/meta/ - Board Meta

[Make a Post]
[X]





Reports Thread hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.1122 (S)(C)[D][U][F][S][L][A][C]
File: d48d0b170d384e2c77a7e5d3d1d00154de03d75253c3b2801c5b97b26e404425.png (dl) (828.71 KiB)

Use this thread to post reports for posts which violate either the global rules stated on the main page, or the board rules of the board it is posted on.
When making a report be sure to include:
* A link to the post in question
* A short description, and context if applicable, of why you think that post should be removed.

hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.1130 [D] >>3165

I would like to append: Any post in this thread which is not either a report or discussion about a report will be removed since it is derailing.
no, this post doesn't count lol

Nanonymous No.1532 [D]

>>>/pol/1812
Absolutely garbage thread

Nanonymous No.1550 [D]

>>>/g/1636
glows in the dark

Nanonymous No.1625 [D]

>>>/b/3351
Already a pedo thread here >>>/b/2075 that serves an identical purpose. Pedo support threads at all are pretty fucked, but at the very least I think the debate should be contained to a single thread so they can't just memory hole the last thread every time their logical inconsistencies gets exposed.

Nanonymous No.1665 [D] >>1666

>>>/b/2780
Violates global rule 1.

Nanonymous No.1666 [D]

>>1665
To be fair it didn't look like there was any cp when the person posted the site. It happened later and then someone bumped the thread.

Nanonymous No.1731 [D] >>1732

http://nanochanxv2lxnqi.onion/pol/2014.html

This thread seems too dumb to not be a shill post. The author claims that /pol/ opinions are mainstream on Russian tv including the fact that Jews run the world.

Anti Jewish sentiment cannot be found on Russian tv and this guy is an obvious shill.

Nanonymous No.1732 [D] >>1733

>>1731
nibba it's /pol/, not /natsoc/. Yeah it's a shit thread, doesn't mean your opinions reigns supreme.

hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.1733 [D]

>>1732
>it's these fags again
From the rules thread:
>nano/pol/ is an explicitly National Socialist board. Promotion of anti-white ideologies or pro-jewish ideologies is not permitted.
If you don't like this, go to 8chan where they have """(((free speech)))""" on their /pol/.

Nanonymous No.1739 [D] >>1740

Troll thread spreading hakase's email address:

http://nanochanxv2lxnqi.onion/b/5721.html


hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.1740 [D]

>>1739
Not against the rules. Dismissed.

Nanonymous No.1872 [D] >>1875 >>1880

Shitposter shitting up the >>>/b/5935 thread right now

Nanonymous No.1875 [D]

>>1872
it's /b/ though

hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.1880 [D]

>>1872
This isn't against the rules and it isn't even off topic either. Dismissed.

Nanonymous No.1885 [D]

>erisposter (separate guy from the spammer) and pedoposters autosaged or nuked outright
>obvious shitstirrer in three separate threads needs his freeze peach
Sends a bad message, but that's your call.

Nanonymous No.1904 [D]

Requesting bump lock on /b/6122

Nanonymous No.1965 [D]

>>>/b/6528

Nanonymous No.2804 [D] >>2805

This guy is just advertising his own reddit post here, just like everywhere he knows.
http://nichank62kpkrxvg.onion/res/3369.html
>>>/g/2592

hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.2805 [D]

>>2804
Alright, autosaged.

Nanonymous No.2806 [D] >>2809

>>>/b/6866

Nanonymous No.2809 [D] >>2810

>>2806
I don't understand why this shit isn't simply deleted ... seriously.

Nanonymous No.2810 [D]

>>2809
Thanks Hakase, I mean it's a bit ineffective to sage and lock an advertisement.

Nanonymous No.2812 [D] >>2813 >>2816

nuke this cunt
>>>/b/6883

Nanonymous No.2813 [D] >>2816

>>2812
Anon I respect your level of legitimate autism, but that's a parody shit-post.

