Scottstud94 wrote:I can see that becoming either controversial or confusing.
Scottstud94 wrote:I see both sides of the issue. I came on the board as a 13 year old, but even then I could maneuver my way around the site
NemesisPrime wrote:Then how about you don't read it then?
Personally I like the adult tie up games but then again I'm an older person but if you don't like a story no one is forcing you to read it man.
zanev wrote:No.
Chris12 wrote:Scottstud94 wrote:I see both sides of the issue. I came on the board as a 13 year old, but even then I could maneuver my way around the site
Same here, if you stay clear of the intimate section your probably gonna be fine.
Sealherlips wrote:Why would you want to read about tie up games if you're not sexually interested in them? Personally, I find it odd that some people would rather read about small children than grown adults. And if you're not interested in tie ups for sexual reasons, why bother reading about tie ups at all? I mean, there's nothing interesting about tie ups if you don't have a fetish for it. That would be like me reading a story all about tickling. I don't find it arousing, so a story about tickling would be no different to me than a story about random people doing nothing at all. It sounds like it would be completely boring to read about tie ups if you're not sexually interested in them. I mean, what other interest could there even be?
cloud wrote:Sealherlips wrote:Why would you want to read about tie up games if you're not sexually interested in them? Personally, I find it odd that some people would rather read about small children than grown adults. And if you're not interested in tie ups for sexual reasons, why bother reading about tie ups at all? I mean, there's nothing interesting about tie ups if you don't have a fetish for it. That would be like me reading a story all about tickling. I don't find it arousing, so a story about tickling would be no different to me than a story about random people doing nothing at all. It sounds like it would be completely boring to read about tie ups if you're not sexually interested in them. I mean, what other interest could there even be?
So then on this basis you should only ever read things that get you sexually aroused then?
Dose reading the newspaper get you excited? Dose reading the instructions on a microwave meal? Dose reading a novel? Their are lots of different things that you read that don't get you sexually excited, so why are you saying people should only read this if it dose?
Not everybody finds tie up's sexually arousing, and not everybody has the same views as you.
elanshof wrote:cloud wrote:Sealherlips wrote:Why would you want to read about tie up games if you're not sexually interested in them? Personally, I find it odd that some people would rather read about small children than grown adults. And if you're not interested in tie ups for sexual reasons, why bother reading about tie ups at all? I mean, there's nothing interesting about tie ups if you don't have a fetish for it. That would be like me reading a story all about tickling. I don't find it arousing, so a story about tickling would be no different to me than a story about random people doing nothing at all. It sounds like it would be completely boring to read about tie ups if you're not sexually interested in them. I mean, what other interest could there even be?
So then on this basis you should only ever read things that get you sexually aroused then?
Dose reading the newspaper get you excited? Dose reading the instructions on a microwave meal? Dose reading a novel? Their are lots of different things that you read that don't get you sexually excited, so why are you saying people should only read this if it dose?
Not everybody finds tie up's sexually arousing, and not everybody has the same views as you.
Your argument is a bit flawed. Very few people have a sexual fetish revolving around the newspaper and microwave instructions, or reading non-erotic novels. But, very many people have a sexual fetish involving bondage/restraint. To me--and I'm sure to many others on this board--bondage and sex are intrinsically linked. And perhaps this is misguided or presumptuous, but I do find it (how do I put this delicately?) curious (?) when others don't make that connection.
Yes, it's true: not every experience revolving around tie ups is necessarily going to involve sex, especially if they're stories of younger kids. However, I'd say that most adults here get turned on by the idea of being tied up or tying someone up or watching someone get tied up, etc.
But, generally, yeah...read what you want to read and steer clear of the other stuff. If you stumble upon something you don't like, there's always the back button.
Christian wrote:elanshof wrote:cloud wrote:Sealherlips wrote:Why would you want to read about tie up games if you're not sexually interested in them? Personally, I find it odd that some people would rather read about small children than grown adults. And if you're not interested in tie ups for sexual reasons, why bother reading about tie ups at all? I mean, there's nothing interesting about tie ups if you don't have a fetish for it. That would be like me reading a story all about tickling. I don't find it arousing, so a story about tickling would be no different to me than a story about random people doing nothing at all. It sounds like it would be completely boring to read about tie ups if you're not sexually interested in them. I mean, what other interest could there even be?
So then on this basis you should only ever read things that get you sexually aroused then?
Dose reading the newspaper get you excited? Dose reading the instructions on a microwave meal? Dose reading a novel? Their are lots of different things that you read that don't get you sexually excited, so why are you saying people should only read this if it dose?
Not everybody finds tie up's sexually arousing, and not everybody has the same views as you.
Your argument is a bit flawed. Very few people have a sexual fetish revolving around the newspaper and microwave instructions, or reading non-erotic novels. But, very many people have a sexual fetish involving bondage/restraint. To me--and I'm sure to many others on this board--bondage and sex are intrinsically linked. And perhaps this is misguided or presumptuous, but I do find it (how do I put this delicately?) curious (?) when others don't make that connection.
Yes, it's true: not every experience revolving around tie ups is necessarily going to involve sex, especially if they're stories of younger kids. However, I'd say that most adults here get turned on by the idea of being tied up or tying someone up or watching someone get tied up, etc.
But, generally, yeah...read what you want to read and steer clear of the other stuff. If you stumble upon something you don't like, there's always the back button.
