/g/ - Technology

install openbsd

[Make a Post]
[X]





Superior Software Nanonymous No.3182 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>3183 >>3197 >>3205
File: 76bd392d34754512a73826c298a240b65f528ebe21e867200f041b0de3791962.png (dl) (5.42 KiB)

Post software that hold such a superiority to its competition that it's dumbfounding.
I'll start with uMatrix
>MUCH less bloated than most *standalone* script blockers and *standalone* ad blockers
>superior features
>superior user control
>increases performance while most of its competition does the opposite
>only unusable to """tech-illiterates""" who can't handle more than one shiny button at a time

Nanonymous No.3183 [D][U][F] >>3195
File: be0930f7a8275bf4ca34d08c818c48de6bfba6170d365021e7c2f136b1beb34d.png (dl) (73.98 KiB)

>>3182
Wolfram Mathematica

Nanonymous No.3185 [D][U][F]
File: 45b897917a72c0c7ad7686db128cd93ba3e787a2d1ccd28ae2a33f1fecf625e1.png (dl) (81.00 KiB)



Nanonymous No.3195 [D][U][F]
File: 272e6d98ef59b9eae6e6dcea36bab817b3c2ed728ad931d3b8b5d9aaab61747b.png (dl) (9.60 KiB)

>>3183
Not familiar with Wolfram Mathematica, but Wolfram Alpha is annoying as fuck as all results they give are fucking images.

Nanonymous No.3197 [D] >>3200

>>3182
Con: You can't blacklist individual scripts. It requires you to make a custom filter on uBlock, which is more than a little silly.

Nanonymous No.3200 [D]

>>3197
Fair. I feel like implementing that into uMatrix would be a lot easier than other extensions successfully emulating most of uMatrix's features, though.

Nanonymous No.3205 [D] >>3230

>>3182
Explorer.exe
>only good because everything else is fucking terrible
nigchink
>best image viewer
>can do the same thing gsync/freesync do on any monitor even one from 1980
>0 input lag, 0 motion blur, 0 judder
>less than 2000 lines of code

>uMatrix
it's fucking trash. you don't need any blockers with JS disabled (javascript.enable;0). web browser plugins are shit and meme

Nanonymous No.3221 [D] >>3253

Redpill me on how this is better than NoScript.

Nanonymous No.3230 [D] >>3252

>>3205
Been a while since I've used Windows but I think Explorer++ was what I used. What's wrong with Ifranview?

Nanonymous No.3252 [D]

>>3230
oh god ppl asking me whats wrong with x and y. i have a whole article pending criticizing every image viewer i could find. IIRC irfanview was slow as fuck. panning and changing to next image in the gallery was slow. and there's no vsync. You can enable DWM but then the vsync will still be broken as fuck or laggy (can't remember which). for windows i think the best image viewer before nigchink was FastStone (which is also shit).

Nanonymous No.3253 [D] >>3256

>>3221
are you asking me to explain why it's better to go to about:config and double click "javascript.enabled" than to install a giant plugin (with more untrusted code and perf hits) dedicated to mitigating XSS,CSRF,clickjacking, etc (and introducing new vulns in the process)

Nanonymous No.3256 [D] >>3257

>3221
It's faster than NoShit. It allows better control for you to restrict tracking images and cookies and scripts, media etc. on a per-site basis.
>>3253
This does not protect you from tracking pixels etc. It also doesn't allow for any flexibility in case you need javashit for a trusted website.

Nanonymous No.3257 [D]

>>3256
you might as well use a separate browser instance as any site with JS destabilizes a piece of shit like firefox or gnome until restart. firefox has --profilemanager exactly for this

Nanonymous No.3355 [D]

lol. s/gnome/chrome