Nanonymous No.2816 [D]

>>2812
>>2813
Parody? No. Shitpost? Yes.
https://monoskop.org/Cyberfeminism
I'm the op

>>>/b/6868
delete this cunt instead

Nanonymous No.2829 [D]

>>>/pol/2234
>We sell 6yo and 8yo sexdolls. Can use mouth, pussy and ass.
pls delete :3

Nanonymous No.2846 [D] >>2852

There is something weird going on >>>/pol/2292

Nanonymous No.2847 [D][U][F] >>2852
File: f2962b6db60b36bf0c977303cea394f88d26c68ece7e3b3db24881f13cf65736.png (dl) (93.94 KiB)

>>2292
>>/pol/2178

Nanonymous No.2852 [D]

>>2846
>>2847
My bad, I guess I found a bug.

Nanonymous No.2903 [D]

>>>/b/7229
>>>/g/2863
Duplicate thread, advertisement.

Nanonymous No.2904 [D][U][F] >>2905
File: bfc110a6e9aecd3d6db033703c9a4c8c303913d70a3044b82132ad5446dd319e.png (dl) (2.92 KiB)

Post id 2841 on >>>/g/1873

I've seen an increase of completely irrelevant and retarded posts like this, is this allowed on /g/?

hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.2905 [D] >>2906

>>2904
Removed under rule 2 (... significantly changing the composition of a board...).

Nanonymous No.2906 [D]

>>2905
Thanks.

Nanonymous No.2926 [D] >>2927

Hello,

>>7260 from >>>/b/7232
>(Links to links to CP are not against the rules :^) )

hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.2927 [D] >>2944

>>2926
Well, since we have flagrant abuse of this rule, I'm going to amend it. I think two levels of dereferencing are reasonable.
>Child pornography is not permitted. Links to child pornography are not permitted either,and neither are links to websites which contain a significant number of direct links to CP.

Nanonymous No.2930 [D] >>2931

>>>/g/2885 Also contains a link to links to CP.

Nanonymous No.2931 [D]

>>2930
In thread >>>/g/2826

Nanonymous No.2941 [D] >>2942

Goddammit, mods. I repeat: post >>2885 in thread >>>/g/2826 violates rule 1. Specifically, the second link links to at least 15 direct links to CP (a significant number, no?)

Nanonymous No.2942 [D] >>2943 >>2944

>>2941
this is what you should have posted the first time. the link in question was a directory of hundreds of random onions. but thanks for clicking them all to find out which ones are cp, for your research i guess?

Nanonymous No.2943 [D]

>>2942
Didn't click on any of them, just recognize the names ;)

Nanonymous No.2944 [D] >>2945

>>2942
You are right, but I don't sense that the purpose of the post was cp (unlike the earlier "flagrant abuse" cited earlier by hakase >>2927, which was willful). I say leave it up at the mod's discretion.

Nanonymous No.2945 [D] >>2946 >>2947

>>2944
So you think the post shouldn't have been deleted because the posting of a link to links to CP was unintentional, while the other one was intentional? Intentional or unintentional, flagrant abuse or accident, it is no less or no more lawful.

Nanonymous No.2946 [D]

>>2945
No, I'm arguing that the indirect cp links were not the majority of the list and also not intentional. no matter, the post was deleted anyway.
>it is no less or no more lawful.
adhering to the spirit of the law is often a better guideline than its letter.

Nanonymous No.2947 [D]

>>2945
>unlawful
This is a hidden service, hapase can enforce whatever she wants to. The only reason we disallow cp is because it's degenerate, not because it's un(((law)))ful.

Nanonymous No.2948 [D] >>2949

I think we should use our (((common sense))) regarding the reports. If it's not a direct link or if there is no intention to link to CP content, I don't see why it has to be censored.
We are using a hidden service after all, CP and drugs are everywhere. We all agree that it's something made for degenerates and weak people and since we don't want to attract that kind of users, censorship is the only weapon we have.

Nanonymous No.2949 [D]

>>2948
Have you ever been on trip?

Nanonymous No.2966 [D] >>2967

>>>/pol/2812
Low effort thread.
Thre is already an active thread about the shooting with all the videos, the manifest, twitter feed...

hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.2967 [D]

>>2966
Deleted, thanks for reporting.

Nanonymous No.2976 [D]

>>>/a/1063
Accidental doublepost. Also doubles as a non-serious bug report, since the post references itself.