I think you're generalizing your own opinions too much. I know personally, I'm interested in this stuff but I hate the sexual aspects people add. I can't stand it. Sure I'd like to be tied up but only for the purpose of being tied up and struggling. I definitely would not want weird freaky stuff done to me or read about those type of acts. So I enjoy these "innocent stories" because I can vicariously experience the kinds of ties up I've never been able to due to my family and upbringing.
elanshof wrote:cloud wrote:Sealherlips wrote:Why would you want to read about tie up games if you're not sexually interested in them? Personally, I find it odd that some people would rather read about small children than grown adults. And if you're not interested in tie ups for sexual reasons, why bother reading about tie ups at all? I mean, there's nothing interesting about tie ups if you don't have a fetish for it. That would be like me reading a story all about tickling. I don't find it arousing, so a story about tickling would be no different to me than a story about random people doing nothing at all. It sounds like it would be completely boring to read about tie ups if you're not sexually interested in them. I mean, what other interest could there even be?
So then on this basis you should only ever read things that get you sexually aroused then?
Dose reading the newspaper get you excited? Dose reading the instructions on a microwave meal? Dose reading a novel? Their are lots of different things that you read that don't get you sexually excited, so why are you saying people should only read this if it dose?
Not everybody finds tie up's sexually arousing, and not everybody has the same views as you.
Your argument is a bit flawed. Very few people have a sexual fetish revolving around the newspaper and microwave instructions, or reading non-erotic novels. But, very many people have a sexual fetish involving bondage/restraint. To me--and I'm sure to many others on this board--bondage and sex are intrinsically linked. And perhaps this is misguided or presumptuous, but I do find it (how do I put this delicately?) curious (?) when others don't make that connection.
Yes, it's true: not every experience revolving around tie ups is necessarily going to involve sex, especially if they're stories of younger kids. However, I'd say that most adults here get turned on by the idea of being tied up or tying someone up or watching someone get tied up, etc.
But, generally, yeah...read what you want to read and steer clear of the other stuff. If you stumble upon something you don't like, there's always the back button.
NemesisPrime wrote:Christian wrote:elanshof wrote:cloud wrote:Sealherlips wrote:Why would you want to read about tie up games if you're not sexually interested in them? Personally, I find it odd that some people would rather read about small children than grown adults. And if you're not interested in tie ups for sexual reasons, why bother reading about tie ups at all? I mean, there's nothing interesting about tie ups if you don't have a fetish for it. That would be like me reading a story all about tickling. I don't find it arousing, so a story about tickling would be no different to me than a story about random people doing nothing at all. It sounds like it would be completely boring to read about tie ups if you're not sexually interested in them. I mean, what other interest could there even be?
So then on this basis you should only ever read things that get you sexually aroused then?
Dose reading the newspaper get you excited? Dose reading the instructions on a microwave meal? Dose reading a novel? Their are lots of different things that you read that don't get you sexually excited, so why are you saying people should only read this if it dose?
Not everybody finds tie up's sexually arousing, and not everybody has the same views as you.
Your argument is a bit flawed. Very few people have a sexual fetish revolving around the newspaper and microwave instructions, or reading non-erotic novels. But, very many people have a sexual fetish involving bondage/restraint. To me--and I'm sure to many others on this board--bondage and sex are intrinsically linked. And perhaps this is misguided or presumptuous, but I do find it (how do I put this delicately?) curious (?) when others don't make that connection.
Yes, it's true: not every experience revolving around tie ups is necessarily going to involve sex, especially if they're stories of younger kids. However, I'd say that most adults here get turned on by the idea of being tied up or tying someone up or watching someone get tied up, etc.
But, generally, yeah...read what you want to read and steer clear of the other stuff. If you stumble upon something you don't like, there's always the back button.
I think you're generalizing your own opinions too much. I know personally, I'm interested in this stuff but I hate the sexual aspects people add. I can't stand it. Sure I'd like to be tied up but only for the purpose of being tied up and struggling. I definitely would not want weird freaky stuff done to me or read about those type of acts. So I enjoy these "innocent stories" because I can vicariously experience the kinds of ties up I've never been able to due to my family and upbringing.
I understand your position Christian though it confuses me. See I think we had simaler upbringings where I never knew about TUGs and bondage until I was about 15 and even then it was an alien concept to me seeing as my parents were not familer with the subject matter so they thought it was werid when I tried to do it and tried to convince me it was wrong.
But while we've both never experinced a true TUG where you and I differ is the fact my love of bondage and being tied up and gagged is interlinked with my desire for sex. I enjoy both so I do get a joy out of reading those stories.
Plus most of the users (including me) seem to incorperate bondage and TUGs into their sex lives. Innocent stories exist, you just have to read the title and what board or sub-board it's posted in. Again, you find something you don't like? Press the back button.
zanev wrote:No.
xtc wrote:zanev wrote:No.
End of argument, surely?
Sealherlips wrote:Why would you want to read about tie up games if you're not sexually interested in them? Personally, I find it odd that some people would rather read about small children than grown adults. And if you're not interested in tie ups for sexual reasons, why bother reading about tie ups at all? I mean, there's nothing interesting about tie ups if you don't have a fetish for it. That would be like me reading a story all about tickling. I don't find it arousing, so a story about tickling would be no different to me than a story about random people doing nothing at all. It sounds like it would be completely boring to read about tie ups if you're not sexually interested in them. I mean, what other interest could there even be?