drawscore wrote:Back in 2013, when the Democrats controlled the Senate, Harry Reid, the majority leader, arbitrarily changed the rules of the Senate, to prevent Republican filibusters of Obama appointments, especially judicial appointments, except for Supreme Court justices. Appointees would get a straight up or down vote. 51 votes confirmed.
Now, the Democrats are bitching and moaning over Trump's appointees to his cabinet, but tough crap! The Democrats changed the rules, and now, they have to live with the changes they made. They won't be able to filibuster any of Trump's cabinet and sub cabinet appointments, no matter how much they whine, bitch, piss, and moan.
I love it when karma comes back to bite them in the ass.
Drawscore
Oohmynameisblue wrote:Fortunately nobodys been triggered by this. Publicly, anyway.
Jason Toddman wrote: I think that is because most people have no idea who most of Trump's picks are or the ideals they represent.
The real bitch about karma is still in the future, when it gradually sinks into the public's mind what a horrible mistake it has made.
drawscore wrote:Jason Toddman wrote: I think that is because most people have no idea who most of Trump's picks are or the ideals they represent.
The real bitch about karma is still in the future, when it gradually sinks into the public's mind what a horrible mistake it has made.
Electing Hillary Clinton would have been an even worse mistake.
Drawscore
tapeandrope666 wrote:drawscore wrote:This problem could have been solved if those idiots in Congress had made me king.
Drawscore
ARE YOU SERIOUS? YOU ARE AN ARROGANT F@!$ AND I WAS GUNNA ARGUE A FEW POINTS BEFORE I READ THIS, BUT NOW, MY GOD, ITS NOT EVEN WORTH THE EFFORT IT TOOK TO TYPE THIS! I HOPE WHEN TRUMP KICKS OFF A WAR, AND COMPLETELY F#%#S AMERICA, I HOPE YOU ARE AT THE F$#@ING CENTRE OF IT, PREFERABLY AT AN EPICENTRE.
drawscore wrote:This problem could have been solved if those idiots in Congress had made me king.
Drawscore
tapeandrope666 wrote:drawscore wrote:This problem could have been solved if those idiots in Congress had made me king.
Drawscore
ARE YOU SERIOUS? YOU ARE AN ARROGANT F@!$ AND I WAS GUNNA ARGUE A FEW POINTS BEFORE I READ THIS, BUT NOW, MY GOD, ITS NOT EVEN WORTH THE EFFORT IT TOOK TO TYPE THIS! I HOPE WHEN TRUMP KICKS OFF A WAR, AND COMPLETELY F#%#S AMERICA, I HOPE YOU ARE AT THE F$#@ING CENTRE OF IT, PREFERABLY AT AN EPICENTRE.
tapeandrope666 wrote:Driverman wrote:tapeandrope666 wrote:drawscore wrote:This problem could have been solved if those idiots in Congress had made me king.
Drawscore
ARE YOU SERIOUS? YOU ARE AN ARROGANT F@!$ AND I WAS GUNNA ARGUE A FEW POINTS BEFORE I READ THIS, BUT NOW, MY GOD, ITS NOT EVEN WORTH THE EFFORT IT TOOK TO TYPE THIS! I HOPE WHEN TRUMP KICKS OFF A WAR, AND COMPLETELY F#%#S AMERICA, I HOPE YOU ARE AT THE F$#@ING CENTRE OF IT, PREFERABLY AT AN EPICENTRE.
My friend, he baited you into this reaction. This is exactly the type of reaction he loves to get. Don't give him the satisfaction.
Oh. F$&#. Lol.
drawscore wrote:Looks like I forgot that facetiousness (fa-SEE-shus-ness) and sarcasm are for face to face conversations, and do not translate well into the written word.
Still, sometimes the reactions are . . . . . more than one expected.
Oh, and tapeandrope666: That's Mister ******** to you. But then, I forgot. Most of those on the far left revel in insults and name calling. The more moderate leftists are a bit more reserved and courteous, and can make their points without resorting to such childish tactics.
Drawscore
drawscore wrote:Most of those on the far left revel in insults and name calling
drawscore wrote:>>>For some reason you like to bring out the worst in people, and it's getting old.<<<
No, Jason. I state a position or opinion. Some disagree, and that's fine. Others bring out the worst in themselves.
drawscore wrote: So I should just let someone call me a dickhead in a public forum, and let it pass? Would you?
drawscore wrote: >>>So kindly scale back the so-called sarcasm or I'm going to delete this thread too and maybe check others more carefully for deliberate attempts to egg people on. Am I making myself clear?<<<
You play the offended party well. But in reality, I have the greater claim to being offended. And you know it.
Drawscore