>>265 >>267 It's a butthurt anarkiddie from (((lainchan))). Fortunately he's just a low level script kiddie and his spam is easy to deal with as long as I'm there to delete it.
If this continues I will need to appoint some global volunteers.
Isn't the 2nd rule plain retarded? I'm pretty sure this board is already saturated with white nationalists. Why would you not want couple of odd people expressing their "anti-white", "pro-jewish" opinions? I think banning certain opinions on certain boards is just against the purpose of this whole image board.
Lainchan is one of the shittiest imageboards to ever exist. From what I recall the website is plastered in autistic rules and they ban you for calling someone a faggot. It was hilarious when I was posting there because the mods were too desperate for users to ban me so every conversation I had with their braindead leftypol goons resulted in getting the thread locked. Weebs are the first to go on the day of the rope.
>>1019 Nice try you retarded spook.
>oy vey goyim why won't you let us slide your threads constantly with disingenuous spam that has been refuted constantly
>y-you must hate freedom if you don't let me post pro kike threads!
>w-what are you guys some sort of fascists?
You boomer spooks never fail to crack me up.
>>oy vey goyim why won't you let us slide your threads constantly with disingenuous spam that has been refuted constantly
>>us
I just pointed out MY opinion on how the rule is retarded
>>disingenuous
that's what your post is.
>>spam
I didn't say anything about removing the global rule that bans spam
>>refuted constanly
lol I didn't even make an argument
>>y-you must hate freedom
>>w-what are you guys some sort of fascists?
lol no where I implied that.
>>if you don't let me post pro kike threads!
I haven't posted a single thread on /pol/ and I have no intentions of posting "pro-kike" threads, whatever the fuck that means.
Nice job creating an imaginary character out of my post. And enjoy your safe space.
>>1109 >jew begs to be allowed to create pro kike threads
>w-what no i swear i would never create a pro kike thread! heh i dont even know what you're talking about goyim im purely innocent in this demand for pro kike threads what ever could you mean disingenuous threads!
It's time to report back to JIDF and get some refresher lessons on sliding spook. What is effective on cuckchan and 8cucks is not going to work here very well.
>/pol/ literally needs safe space rules in line with reddit standards
Wasn't /pol/ supposed to be the politically incorrect board?
This is as pathetic as "punks" sticking it to conformism by all adopting the same style.
>>1166 So /int/ discord faggots decided to stop by. Nazis are the most conformist, just not to Jewish standards. We're not some libertarians, not sure why you keep confusing /pol/ with that. Well I do, because you want to subvert us. There's no problem with Reddit safespace rules, except that those rules are meant to enforce and promote Jewish ideologies.
>anyone disagreeing with me must come from X
No (you) for you, even if this channel doesn't have them anyways.
>Nazis are the most conformist
>not sure why you keep confusing /pol/ with that.
Did I say /pol/ is libertarian? No, learn to read.
Unlike the newfags from stormfront, I know that /pol/ was created to be the politics board, not the "my politics only" board.
>Well I do, because you want to subvert us.
Subvert a semi-dead board on a tiny darknet channel?
You think too highly of your hugbox.
>There's no problem with Reddit safespace rules
The absolute state of /pol/acks rofl, you think being indistinguishable from triggered feminists is ok as long as it keeps anons from hurting your feelings lmao.
>>1171 Imagine being this paranoid.
"Oh noes, my sekrit 'anonymous' club is being infiltrated by one person with different ideas, shut it down!"
>>1172 Imagine being this new.
Hint: 2ch
>>1170 >people don't like the culture of X honeypot imageboard
>make their own to have the environment they desire
>REEE WHY AREN'T YOU JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER IMAGEBOARD FUCKING FASCIST NAZI'S SOMETHING SOMETHING HORSESHOE THEORY
Every fucking time
>>1170 >muh stormfront
Holy shit it's like I'm back on 4chan in 2012. Nobody had even heard of stormfront until retards like you started accusing people of being from there.
>>1173 >implying the knowledge of 2ch makes you an oldfag
Nice to see your shill training course gave you a quick rundown on the history of chans at least
>>1187 He's not a shill, at least not a paid one. He's just a butthurt /int/ drifter who likes attention and drama. Best to just ignore.
Anyway, I'd like to propose a rule.
1. Obvious D&C tactics will be removed. This goes for baseless accusations of "drumphftard maga ZOG", "Christcuck jew on a stick", "Irish, Italian, Slavs aren't white/are the true master race".
