Averi Land✝🐾 - 📚literature-philosophy

Averi Land✝🐾
sneed-etc / 📚literature-philosophy
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 13:43
first
13:43
1
Sogga 09/18/2024 13:48
second
13:48
need some good books to read
13:48
anything will do
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 13:49
If anyone wants to start reading about psychology I'd recommend the laws of human nature by Robert Greene
1
Extra-sensory PURRception
If anyone wants to start reading about psychology I'd recommend the laws of human nature by Robert Greene
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 13:50
It covers a lot of different things regarding psychology
Sogga
need some good books to read
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:03
Mitochondrial Eve
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:03
this robert greene guy gonna change my life
Mitochondrial Eve
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:03
Have you read all of these?
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:03
heard
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:03
I've only read 2 of them
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:03
Mitochondrial Eve
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 14:04
ive read the 48 Laws of Power and the Art of Seduction
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:04
from sam hyde (edited)
Mitochondrial Eve
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:04
Damn, that's a good deal
Мико⚜🐾
ive read the 48 Laws of Power and the Art of Seduction
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:05
I've read the 48 Laws of power and The Laws of Human Nature
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:05
too busy reading this
14:05
ts one is
14:05
either gemmy or coal
14:06
@Мико⚜🐾 should be philisophy and literature
2
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:07
i wanna be an author so badd
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:07
nigga
Sogga
i wanna be an author so badd
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:07
Then become one
Extra-sensory PURRception
Then become one
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:07
fuck off
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:07
Start writing or reading
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:07
aint got the resources for it
Sogga
aint got the resources for it
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:07
What do you need?
Extra-sensory PURRception
What do you need?
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:07
a computer
14:07
way more efficient in writing
Sogga
a computer
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:08
You don't have a computer?
Extra-sensory PURRception
You don't have a computer?
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:08
holy shit are you fucking illiterate
Sogga
way more efficient in writing
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:08
I mean, Damien Echols wrote 5 or 4 books on his phone
Extra-sensory PURRception
I mean, Damien Echols wrote 5 or 4 books on his phone
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:08
imma do that then
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:08
study
14:08
literature
14:08
first
Sogga
holy shit are you fucking illiterate
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:09
It was a rhetorical question since I was surprised
Mitochondrial Eve
first
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:09
Extra-sensory PURRception
It was a rhetorical question since I was surprised
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:09
balkanites cant afford shit
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:09
Can't you just buy a keyboard for your phone or something though?
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:09
just know that
Extra-sensory PURRception
Can't you just buy a keyboard for your phone or something though?
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:09
imagine me carrying a massive keyboard with me everywhere i go lel
Sogga
imagine me carrying a massive keyboard with me everywhere i go lel
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:10
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:10
is extra a mutt
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:10
i can see the burger grease on his lips
Sogga
imagine me carrying a massive keyboard with me everywhere i go lel
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:11
What's the problem with this though? I mean, phone keyboards are usually somewhat small
Extra-sensory PURRception
What's the problem with this though? I mean, phone keyboards are usually somewhat small
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:12
i have a better solution
14:12
speech to text
Sogga
speech to text
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:12
Yeah, that would probably work
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:13
its text to speech
14:13
esl
Mitochondrial Eve
its text to speech
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:13
Mitochondrial Eve
its text to speech
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:13
i meant what i said
14:13
speech that gets converted to text
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:14
nigga you're losing to a 15 year old
Mitochondrial Eve
nigga you're losing to a 15 year old
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:14
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 14:19
14:19
recent reads
14:20
well, still reading confessions
Мико⚜🐾
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 14:20
Is The Divine Names a good book?
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:25
rename this to literature and phylosophy
Мико⚜🐾
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:25
brave new world is a gem
1
Mitochondrial Eve
rename this to literature and phylosophy
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:25
phylosophy
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:25
die
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:25
<3
14:31
what is mikko typing up dude
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:31
https://youtu.be/Fgc9Gq4xzVs?si=35ChgxVPpIElZnzj
librogil
The Sopranos - AJ "absurdity of life"
14:31
After one
14:31
Phylosophy essay
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:32
hebrew subs though
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:32
Funny
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:32
imagine if tony soprano was jewish
Sogga
imagine if tony soprano was jewish
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:34
God forgive you
Sogga 09/18/2024 14:35
tony goyprano
14:35
what the fuck is mikko actually typing right now
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 14:42
14:42
14:45
14:45
Extra-sensory PURRception
Is The Divine Names a good book?
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 14:58
I would definitely recommend it if you want to ever read an early Church Father writing. Dionysius, apostle of Paul and 1st bishop of Athens then Paris, is personally my favourite ante-Nicene father. In this particular writing he contemplates several interesting things here like: >what he understands the Divine Essence of God to be. He touches on the different titles attributed to God in the Bible, goes into depth as to what we should understand them to mean ("the Good", "the Wonderful, Beautiful", "the Word" or "Logos", "Truth", "Love" etc.) >the "telos" or purpose of Man, the purpose of creation >synthesises and reconciles the Old Testament scripture with a lot of middle Platonic ideas here for his Greek audience >presents the earliest detailed notion unique to Eastern Orthodoxy of a "real" distinction between God's essence and his "Energeia" or works, goes into his understanding of how God interacts with creation >he also presents a detailed fleshing out of the "monarchical Trinity", the oneness and multi-personhood of the Christian God >touches on the problem of evil, its status as an ontological existence or privation of "the Good" >he also offers a critique in the writing on some of the popular Pagan ideas of the time, such as Dualism, the wickedness of matter and what he thinks is a false dialectic between matter, the material world and God (which attacks inadvertently Gnosticism, Manicheanism etc.) (edited)
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:00
15:00
pin
15:01
1
Мико⚜🐾 pinned a message to this channel. 09/18/2024 15:01
Мико⚜🐾
I would definitely recommend it if you want to ever read an early Church Father writing. Dionysius, apostle of Paul and 1st bishop of Athens then Paris, is personally my favourite ante-Nicene father. In this particular writing he contemplates several interesting things here like: >what he understands the Divine Essence of God to be. He touches on the different titles attributed to God in the Bible, goes into depth as to what we should understand them to mean ("the Good", "the Wonderful, Beautiful", "the Word" or "Logos", "Truth", "Love" etc.) >the "telos" or purpose of Man, the purpose of creation >synthesises and reconciles the Old Testament scripture with a lot of middle Platonic ideas here for his Greek audience >presents the earliest detailed notion unique to Eastern Orthodoxy of a "real" distinction between God's essence and his "Energeia" or works, goes into his understanding of how God interacts with creation >he also presents a detailed fleshing out of the "monarchical Trinity", the oneness and multi-personhood of the Christian God >touches on the problem of evil, its status as an ontological existence or privation of "the Good" >he also offers a critique in the writing on some of the popular Pagan ideas of the time, such as Dualism, the wickedness of matter and what he thinks is a false dialectic between matter, the material world and God (which attacks inadvertently Gnosticism, Manicheanism etc.) (edited)
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 15:01
Damn, I might have to check it out when I'm done with reading the Bible
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:01
amonhere
1
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:02
need to pick that up again
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:02
already did this
15:02
hearing from essays
15:02
doesnt give the same feeling
15:02
so still got to readf
15:02
1
15:02
this too
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:03
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:04
15:05
пуьы
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:05
catch-22 is fire
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:05
яф
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:05
1984 is decent, but brave new world is better
15:05
i think the former is a bit cliche now
Mitochondrial Eve
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:06
catcher in the rye
15:06
classic
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:06
wonder how much time it would take for you to read every book on there
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:07
definitely a few years at least
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:07
next month no discord for the entire month
15:07
gone try atleast to
15:07
reach
15:08
1
15:09
also kino
Мико⚜🐾
definitely a few years at least
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 15:16
Depends on how much and how fast you read (edited)
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:17
also depends on the type of books you try to tackle
15:17
i only need to read fiction once
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:17
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1208422823006052413/1262537899434573894/videoplayback1.mp4?ex=66ebfe4c&is=66eaaccc&hm=72bcc963d97a0775a725ab70ed4e4f0b1376187bd04814d890b9fd5032c63d8e&
1
15:17
olbigyatory
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:18
but anything philosophical. or religious, even if its not Christian, i read several times (edited)
15:18
same story if its pyschology or 'self-help' or medical, dietary
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:19
Bardo Thodol need
Mitochondrial Eve
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1208422823006052413/1262537899434573894/videoplayback1.mp4?ex=66ebfe4c&is=66eaaccc&hm=72bcc963d97a0775a725ab70ed4e4f0b1376187bd04814d890b9fd5032c63d8e&
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:19
lmao, this is the meta at this point
Мико⚜🐾
but anything philosophical. or religious, even if its not Christian, i read several times (edited)
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 15:20
I just read books once (I don't read fast) and meditate on it. Sometimes I go back and read a part of the book multiple times
Mitochondrial Eve
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1208422823006052413/1262537899434573894/videoplayback1.mp4?ex=66ebfe4c&is=66eaaccc&hm=72bcc963d97a0775a725ab70ed4e4f0b1376187bd04814d890b9fd5032c63d8e&
Extra-sensory PURRception 09/18/2024 15:20
Materialism seems to be the worst one in my opinion
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:20
Hedonism
15:20
on there too
15:21
n nihilism
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:21
yeah, materialism is the worst
Mitochondrial Eve
on there too
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:21
those are incoherent too but thats the most cringy
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:21
Nihilism depends
15:21
positive is fine
15:21
negative is reddit
1
15:22
positive nihilism is a bit on the absurdsm side doe
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:24
you end up finding meaning in the absurdity
Мико⚜🐾
you end up finding meaning in the absurdity
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:25
15:26
media is adumb channel
Mitochondrial Eve
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1208422823006052413/1262537899434573894/videoplayback1.mp4?ex=66ebfe4c&is=66eaaccc&hm=72bcc963d97a0775a725ab70ed4e4f0b1376187bd04814d890b9fd5032c63d8e&
Sogga 09/18/2024 15:26
stoicism all the way
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:26
using this to post movies now
15:26
@Мико⚜🐾
Sogga 09/18/2024 15:26
shoulda been named movies and media
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:26
no, continue to use media i can clean it up
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:26
kino
Мико⚜🐾
no, continue to use media i can clean it up
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:27
prefer having specific channels
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:27
unless you want to go into analysis
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:27
make this a film channel too
Мико⚜🐾 09/18/2024 15:27
off topic @Sogga
Мико⚜🐾
off topic @Sogga
Sogga 09/18/2024 15:27
my bad
15:27
rong channel
Mitochondrial Eve 09/18/2024 15:28
only even had the chance
1
15:28
to watch this
15:28
on a vrc
15:28
player
Mitochondrial Eve
only even had the chance
Skyfoil, the Autistic Theologian 09/18/2024 17:27
Peak animated movie
Мико⚜🐾 09/19/2024 07:11
Why materialism can't be the case:
Materialists assume transcendentals such as reason and logic without having an account or justification for either, while hailing their utilisation of the scientific method. Even the 'greatest' minds of those who held a Materialist or Materialist-adjacent worldview did not have an account or justification for these two transcendentals, and affirmed that they "used it because it just is". This is very problematic for them philosophically because the ardent worship of the "scientific method" they profess to maintain requires one to only affirm things that are "rational", "demonstrable" or "empirical". It, the "scientific method" I mean, uses something they cannot prove or account for in their POV due to "reason" and "logic" being unquantifiable via their only way to measure it, leading them to be unable to actually justify the scientific method and destroying the coherence of their worldview in the process. Yet they will attack Theists viciously who presume a more Platonic idea of reality for not being able to "prove God" and being "irrational" for affirming the existence of angelic beings and demons. David Hume, an Agnostic philosopher, realised the logical conclusion of his worldview unlike the naïve "empiricists" of today and fell into complete scepticism. The whole process of the "scientific method" in short, in such positions, leaves no explanation for itself (the scientific method). "How are we doing what we're doing here?", "Why are we doing what we're doing here?" No answers. They assume a logical meaning behind everything being done, yet logic and reason are not things you can measure or observe.
(edited)
Mitochondrial Eve
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1208422823006052413/1262537899434573894/videoplayback1.mp4?ex=66ebfe4c&is=66eaaccc&hm=72bcc963d97a0775a725ab70ed4e4f0b1376187bd04814d890b9fd5032c63d8e&
🜋𝕽𝖆𝖒𝖛𝖉🜋 Σ 09/20/2024 23:51
Jesus
Mitochondrial Eve
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1208422823006052413/1262537899434573894/videoplayback1.mp4?ex=66ebfe4c&is=66eaaccc&hm=72bcc963d97a0775a725ab70ed4e4f0b1376187bd04814d890b9fd5032c63d8e&
Mitochondrial Eve 09/20/2024 23:54
update
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/22/2024 21:50
I'm going to watch how you discuss your inferior literature while knowing that I know the language with the best one. Also the philosophy inside the Spanish literature absolutely kills the German idealism.
