## censored

Post by girl4boysub » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:50 am

I guess sandy hook is not allowed to be discussed yet nuclear wars, children killing other children with ''their first guns'' religious intolerance pornography , pornographic bdsm videos to name but a few are all fair game and remain uploaded ,,,strange and i thought this was a board for controversial discussion... and to the fascist little twerp who keeps sending me PMs after flagging these posts get a life or get laid but judging by your mentality and semi retarded features you cant find a partner take your frustration out at posts you deem unmentionable and yes Adam Lanza was a cute guy unlike yourself i hasten to add

### Re: censored

Post by Scottstud94 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:42 am

Post flagged. Again.
Adam Lanza was a psychotic murderer who killed 20 children. If you like him, God have mercy on your soul.

### Re: censored

Post by girl4boysub » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:01 am

> Scottstud94 wrote:Post flagged. Again.
> Adam Lanza was a psychotic murderer who killed 20 children. If you like him, God have mercy on your soul.

I never said i ''liked'' him i stated that he was ''cute'' which he was if you would rather i said that he was ugly just because you dident like what he done then i wont lie his photo is there for all to see and unless you are blind you can tell that he was a cute looking young guy.
I further questioned the events of that day as they dont add up '' why is there no trace of an Adam Lanza in any search of his town on the internet? lots of people have asked this too... why was no cctv footage made available to the public of him entering or driving up to the school yet in all other mass gun rampages this was made available to the media.... what motive did this man have to carry out such an attack when he had zero connection to this school....why have his father or brother not spoken out ONCE since this rampage to say anything about what he has done?....why was there nobody in his neighborhood who could remebmer seeing him about town and yet it wa s aclose knit comunnity?.....why was he the only pupil to graduate in 2009 with no photo in the school yearbook?....why were some of the parents laughing and joking on the day and the following days of this event when there children were supposedly ''shot dead'' ? If you think i am happy that lots of kids were shot dead then you misunderstand my posts im simply asking in view of all these bizzare happenings why they dont sound consistent with all other previous mass gun rampages, In addition several experts in photography have stated that the image of Adam that supposedly was taken of him at 20 years old was a photoshop image. Its not disrespectful to question the events of that day as in a ddemocratic society everything should be open to question....btw i am not a conspiracy nut but this case does not make sense one bit when you begin to look at the facts.
No cctv
nobody remembers the shooter for years before the attack
shooter has no motive
men in black army fatigues running into the woods chased by police
police holding a second man at gunpoint on day of shooting
lanza had no connection with school yet supposedly his mother was a teacher there which later turned out to be false
not one person can remeber seing the boy in the photo at in or near the school, that day
seraches for adam lanza show he never existed yet his father mom and older brother show up
father and older brother not seen or heard of since day of attack
picture of child who was supposedly shot was in fact alive and was only removed after parents complained to media
parents of dead kids showing absouloutly no grief day of childrens deaths and were in fact laughing and joking like they were unaffected in the slightest
if all these things dont make you question what happened that day then i gues nothing will

### Re: censored

Post by Chris12 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:43 am

Maybe you'll want to post proof of your claims? Video's about the laughing parents or the kid that didn't die.
I'l repeat my earlier question. Why would anyone go through the trouble of staging it all?

### Re: censored

Post by Jason Toddman » Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:18 am

Okay, enough is enough. I missed out on the earlier controversy, and it was a different mod who deleted your previous post, but there's too much acrimony going on here for my liking. Personally i think the poster's views are a tad out there, but said poster has the right to express them. What they indicate that person is immaterial. But this bickering is another matter and so I'm putting a stop to it.
Rather than delete this like the previous apparently was, I'm just going to lock this topic so that others can judge it and form their own opinion on the matter. So everyone, let's all be civilized and just drop it.
Dare to be different... and make a difference.
To boldly go where no one in their right mind has gone before...