We should be able to discuss topics on Trump, Christianity, or race without devolving into shit-flinging and constant accusations. This was an easy target to exploit by shills on 8ch, which they used often to derail threads to the point of unusability and cause division among users. I'm not suggesting users can't be critical of others for being pro or anti Trump or Christianity, but that posts which accuse a user of being pro- or anti-whatever when a post has absolutely nothing to do with that topic, or is not expressing their opinion on it but simply discussing it should be grounds for removal.
This would be a bit subjective as to what is baseless accusations and obviously D&C tactics, so it would need changes to the wording.
>>1188 I add an example as well. On 8ch there was a thread discussing attempts at censorship of the Bible by Jews. There was a flood of posts accusing OP of being a Christcuck, when the topic is inherently neither pro or anti Christianity, however it would be beneficial to let Christians know what the Jews are doing.
Thread is created with title: >Hillary Clinton: Europe must curb immigration to stop rightwing populists
The first post is
>The fucking satan cunt has more balls than trumpkike. How quaint.
That same user goes on to claim all white Americans are mutts, and call random users magatards for pointing out that the OP had nothing to do with Trump and that they added nothing.
Very obvious tactic that I've seen implemented in exactly the same way again and again.
>>>/pol/1494 The post you deleted was in response to a post that came after the exchange had finished you revisionist faggot.
>ignoring the fact you completely contradicted yourself and walking back everything you just said to shit-fling some more
>muh reddit spacing when there literally isn't a single post in the thread with reddit spacing besides your own
At this point it's just embarrassing brother. You actively decided to take an interaction which you yourself admitted had merit and blow it up into a conversation about rules and "shitting up" threads. It was blatantly obvious there was no malice but you walk back after the fact and pretend that I was sliding when the reality is that you've caused more problems than my handful of posts ever could. Kill yourself you retarded sperg.
>>1217 >don't disagree with me or spend time on a well reasoned response or i'll just call you a sperg ;^)
also
>flailing so hard he doubleposted the same message in the wrong meta
Standard kike behavior. All that happened was I deleted your bitch response to me saying not to derail the thread further which I will gladly provide a screencap if you like, but then decided to give you the benefit of the doubt and provide more explanation for both the deletion and the thread, since you seemed angry and confused. But you dug yourself in even deeper and revealed your rabbinic powerlevel.
My only fuckup was not taking this bullshit to meta off the bat. I eagerly await more of your flailing on this very important issue.
>>1219 It's hilarious how you ignore everything said and just resort to kvetching about me being a kike because you sperged impulsively.
>since you seemed angry and confused
Nigger all of the relevant posts are there. Anyone can follow the conversation and see that it isn't even remotely derailing and that the concerns were perfectly valid. Who the fuck are you trying to fool here? Keep on deleting any attempt at seeking higher quality threads or people asking perfectly innocuous questions. It makes little difference to me. A dumpster fire's a dumpster fire. No one here is stupid enough to think that my handful of posts over the course of fucking days were malicious while we're on a board with little moderation and no way to get banned and a thousand better ways to subvert it than seeking more context in a thread devoted to exposing glow in the dark niggers. So you're either just using "kike behavior" as a stand in for "anyone who's tone i dont like" or you're a literal retard.
>I eagerly await more of your flailing on this very important issue.
<h-heh.. i bet you'll keep responding to me loser!
Jesus christ man how old are you?
You'll be fine unless this place explodes in popularity.
The fewer rules you have, the better. jews jew their own god in the talmud, they equivocate or use another logical fallacy and then break whatever rule you set in front. Rules only affect real users who aren't going to start equivocating, because equivocation is unhelpful in discussion.
>>1265 If you make rules, add something about "common sense" in them and get mods you can trust to act in good faith without crossreferencing a rulebook.
>>1265 >>1271 >Add something about "common sense"
Got that covered already. See the /pol/ rules thread, >>>/pol/1:
>Common sense will always be applied when enforcing the rules.
See the global rules on the main page:
>Common sense will be utilized.
>>1275 You cannot define a board such as /pol/ using a highly specific predined set of rules that are actually followed to the letter. Doing this is a recipe for unjust deletion of important threads because they don't follow some retarded guideline.
>>1275 >Common sense is bullshit undefinable
If spoken by a jew, "common sense" is jewish bullshit. If spoken by a non-jew, "common sense" is reasonable.