1
21:51
Мико⚜🐾
Why materialism can't be the case:
Materialists assume transcendentals such as reason and logic without having an account or justification for either, while hailing their utilisation of the scientific method. Even the 'greatest' minds of those who held a Materialist or Materialist-adjacent worldview did not have an account or justification for these two transcendentals, and affirmed that they "used it because it just is". This is very problematic for them philosophically because the ardent worship of the "scientific method" they profess to maintain requires one to only affirm things that are "rational", "demonstrable" or "empirical". It, the "scientific method" I mean, uses something they cannot prove or account for in their POV due to "reason" and "logic" being unquantifiable via their only way to measure it, leading them to be unable to actually justify the scientific method and destroying the coherence of their worldview in the process. Yet they will attack Theists viciously who presume a more Platonic idea of reality for not being able to "prove God" and being "irrational" for affirming the existence of angelic beings and demons. David Hume, an Agnostic philosopher, realised the logical conclusion of his worldview unlike the naïve "empiricists" of today and fell into complete scepticism. The whole process of the "scientific method" in short, in such positions, leaves no explanation for itself (the scientific method). "How are we doing what we're doing here?", "Why are we doing what we're doing here?" No answers. They assume a logical meaning behind everything being done, yet logic and reason are not things you can measure or observe.
(edited)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/22/2024 22:12
The scientific method was questioned for centuries and it's used to identify a scientific act. But even inside the science it's a touchy subject because it's so ambiguous. But there is of course answer to "why are we using it?" Because they proves us that something happens under certain conditions, and that founding it's a hint that leads closer to the full truth. About the "how are we doing what we are doing here?" It just depends, and in fact, some ways of experimenting something are better than others. There is of course not an universal way of doing experiments, or an experiment that can give us an empiric truth, but they proves that under this circumstances, this happened. About the reason and logic, they are artificial and abstract concepts that doesn't need to be observed because nothing can be partially logic or partially reasonable. That makes no sense. And the materialism itself doesn't attack the theism. And by the way Hume was a son of a bitch who only said evident things and didn't apport anything, just like Descartes, but at least Descartes was more a mathematician than a philosopher.
1
Мико⚜🐾 09/23/2024 06:44
I dont like Hume btw
06:45
let me make that clear
06:45
yeah, materialism isnt necessarily opposed to theism, im more so talking about an extreme view
06:46
both approaches can become absurd in their extremes
06:50
wouldve been more accurate to say "why extreme materialism cant be the case"
Мико⚜🐾
both approaches can become absurd in their extremes
Мико⚜🐾 09/23/2024 06:56
youll have some on the other end babbling on about how the physical world is evil
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The scientific method was questioned for centuries and it's used to identify a scientific act. But even inside the science it's a touchy subject because it's so ambiguous. But there is of course answer to "why are we using it?" Because they proves us that something happens under certain conditions, and that founding it's a hint that leads closer to the full truth. About the "how are we doing what we are doing here?" It just depends, and in fact, some ways of experimenting something are better than others. There is of course not an universal way of doing experiments, or an experiment that can give us an empiric truth, but they proves that under this circumstances, this happened. About the reason and logic, they are artificial and abstract concepts that doesn't need to be observed because nothing can be partially logic or partially reasonable. That makes no sense. And the materialism itself doesn't attack the theism. And by the way Hume was a son of a bitch who only said evident things and didn't apport anything, just like Descartes, but at least Descartes was more a mathematician than a philosopher.
Мико⚜🐾 09/23/2024 07:11
Yeah, logic and reason is abstract and immaterial, based
07:14
the thing is an extreme materialist would that its a human construct and just that. the problem with that is that if that was true, it would be subjective. however its recognized universally that 2 things +2 of that same thing =4 things (edited)
07:15
platonists are just as bad because they would say that they literally exist as "physical" things in the world of the forms
07:20
i would be somewhere in the middle of this and say that there is created logic and reason, a finite participation in God's rationality. and then the uncreated and fully realized concept of logic in the divine mind of God.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'm going to watch how you discuss your inferior literature while knowing that I know the language with the best one. Also the philosophy inside the Spanish literature absolutely kills the German idealism.
Мико⚜🐾 09/23/2024 07:26
what Spanish books would you recommend
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'm going to watch how you discuss your inferior literature while knowing that I know the language with the best one. Also the philosophy inside the Spanish literature absolutely kills the German idealism.
serpente482 09/23/2024 08:54
Maestro
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/23/2024 13:09
The Quixote is basically the best book ever made, you know that, it's hard to recommend because I would have to trust a translation but at least it one of the most translated books so I guess it's pretty well translated, so I also recommend all the Cervantes' Novelas Ejemplares and Entremeses. The golden year, the baroque, is weird also because most of it is poetry (and it's a pretty hard poetry) and reading it translated would be kind of a waste. I can recommend you also one hundred years of solitude from 1967. But in a nutshell, the Spanish Baroque is the peak of the literature. (edited)
1
Мико⚜🐾
wouldve been more accurate to say "why extreme materialism cant be the case"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/23/2024 13:18
I mean, nothing extreme can be the case, the problem is that every philosophy tends to the extremism, to the idealism, no matter how materialist is a philosopher, he will always end up in the idealism in a way or another. (edited)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The Quixote is basically the best book ever made, you know that, it's hard to recommend because I would have to trust a translation but at least it one of the most translated books so I guess it's pretty well translated, so I also recommend all the Cervantes' Novelas Ejemplares and Entremeses. The golden year, the baroque, is weird also because most of it is poetry (and it's a pretty hard poetry) and reading it translated would be kind of a waste. I can recommend you also one hundred years of solitude from 1967. But in a nutshell, the Spanish Baroque is the peak of the literature. (edited)
Мико⚜🐾 09/23/2024 13:35
alright then
Мико⚜🐾
alright then
serpente482 09/23/2024 13:58
Lazarillo de Tormes is also good
13:58
Also very short
13:59
Its about a kid who has to leave his mom to serve various people as helpers
1
serpente482
Lazarillo de Tormes is also good
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/23/2024 16:11
It's considered the first modern novel so...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
It's considered the first modern novel so...
serpente482 09/23/2024 16:12
thats Don Quijote
serpente482
thats Don Quijote
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/23/2024 16:13
Don Quixote is just the literature itself
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Don Quixote is just the literature itself
serpente482 09/23/2024 16:13
no
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/23/2024 16:13
You can rebiuld the whole literature just using the Quixote
serpente482 09/23/2024 16:13
there was literature much much before
Sogga 09/23/2024 16:13
eat my Don Cojones
serpente482
there was literature much much before
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/23/2024 16:13
I didn't mean the first literature thing
Sogga
eat my Don Cojones
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/23/2024 16:13
Don Cipote
serpente482
there was literature much much before
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 09/23/2024 16:14
I meant its the literature itself
Sogga 09/23/2024 16:15
have you guys read war and peace
Мико⚜🐾 09/23/2024 16:36
some of it yeah
16:36
i was reading it at 14 but then mum threw my books away
Мико⚜🐾 09/30/2024 09:31
09:31
goated
Мико⚜🐾 09/30/2024 15:20
https://annas-archive.org/
Anna’s Archive
The world’s largest open-source open-data library. Mirrors Sci-Hub, Library Genesis, Z-Library, and more.
Мико⚜🐾 pinned a message to this channel. 09/30/2024 15:20
Мико⚜🐾 10/07/2024 13:20
https://youtu.be/GykkuulgY2E
InspiringPhilosophy
A Critique of Moral Relativism
NasCar 10/10/2024 21:00
Did this for literature class, excuse the spaniard Temor Abrumante El hombre tiene miedo, miedo a estar solo, no importa si se encuentra acompañado, la amenaza de la soledad lo atormenta. No quiere fallar, quiere ser el mejor posible, porque si no es el mejor, no es nada, un desperdicio de oxigeno. Tiene miedo a ser olvidado, que toda su existencia sea reducida a nada apenas fallezca, tiene miedo a no ser suficiente, a ser ineficiente en una sociedad que activamente lo desprecia, pero se ve obligado a ayudar. El hombre le tiene miedo a fallar. Le tiene miedo a lo que se convierte si es que pierde su propósito. El hombre odia, odia mucho, y se odia a sí mismo más que todo lo demás.
2
21:01
NasCar
Did this for literature class, excuse the spaniard Temor Abrumante El hombre tiene miedo, miedo a estar solo, no importa si se encuentra acompañado, la amenaza de la soledad lo atormenta. No quiere fallar, quiere ser el mejor posible, porque si no es el mejor, no es nada, un desperdicio de oxigeno. Tiene miedo a ser olvidado, que toda su existencia sea reducida a nada apenas fallezca, tiene miedo a no ser suficiente, a ser ineficiente en una sociedad que activamente lo desprecia, pero se ve obligado a ayudar. El hombre le tiene miedo a fallar. Le tiene miedo a lo que se convierte si es que pierde su propósito. El hombre odia, odia mucho, y se odia a sí mismo más que todo lo demás.
serpente482 10/11/2024 12:04
Mitochondrial Eve 10/13/2024 04:01
good book
1
04:01
and movie
Мико⚜🐾 10/13/2024 04:26
true
NasCar 10/15/2024 01:41
4
Мико⚜🐾 10/16/2024 03:49
https://youtu.be/nt-U6CMwwA0
yayo
Liberalism's Masked Nihilism - Fr. Seraphim Rose
Мико⚜🐾 10/18/2024 09:50
https://youtu.be/aDxlh27_NwQ
Jiub
Jimbob vs Satanist | morality
Мико⚜🐾
https://youtu.be/aDxlh27_NwQ
Мико⚜🐾 10/18/2024 09:51
great conversation between an Eastern Orthodox christian and an honest Atheistic Satanist
Мико⚜🐾
https://youtu.be/aDxlh27_NwQ
bongvain 10/18/2024 10:41
not being held accountable for theyre actions and poor self control fanclub
1
bongvain
not being held accountable for theyre actions and poor self control fanclub
Мико⚜🐾 10/18/2024 10:42
thats pretty much it and they have the same issues as all other "modern" worldviews do (edited)
10:42
in terms of relativism, not being able to account for rights, morality etc.
bongvain 10/18/2024 10:42
glad that goyim make themselves known and are loud about theyre weaknesses and short comings
10:44
also the goyims accent as it spews about "muh worldly mediocrity"
10:44
sounds like a generic vampire
Мико⚜🐾 10/18/2024 20:53
https://youtu.be/81LnM1M3xfQ
The Altar of Reason
What Science Can't Explain: The Hidden Path to Truth
Мико⚜🐾 10/19/2024 18:26
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 10/19/2024 22:41
I love when people call Sun Tzu a philosopher
1
Мико⚜🐾 10/22/2024 06:55
Мико⚜🐾
Click to see attachment 🖼️
𝓜𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮 🐾🇵🇱 10/22/2024 07:19
like monarchism there were many attempts to instate anarchies they failed there were many attempts to instate communism they failed there were many attempts to instate fully free self-regulating market guess what, they failed there have existed many monarchies in the past they did not just succeed, they flourished for centuries. it was real monarchism and it was beautiful
1
Мико⚜🐾 10/22/2024 20:36
https://youtu.be/Kb2POyqYz1g
Jay Dyer
Platonism Destroys Materialism - Jay Dyer
Мико⚜🐾 pinned a message to this channel. 10/22/2024 20:36
Мико⚜🐾
https://youtu.be/Kb2POyqYz1g
Мико⚜🐾 10/22/2024 20:36
@Skyfoil, the Autistic Theologian
1
Мико⚜🐾
https://youtu.be/Kb2POyqYz1g
𝓜𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮 🐾🇵🇱 10/22/2024 21:12
quantum physics are probably better at disproving it, but I will still watch Jay's reasoning
Мико⚜🐾 10/23/2024 03:25
it most likely does but atp philosophy is easier to understand for the plebs
Мико⚜🐾 10/27/2024 16:28
https://youtu.be/ucn2KzCDnOY
Luke Smith
What's "Natural" anyway?
Мико⚜🐾 10/28/2024 17:01
The_Brothers_Karamazov_Vintage_Classics_Everymans_--_Fyodor_Dostoyevsky_Richard_Pevear_Larissa_Volokhonsky_--_1992_--_Vintage_--_9780099922803_--_81c85d4bac9857914377fdb5e7d2d221_--_Annas_Archive.pdf
2.89 MB
serpente482 10/29/2024 23:56
@HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
2
1
Blackdog 11/02/2024 20:34
new book acquired
1
𝓜𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮 🐾🇵🇱 11/05/2024 22:03
I have an idea change the english language so that or is used only for the inclusive or and xor for the exclusive or truth tables: A | B | A ∨ B ------------- T | T | T -------- T | F | T -------- F | T | T ------- F | F | F A | B | A ⊻ B ------------- T | T | F ------- T | F | T ------- F | T | T -------- F | F | F
22:06
I don't think the trut tables are needed but there might be some that it will be easier to understand with
NasCar 11/05/2024 23:24
people don't realize that the true meaning of little red hood or whatever the name is in english is that
23:24
you should beware of transvestites
1
1
Мико⚜🐾 11/18/2024 12:42
https://youtu.be/CatXdIbrm1Y
AUcollege
John Givens: "The Image of Christ in Russian Literature: Dostoevsky...
