/t/ - The Toilet

Low quality shitposting

All users of /b/: read >>>/meta/3253
[Make a Post]
[X]





Parenting thread Nanonymous No.2066 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C]
File: fd33a8efc5fa5e07b109b8b34fc000bb3785bc80659e1fdc33a3ab225fc289be.jpg (dl) (37.56 KiB)

How do you raise your kid to be Übermensch? How do you raise strong boys and respectable girls?

Nanonymous No.2067 [D][U][F] >>2068 >>2071
File: 52008a68d56cc11a29482b80aecbac495f299e1c2f7b14bbd692851d607521a5.jpg (dl) (18.08 KiB)

Don't spoil them. Don't handhold them past the age of 10. Don't introduce them to the (((talmudvision))). Minimize their exposure to the kiked school system; prefer homeschooling whenever possible. For social contact, let them join some non-pozzed organization like what scouts used to be (I heard in the USA, mormons made their own non-pozzed version of the soyboy scouts).

Nanonymous No.2068 [D]

>>2067
Point out the flaws in the jewish thought system whenever possible. Point out differences in the races.
For girls, make sure you check who she's dating. Do not encourage whoring around, do not let her date non-whites.
For boys, also make sure he doesn't engage in degenerate (((hookup culture))). Discourage him from fucking nonwhites.

Nanonymous No.2069 [D] >>2070 >>2071

Raise other people's kids first. Normies expect schools to teach. Actual teaching is optional and only the best teachers will bother.
If race is a top 10 concern, you aren't doing a great job. I can think of many worse things than my sons having a black girlfriend that said he'd better pick one of the best ones. the lower half ARE something to worry about.

Nanonymous No.2070 [D]

>>2069
>I can think of many worse things than my sons having a black girlfriend
For me, he wouldn't be irredeemable after this (coalburning in women is far worse); however, that he would consider dating a nigger indicates a severe lack of standards. Niggers are disgusting, ugly creatures.

Nanonymous No.2071 [D] >>2072 >>2074 >>2078

Kid is under 17-19 years old for me.
Do not let them near anything digital.
Do not let them read bible/mein kampf and other jewish fuckery.
Share your passion for art and knowledge, have a nice big library, some paintings and generally anything from furniture to house you are living in should be of good taste and non-modernist, preferably ornamental and from close-to-human materials, like wood. Be sure to not raise kids in city or some poor redneck village.
Try to segregate him from other kids, as they will corrupt him when he's young. He will understand later. Or, if you are willing to kill everything that makes kids kids, teach him about society. You don't have much options to let him socialize, unless you are living in community of similar-minded ubermenschen.
>>2067
>prefer homeschooling whenever possible
This, and if you have money, try to get him lector who's knowledgable. It's a good thing.
>don't handhold them past the age of 10
Also good thing. He should be as independent as possible.
>>2069
>raise other people's kids first
Impossible. If I were thinking that way I would never have a kid. But sure would be nice if humans actually had some dignity and were humans in the first place.
>if race is a top 10 concern, you aren't doing a great job
this

if you are poor and believe your kid has good genes and will be just like you and your mother, just share your passion for art and knowledge and the kid will do just fine, but it's the worse and muddier road

Nanonymous No.2072 [D][U][F] >>2073
File: a46f776763d7acabbbad43fc260130c88a2d1832a0a934301496aa6a5c290467.png (dl) (320.79 KiB)

>>2071
>Do not let them read mein kampf and other jewish fuckery
do you know where you are faggot

Nanonymous No.2073 [D][U][F]
File: cdbbb92b9b4fd753ab0450dba128145cc55b60f3089687155bac3955fd34b818.jpg (dl) (144.87 KiB)

>>2072
Does that make all my arguments less sound because I think there's a lot of actual philosophers that are not on the cringe level of Gobineau, who, just like hitler, wasn't philosopher? gobineau wasn't aristocrat btw

me No.2074 [D]

>>2071
like you and your wife*

Nanonymous No.2078 [D] >>2079 >>2080

>>2071

>Do not let them near anything digital

I think that kids should learn about the dangers of the internet early on and learn how to use modern devices for educational purposes.

Nanonymous No.2079 [D]

>>2078
Agreed. Children should have access to internet when they are responsible enough not to turn into chris-chan/e-whores. Mainstream media sites, reddit, faceberg etc. should be mocked.

Nanonymous No.2080 [D] >>2089

>>2078
Now tell me, aside from technical whitepapers and sites like monoskop, ubu, tpb and this, what is the internet good for and mainly, what the fuck it will be good for in few years forward? There's a big censorship wave coming and being flagged for using tor in the future could be seriously dangerous. Also in the future, when most of the things we are now doing will be considered criminal act, foss/oss will be prohibited and you will maybe only be able to acces internet via some terminal; isn't it better to get rid of modern devices than use them when comfortable and started being dependent on them in some way? Internet is very good for visual arts, but you are better out with books for any other thing except computer science. Visual art destroys imagination to some extent too.
Also little reminder that modern technology introduced mass anxiety and deep social problems, and I'm not talking only about internet and computers, but about cars and factories etc too.

