Would you pay btc for access to a completely unmoderated chan? I have a feeling that people like to talk shit about mods, but a community without them would be completely unbearable.
>>7341 I don't talk shit about mods unless they're pretentious, overbearing, and making decisions more to gratify their ego than to maintain the health of the board. The current mods of nanochan do not seem problematic.
>Would you pay btc for access to a completely unmoderated chan?
No. If I had the money to spend on btc in $current_year I would host my own.
In answer
>>7341 Wouldn't spare even a penny. Besides, unmoderated imageboards exist(ed), but nobody uses them, chiefly because they never gain a userbase, perhaps because it is difficult to propagate their address: every site you post their address on removes the link, as it breaks the rules against linking to CP or something. werchan24h52wjqi.onion (now a dead link) was one such site, for example.
And what exactly is so great about mods? How would a modless community be completely unbearable? If you are uncomfortable with looking at CP and reading about alternative opinions, you wouldn't stay for long anyway.
>>7341 No, I woukd not (((pay))) money to post somewhere where the mods are critically lazy, don't do their jobs and beg for money to boot. I would have to filter all the spam myself and it would be more rewarding to spam there given that all the users would be forced to see it at least once.
>>7341 A completely unmoderated imageboard would immediately become a magnet for child pornography. I would not use a non-anonymous cryptocurrency like BTC to pay for access to a place with gigs of CP. That would be stupid.
>>7345 I'm pretty sure the point of the paywall is to deter spammers.
>I'd have to do something for myself? No, I'd rather have somebody else do it for me, preferably for free.
Good heavens!
>>7352 >start my own
then you would just be talking to yourself exclusively and you'd probably end up participating in hapase-tier samefagging to such a degree that you can't even remember which posts are yours so it feels like you're talking to someone else.
>>7376 >synagogue shooters
I would be proud to host a board with synagogue shooters on it. More productive than 90% of modern /pol/.
Although we all know that there would just be a bunch of pedokikes encoding their images into base64 or posting links to images.
A good deal of people shitting against mods are activly trying to stir shit. t. mod
For exapmple:
>be faggot
>make trump hate thread
>spam a few dozen posts in a row
>get deleted
>complain in 20 different threads how mods ban all anti-trump things
>make thread starting with title "mods ban this!1!1!!1!" and copypasting some article
>make all other posts in that tread shitting on mods instead of the topic you posted about
>get 5 minute ban with the message saying remake the thread without the bitching
>never do so
>bitch more
Anyway, as for the question, fuck no. First because >paying, second because it would be either so expensive no one would ever actually go there exept two richfags or be utterly unuseable.
>>7472 >MUH DRUMP
Look in some of the early /pol/ threads like the "exodus electric jewgaloo" one and you will see anti trump sentiment. Making an entire thread about MUH DRUMP would be a low quality thread, which is why nobody makes it. On /b/ I don't think hapase would delete it, so go ahead and try. You might not get any replies though.
Would you pay btc for access to a completely unmoderated chan? I have a feeling that people like to talk shit about mods, but a community without them would be completely unbearable.