NasCar
you should beware of transvestites
NasCar 11/18/2024 21:39
whoever reacted to this, the wolf crosdresses as the granny
21:39
BEWARE OF FAGS
NasCar
BEWARE OF FAGS
Skyfoil, the Autistic Theologian 11/18/2024 21:53
Мико⚜🐾 11/24/2024 07:09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MednlcGmB7I from eurocyon (edited)
Let's Talk Philosophy
The Philosophy of Averroes (Ibn Rushd)
Мико⚜🐾 pinned a message to this channel. 11/24/2024 08:09
Мико⚜🐾 11/26/2024 12:16
https://x.com/Zoraxe345/status/1861130788097663070
Zoraxe (@Zoraxe345) on X
@ShitpostGate
Мико⚜🐾
https://x.com/Zoraxe345/status/1861130788097663070
Zoraxe 11/27/2024 01:53
Hey that's me
Мико⚜🐾 11/28/2024 15:25
https://youtu.be/FmcWut5Bfog
Language and Ideas
What is Cultural Relativism?
𝓜𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮 🐾🇵🇱 11/29/2024 08:57
Adam Mickiewicz - Ode to Youth No Heart, no Spirit – Lo! cadaverous crowds! O Youth! Pass me thy wings, And let me o’er the dead earth soar; Let me vanish in delusion’s clouds, Where many the Zeal begets a wonder And grows a flower of novelty up yonder, Adorned in Hope’s enamellings. Who by his elder age shall darkened be His toilsome forehead to the ground bent low, Let him no more perceive or know Than his thus lowered selfish eyes may see. Youth! Up and over the horizons rise, And smoothly penetrate With Thy all-seeing eyes The nations small and great. Lo there! The space of dearth, Where putrid vapors in the chaos wrestle: ’Tis Earth! Up from the waters where the dead wind blows A shell-clad Reptile rose. He is his own rudder, sailor and vessel. He often dives and rises up with little trouble, For some smaller brutes he craves, The waves cleave not to him nor he to the waves; And suddenly he bumps upon a rock and bursts like a bubble. Nobody knew his life, and of his death nobody wists. Egoists! Oh Youth! The ambrosia of life be Thine When I with friends do share the time so sweet When youthful hearts at heav’nly feasting meet And golden threads around them all entwine. En masse, Young Friends! In happiness our ends. Strong in unison, reasoned in rage: Move on, Young Friends! And happy he that perished in the strife If for the others he’d prepared the stage Of fame and honored life. En masse, Young Friends! Though steep and icy be our path Though force and frailty guard the door: When force is used, with force respond and wrath; While young, upon our frailty wage a war.
08:57
Who, as a child, detached foul Hydra’s head, In Youth, shall strangle Centaurs even; Snatch victims from the Devil dread, And for the laurels march to Heaven. Up and reach the places out of sight, Break that to which the brain can do no harm! Youth! Mighty as an eagle’s is Thy flight, As a thunderbolt – Thine arm! Hey, arm to arm! by chains Let’s bind the earth around; To one focus bring each sound, To one focus spirits bring and brains! Move on, Thou Clod! Leave the foundations of the world! We’ll make Thee roll where Thou hast never rolled, When finally vanishes from Thee the mold, Green years shall be once more, Thy sails unfurled. Since in the land of darkness and of night, The Elements have fallen out; By a simple “Let there be”, due to Heaven’s might, The world of things is made; Gales are blowing, shelters give no shade, And soon the stars will brighten Heaven all about; While in the land of men a night so dumb, The elements of Will are yet at war; But Love shall soon burst forth like fire; Out of the dark, the world of Soul will come, In Youth’s conceived desire, By friendship braced forever more. The ice, so long unmoved, is bursting now, With superstitions that have dimmed the light. Hail, Dawn of Liberty! Oh, Long live Thou! Thou carriest the Redeeming Sun so bright.
2
дмитрий 12/02/2024 14:08
https://youtu.be/8s-GdYeQ0Ao
Europos
The "Fallen Father" Archetype
Мико⚜🐾 12/13/2024 12:04
Eurocyon 12/13/2024 19:34
https://x.com/QuoteNietzsche/status/1867615808651751655?t=4KcMbVUfXJmptZ1w1vWOQw&s=19
Friedrich Nietzsche | Philosophy & Psychology (@QuoteNietzsche) o...
Мико⚜🐾 12/16/2024 05:32
https://x.com/QuoteNietzsche/status/1867785419460378820?t=YHNGXAvHWx1olVnmQsleZg&s=19 @Eurocyon sent this earlier (edited)
Friedrich Nietzsche | Philosophy & Psychology (@QuoteNietzsche) o...
bongvain 12/16/2024 06:13
truest thing he said
1
Eurocyon
https://x.com/QuoteNietzsche/status/1867615808651751655?t=4KcMbVUfXJmptZ1w1vWOQw&s=19
NasCar 12/18/2024 01:16
I thought it said "...ideas we conquered o algo"
01:16
actually over for me
Eurocyon 12/18/2024 11:20
https://x.com/KeyedCorbusier/status/1868848745464709439?t=S5u9vo_j5y4FhkjsN4_M-A&s=19
The Emergent New Man (@KeyedCorbusier) on X
NasCar
I thought it said "...ideas we conquered o algo"
Eurocyon 12/18/2024 11:20
Its joever, the brainrot consumes him.
Eurocyon 12/18/2024 19:19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NGH0xgBHkI
Philosophy Overdose
Averroes on the Intellect (History of Philosophy)
1
Мико⚜🐾 12/18/2024 19:31
Finally!
Мико⚜🐾 12/24/2024 05:14
A few weeks ago I was made aware that Richard Adams, author of the popular mature novel about rabbits "Watership Down", was an Orthodox Christian. (edited)
05:17
Watership_Down_Richard_Adams.pdf
1.3 MB
ungen 01/02/2025 11:11
@Мико⚜🐾 these WOAH-jacks are incomprehensible o algo
Deleted User 01/02/2025 19:13
Woahuh
ungen
@Мико⚜🐾 these WOAH-jacks are incomprehensible o algo
Мико⚜🐾 01/02/2025 19:18
i dont understand this
Мико⚜🐾 01/06/2025 16:58
16:58
my response to someone saying that they became agnostic because they "can't know whether God exists"
𝓜𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮 🐾🇵🇱 01/06/2025 17:00
You can't prove the empirical means with empirical means without making a circular argument
Arcane BOT 01/06/2025 17:00
@𝓜𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮 🐾🇵🇱 has reached level 27. GG!
𝓜𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮 🐾🇵🇱 01/06/2025 17:00
So such position is self refuting
𝓜𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮 🐾🇵🇱
You can't prove the empirical means with empirical means without making a circular argument
Мико⚜🐾 01/06/2025 17:00
exactly
Мико⚜🐾 01/06/2025 17:25
https://youtu.be/_fkIr5n-K78
telosbound
The secular dogma of “moral relativism” and its consequences
Мико⚜🐾
https://youtu.be/_fkIr5n-K78
𝓜𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮 🐾🇵🇱 01/06/2025 21:03
5
Ivory 01/08/2025 05:46
The Easter bunny is real
05:46
I met him
Ivory
I met him
Skyfoil, the Autistic Theologian 01/08/2025 08:08
Prove it
Sogga 01/10/2025 19:38
I met Santa Claus once
Мико⚜🐾 01/13/2025 09:10
https://youtube.com/shorts/EjbhyUnBey8
The Philosofur
The Fatal Flaws with ‘Your Truth’ and ‘My Truth’
Mitochondrial Eve 01/17/2025 05:31
https://youtu.be/tKX90LbnYd4?si=8I_QyxUSgAI9MV0C
CloudCuckooCountry
Ergodic Literature: The Weirdest Book Genre
1
VixenAurelian 01/28/2025 23:01
23:01
23:02
Goyslop
23:02
23:03
VixenAurelian
Goyslop
VikingTiger6 01/28/2025 23:24
betcha theres something incredibly graphic hiding in this book, open it to that page and put it where people will see it in the library
VixenAurelian
Goyslop
serpente482 01/28/2025 23:31
Fag history // Fag history without pedos
VikingTiger6
betcha theres something incredibly graphic hiding in this book, open it to that page and put it where people will see it in the library
VixenAurelian 01/28/2025 23:34
Im not in school anymore
23:34
Those two pics where from a while ago
23:35
I just picked up this book recently
23:35
VixenAurelian
Click to see attachment 🖼️
VikingTiger6 01/28/2025 23:38
gnostisicm is evil man
VikingTiger6
gnostisicm is evil man
VixenAurelian 01/28/2025 23:40
VixenAurelian
Click to see attachment 🖼️
VikingTiger6 01/28/2025 23:43
it trys to say that God is evil and that the devil is God
VixenAurelian 01/28/2025 23:45
Oh okay
23:45
VixenAurelian
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/29/2025 06:09
The concepts presented in this book are mostly decent from what I remember (edited)
VikingTiger6 01/29/2025 08:09
hermetic philosophy makes gnostics
VixenAurelian 01/29/2025 15:56
O algo
The_Black_Book_of_Satan_-_Anton_Long_Revisions_119_Fayen.pdf
2.57 MB
15:56
VixenAurelian
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Plazma Silvara 01/29/2025 23:37
23:37
You ever think this shit is retarded
Plazma Silvara
You ever think this shit is retarded
VixenAurelian 01/30/2025 05:01
Ya which is why its funny
VixenAurelian
Ya which is why its funny
Plazma Silvara 01/30/2025 05:34
I'm going to do that one day
VixenAurelian 02/06/2025 10:49
10:49
>If I believe hard enough fox women vvil come to life
2
10:49
VixenAurelian 02/07/2025 20:26
What is Isis?
20:27
"Veil of Isis"
VixenAurelian
What is Isis?
VikingTiger6 02/07/2025 20:46
Ancient god
VikingTiger6
Ancient god
VixenAurelian 02/07/2025 20:46
O
NasCar 02/13/2025 21:43
2
Arcane BOT 02/13/2025 21:43
@NasCar has reached level 50. GG!
Мико⚜🐾 02/22/2025 10:08
Мико⚜🐾 03/29/2025 18:22
https://youtu.be/PrmkKXcBtgw
voltarol
Jonathan Bowden - Nietzsche Explained
Мико⚜🐾 05/15/2025 21:21
https://youtu.be/kdqQ4dfzZow
Dr. Jordan B Cooper
Herbert Marcuse and Critical Theory (Makers of the Modern World)
Мико⚜🐾 05/20/2025 17:30
https://youtu.be/V7abyVkS6U8
Luke Smith
Consciousness Is Not Material.
Extra-sensory PURRception 05/25/2025 19:07
2
Мико⚜🐾 07/07/2025 09:15
https://youtu.be/nndPxHk_aYc
Ephemeral Solidity
Above and Beyond Man
Мико⚜🐾
https://youtu.be/ucn2KzCDnOY
Dear Deer 07/07/2025 15:56
Welcome to the wonderful world of Luke Smith.
Dear Deer 07/08/2025 06:05
06:05
So many people I find to be Gnostic without knowing it.
Dear Deer
So many people I find to be Gnostic without knowing it.
Мико⚜🐾 07/08/2025 06:13
there is definitely going to be an implicit Gnosticism quite a lot of people have, Gnosticism broadly speaking is definitely far more popular today than it was in the Roman world in the 2nd and 3rd century (edited)
Мико⚜🐾 07/09/2025 03:12
Transgenderism, transhumanism, its as a result of Gnostic ideas
2
2
Мико⚜🐾
Transgenderism, transhumanism, its as a result of Gnostic ideas
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 03:14
https://deathtotheworld.com/articles/death-to-the-machine/
Paul Kingsnorth
Death to the Machine
1
Мико⚜🐾
Transgenderism, transhumanism, its as a result of Gnostic ideas
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 03:20
Let us listen to transhumanist writer Elise Bohan: AI, robotics and other related technologies will ‘make us more than human’ and to offer us ‘something better’ than our human minds and bodies. Through these new tools, we are ‘building God.’ Let us listen to transhumanist and transgenderist Martine (formerly Martin) Rothblatt: ‘We are making God as we are implementing technology that is ever more all-knowing, ever-present, all-powerful and beneficent. Geoethical nanotechnology will ultimately connect all consciousness and control the cosmos.’
1
Dear Deer
Let us listen to transhumanist writer Elise Bohan: AI, robotics and other related technologies will ‘make us more than human’ and to offer us ‘something better’ than our human minds and bodies. Through these new tools, we are ‘building God.’ Let us listen to transhumanist and transgenderist Martine (formerly Martin) Rothblatt: ‘We are making God as we are implementing technology that is ever more all-knowing, ever-present, all-powerful and beneficent. Geoethical nanotechnology will ultimately connect all consciousness and control the cosmos.’
Мико⚜🐾 07/09/2025 16:04
Мико⚜🐾
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Мико⚜🐾 07/09/2025 16:05
the title artificial intelligence itself is already loaded with presumptions about consciousness that these materialists and transhumanists actually can’t account for
Мико⚜🐾
the title artificial intelligence itself is already loaded with presumptions about consciousness that these materialists and transhumanists actually can’t account for
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 16:10
https://videos.lukesmith.xyz/w/doQwu4rbmqXUvqi1kCj2qh
Luke Smith
Computation Isn't Consciousness: The Chinese Room
I discuss John Searle's Chinese Room Experiment, but also whether a narrowly materialistic universe can give rise to consciousness on its own (it can't).
1
16:11
>He's so goated he made his own YouTube.
Dear Deer
https://videos.lukesmith.xyz/w/doQwu4rbmqXUvqi1kCj2qh
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 16:36
@vertandus.