Nanonymous No.2086 [D]

how distant should you be from your child? What's the right amount? I've had extremely clinging, very Jewish-like parents who spent hours on retarded horseshit and it made me fucking hate communicating with people for a long time.

Nanonymous No.2089 [D] >>2090 >>2092

>>2080
Sure internet had bad sides and is used to very effectively spy on us and our habits but without it, how could i possibly be talking to you?
How could i know about whites being murdered in South Africa?

Internet has allowed me to do so much research on US history which helped me debunk all the myths about racism and black oppression.
I can now recite several historical incident where blacks turned on whites and acted "racist". Like the Haitian revolution or the USS Kitty incident.

Before the internet all my information came from TV and i live in a country that has very few blacks so i was brainwashed to think that black people were funny and great.

Nanonymous No.2090 [D] >>2091

>>2089
Call me nigger but I enjoyed American movies with mainly black cast, especially crime ones.

Nanonymous No.2091 [D]

>>2090
well, niggers do commit a lot of crime, so it makes sense that they are featured in crime movies.

Nanonymous No.2092 [D] >>2093

>>2089
>before the internet all my information came from TV
Have you considered killing yourself? Books and observations should be your intelligence sources, not society. Internet should have been discussion place, not place from where you gain information other than visual, eg ubu.com.

Nanonymous No.2093 [D] >>2094

>>2092
If you were smart you would look up pdf's on the internet then you learn things while also having access to a convenient tool which can help you discover new possibilities. We do need to find a way to prevent governments and corporations from spying on us though. Maybe if we get a group extremely skill with A.I then we could create an A.I that protects us from being spied on. Though I doubt that would work.

Nanonymous No.2094 [D][U][F] >>2095
File: db30ffcdcb666e4f54c716b10c0c04b8a92d7113b9d533a9f0258ade014da30a.pdf (dl) (3.41 MiB)

>>2093
>staring at screen for hours is somehow smart
Yeah, you should have considered it.
>which can help you discover new possibilities
Every time I hear that I cringe. Not only fagots on internets don't read, but if some eventually read, they read shit and think it's not shit. Goodreads-tier retardation. If you ever were to listen to internets preaching new gospels, you would turn out more black than white.

And anon, 'murica is 'murica, there's nothing like that degenerate shithole elsewhere in the world.

Nanonymous No.2095 [D]

>>2094
>Looking for new idea's is cringe
The world advances on the idea's of those who are creative the internet is a place for expressing these thoughts. While yes the internet does damage your eyes because of over exposure you need to realize that not only does it allow for more efficient communication such as how I am able to argue with you currently. But it also allows you to look up things on the internet which you may have never discovered otherwise. Also don't say oh go buy a book instead. Problem with that idea is that directly buying a book that promotes nationalistic ideologies could potentially put you on a hit list anyway. So you can't even use the argument that it is safer because at the end of the day they could easily look up your purchase history

Nanonymous No.2096 [D][U][F] >>2097
File: 2090f3a2c692c1cde09c4998d3808d395635bfdcea66d2651f09e59170fb0f98.jpg (dl) (75.26 KiB)

I agree with you, and sites like b-ok.org are infinitely more efficient than a library. However,
>the internet damages your eyes from over exposure
This isn't even true. It's a conveniant falsehood, so skeptics are quick to jump on keeping afloat its veracity since it puts addicts in a worse light.
This is merely BLUE light absorbtion. It causes eye fatigue, yes, but permanent damage very seldom occurs unless you're using screens for hours a day and are under the age of twelve, since your eyes absorb a greater amount of blue light at that age. This issue is mitigated swiftly by not letting your children on the internet, as the freedom it offers is no use for their under-developed minds and will surely result in addiction. Adolescents and adults can just use a simple blue light filter to prevent fatigue.
You're right anon, we really have something special. Hopefully it's not squandered by normies who's parents were too lazy to care what was done on their computers when said normies were children.

Nanonymous No.2097 [D] >>2102

>>2096
Not sure about you, but staring at blinking display isn't comfy.

Nanonymous No.2098 [D]

I was discussing permanent eye health, not temporary comfort.
Is looking at something that isn't a direct source of blue light less strenuous for your eyes?
Yes.
Does looking at said something over an electonic display emmiting blue light lessen your risk of permanent eye damage?
Unless you are 12 or younger, no.

Nanonymous No.2102 [D] >>2104

>>2097
What are e-ink displays

Nanonymous No.2104 [D]

>>2102
Good luck finding devices that respect your freedom.

Nanonymous No.2113 [D]

Create a healthy environment at home, and teach them the skills they need to thrive in the disgusting mess that is modern society.

Nanonymous No.2321 [D]

>How do you raise your kid to be Übermensch?
Leading by example.

Nanonymous No.2409 [D]

https://nypost.com/2019/02/17/9-year-old-hanged-herself-after-argument-with-mother-cops/

Letting kids use internet without any sort of content control is freaking nuts.
It seems like nobody understand the danger of giving an unlimited source of uncesored content to a kid that learned to walk 3 years ago.