romans 1:26-32
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
One more thing the bible specifically states that during the end times things considered good will be considered evil and vice versa. Notice the rampant promotion of all of these degenerate fetishes and the promotion of pride and other selfish desires. This is what people seem to misunderstand about christianity. People correlate christianity with the type of christians the media promotes. You know the ones that are afraid to offend anyone to afraid to stand up against homosexuality and saying you do you. Well guess what those types of christians are also going to hell.
Revelation 3:13-19
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches. 14And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; 15I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. 16So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. 17Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: 18I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. 19As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.
The cathedral of Paris is on fire.
Smoke and fire is seen leaping from the top of Notre Dame. The blaze is engulfing the spire between its bell towers.
The fire broke out in the cathedral on Monday afternoon.