Мико⚜🐾
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 16:39
Ai is the devil's tool. It steals jobs and it encourages laziness. No ones going to draw if they Can just type a description of a character
Pretty Hate Machine
Ai is the devil's tool. It steals jobs and it encourages laziness. No ones going to draw if they Can just type a description of a character
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 16:42
Both priests I know believe AI is a demon.
Dear Deer
Both priests I know believe AI is a demon.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 16:44
Exactly
16:46
Slowly in time, it will become more advanced, start taking over more things people don't want to do, Until it basically can do anything
Arcane BOT 07/09/2025 16:46
@Pretty Hate Machine has reached level 3. GG!
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 16:46
Then what is the point in doing anything when a computer can do it for you?
16:47
How is something like that beneficial to a persons wellbeing
Pretty Hate Machine
Then what is the point in doing anything when a computer can do it for you?
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 16:56
I mean, that's all rooted within the transhumanist agenda. (edited)
Dear Deer
I mean, that's all rooted within the transhumanist agenda. (edited)
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 16:57
Damn
16:58
They're taking science too far
Pretty Hate Machine
They're taking science too far
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 16:59
We're taking technology too far. Google made people lazier as well, algorithms have already been influencing the way we think for the past 20 years.
Dear Deer
We're taking technology too far. Google made people lazier as well, algorithms have already been influencing the way we think for the past 20 years.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 16:59
Have you seen people try use a map?
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:00
I have, it's a shame.
17:00
Or even write a letter.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:00
It really is
17:00
YES
17:01
Nowadays you can just "YouTube tutorial" it. Meanwhile the thousands of pages of cooking magazines and passed on knowledge...
17:01
Why do it yourself when you can get told what to do
Pretty Hate Machine
Why do it yourself when you can get told what to do
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:02
https://deathtotheworld.com/articles/death-to-the-machine/
Paul Kingsnorth
Death to the Machine
17:03
This does more in depth on that topic.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:03
Audiobooks replace paper books too
17:03
That's a sad thing to see
Pretty Hate Machine
Audiobooks replace paper books too
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:03
audiobooks have a use, e-books are pure evil.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:04
I mix the two up, my apologies (edited)
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:04
I can workout or clean while listening to an audiobook, e-books have the same restrictions as a real book - just you don't own it.
Dear Deer
I can workout or clean while listening to an audiobook, e-books have the same restrictions as a real book - just you don't own it.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:04
E books also don't hold sentimental value
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:04
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:05
You can't physically feel it, or even smell the fresh paper (edited)
Pretty Hate Machine
You can't physically feel it, or even smell the fresh paper (edited)
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:05
Also you can't mark an e-book*. (edited)
17:05
Sorry.
17:05
They're a pain to study.
Мико⚜🐾 07/09/2025 17:07
you cant control f a physical book
17:07
in all seriousness though, i prefer physical books
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:09
Another issue we have, one that's well documented and people are well aware of, are mobile phones. The internet, while allowing us to connect with the world, also is a trap for those who cannot regulate how they use it. End up being on the internet more than Interacting with physical people
17:09
You see people walking down roads just texting
17:09
Oblivious to what's going on around them
Pretty Hate Machine
Another issue we have, one that's well documented and people are well aware of, are mobile phones. The internet, while allowing us to connect with the world, also is a trap for those who cannot regulate how they use it. End up being on the internet more than Interacting with physical people
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:10
Smartphones are truly terrible, devices originally made for communication turned into a void of consumption
17:11
You can't create anything on a smartphone like you can on a computer, you can virtually only consume
1
1
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:11
Very true
Arcane BOT 07/09/2025 17:11
@Pretty Hate Machine has reached level 4. GG!
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:12
Another thing I hate about phones, is they use Ai to manipulate images taken on their cameras
Мико⚜🐾 07/09/2025 17:12
The medium is the message
Pretty Hate Machine
Another thing I hate about phones, is they use Ai to manipulate images taken on their cameras
Мико⚜🐾 07/09/2025 17:12
You can disable it tbf
17:12
It's pretty easy
Мико⚜🐾
You can disable it tbf
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:12
I don't use my phone camera much, I have a dslr
Extra-sensory PURRception
Smartphones are truly terrible, devices originally made for communication turned into a void of consumption
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:13
The smartphone was the worst thing to happen to mankind in the past 30 years.
5
Мико⚜🐾
The medium is the message
Мико⚜🐾 07/09/2025 17:13
https://youtu.be/gCr2binb4Fs
Eudaimonia
The Medium is the Message by Marshall McLuhan | Animated Book Review
1
Dear Deer
The smartphone was the worst thing to happen to mankind in the past 30 years.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:13
Agreed
Мико⚜🐾
https://youtu.be/gCr2binb4Fs
Мико⚜🐾 07/09/2025 17:13
This guy’s book is very profound and ahead of its time
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:13
It sad how it has become the norm for people to stare into their dopamine bricks the second they aren't engaged in some activity due to their horrendous attention spans
Pretty Hate Machine
I don't use my phone camera much, I have a dslr
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:14
I just switched to an Open Source fork of android, it's only for calling.
Extra-sensory PURRception
It sad how it has become the norm for people to stare into their dopamine bricks the second they aren't engaged in some activity due to their horrendous attention spans
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:14
The saddest example I can give is at family gatherings. Is it really spending time with the family if they are all on their phones?
Pretty Hate Machine
The saddest example I can give is at family gatherings. Is it really spending time with the family if they are all on their phones?
Мико⚜🐾 07/09/2025 17:15
It isnt
Pretty Hate Machine
The saddest example I can give is at family gatherings. Is it really spending time with the family if they are all on their phones?
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:15
True
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:16
There's a reason kids shouldnt have phones. They can't regulate themselves using them
17:16
I didn't have a phone until I was 16 for this reason
Pretty Hate Machine
There's a reason kids shouldnt have phones. They can't regulate themselves using them
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:16
My kid is getting a flip phone.
Dear Deer
My kid is getting a flip phone.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:16
Yes.
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:17
It's also horrible when people use their phone when they are outside, I've seen mothers walk with their baby in a stroller while just staring into their phones
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:17
Keep phones to how they are intended: to call people
3
Pretty Hate Machine
Keep phones to how they are intended: to call people
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:18
Yeah, communication and 2FA are pretty much the only acceptable uses in my opinion
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:18
I enjoy calling people or talking face to face, besides IRC chatrooms and places like this I hate talking to people on the Internet.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:18
And the more functions these large companies add to them, the more people rely on them. Same can be said about ai.
Dear Deer
I enjoy calling people or talking face to face, besides IRC chatrooms and places like this I hate talking to people on the Internet.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:18
Same here
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:18
The next red pill you need is that gaming is lame 'n gay.
Dear Deer
The next red pill you need is that gaming is lame 'n gay.
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:19
It's a prison, for the mind
17:19
Quite literally
Dear Deer
The next red pill you need is that gaming is lame 'n gay.
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:20
I can mostly agree with this, I think that it can be acceptable if done rarely
Extra-sensory PURRception
I can mostly agree with this, I think that it can be acceptable if done rarely
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:20
As a reward
17:21
In small doses, otherwise it's no better than drugs
17:21
Which in this context give lots of dopamine
Pretty Hate Machine
As a reward
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:21
Yeah, also most preferably with friends
Pretty Hate Machine
In small doses, otherwise it's no better than drugs
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:21
True
Extra-sensory PURRception
Yeah, also most preferably with friends
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:22
Agreed
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:22
The same thing goes for most digital entertainment
Extra-sensory PURRception
I can mostly agree with this, I think that it can be acceptable if done rarely
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:22
I watch a movie like once every three months and I let myself play some Doom like every two months, I don't really like gaming any more as well. Also I'm running OpenBSD, not too many games run on my OS.
Extra-sensory PURRception
The same thing goes for most digital entertainment
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:22
Why go to a band concert if you could just see it on YouTube
17:22
Although in its defense it is nice to see concerts that you've missed (edited)
17:23
TV shows which are just on demand because of streaming platforms
Dear Deer
I watch a movie like once every three months and I let myself play some Doom like every two months, I don't really like gaming any more as well. Also I'm running OpenBSD, not too many games run on my OS.
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:23
I watch movies/shows occasionally, when it comes to playing games I (rarely) do it on an old laptop or ps4 since I don't have any proprietary software installed on my computer
2
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:23
Streaming platforms have killed TV shows
17:24
They encourage people to "binge watch"
Extra-sensory PURRception
I watch movies/shows occasionally, when it comes to playing games I (rarely) do it on an old laptop or ps4 since I don't have any proprietary software installed on my computer
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:24
Me neither
Extra-sensory PURRception
I watch movies/shows occasionally, when it comes to playing games I (rarely) do it on an old laptop or ps4 since I don't have any proprietary software installed on my computer
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:24
I still have a PS3
Pretty Hate Machine
Streaming platforms have killed TV shows
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 17:25
If buying isn't owning, then pirating isn't stealing.
Dear Deer
If buying isn't owning, then pirating isn't stealing.
Extra-sensory PURRception 07/09/2025 17:25
But pirating has always been justified since intellectual property is bullshit
4
Pretty Hate Machine 07/09/2025 17:27
If you can't hold it in your hands, do you really own it?
Dear Deer
https://videos.lukesmith.xyz/w/doQwu4rbmqXUvqi1kCj2qh
vertandus 07/09/2025 18:19
based
Pretty Hate Machine
There's a reason kids shouldnt have phones. They can't regulate themselves using them
vertandus 07/09/2025 18:47
my father gave me an ipod when I was 3, and it screwed over my life (edited)
18:48
interesting how leftoids glaze their childhood
18:49
and assert how its better than tiktok or what they perceive what the "alt right trolls" are doing
Dear Deer 07/09/2025 22:11
1
22:11
vertandus
my father gave me an ipod when I was 3, and it screwed over my life (edited)
Pretty Hate Machine 07/10/2025 12:34
im seeing it today with my little sister too. she was given a tablet, now when she doesnt have it, she gets mad
Dear Deer
Click to see original message
Pretty Hate Machine 07/10/2025 12:42
you see this more and more. if people are not given something to work towards, they will never get that sense of accomplishment within themselves. Why should they chase goals if they are not pushed? Once you get comfortable, you become trapped. (edited)
Κωνσταντίνος Πασάς 07/13/2025 15:43
https://youtu.be/aEzgl0stduQ?si=p-kOcVnSJrJ6AN9N
Bornstellar
Hazbin Hotel is Demonic Propaganda
15:43
An Orthodox refutation of Hazbin's Hotel
15:44
I plan on making an Orthodox refutation/critique/tearing apart of it
1
Κωνσταντίνος Πασάς
https://youtu.be/aEzgl0stduQ?si=p-kOcVnSJrJ6AN9N
vertandus 07/13/2025 18:49
Gaming (edited)
Κωνσταντίνος Πασάς
https://youtu.be/aEzgl0stduQ?si=p-kOcVnSJrJ6AN9N
Мико⚜🐾 07/15/2025 10:41
Let me watch this now
Κωνσταντίνος Πασάς
https://youtu.be/aEzgl0stduQ?si=p-kOcVnSJrJ6AN9N
Dear Deer 07/16/2025 04:37
Gem
Мико⚜🐾 07/31/2025 13:46
“After the word 'freedom', perhaps no word is subjected to such speculation, perversions, and sophistical prostitution as the word 'love'. If the word 'freedom' in its populist form was needed to break down social structures and moral norms, then the word 'love' in its modern liberal interpretation begins to serve as a justification for all sorts of perversions, starting with theological and ending with sexual. In the Russian language, the word 'love' is not differentiated, therefore it is semantically non-uniform. Inadequate concepts can be loaded into it, moreover, concepts opposite to each other, which partly gave liberals, both in cassocks and without cassocks, the opportunity to argue that love is above all, prudently concealing what they understand by love. Theosophists introduced their idea for the destruction of Christianity, which appealed to the decadent intelligentsia: 'Truth is above religion', that is, above Christianity. And now new Gnostics and Manicheans shout: 'Love is above morality', and before 'her majesty' love, all moral concepts must disappear, like swaddling clothes that are no longer needed for a grown child. Modern prostitutes of love go so far in their insolence that they call people who adhere to firm, traditional morality Pharisees or primitive beings for this reason, who do not want to emerge from the dark Middle Ages into the light of freedom. Modernists from theology have joined this verbal bedlam. They declare: 'If love is above all, then it is above dogmas, therefore we must discard dogmas that hinder the manifestation of love in all its fullness, break them like a Chinese wall that has stood for many centuries between confessions, and merge all humanity into a single family.' Against the backdrop of a catastrophic loss of morality, when fornication and homosexuality are justified by love, 'religious fornication' arises, where under the guise of love Orthodoxy is destroyed, and in turn, the religious-theosophical chaos further stimulates the process of moral decadence. The Orthodox teaching of 'unity in truth' is being attempted to be replaced by religious decadents with 'unity without truth'. They say: 'Truth is above religion, and love is above truth. Any division is a sin against love, therefore – unite.' Man has an earthly fatherland – the country where he was born and raised; he has his origin, the history of the country and the people; he has a spiritual fatherland – the Church in which he was baptized; he has a genealogy – Orthodoxy, tracing its origin from Christ. By denying traditions, man becomes a homeless waif in his own country; through the destruction of Church Tradition, man loses his heavenly fatherland: he becomes a Uniate of all confessions and religions, and after death in eternity – a wanderer without shelter. Mixing lies and truth turns truth into lies. Half-truth is the most poisonous hybrid. At the same time, love, without truth and morality, turns into passion and becomes a rotting swamp. The falsifiers of love say: 'Fill the soul with love alone, thinking of nothing else,' as if the soul were a bottle from which one liquid can easily be poured out and another poured in. We would ask these falsifiers: where have they put Christian asceticism, the fierce struggle against sin in the heart, when a man tears passions out of his soul as if shedding blood, when great caution against the temptations surrounding him is necessary, when even greater humility of the soul before God is needed? Reveal the secret, how did you deal so quickly and simply with original sin? Gentlemen falsifiers! You speak of love so simply, as if you have no passions occupying your own heart. You have forgotten about the devil, who constantly leads you by the nose; you have forgotten about him because he has hidden under your clothing, and you do not see sin because you live in it.”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, The Profanation of Love` (edited)
