## Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by GalaxyTrain » Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:28 am

The title is misleading. Instead of (M/FF), it should say (FF/M), because the girls tied YOU up. See, the letter(s) that comes first indicates the gender(s) of the one doing the tying, the letter(s) after the slash indicate the one being tied. Please change that. Based on the title, I was expecting you to tie up two females, and was very disappointed. I'll hardly be the only one. So change the title to reflect what actually happens in the story.

### Re: Tied up on the job (M/FF)

Post by Suestruggles » Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:54 am

> GalaxyTrain wrote:The title is misleading. Instead of (M/FF), it should say (FF/M), because the girls tied YOU up. See, the letter(s) that comes first indicates the gender(s) of the one doing the tying, the letter(s) after the slash indicate the one being tied. Please change that. Based on the title, I was expecting you to tie up two females, and was very disappointed. I'll hardly be the only one. So change the title to reflect what actually happens in the story.

Dissapointed. Speak for yourself! But yes the title is missleading. it shoulf be FF/M
Sue
Fit to be tied, wants to struggle.

### Re: Tied up on the job (M/FF)

Post by Jason Toddman » Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:30 pm

To Hell with the title! It was a nice story! And at least Steveluis TRIED to indicate what kind of story it was; most other people don't even bother! So how about you people give Steveluis a break and give him credit for telling a good story?! Sheesh!
Anyway, nice story Steveluis. Don't worry about the petty kibbitzers and if you have other stories like this I at least would LOVE to read them!
Dare to be different... and make a difference.
To boldly go where no one in their right mind has gone before...

### Re: Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by canuck100 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:49 pm

Great story, I agree with Jason's comment.
I also edited the title, just to avoid any confusion...

### Re: Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by xtc » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:27 am

Good one, SL.
As for the rather peevish, unsupportive and clumsy replies (JT & Cannuck honourably excepted) - nihil illigitimae carborundum!
I hope dog latin translates where you are, if not, I'll post the alleged translation.
Wassail,
xtc
Boxer shorts are cool,
but little speedos rule!
More by the same author: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=22729

### Re: Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by ducttapeboy001 » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:56 am

Cool story...
Must be very humiliating to be tied by the girls and seen by their parents.
Lol why dont you babysit them again ???
it makes me GLaD, Im not you
And believe me Im still alive
Im doing TUGs and Im still alive.
I feel fantastic and Im stilll alive
You'd be EVIL if you're GLaD

### Re: Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by canuck100 » Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:17 am

> ducttapeboy001 wrote:Lol why dont you babysit them again ???

LOL just what I was thinking! I'd go back in a heartbeat!

### Re: Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by Jason Toddman » Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:05 am

Me too. I'd have preferred boys - partly because misunderstandings are not quite as likely if found out by the parents again; boys will be boys and all that - but I still would have enjoyed repeating the experiences you had.
Dare to be different... and make a difference.
To boldly go where no one in their right mind has gone before...

### Re: Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by OverLooker » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:47 pm

I would babysit them whenever they wanted
"Mmmmppphhhhhhh"

### Re: Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by tyme115 » Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:54 pm

Yes, great story, wish I had experiences like that, lol

### Re: Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by Tied beauty » Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:22 am

great story

### Re: Tied up on the job (FF/M)

Post by fratboydanny » Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:38 pm

Yest I agree with the others. This is a wonderful story. As my story Babysitting Adventures" indicates I would have gone back again and again.