>>1289 and rules are unnecessary for non-jews, which is my point.
Anyone who's not a fucking kike isn't going to be causing trouble, and newfags are easy enough to BTFO in thread. The only people who really cause problems are people posting in bad faith, and no ruleset will ever cause them to admit defeat and just fuck off.
You cannot argue with those people, there's no convincing an alinskyite. All you can do is kill them (or prevent them from posting entirely, in this case).
>>1287 >gas the jews.
Stop propagating the myth of the Holocaust, no person was gassed in the Third Reich, clothes were the only thing that was gassed in order to get rid of lice.
>>1290 Kinda agree, still think rules should be used as a guideline to measure potential mods against (if they agree with the rules they are accepted, if not they are not accepted) but the first and really only line of defense is to have good mods who care about the state of the board, and to let them moderate as they see fit.
>>1338 Yeah, this. If you say it's heresy and ban, that's how it is, you're a mod and that's reason enough.
If you end up going crazy with it, someone needs to give you the bolter round.
Coonfy wasn't bad in the sense of what powers he had, but in the way he used them, which was just flat out trolling and powertripping. Sadly, the mentioned bolter round came too late and what followed we all know.
>>1423 >trolling so much that they shut down the operation of the board is imageboard culture
You clearly weren't on pigchan during that time.
Kikey supporters do a shit ton of mental gymnastics to justify his retarded bullshit like wordfiltering "nigger", or "gate", or rachspamming everywhere, or allowing the pajeet to post his bullshit everywhere.
>>1426 >Allowing the pajeet
Ron limited rangebans to /24, any dedicated spammer could effectively cripple the board as long as he had the autism and proxies.
Now I know you're a shill.
Go take your jewish asspain elsewhere.
>>1427 The pajeet wasn't a "dedicated spammer". He only has a few ip addresses. When I was a mod I was easily able to remove his bullshit. Stop making excuses for your roach buttbuddy.
>s-s-shill!
no u
>>1430 Ironically, dysnigger managed to get his shit together and implement some actual rules.
/b/'s rules are better than /pol/'s rules.
Let that sink in for a moment.
>>1427 Kikey let the pajeet threads stay up. They just hit 751 posts eventually. Hell, this is one of the few things the shit moderation over there nowadays does right, the pajeet eats a delete on sight.
>>1428 >He only has a few ip addresses.
Don't think so. He's getting permas from me every time and he's ack almost daily. Chances are he's payed to post daily or his poovider only lets him post for 20min a day.
>>1431 >months after virtually every single old guard user abandons the platform the one man left with hordes of cuckchan cross-posters realises what he's done and desperately tries to salvage the unsalvageable
Dysnigger is one of if not the single most fucking retarded people on this planet. The fact that he implemented the rules after literally every single person who wanted them in the first place abandoned the platform only makes him that much more of a complete fucking retard. At this point everyone has left from alternative imageboards and probably IRC. Any imageboard that gets over 30pph site wide is basically ruined by that point. And I sincerely mean that.
>>1430 >I EXPECT DECENCY FROM MY MONGOLIAN CAVE PAINTING SYMPOSIUM
lol fgt
>>1432 >another endnigger kike enters the fray
It's really obvious that english isn't your first language, maybe you should take some time away from hebrew.
>>1431 >Closing the barn door after the cows left
8ch died Jan 2017. You could practically hear the giant sucking sound immediately after inauguration, and once Spicer was out, that was pretty much it. Dys killed /b/ wayyyyyy before that. With Mark jewing /v/ and /pol/acks joining ICE, 8ch really lost its purpose of existence. The biggest tell was that /monster/ became a hole in the ground. When the waifufags leave a website entirely, you know it's toast.
>>1464 >maybe you should take some time away from hebrew.
There's more langauges than english and heeb. Just because you don't speak them doesn't mean they don't exist.
>>1431 >/b/'s rules
/b/ having rules defeats the point, and it would take effort to do worse than a particularly shitty /pol/.
>>1343 >And I sincerely mean that.
Because you're a retard with no understanding of what an anonymous imageboard is supposed to be.
With such low posting activity, people start identifying individual posters, and then you get a shittier chatroom.
1824
/pol/'s original naming was exactly to accommodate racists because all previous iterations became exclusively stormfront[sic]. do your goony googles.
>>1824 They don't want to discuss politics, they want an echo chamber. If you actually want to discuss politics, you're going to have to go somewhere else, I'm afraid. A real shame.