Мико⚜🐾
“After the word 'freedom', perhaps no word is subjected to such speculation, perversions, and sophistical prostitution as the word 'love'. If the word 'freedom' in its populist form was needed to break down social structures and moral norms, then the word 'love' in its modern liberal interpretation begins to serve as a justification for all sorts of perversions, starting with theological and ending with sexual. In the Russian language, the word 'love' is not differentiated, therefore it is semantically non-uniform. Inadequate concepts can be loaded into it, moreover, concepts opposite to each other, which partly gave liberals, both in cassocks and without cassocks, the opportunity to argue that love is above all, prudently concealing what they understand by love. Theosophists introduced their idea for the destruction of Christianity, which appealed to the decadent intelligentsia: 'Truth is above religion', that is, above Christianity. And now new Gnostics and Manicheans shout: 'Love is above morality', and before 'her majesty' love, all moral concepts must disappear, like swaddling clothes that are no longer needed for a grown child. Modern prostitutes of love go so far in their insolence that they call people who adhere to firm, traditional morality Pharisees or primitive beings for this reason, who do not want to emerge from the dark Middle Ages into the light of freedom. Modernists from theology have joined this verbal bedlam. They declare: 'If love is above all, then it is above dogmas, therefore we must discard dogmas that hinder the manifestation of love in all its fullness, break them like a Chinese wall that has stood for many centuries between confessions, and merge all humanity into a single family.' Against the backdrop of a catastrophic loss of morality, when fornication and homosexuality are justified by love, 'religious fornication' arises, where under the guise of love Orthodoxy is destroyed, and in turn, the religious-theosophical chaos further stimulates the process of moral decadence. The Orthodox teaching of 'unity in truth' is being attempted to be replaced by religious decadents with 'unity without truth'. They say: 'Truth is above religion, and love is above truth. Any division is a sin against love, therefore – unite.' Man has an earthly fatherland – the country where he was born and raised; he has his origin, the history of the country and the people; he has a spiritual fatherland – the Church in which he was baptized; he has a genealogy – Orthodoxy, tracing its origin from Christ. By denying traditions, man becomes a homeless waif in his own country; through the destruction of Church Tradition, man loses his heavenly fatherland: he becomes a Uniate of all confessions and religions, and after death in eternity – a wanderer without shelter. Mixing lies and truth turns truth into lies. Half-truth is the most poisonous hybrid. At the same time, love, without truth and morality, turns into passion and becomes a rotting swamp. The falsifiers of love say: 'Fill the soul with love alone, thinking of nothing else,' as if the soul were a bottle from which one liquid can easily be poured out and another poured in. We would ask these falsifiers: where have they put Christian asceticism, the fierce struggle against sin in the heart, when a man tears passions out of his soul as if shedding blood, when great caution against the temptations surrounding him is necessary, when even greater humility of the soul before God is needed? Reveal the secret, how did you deal so quickly and simply with original sin? Gentlemen falsifiers! You speak of love so simply, as if you have no passions occupying your own heart. You have forgotten about the devil, who constantly leads you by the nose; you have forgotten about him because he has hidden under your clothing, and you do not see sin because you live in it.”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, The Profanation of Love` (edited)
Мико⚜🐾 07/31/2025 13:51
“You have united man and ape into one genus, as descendant and ancestor, and now you are uniting love with fornication. You are 'born connectors' of everyone with everyone, everything with everything. If you were given power, you would arrange meetings to unite angels with demons, and further I remain silent. Now, nevertheless, let us turn to our task: what is love, in order to distinguish it from pseudo-love. In the trichotomy of man, we can conditionally distinguish three kinds of love: Carnal Love, which is based on the unity of origin and kinship solidarity; this is sexual, marital, familial love, based on the voice of blood. For the most part, this love is an attraction of flesh to flesh, although love between parents and children can transition into a sublimated psychic feeling. Carnal love is inherent not only to man but also to other creatures inhabiting the earth. Psychic Love is based on human solidarity, community of interests, love for the fatherland, mutual understanding, as if a mutual penetration of souls. This love is higher than carnal love, but it also belongs to the soul and is subject to fluctuations of emotions and moods. This love provides nourishment for art, is the basis of friendship and human community, but it can unexpectedly change into indifference or turn into hatred. It is the cause of life's tragedies; it is often combined with carnal love, and therefore, St. Gregory the Theologian spoke of the 'unlovely love of the soul for the sake of the beautiful body.' Psychic love, in its sublimated form, can manifest as bodily mercy, charity, and compassion. This love exists within the circle of earthly experiences; it can be ardent and tender, but it lacks strength and constancy, therefore the Psalmist prophet said: '...every man is a liar.' Psychic love is inherent to all peoples and all nations. We see its manifestations throughout all observable historical times. Therefore, man can feel, understand, and experience the poems of Homer and Virgil, the tragedies of Shakespeare, the biographies of Plutarch, and the poetry of Tasso. Psychic love is inherent to people of all religions. Spiritual Love.This is possible only through the action of Divine Grace, when the spirit awakens from the sleep into which it was plunged by the passions, as the earth awakens under the rays of the spring sun. Passions nesting in the soul and body enter into battle with spiritual love. Therefore, spiritual love is largely the liberation of the spirit from the slavery of psychic attractions and emotions, and the establishment of the hierarchical forces of the human monad. This is achieved in persistent struggle. Therefore, the beginning of spiritual love is repentance, and the beginning of freedom is asceticism and the submission of one's will to Grace. The spirit, having taken the dominant place in the human trichotomy, permeates the soul with its impulses, spiritualizes it, and purifies psychic love itself. Without Grace, psychic love is constantly subjected to corrosion and deformation due to the sin living in man and embedded in his nature. Without truth, the acquisition of Grace is impossible; and without Grace, psychic love turns into passionate lust. Truth is the guardian of love; without it, love becomes a harlot. Humanity is catastrophically losing spiritual love. On the psychic plane, this manifests as decadence in art, as the alienation of people from each other, as an invisible darkness that increasingly thickens over the earth; on the psychic-carnal plane, it manifests as a thirst for blood and fornication, as sexual anomalies. It seems that the capitals of the world want to surpass Babylon in pride and Sodom in sins. And this rapid fall into the abyss is called liberalism and humanism, that is, freedom and love.”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, the Profanation of Love`
Мико⚜🐾
“You have united man and ape into one genus, as descendant and ancestor, and now you are uniting love with fornication. You are 'born connectors' of everyone with everyone, everything with everything. If you were given power, you would arrange meetings to unite angels with demons, and further I remain silent. Now, nevertheless, let us turn to our task: what is love, in order to distinguish it from pseudo-love. In the trichotomy of man, we can conditionally distinguish three kinds of love: Carnal Love, which is based on the unity of origin and kinship solidarity; this is sexual, marital, familial love, based on the voice of blood. For the most part, this love is an attraction of flesh to flesh, although love between parents and children can transition into a sublimated psychic feeling. Carnal love is inherent not only to man but also to other creatures inhabiting the earth. Psychic Love is based on human solidarity, community of interests, love for the fatherland, mutual understanding, as if a mutual penetration of souls. This love is higher than carnal love, but it also belongs to the soul and is subject to fluctuations of emotions and moods. This love provides nourishment for art, is the basis of friendship and human community, but it can unexpectedly change into indifference or turn into hatred. It is the cause of life's tragedies; it is often combined with carnal love, and therefore, St. Gregory the Theologian spoke of the 'unlovely love of the soul for the sake of the beautiful body.' Psychic love, in its sublimated form, can manifest as bodily mercy, charity, and compassion. This love exists within the circle of earthly experiences; it can be ardent and tender, but it lacks strength and constancy, therefore the Psalmist prophet said: '...every man is a liar.' Psychic love is inherent to all peoples and all nations. We see its manifestations throughout all observable historical times. Therefore, man can feel, understand, and experience the poems of Homer and Virgil, the tragedies of Shakespeare, the biographies of Plutarch, and the poetry of Tasso. Psychic love is inherent to people of all religions. Spiritual Love.This is possible only through the action of Divine Grace, when the spirit awakens from the sleep into which it was plunged by the passions, as the earth awakens under the rays of the spring sun. Passions nesting in the soul and body enter into battle with spiritual love. Therefore, spiritual love is largely the liberation of the spirit from the slavery of psychic attractions and emotions, and the establishment of the hierarchical forces of the human monad. This is achieved in persistent struggle. Therefore, the beginning of spiritual love is repentance, and the beginning of freedom is asceticism and the submission of one's will to Grace. The spirit, having taken the dominant place in the human trichotomy, permeates the soul with its impulses, spiritualizes it, and purifies psychic love itself. Without Grace, psychic love is constantly subjected to corrosion and deformation due to the sin living in man and embedded in his nature. Without truth, the acquisition of Grace is impossible; and without Grace, psychic love turns into passionate lust. Truth is the guardian of love; without it, love becomes a harlot. Humanity is catastrophically losing spiritual love. On the psychic plane, this manifests as decadence in art, as the alienation of people from each other, as an invisible darkness that increasingly thickens over the earth; on the psychic-carnal plane, it manifests as a thirst for blood and fornication, as sexual anomalies. It seems that the capitals of the world want to surpass Babylon in pride and Sodom in sins. And this rapid fall into the abyss is called liberalism and humanism, that is, freedom and love.”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, the Profanation of Love`
Мико⚜🐾 07/31/2025 13:53
“Now is a strange time: onto the book market, along with dirty pulp paper, various manuals on occultism and sex, books on Christian mysticism have been brought out, which were previously kept in monasteries, and the elders allowed only prepared monks to read them, and even then, under their guidance. Now, near-church 'intellectuals,' sunbathing on public beaches and scratching their backs, can discourse on the hymns of Symeon the New Theologian, or, returning from a rock concert, talk about the heartfelt Jesus Prayer, quoting Gregory of Sinai and Palamas. The words of Esenin come to mind when one hears about some modern forums on religious themes: 'I love poets – a most amusing folk, In them I always find a story familiar to the heart. Like a long-haired freak to a pimply female student, Speaks of worlds, exuding sexual languor.' Take secular literature. What speculations, forgeries, and perversions has the word "love" not been subjected to, how has vice not been praised under the name "love"? In the 'poets' quarter,' sung by Blok, virginity and chastity will forever remain Cinderella sisters, two beggar women.”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, The Profanation of Love`
Мико⚜🐾
“Now is a strange time: onto the book market, along with dirty pulp paper, various manuals on occultism and sex, books on Christian mysticism have been brought out, which were previously kept in monasteries, and the elders allowed only prepared monks to read them, and even then, under their guidance. Now, near-church 'intellectuals,' sunbathing on public beaches and scratching their backs, can discourse on the hymns of Symeon the New Theologian, or, returning from a rock concert, talk about the heartfelt Jesus Prayer, quoting Gregory of Sinai and Palamas. The words of Esenin come to mind when one hears about some modern forums on religious themes: 'I love poets – a most amusing folk, In them I always find a story familiar to the heart. Like a long-haired freak to a pimply female student, Speaks of worlds, exuding sexual languor.' Take secular literature. What speculations, forgeries, and perversions has the word "love" not been subjected to, how has vice not been praised under the name "love"? In the 'poets' quarter,' sung by Blok, virginity and chastity will forever remain Cinderella sisters, two beggar women.”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, The Profanation of Love`
Мико⚜🐾 07/31/2025 13:57