Nanonymous No.2995 [D]

https://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/ar/109.html#post129
Advertising

Nanonymous No.3123 [D]

>>>/b/9280
>>>/b/9281
Accidental doublepost and for some reason my file won't upload

Nanonymous No.3139 [D]

http://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/b/9530.html
http://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/b/9529.html
ni-chan tier spam

Nanonymous No.3145 [D] >>3146

https://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/b/9630.html low quality post trying to avoid autosage, same post as here: https://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/b/9422.html - just nuke it

https://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/b/9530.html low quality newfag, goes offtopic with heavy avatarfagging - autosage

Nanonymous No.3146 [D]

>>3145
That was quick.

Nanonymous No.3149 [D]

delete >>>/v/731 http://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/v/644.html
didn't notice the webm is already there

Nanonymous No.3155 [D]

delete http://nanochancsvnej4vxiidu4fhpchkxffl3mgqypub63xadeetkjttavqd.onion/b/9636.html

hakase ## Nanochan Administrator No.3165 [D]

A further reminder that posts ITT which derail the thread are NOT PERMITTED and will be deleted. This is a reports thread, not a site meta thread. The only discussion which is permitted is about whether the reported post(s) break global or board rules.
See >>1130 for precedent.

Nanonymous No.3180 [D]

>>>/b/9736
>>>/b/9737
Duplicate and low quality
>>>/pol/3469
Should be on meta probably?

Nanonymous No.3182 [D]

>>>/b/9827 should be on >>>/pol/ or deleted

Nanonymous No.3192 [D]

>>>/b/9927

Nanonymous No.3193 [D]

>>>/pol/3482

Nanonymous No.3226 [D][U][F]
File: e2b3d2c1d4d7fc294f78b35c27306b2544f11f2333ee02fa98b810668d023ff3.png (dl) (33.84 KiB)

>>>/pol/3458
>>>/pol/3459
>>>/pol/3460
>>>/pol/3461
>>>/pol/3462
duplicates desu

Nanonymous No.3270 [D]

>>>/b/10222
duplicate desu

Nanonymous No.3306 [D][U][F]
File: 24df76b2c6a8648f6e864eba1591d26f3fc0937e4b832390e93489532cf30a94.jpg (dl) (36.87 KiB)

>>>/g/3851
Schizoposter, autosage desu
>>>/g/3809
Belongs to QTDDTOT, also low quality

Nanonymous No.3319 [D]

>>>/b/10490
shitty larper advertisement

Nanonymous No.3353 [D]

>>>/l/10584 is /t/-tier

Nanonymous No.3398 [D][U][F]
File: 3aca3fa09cad92997ac90c1b78f9b85cf6128755ef46516fae8f55ece40cd94c.jpg (dl) (63.85 KiB)

>>>/l/10734
should be in the /t/oilet

Nanonymous No.3401 [D]

>>>/l/10759 flush it

Nanonymous No.3417 [D]

>>>/l/11002
>>>/l/11003
Needs to be flushed in the toilet

Nanonymous No.3426 [D]

>>>/l/11025
Quality schizo thread that should pinned.

Nanonymous No.3427 [D][U][F]
File: bcb49e6d966c2ac1f5c64616731f9f817200fd4f93cc9fd0a20a3c60f5e15194.png (dl) (104.67 KiB)

>>>/l/11044
hapase did you make this to clear /l/ or is it somebody that doesn't know of /t/?
>>>/a/1187
we have a new spammer

Nanonymous No.3431 [D]

>>/a/1190
Not sure but I don't think its good

Nanonymous No.3432 [D]

>>>/l/11058
i can report you everyday not a problem ...

Nanonymous No.3438 [D]

>>>/meta/3437
>>>/meta/3436
>>>/meta/3435
>>>/l/11103
>>>/l/11102
>>>/l/11100
>>>/t/3643
>>>/t/3642
>>>/t/3641
>>>/v/856
>>>/a/1198
>>>/a/1197
>>>/g/4057
>>>/g/4056
>>>/g/4055
Flooding

>>>/a/1199
Advertising/spam

Nanonymous No.3439 [D][U][F]
File: 2cb5486f80a4aa82b16ef875a1b17187947f3dd1c29a627f5d5584fe1191bbc4.jpg (dl) (2.04 KiB)

>>>/t/11123
Blatantly low quality, sentence-less post.

Okay, who advertised this place in normieville?