>>1827 I know the history, it's always turned radical political discussion, that doesn't mean that should be enforced by a biased admin though.
>>1833 It's an ideology. What else could it be?
>>1835 >It's an ideology.
National Socialism is not merely an ideology. It is the execution of absolute truth and justice as dictated by the forces of Nature herself. Read Mein Kampf, it's up on /ar/ somewhere most likely.
>>1833 I simply stated that you don't discuss politics, which is true.
But I agree, it is not an ideology. It is not so coherent to be considered an ideology. It is utter nonsense.
>I am an unlearned zoomer jew and I do not have the vocabulary or mental capacity to understand how belief systems are categorized, much less how they work, because I have learned everything from (((school))) and twitter
Doubleplus ungood, faggot.
>>1846 >claims to have read Mein Kampf
>still misses the fucking point
I'll spoonfeed you. Find out who coined the term "ideology" and while you're at it, define it.
>>1841 >I simply stated that you don't discuss politics
Ah, but that is where you miss the point entirely. /pol/ is not a "politics" board, it is the "Politically Incorrect" board. As such, not all discussion needs to be directly relevant to politicians or governments for it to be on topic. Neither does it make sense to promote liberalism, lolbergtardianism, communism, anarchism or other fake&gay ideas on /pol/, since they are all politically correct.
>>1852 >Communism and anarchism are politically correct.
??? Do you even know what either of these are? It seems you don't.
And I don't care to talk about 'politically correct' topics anyway, I would just like some discussion beyond 'it's the Jews!', 'kill all niggers!', 'Aryan master race!', etc.
>>1859 Communist and socialist policies are completely acceptable in certain cucked governments as long as you don't call them communism. See: (((Bernie Sanders))).
>I would just like some discussion beyond...
In which case, 8chan is perfectly suited to you and your ilk. Their /pol/ rules don't endorse or prohibit anything, and the board is a shithole because of it.
>>1862 Why would we bother putting effort into our posts when you clearly don't read them? You're here in bad faith, and a faggot to boot, so really all that is left is to smug in your general direction.
>>1866 Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. There cannot be communist or socialist policies under capitalism. Communism, socialism, and capitalism are non-compatible: you can only have one.
>>1861 >We must destroy whiteness and white people!
>t. entire jewish media and political class
Yes, killing millions of people is politically correct in today's political climate.
>>1877 the overton windows is going slowly more nationalistic, I think you're wrong. You've probably just been lurking around /pol/ a shitton and been blackpilled on the average opinion on that sort of stuff.
It's still politically incorrect. Read up the definition some more.
>>1878 I am not disrupting any concurrent conversations. And, yes, I am white, but, no, I won't prove I'm white. Besides, I do not live in your country so why worry? If you convince me to be a national-socialist, I would be nationalistic for my own country.
Continuing on the theme of good faith and common sense: If not a rule, should we have a written guideline explicitly encouraging users to ignore bad faith posts, and entrust mods with deleting bad faith posts when appropriate? Cultivating a good faith culture is the responsibility of users and mods both, imo. Thoughts?
>>1976 What do you mean by "good faith" and "bad faith" posts? Criticisms of the site, its moderation or its content could be considered as "bad faith" posts, but they shouldn't be ignored or censored. That said, I don't trust the moderators' good faith and common sense. It is, then, solely up to the users, which is how it ought to be. Problematically, the userbase is retarded.
>>1978 >Poor quality posts reflect the poor quality userbase.
In this case, a purge of the low quality users is required. Nothing but the complete and swift removal of low quality posts that they make will cause this to happen.
>we should do this
>we should do that
>too fucking lazy to actually make anything of value, but spend all day every day trying to subvert the people who do produce value
jews jewing as jewsual, I see.
>>2743 The amount of money being poured into online subversion is at all time highs. There was a brief lull after President Trump's inauguration, and then the kikes realized they can not ignore a single piece of digital information. The lockdown is in full effect. It doesn't fucking matter though, indictments of Clapper and Brennan in a matter of weeks.
GG NO RE, GLOWNIGGER KIKES.
>>3442 /pol/ never had anything of value aside from memes
everyone who posted seriously there were fucking cancerous polarized hothead zoomers LARPing as boomers (and some real boomers, who were just as obnoxious)
This meta thread is dedicated to your issues with /pol/ and its moderation. Post any reports, complaints, or suggestions to this thread.