“What concept of love can our generation, raised under the radiation of televisions, have? – Probably as the freedom of not only antique Eros but also the most vulgar sex. Christ brought the message of all-forgiving love, but it was a message about a new love, for which a person must make sacrifices, reject earthly attachments, reject everything that stands between the soul and God. In this sense, spiritual love is a victory over passionate psychic love – over the love that in our time is increasingly permeated by the deathly Luciferian light. Modernists say: 'Religions and confessions, unite in love and through love.' But in reality, this is a call: 'People, unite against God, in the name of the coming Satan.' Already in the Apostle Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians, there is a description of Christian love. In these words of the apostle, we will see the face of our soul as in a mirror; we will see our condition as a negative image, opposite to that hymn of love written by the chief apostle. Modernists say: 'Love is above the law, love is above morality.' Can one say that the roof is above the house? No. It crowns the house, but rests on pillars and walls. So too, love, being the greatest commandment, rests like pillars on the other commandments of the Gospel. If it contradicts even one of them, then it is not love, but a counterfeit of love. Modernists compare traditionalists to the Pharisees and scribes denounced by Christ. But the Lord denounced the Pharisees not for the exact fulfillment of Old Testament rites, but for introducing new prescriptions, rules, and customs. They distorted the law given by God through Moses, entangling it in a web of their own casuistic judgments, prohibitions, permissions, curses, and blessings. The Pharisees detached rites from commandments and made them not the language of the Church, not prototypes of the future, not a remembrance of the coming Messiah, but a certain self-sufficient value, convincing the people that man's salvation depended on their external, literal, even mechanical fulfillment. Having disconnected from the ancient temple tradition, the Pharisees became reformers of the Old Testament, and therefore Christ called them 'blind leaders of the people.' Can modernists claim that the rites of the Orthodox Church are false? That he who fulfills them loses the main thing – love? That Christian theologians, who preserved Orthodoxy in the centuries-long struggle with heretics, are scribes who placed the letter above the spirit? Bengali Krishnas list several kinds of love: parental, marital, religious, friendly, and consider that the highest love is depraved love, which liberates man from the conventions of this world, places him above commandments and laws, and, having passed through the fire of depraved love in its various forms, man can wholly devote himself to serving Krishna. The same was preached by the ancient Gnostics – ecstatics. If you ask a prostitute whom she serves, she will answer: 'I serve love, and I give people the love they do not receive in families.' Villains who organized revolutions and then became dictators justified their crimes with love for the people. In our country, images of leaders were created whose lives were 'animated' by love for people.”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, The Profanation of Love (cont.)` (edited)
Мико⚜🐾
“What concept of love can our generation, raised under the radiation of televisions, have? – Probably as the freedom of not only antique Eros but also the most vulgar sex. Christ brought the message of all-forgiving love, but it was a message about a new love, for which a person must make sacrifices, reject earthly attachments, reject everything that stands between the soul and God. In this sense, spiritual love is a victory over passionate psychic love – over the love that in our time is increasingly permeated by the deathly Luciferian light. Modernists say: 'Religions and confessions, unite in love and through love.' But in reality, this is a call: 'People, unite against God, in the name of the coming Satan.' Already in the Apostle Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians, there is a description of Christian love. In these words of the apostle, we will see the face of our soul as in a mirror; we will see our condition as a negative image, opposite to that hymn of love written by the chief apostle. Modernists say: 'Love is above the law, love is above morality.' Can one say that the roof is above the house? No. It crowns the house, but rests on pillars and walls. So too, love, being the greatest commandment, rests like pillars on the other commandments of the Gospel. If it contradicts even one of them, then it is not love, but a counterfeit of love. Modernists compare traditionalists to the Pharisees and scribes denounced by Christ. But the Lord denounced the Pharisees not for the exact fulfillment of Old Testament rites, but for introducing new prescriptions, rules, and customs. They distorted the law given by God through Moses, entangling it in a web of their own casuistic judgments, prohibitions, permissions, curses, and blessings. The Pharisees detached rites from commandments and made them not the language of the Church, not prototypes of the future, not a remembrance of the coming Messiah, but a certain self-sufficient value, convincing the people that man's salvation depended on their external, literal, even mechanical fulfillment. Having disconnected from the ancient temple tradition, the Pharisees became reformers of the Old Testament, and therefore Christ called them 'blind leaders of the people.' Can modernists claim that the rites of the Orthodox Church are false? That he who fulfills them loses the main thing – love? That Christian theologians, who preserved Orthodoxy in the centuries-long struggle with heretics, are scribes who placed the letter above the spirit? Bengali Krishnas list several kinds of love: parental, marital, religious, friendly, and consider that the highest love is depraved love, which liberates man from the conventions of this world, places him above commandments and laws, and, having passed through the fire of depraved love in its various forms, man can wholly devote himself to serving Krishna. The same was preached by the ancient Gnostics – ecstatics. If you ask a prostitute whom she serves, she will answer: 'I serve love, and I give people the love they do not receive in families.' Villains who organized revolutions and then became dictators justified their crimes with love for the people. In our country, images of leaders were created whose lives were 'animated' by love for people.”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, The Profanation of Love (cont.)` (edited)
Мико⚜🐾 07/31/2025 13:58
“In apostolic times, the deacon Nicholas of Antioch put forth a teaching that out of love for one another, not only property but also wives should be held in common, that perfect love seeks nothing for itself, and therefore each man's wife should belong to all. This teaching was continued in subsequent Gnostic sects. The Holy Spirit, addressing the bishop of the Church of Ephesus, speaks of the Nicolaitans: 'But this you have, that you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate'; and to the bishop of the Church of Pergamum, He calls for repentance because there are people in the Pergamene Church holding to the doctrine of the Nicolaitans. The Holy Spirit says to the bishop of Pergamum: 'I will come to you quickly and will fight against them (the Nicolaitans) with the sword of My mouth.' Twice the Holy Spirit says that He hates fornication covered up by words about Christian love. Some Protestant pastors 'bless' same-sex 'marriages' of homosexuals and lesbians, also justifying this with words about love for people and freedom in love, which is above morality. Poor maiden Love, how all sorts of filth violate you!”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, The Profanation of Love (cont.)` (edited)
Мико⚜🐾
“After the word 'freedom', perhaps no word is subjected to such speculation, perversions, and sophistical prostitution as the word 'love'. If the word 'freedom' in its populist form was needed to break down social structures and moral norms, then the word 'love' in its modern liberal interpretation begins to serve as a justification for all sorts of perversions, starting with theological and ending with sexual. In the Russian language, the word 'love' is not differentiated, therefore it is semantically non-uniform. Inadequate concepts can be loaded into it, moreover, concepts opposite to each other, which partly gave liberals, both in cassocks and without cassocks, the opportunity to argue that love is above all, prudently concealing what they understand by love. Theosophists introduced their idea for the destruction of Christianity, which appealed to the decadent intelligentsia: 'Truth is above religion', that is, above Christianity. And now new Gnostics and Manicheans shout: 'Love is above morality', and before 'her majesty' love, all moral concepts must disappear, like swaddling clothes that are no longer needed for a grown child. Modern prostitutes of love go so far in their insolence that they call people who adhere to firm, traditional morality Pharisees or primitive beings for this reason, who do not want to emerge from the dark Middle Ages into the light of freedom. Modernists from theology have joined this verbal bedlam. They declare: 'If love is above all, then it is above dogmas, therefore we must discard dogmas that hinder the manifestation of love in all its fullness, break them like a Chinese wall that has stood for many centuries between confessions, and merge all humanity into a single family.' Against the backdrop of a catastrophic loss of morality, when fornication and homosexuality are justified by love, 'religious fornication' arises, where under the guise of love Orthodoxy is destroyed, and in turn, the religious-theosophical chaos further stimulates the process of moral decadence. The Orthodox teaching of 'unity in truth' is being attempted to be replaced by religious decadents with 'unity without truth'. They say: 'Truth is above religion, and love is above truth. Any division is a sin against love, therefore – unite.' Man has an earthly fatherland – the country where he was born and raised; he has his origin, the history of the country and the people; he has a spiritual fatherland – the Church in which he was baptized; he has a genealogy – Orthodoxy, tracing its origin from Christ. By denying traditions, man becomes a homeless waif in his own country; through the destruction of Church Tradition, man loses his heavenly fatherland: he becomes a Uniate of all confessions and religions, and after death in eternity – a wanderer without shelter. Mixing lies and truth turns truth into lies. Half-truth is the most poisonous hybrid. At the same time, love, without truth and morality, turns into passion and becomes a rotting swamp. The falsifiers of love say: 'Fill the soul with love alone, thinking of nothing else,' as if the soul were a bottle from which one liquid can easily be poured out and another poured in. We would ask these falsifiers: where have they put Christian asceticism, the fierce struggle against sin in the heart, when a man tears passions out of his soul as if shedding blood, when great caution against the temptations surrounding him is necessary, when even greater humility of the soul before God is needed? Reveal the secret, how did you deal so quickly and simply with original sin? Gentlemen falsifiers! You speak of love so simply, as if you have no passions occupying your own heart. You have forgotten about the devil, who constantly leads you by the nose; you have forgotten about him because he has hidden under your clothing, and you do not see sin because you live in it.”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, The Profanation of Love` (edited)
vertandus 07/31/2025 21:56
Love is love guys make no distinction between its different types unlike the greeks (edited)
2
21:56
Eros = pragma = agape and so on (edited)
vertandus
Love is love guys make no distinction between its different types unlike the greeks (edited)
0mniscience 07/31/2025 21:56
average thought-killing statement:
21:57
"hey guys im so smart i must be right"
vertandus 07/31/2025 21:58
Sodom, Gomorrah, your outcry is right; your sins are exceedingly grave
21:58
If just 50 of you were found to be righteous, then every one of you are to be saved
21:59
I love this song man
22:06
I found a book titled "The Ethical Slut" in my local library (edited)
vertandus
I found a book titled "The Ethical Slut" in my local library (edited)
0mniscience 07/31/2025 22:08
The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities that Will Never Make You Happy
0mniscience
The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities that Will Never Make You Happy
vertandus 07/31/2025 22:08
geg
vertandus
geg
0mniscience 07/31/2025 22:09
Xhe author left that last part out o algo
Arcane BOT 07/31/2025 22:09
@0mniscience has reached level 1. GG!
Arcane
@0mniscience has reached level 1. GG!
0mniscience 07/31/2025 22:09
GGs yall im omw to 1.65 million power
Мико⚜🐾
“In apostolic times, the deacon Nicholas of Antioch put forth a teaching that out of love for one another, not only property but also wives should be held in common, that perfect love seeks nothing for itself, and therefore each man's wife should belong to all. This teaching was continued in subsequent Gnostic sects. The Holy Spirit, addressing the bishop of the Church of Ephesus, speaks of the Nicolaitans: 'But this you have, that you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate'; and to the bishop of the Church of Pergamum, He calls for repentance because there are people in the Pergamene Church holding to the doctrine of the Nicolaitans. The Holy Spirit says to the bishop of Pergamum: 'I will come to you quickly and will fight against them (the Nicolaitans) with the sword of My mouth.' Twice the Holy Spirit says that He hates fornication covered up by words about Christian love. Some Protestant pastors 'bless' same-sex 'marriages' of homosexuals and lesbians, also justifying this with words about love for people and freedom in love, which is above morality. Poor maiden Love, how all sorts of filth violate you!”
`Archimandrite Raphael Karelin, The Profanation of Love (cont.)` (edited)
Brøther Særaphim 08/01/2025 11:39
yes WE ARE reading the most esoteric writings of Arch. Raphael Karelin yes WE ARE opposing the decadence of the arts
0mniscience 08/01/2025 16:09
Does anyone wanna try and refute these two premises? They came from a Pantheist philosophy fanatic. Also he was arguing on opposition of Christianity. P1: God is the totality of all things (a variation of pantheism) Justification: God being the totality of all things as in the infinite substance of which all are modes of is justified by quantum field theory and mathematics. For starters quantum field theory shows us that all particles and objects we perceive are temporary manifestations of a quantum field. Furthermore the wave function extends infinitely across the universe, this is a necessary axiom for our physics to work. Furthermore given the 2022 nobel prize experiment in regards to bells theorem and locality it demonstrates that the universe is maximally holistic which completely supports my position (and spinozas). Lastly it best account for consciousness and the metaphysical positions that are the most well supported such as anti essentialism (with everything being modes of one thing) and universals (which everything being a bundle of tropes that borrow from a fundamental substrate) this helps explain mathematics and logic itself. Furthermore my god doesn't intervene in the universe or anywhere else, because my god is everything. Your god can come in at any moment and disrupt the temporal coherence of the world which annihilates the possibility of knowledge as inferences and causal succession itself is being constantly violated by providence and/or interventions. P2: The idea of the Christian God would destroy the temporal coherence that is necessary for logic and thought to even exist if it were real. Justification:
16:09
Your views are self refuting as you cannot justify inferences which is necessary for logic, maths, reasoning etc This is because causality is a necessary axiom for any system and this causality must remain in some sense, absolute. If your god (which everything is contingent upon) can simply enter this world and change the temporal/causal succession (as in make things be other than they were) then this poses a deadly epistemic and metaphysical issue, as causality itself is being disrupted from a non causal entity, which collapses the nomic web of temporal succession which destroys mathematical and logical and physically symmetry, collapses time symmetry, inferential symmetry and not only that it also destroys the soundness of deductive logic itself, meaning that maths and necessary truths are inductively verified instead of deductively which is impossible.
16:11
The jargon here is too much and gives me a headache so I ain't tackling it (edited)
16:11
16:12
Maybe some day when I'm in a more peak state of logicality (i.e. higher quality sleep) I'll dismantle this.
16:15
My current objection to this is that his view premises that God must be bound to logical coherence, which, by definition of what God is, cannot possibly be true. God negates; he negates the need to adhere to the logical coherence of the universe. Under this person's premises, God is a being that must adhere to the very laws of nature that he wrote, which makes no sense. (edited)
16:19
If God is bound to logical coherence, then God cannot do even the simplest things that would be considered miracles, like turning water into wine or something. now that I think about it, hes presuming that God must be bound to logical coherence lmao, why didn't I ask him to justify this presupposition :((( (edited)
vertandus 08/07/2025 16:53
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWdJ8BRl9lA How do you defend moral realism when faced with contradictions?
