gone

Postby Guy_loves_bondage » Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:09 pm

deleted.
Last edited by Guy_loves_bondage on Tue May 03, 2016 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby viking » Fri Nov 13, 2015 11:55 pm

the shit that has been going on in France tonight is just terrible. how a person can get so fucked up in their mind, that they decide to kill a whole lot of innocent people is far beyond my understanding.
i mean, we are in the year of 2015 (almost 2016) and there are still people out there who thinks something like this is the right thing to do?

like you said Guy Shortstied, my thoughts goes to the victims, their families, and everyone else who lives in France.
may they have all the support they need to go through this terrible day in history.

12208624_10153622153955469_4315217511329290194_n.jpg
Once a scout, always a perverted pyromaniac with a fetish for knives and duct tape

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby freyjaceleste862 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 3:19 am

Last week some of my friends said don't wear a poppy, hate the military. Now this week, those in Paris thank the security forces.
love cooking, panty/knicker gags, nappies, handicapped.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby Lake Lover » Sat Nov 14, 2015 4:47 am

Support civilization. Strength to the decent people around the globe in the battle against barbarians. God knows we will only be strengthened against the terrorists. We will not cower down before them.

Vive la France!

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby Chris12 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 8:04 am

Its infuriating to see how a bunch of barbarian psychopath's are able to damage a proud nation like this.

This is going to have a further fallout. If the shooters came with the refugee stream we can expect the debate surrounding that to be much grimmer and if they are from France its homegrown Muslim population...well its not looking good for that population then.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby Tieup1 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:18 am

The people who did this are just criminals. They represent nobody but themselves. They have no reasoned argument for what they do, they just hate, for hate's sake. In the end they will be beaten.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby 31acujoker » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:07 am

Indeed we should pray for all the victims of these heartless cruel attacks, the people of Paris, those who witnessed it and survived, all the Muslims who will only suffer more unjustified persecution. and most of all for those whose lives were tragically taken away from them by heartless thugs who care nothing for other human beings, and choose to kill us simply for the way we choose to live our lives.

I send my love and sympathies to all the people of Paris, of France and all peace-loving people of the world, Vive le France.
"A thing is not beautiful because it lasts"
- The Vision

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby NemesisPrime » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:49 am

Chris12 wrote:Its infuriating to see how a bunch of barbarian psychopath's are able to damage a proud nation like this.

This is going to have a further fallout. If the shooters came with the refugee stream we can expect the debate surrounding that to be much grimmer and if they are from France its homegrown Muslim population...well its not looking good for that population then.

That and more broad surveillance laws. People like this only make things worse for everyone else.
Everyone speaks in multiple languages...But gag talk is universal and a sock in your mouth is the perfect translator!

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby drawscore » Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:57 pm

The people responsible have an 8th century mentality, but 21st century technology. And while many of my more liberal friends and acquaintances may disagree, these people need to be hit, and hit hard, very publicly. You know they are sub-human when even the leaders of Iran condemn them.

General Curtis LeMay, although long dead, has always been a pariah to liberals, but in this case, his words ring true: "When you kill enough of them, they'll quit." I am of the opinion that brutal violence is the only thing they will understand.

Of course, we could take the high ground, and sit by, while others do our dirty work - like the Russians. Several years back, some Russians were kidnapped in the Middle East, and a ransom demand was sent to the Russian embassy. The Russian intelligence service knew who the terrorists were, and where they lived, so they returned the favor by kidnapping the terrorist leader's adult son, and sent him to the terrorists stone cold dead, with his genitals removed, and stuffed in his mouth. The Russian hostages were released forthwith.

Probably the biggest damn fool mistake ISIS made, was to take credit for downing a Russian plane with 224 people aboard. I'm sure Russian retaliation will be swift and brutal, but also very covert. The Russians won't say anything, and the terrorists won't want to admit anything is wrong.

Drawscore

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby elusinius » Sun Nov 15, 2015 7:59 am

May I offer the opinion of someone who has a different perspective
on what to do about this?

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/po ... igarchies/

For many years, the French anthem Le Marseillaise was also the anthem of those
who fought for representative government against authoritarians and plutocrats.
For the people of France!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4K1q9Ntcr5g

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby misterg792000 » Sun Nov 15, 2015 10:30 am

drawscore wrote:The people responsible have an 8th century mentality, but 21st century technology. And while many of my more liberal friends and acquaintances may disagree, these people need to be hit, and hit hard, very publicly. You know they are sub-human when even the leaders of Iran condemn them.

General Curtis LeMay, although long dead, has always been a pariah to liberals, but in this case, his words ring true: "When you kill enough of them, they'll quit." I am of the opinion that brutal violence is the only thing they will understand.


I can't imagine why running with an avowed segregationist and white supremacist for the highest office in the land would make you a pariah. Or was it the fact that he considered it a defeat when the Cuban Missile Crisis didn't end in all-out nuclear war? Regardless, what does it matter as long as he sounds super-badass and cool to Call of Duty addicted 13 year olds?