Kane B
Moral Contradictions
3
16:56
moral trivialism sounds very heretical
vertandus
moral trivialism sounds very heretical
0mniscience 08/07/2025 19:05
how tho
19:05
may u explain, porfa
0mniscience
may u explain, porfa
vertandus 08/07/2025 19:13
christian metaethical doctrine states that good is a pure state and evil is only the abscence of good
19:13
moral trivialism states that all actions are good and evil at the same time
19:13
and has its origins in eastern thought
vertandus
moral trivialism states that all actions are good and evil at the same time
0mniscience 08/07/2025 19:13
really?
19:14
didnt know that
0mniscience
really?
vertandus 08/07/2025 19:14
that's how the video explains, so saying that it is radical dialetheism is incomplete
vertandus 08/08/2025 21:49
https://g.progressivism.lgbt/ amazing
Consistent Progressivism
Consistent Progressivism is a political worldview and ideology that advocates the complete and total abolition of all forms of conservatism in favor of a radqueer society in which all beings can live and identify free of things like identity and relationship stigmatization, bigotry, corporations, the family institution, and the state.
2
Мико⚜🐾 08/10/2025 22:01
https://youtu.be/cudDNTd4Ncw
telosbound
Orthodox Christian Ontology: Being is Communion (Self-Relation is N...
Мико⚜🐾 08/10/2025 22:16
https://youtu.be/J4mUxPlrOOE
telosbound
Byung-Chul Han: The Agony of Eros
Мико⚜🐾 08/10/2025 22:45
https://youtu.be/hnMhCZ3SJ6Y
telosbound
Byung-Chul Han: The Expulsion of the Other
andrezj 08/20/2025 09:42
what's yall opinion on the book called "Hojoki, by Kamo no Chomei" ? since i kinda want to read this book and needed suggestions before getting into it
Мико⚜🐾 08/23/2025 09:59
https://youtu.be/vLpEDlgEleg
Jonathan Pageau
Symbolism Explained: The Fundamental WWII Duality That Still Haunts...
andrezj
what's yall opinion on the book called "Hojoki, by Kamo no Chomei" ? since i kinda want to read this book and needed suggestions before getting into it
Мико⚜🐾 08/23/2025 09:59
havent checked it out
09:59
what is it about?
Мико⚜🐾
what is it about?
andrezj 08/23/2025 10:06
some peeps said its like the book of ecclesiastes, but buddhist
10:06
i havent read it yet tho
Мико⚜🐾 08/23/2025 10:22
Ahhh, I think I know what you're talking about now
10:22
I just forgot the name
10:23
There's a review of it, funnily enough, by someone from the channel I posted above
andrezj
i havent read it yet tho
Мико⚜🐾 08/23/2025 10:23
https://youtu.be/MhUrQThARAQ
telosbound
The Japanese Ecclesiastes (Hojoki: Kamo-No-Chomei)
10:27
Fr. Daniel Sysoev also has a commentary on Ecclesiastes as well which might be useful to you
2
2
Мико⚜🐾
Fr. Daniel Sysoev also has a commentary on Ecclesiastes as well which might be useful to you
andrezj 08/23/2025 10:28
thank you so much brother
Deleted User 09/02/2025 17:35
muh man Kane B has gone off the deep end gng https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYaacLGytHc&lc=Ugz3Sths8TLYeS2XP_54AaABAg
Kane B
I don't care for the Moon
0mniscience
Your views are self refuting as you cannot justify inferences which is necessary for logic, maths, reasoning etc This is because causality is a necessary axiom for any system and this causality must remain in some sense, absolute. If your god (which everything is contingent upon) can simply enter this world and change the temporal/causal succession (as in make things be other than they were) then this poses a deadly epistemic and metaphysical issue, as causality itself is being disrupted from a non causal entity, which collapses the nomic web of temporal succession which destroys mathematical and logical and physically symmetry, collapses time symmetry, inferential symmetry and not only that it also destroys the soundness of deductive logic itself, meaning that maths and necessary truths are inductively verified instead of deductively which is impossible.
Deleted User 09/07/2025 02:48
chat i finally refuted this argument against God (took me long enough this one was super hard)
02:52
basically the formal argument LogosDIA made was: P1 induction is a necessity P2 the universe is holistic P3 God disrupts the consistency of the universe Modus tollens (I think, his argument wasn't formalized) God (in the Bible) does not exist There was also a sneaky non-sequitur in there where he included deduction in his hypothesis it was a fallacy of the 4th (or extra; additional) term (edited)
02:56
My refutation was: "I believe I see a category error here: just because God can interfere with causality and undermine inductive logic, does not mean that God undermines deductive logic. This is a leap in reasoning that needs further justification. Deductive logic is purely through reason, which does not include your given example of gravity; that is still inductive as it is contingent upon the observations that have been made about how the universe behaves. inductive inferences are probabilistic in nature. just because our universe does not have stable causality, does not mean that we cannot probabilistically justify inferences, as we ALWAYS have, because that is, by definition, what an inference is. To further refute this, let there exist two scenarios: 1. we live in a universe with stable causality, and we make consistent observations about things. are we able to make inductive inferences? 2. we live in a universe without stable causality, and we make consistent observations about things. are we able to make inductive inferences? Also: inductive truths have the capacity to change over time. Inductive reasoning is not absolute, as we cannot, by definition of inductive reasoning NOT being absolute, verify an inductive truth to be absolutely true; it will always be probabilistically justified rather than absolutely justified. Your argument does not entail any collapse of induction, it misidentifies the very nature of what you're trying to prove.
02:56
You are posing the entire idea of God to be a slippery slope. We know that the God of the Bible has, according to the Bible, done things that would, in your view, shift the causal succession. Although I agree with this notion, this does not mean that the holistic validity of inductive reasoning is now rendered invalid. You are essentially saying that: if a single slice of bread, 1 billion light years away, were to spontaneously turn into a block of wood, then we cannot predict whether a ping pong ball on Earth is going to fall up or down. You are assuming that one error in the causal succession causes the entirety of the universe to suddenly stop making coherent sense, while the fundamental universe (the quantum world) is, by its very nature of being based in probability, inconsistent." quantum physics is strange asl (edited)
Deleted User
My refutation was: "I believe I see a category error here: just because God can interfere with causality and undermine inductive logic, does not mean that God undermines deductive logic. This is a leap in reasoning that needs further justification. Deductive logic is purely through reason, which does not include your given example of gravity; that is still inductive as it is contingent upon the observations that have been made about how the universe behaves. inductive inferences are probabilistic in nature. just because our universe does not have stable causality, does not mean that we cannot probabilistically justify inferences, as we ALWAYS have, because that is, by definition, what an inference is. To further refute this, let there exist two scenarios: 1. we live in a universe with stable causality, and we make consistent observations about things. are we able to make inductive inferences? 2. we live in a universe without stable causality, and we make consistent observations about things. are we able to make inductive inferences? Also: inductive truths have the capacity to change over time. Inductive reasoning is not absolute, as we cannot, by definition of inductive reasoning NOT being absolute, verify an inductive truth to be absolutely true; it will always be probabilistically justified rather than absolutely justified. Your argument does not entail any collapse of induction, it misidentifies the very nature of what you're trying to prove.
Deleted User 09/07/2025 02:57
I vvon like the based chad i am
Мико⚜🐾 09/10/2025 21:13
2
Мико⚜🐾
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Deleted User 09/12/2025 01:45
based
Мико⚜🐾 09/21/2025 18:55
HoH_I4_Contentproto_DONE916.pdf
26.23 MB
Мико⚜🐾
Click to see attachment 🖼️
vertandus 09/27/2025 20:41
nietzsche out of all people
20:41
vertandus
nietzsche out of all people
Deleted User 10/01/2025 11:42
the one dude that makes every midwit think they've found out the secrets of the universe after reading 5 pages of his works o algo
3
1
Deleted User 10/04/2025 13:45
https://youtu.be/KVl5kMXz1vA?si=Vp3Bz-5TOX9stu9R
Jeffrey Kaplan
Peter Singer - ordinary people are evil
13:45
insanely insightful
13:46
very thorough and difficult to refute i personally dont think that the premises can be refuted
13:46
i made a half-rebuttal that reduces the extreme nature of this argument but it can probably be easily countered
Deleted User
https://youtu.be/KVl5kMXz1vA?si=Vp3Bz-5TOX9stu9R
Extra-sensory PURRception 10/04/2025 15:16
I haven't read the original text, but I assume that the text doesn't account for scale since it's not mentioned in the video. Since relief agencies mostly help in developing countries it makes the country dependent on relief/outside funding. Such reliance on aid not only prevents the country from becoming independent, but will also cause more suffering once the aid is taken away. You could also take into account that the money spent on luxuries would partially go to the government due to taxes, which would help improve the country and therefore possibly decrease suffering.
1
15:17
I haven't thought much about this so I'd like to know what your thoughts are on it
Extra-sensory PURRception
I haven't read the original text, but I assume that the text doesn't account for scale since it's not mentioned in the video. Since relief agencies mostly help in developing countries it makes the country dependent on relief/outside funding. Such reliance on aid not only prevents the country from becoming independent, but will also cause more suffering once the aid is taken away. You could also take into account that the money spent on luxuries would partially go to the government due to taxes, which would help improve the country and therefore possibly decrease suffering.
Deleted User 10/04/2025 15:23
its probably in the text but i didnt read it either. the author goes over a bunch of counterarguments. i accepted all the premises because I didn't go into technicalities, thats just not how I think. everything that you're saying could be true, but if these relief agencies are not consequentially negative, then the argument he made is very sound. I don't think the consequence of dependence would have too much of an effect, because regardless of that notion, lives would be saved from starvation, the elements, etc. so ig what youre saying is a decent counterpoint but what about different things like charities etc. that get people off the streets in your own country? It's not limited to international funds, so the argument still works to some degree. My main counterpoint was accepting the diffusion of responsibility, but it doesn't disprove the argument, it just posits that we, as blessed people to live in quality, are still able to indulge in excess pleasure while giving funds to help others. The argument presented was very absolute in the sense that anything seen as unnecessary would follow that you're doing something ontologically evil, when it might not take all the excess wealth of fortunate individuals to help the rest of the world ig. (edited)
15:26
however my counterpoint can just be deontologically refuted with Christian theism, and I don't think that pleasure/happiness has any value so I basically stop there (edited)
Extra-sensory PURRception
I haven't read the original text, but I assume that the text doesn't account for scale since it's not mentioned in the video. Since relief agencies mostly help in developing countries it makes the country dependent on relief/outside funding. Such reliance on aid not only prevents the country from becoming independent, but will also cause more suffering once the aid is taken away. You could also take into account that the money spent on luxuries would partially go to the government due to taxes, which would help improve the country and therefore possibly decrease suffering.
Deleted User 10/04/2025 16:53
so do u have any comments on my thoughts here?
Deleted User
so do u have any comments on my thoughts here?
Extra-sensory PURRception 10/04/2025 17:16
I don't really have anything else to add
Extra-sensory PURRception
I don't really have anything else to add
Deleted User 10/04/2025 17:23
oke
Мико⚜🐾 10/07/2025 13:57
https://youtu.be/VCj2J1B1fJg
Europos
What is Nietzsche's "Overman"?
Deleted User 10/11/2025 03:28
Nietzsche is a 6️⃣ (only @vertandus gets this)
Skyfoil, the Autistic Theologian 10/21/2025 14:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cv659HLRUg
The Second Story
Modern Villains are Pitiful and Impotent
brapmaster 12/15/2025 01:04
1
brapmaster
Click to see attachment 🖼️
GR 12/15/2025 05:19
an all-time favorite of mine
GR
an all-time favorite of mine
brapmaster 12/15/2025 14:13
I am currently reading via audio book. Excellent so far
Eurocyon 12/27/2025 16:50
Who here has read the republic?
Eurocyon
Who here has read the republic?
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/01/2026 07:19
I have
vertandus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWdJ8BRl9lA How do you defend moral realism when faced with contradictions?
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 02:09
so i think the basic solution you and i came to here is that thia presumes any individual evaluator for moral propositions to be absolute, which is a foolish view. surely some disgusting actions such as necrophilia and incest are always immoral, yet if we hold consequantial absolutism, one can ad hoc the scenario as to where there no consequentual case to argue from. there are reasons why these things are wrong that arent consequential, but deontological i.e. incest ruins families which ties into my deontology theory that morality is for human survival, well-being, and symbiosis. any given mode for moral evaluation is applicable in some scenario but not others, unless you take the set of Christian ethics to be complete (as in you can use it to evaluate all scenarios, which I disagree with). Addressing the trolley problem, the very reasoning behind the question leads to the fact that deontology is categorically irrelevant to the problem. The question of the problem is: "are you willing to sacrifice one person in order to save five lives if your inaction will result in the vice versa?" Deontology isn't in here, merely emotivism and consequentialism, however, emotivism is egocentric and subjective, while the problem itself combtains numbers that must be evaluated. I woukd argue honestly that emotivism never constitutes as a moral evaluator (as in one's emotional reactivity does not carry morality in and if itself). So then its just consequentialism.
Ad Envyought
so i think the basic solution you and i came to here is that thia presumes any individual evaluator for moral propositions to be absolute, which is a foolish view. surely some disgusting actions such as necrophilia and incest are always immoral, yet if we hold consequantial absolutism, one can ad hoc the scenario as to where there no consequentual case to argue from. there are reasons why these things are wrong that arent consequential, but deontological i.e. incest ruins families which ties into my deontology theory that morality is for human survival, well-being, and symbiosis. any given mode for moral evaluation is applicable in some scenario but not others, unless you take the set of Christian ethics to be complete (as in you can use it to evaluate all scenarios, which I disagree with). Addressing the trolley problem, the very reasoning behind the question leads to the fact that deontology is categorically irrelevant to the problem. The question of the problem is: "are you willing to sacrifice one person in order to save five lives if your inaction will result in the vice versa?" Deontology isn't in here, merely emotivism and consequentialism, however, emotivism is egocentric and subjective, while the problem itself combtains numbers that must be evaluated. I woukd argue honestly that emotivism never constitutes as a moral evaluator (as in one's emotional reactivity does not carry morality in and if itself). So then its just consequentialism.
vertandus 01/02/2026 03:20
you're back!
vertandus
you're back!
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 03:20
at last
03:20
3 month purge and im purified or somethinf
Ad Envyought
3 month purge and im purified or somethinf
vertandus 01/02/2026 03:21
the way you said that sounded like you got banned geg
vertandus
the way you said that sounded like you got banned geg
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 03:22
naur i left willingly cuz i was neuroric asl and ppl were pissing me off it wasnt their fault tho, it was me
Mitochondrial Eve 01/02/2026 04:16
Beginning_and_Intermediate_Algebra.pdf
2.08 MB
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 05:29
ts is not philo nor lit gng
Ad Envyought
ts is not philo nor lit gng
Mitochondrial Eve 01/02/2026 06:28
I made this channel
06:28
I was there before you came
06:28
and I will sitll be there when you will be dead
1
Mitochondrial Eve
I made this channel
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 11:55
i was asking for consistency, not an indication of your own insecurity by immediately gravitating towards asserting dominance
Arcane BOT 01/02/2026 11:55
@Ad Envyought has reached level 2. GG!
Ad Envyought
i was asking for consistency, not an indication of your own insecurity by immediately gravitating towards asserting dominance
Ski Squire 01/02/2026 12:33
oh shit you are back in this server too :D
12:33
welcome back :DDDD
1
Ski Squire
oh shit you are back in this server too :D
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 13:33
yayayays
1
Ad Envyought
i was asking for consistency, not an indication of your own insecurity by immediately gravitating towards asserting dominance
Mitochondrial Eve 01/02/2026 18:39
Mitochondrial Eve
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 18:40
Mitochondrial Eve 01/02/2026 18:45
18:45
GR 01/02/2026 18:47
goated
Mitochondrial Eve 01/02/2026 18:47
Catholicism is the only true church
4
6
18:47
End of discission
GR 01/02/2026 18:48
or something
Mitochondrial Eve
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 18:58
too scared to tag me award
Ad Envyought
too scared to tag me award
Mitochondrial Eve 01/02/2026 18:59
Nigga this is discord get a life
Mitochondrial Eve
Nigga this is discord get a life
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 18:59
im propagating the joking you autist
Mitochondrial Eve 01/02/2026 19:00
1
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 19:00
"erm i was also joking when i said that"
Mitochondrial Eve 01/02/2026 19:00
I'm busy nigga
19:00
Not reading this
19:00
Being blocked btw
1
Mitochondrial Eve
Being blocked btw
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 19:00
its that ez ig geg
Mitochondrial Eve 01/02/2026 19:00
Yaaaawn
19:01
vertandus 01/02/2026 19:04
dielectrics
vertandus
dielectrics
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 19:07
vufio:
Ad Envyought
vufio:
vertandus 01/02/2026 19:28
spheno:
vertandus
spheno:
Ad Envyought 01/02/2026 19:29
your mom: [unfunny humor] gifted: power
19:29
i am kirkenuinely a humor genius
VikingTiger6 01/03/2026 03:53
knox was based
03:54
03:54
1
VikingTiger6
Click to see attachment 🖼️
Eurocyon 01/03/2026 04:15
"I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of ‘Women’s Rights,’ with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to ‘unsex’ themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection." - Queen Victoria
1
Ad Envyought 01/09/2026 03:43
Lately I've been thinking a lot about metaethics without a theistic presupposition, and I've come to the conclusion that morality is an incomplete set of propositions, as in there must be specific existing conditions in order for morals to be logically consistent. I think this could genuinely be an argument for a higher power, but what I wrote below does not argue for it. I could argue that a fallible authority does not solve this collapse problem I have created, which would suggest that a higher power ia needed for morality at all. What I've formulated below is a definitional collapse of the word "immoral" when given two assumptioms (P1 and P6 are assumptions). P1: Negative moral assumption, action A is immoral; I(A) P2: What is immoral is obligatory to not do; ∀x[I(x) → O(¬x)] Conclusion 1: By Universal Instantiation from P1+P2, It is obligatory that not A; O(¬A) P3: It is obligatory that, if it is obligatory that not x, then not x becomes a reality; O[O(¬x) → ¬x] Conclusion 2: By Modus Ponens from C1+P3, It is obligatory that not A becomes a reality P4: Morality is most effectively made a reality either by some formal legal system or by vigilantes P5: Vigilante is not proper authority to determine what is moral and what is not Conclusion 3: By Disjunctive Syllogism from P4+P5, morality is only effectively made a reality from a legal system P6: Assumption about A: there is no legal binding to discourage action A in an effective manner P7: The simple assertion that action A is immoral does not make action A obligatory to not do in the real world P8: "It is obligatory that not X" is the same as "it is obligatory that not X in the real world" Conclusion 4: By Modus Tollens and Biconditional Elimination from P2+P6+P7+P8, it is not the case that action A is obligatory to not do Conclusion 5: By conjunctive introduction from C1+C4, it is obligatory that not A and it is not obligatory that not A. Conclusion 6: By the Proof of Explosion (from a contradiction, any proposition becomes true), the premises provided cause morality to be explosive, as in all moral propositions are both true and false. I can justify P8 via the axiom in P3 btw This ties in to atheism because an atheist that rejects any necessity to make morality a complete system causes their ethics to be explosive. The theist does not have to worry about this because a divine authority renders morality complete by default. Non-cognitivism is bullshit btw, when we make any type of assertion, we are trying to assert that some sentence P reflects or does not reflect the real world through some coherence theory truth, empirical truth, pragmatic truth, etc.
2
Ad Envyought 01/09/2026 03:52
turkey yum
Original message was deleted or could not be loaded.
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 16:41
I don't remember which one that is (edited)
Original message was deleted or could not be loaded.
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 17:04
I probably disagree with most of the things said there (edited)
Extra-sensory PURRception
I probably disagree with most of the things said there (edited)
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 17:15
what does he say in that chapter? vertandus is reading the republic and i wanna get started on it soon
17:15
like a summary ig (edited)
Ad Envyought
what does he say in that chapter? vertandus is reading the republic and i wanna get started on it soon
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 17:23
I think that he said that women should get similar education to men, then that there should be eugenic-based relationships and that children should be given to random parents or something. I'm sure that I've missed some things
Extra-sensory PURRception
I think that he said that women should get similar education to men, then that there should be eugenic-based relationships and that children should be given to random parents or something. I'm sure that I've missed some things
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 17:23
alr
17:23
ill read it myself because you dont sound at all confident
Ad Envyought
ill read it myself because you dont sound at all confident
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 17:26
Sounds like a good idea (edited)
Original message was deleted or could not be loaded.
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:29
how did he define it
Extra-sensory PURRception
I think that he said that women should get similar education to men, then that there should be eugenic-based relationships and that children should be given to random parents or something. I'm sure that I've missed some things
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:29
>then that there should be eugenic-based relationships and that children should be given to random parents or something funny
18:30
holy consistent utilitarianism
Arcane BOT 01/12/2026 18:30
@Ad Envyought has reached level 8. GG!
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:31
wdym by that
Ad Envyought
>then that there should be eugenic-based relationships and that children should be given to random parents or something funny
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 18:32
I don't think that it summarizes it fairly well
Extra-sensory PURRception
I don't think that it summarizes it fairly well
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:32
eurocyon filled in the gap a little
18:32
i cannot wait to read this
18:33
bro wrote down his good ideas first o algo
Ad Envyought
eurocyon filled in the gap a little
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 18:33
I meant the section that you highlighted (edited)
Extra-sensory PURRception
I meant the section that you highlighted (edited)
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:33
thats what i was referencing
18:34
altho
18:34
summarization doesnt do philosophy justice, you gotta read why they think what they think first
Original message was deleted or could not be loaded.
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 18:34
Some of the later ones are fine too
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:34
i will
Ad Envyought
summarization doesnt do philosophy justice, you gotta read why they think what they think first
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 18:34
Yeah, obviously... but you were the one who asked for a summary
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:35
but i wanna get thru aristotle's metaphysics first because thats one of my main focuses at the moment
18:35
that and metaethics
18:35
cuz im developing an entire metaethical system
18:35
just for the funnies
18:35
its basically glazing Kant my beloved (edited)
18:35
he cant get enough glaze
Extra-sensory PURRception
Yeah, obviously... but you were the one who asked for a summary
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:36
ik
18:36
i wanted an idea
18:36
i wasnt going to take what you said to heart
18:36
just an idea
Ad Envyought
its basically glazing Kant my beloved (edited)
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 18:37
Sounds like you should just read him then
Extra-sensory PURRception
Sounds like you should just read him then
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:37
i like reading multiple perspectives
18:38
well, learning about. im just starting reading stuff
18:38
the first philosopher that i absolutely hate that i wanna read about is hume
18:38
(yes im not capitalizing his name bc i hate him so much)
18:39
his is-ought problem is a very important one to know in metaethics too
Ad Envyought
the first philosopher that i absolutely hate that i wanna read about is hume
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 18:40
Hating someone before even reading their stuff seems pretty dumb
Extra-sensory PURRception
Hating someone before even reading their stuff seems pretty dumb
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:40
ive watched videos
18:41
i havent read original works
18:41
ive already told you that i listen to very long podcasts and lectures about philosophers
Ad Envyought
ive already told you that i listen to very long podcasts and lectures about philosophers
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 18:44
I know
Extra-sensory PURRception
I know
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 18:46
its that my idea of what their opinions is is something i dont like the very reason i wanna read their original works is to better understand it, but i have a hard time with the jargon
VikingTiger6 01/12/2026 20:38
People use philosophy to fill the God shaped hole in their heart, thats why ideology was invented so recently as a response to large scale atheism
Ad Envyought
just for the funnies
Incel Furvert Chud 01/12/2026 20:51
I thought that said just for furries
Incel Furvert Chud
I thought that said just for furries
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 20:53
you always have furries on your mind
VikingTiger6
People use philosophy to fill the God shaped hole in their heart, thats why ideology was invented so recently as a response to large scale atheism
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 20:53
i can see how thats the case for some aspects of philosophy
Ad Envyought
you always have furries on your mind
Incel Furvert Chud 01/12/2026 20:58
all real men do
Original message was deleted or could not be loaded.
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 21:06
by the way, where did you access plato's republic? did you purchase a physical copy, or did you access a free e-book. if the latter, where?
Incel Furvert Chud
all real men do
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 21:06
ofc
Ad Envyought
by the way, where did you access plato's republic? did you purchase a physical copy, or did you access a free e-book. if the latter, where?
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 21:06
Both of us have physical copies
Extra-sensory PURRception
Both of us have physical copies
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 21:07
ok
Extra-sensory PURRception
Both of us have physical copies
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 21:08
does your physical copy have an ISBN number on it? i wanna look it up to see if i can find it for free online
21:08
idk if the ISBN thing is universal or not, thats just how i find books online without paying for them
Ad Envyought
does your physical copy have an ISBN number on it? i wanna look it up to see if i can find it for free online
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 21:09
There seem to be multiple
Extra-sensory PURRception
There seem to be multiple
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 21:09
lemme see, porfa
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 21:10
Sorry, I was wrong. Those were for other books listed at the end. I'll check the ISBN of this one
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 21:10
ok
Ad Envyought
ok
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 21:11
It's 978-0-140-45511-3
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 21:11
thx
Ad Envyought
thx
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 21:11
You're welcome
Extra-sensory PURRception
You're welcome
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 21:13
i should have done this back when i purchased aristotles metaphysics and that logic book
21:13
coulda saved 40 dollars
21:13
ugh
Ad Envyought
coulda saved 40 dollars
Extra-sensory PURRception 01/12/2026 21:14
By reading them online or getting a bundle discount?
Extra-sensory PURRception
By reading them online or getting a bundle discount?
Ad Envyought 01/12/2026 21:14
by reading them online
21:14
i have physical copies
21:14
which is a little convenient
21:15
since i can physically annotate
21:15
but i dont think the benefit is worth 40 bucks
21:17
especially for the logic book since i picked up on basically everything in it except the predicate logic just from other things (edited)
Incel Furvert Chud 01/18/2026 21:49
@Мико⚜🐾can you change this channel to be called litfurature-furlosophy?
1
Exported 623 message(s)
Timezone: UTC+0