Anyway, how have decades of brutal violence been working out for us so far? We'll see how long your opinion holds up when you're ever actually in a position to be affected in any way, shape, or form by said "brutal violence", but since that will never happen you just hang onto your weird GI Joe vs Cobra fantasy. It's a brave man indeed who can beat his chest until he's blue in the face while never standing a chance of facing the consequences of choosing to do violence.

Matter of fact, since you're constantly on here rambling on about how killing those filthy mooslims is the highest priority in the world; either join up and do it yourself or shut the fuck up already, chickenhawk.

drawscore wrote:The Russian intelligence service knew who the terrorists were, and where they lived, so they returned the favor by kidnapping the terrorist leader's adult son, and sent him to the terrorists stone cold dead, with his genitals removed, and stuffed in his mouth. The Russian hostages were released forthwith.


When the strongest argument for your position is a 40-year-old apocryphal story with no supporting evidence, that should tell you something.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby drawscore » Sun Nov 15, 2015 4:20 pm

Sorry, folks, but you will not defeat ISIS by being nice to them.

Drawscore

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby misterg792000 » Sun Nov 15, 2015 7:15 pm

drawscore wrote:Sorry, folks, but you will not defeat ISIS by being nice to them.


Congratulations on refuting a claim no one made.

Have you gone to your local recruiter yet?

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby Soraka » Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:21 am

misterg792000 wrote:
drawscore wrote:The people responsible have an 8th century mentality, but 21st century technology. And while many of my more liberal friends and acquaintances may disagree, these people need to be hit, and hit hard, very publicly. You know they are sub-human when even the leaders of Iran condemn them.

General Curtis LeMay, although long dead, has always been a pariah to liberals, but in this case, his words ring true: "When you kill enough of them, they'll quit." I am of the opinion that brutal violence is the only thing they will understand.


I can't imagine why running with an avowed segregationist and white supremacist for the highest office in the land would make you a pariah. Or was it the fact that he considered it a defeat when the Cuban Missile Crisis didn't end in all-out nuclear war? Regardless, what does it matter as long as he sounds super-badass and cool to Call of Duty addicted 13 year olds?

Anyway, how have decades of brutal violence been working out for us so far? We'll see how long your opinion holds up when you're ever actually in a position to be affected in any way, shape, or form by said "brutal violence", but since that will never happen you just hang onto your weird GI Joe vs Cobra fantasy. It's a brave man indeed who can beat his chest until he's blue in the face while never standing a chance of facing the consequences of choosing to do violence.

Matter of fact, since you're constantly on here rambling on about how killing those filthy mooslims is the highest priority in the world; either join up and do it yourself or shut the fuck up already, chickenhawk.

drawscore wrote:The Russian intelligence service knew who the terrorists were, and where they lived, so they returned the favor by kidnapping the terrorist leader's adult son, and sent him to the terrorists stone cold dead, with his genitals removed, and stuffed in his mouth. The Russian hostages were released forthwith.


When the strongest argument for your position is a 40-year-old apocryphal story with no supporting evidence, that should tell you something.


So, how do you want to defeat them? They don't want peace, they don't want to negotiate and we can't give them their own state, right? They're violating human rights, they kill innnocent people and do a lot of other bad things. Brutal violence is the last option you should use, but we don't have a choice in this situation...

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby misterg792000 » Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:25 am

Soraka wrote:So, how do you want to defeat them? They don't want peace, they don't want to negotiate and we can't give them their own state, right? They're violating human rights, they kill innnocent people and do a lot of other bad things. Brutal violence is the last option you should use, but we don't have a choice in this situation...


Targted, proportional violence. Yes, we do have a choice, and "do nothing" and "carpet bomb the entire region" are not the only two options.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby xtc » Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:58 am

It is not a misunderstanding of history but a willful ignorance of it that allows anybody of better than average intelligence to advocate what I shall refer to as "carpet bombing": destroying the infrastructure and slaughtering the inhabitants of a state. I must quote America's wars (Indochina) and Blair's war (Middle East). Surely no one can advocate any longer the all out destruction that leaves states that are fit only for continued war?

There is a lot that is relevant in the stylistically rather laboured article quoted by Elusinius above.
Boxer shorts are cool,
but little speedos rule!

More by the same author: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=22729

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby AlexUSA » Mon Nov 16, 2015 5:47 pm

I see some of us are quite frequently filled with rage here, both here and in other "Jump in the Fire" threads. Perhaps for our health, we best stay away from these because argument, unlike debate, only weakens the heart and mind and arrives at no desirable conclusion.
I rite on a tabblit, so speling errurs will hap pin free quintly.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby Jason Toddman » Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:37 pm

drawscore wrote:The people responsible have an 8th century mentality, but 21st century technology. And while many of my more liberal friends and acquaintances may disagree, these people need to be hit, and hit hard, very publicly.
Drawscore


There may be some liberals who disagree, but i'm not one of them. This is war, and these people should be wiped out as the Nazis were. at the same time though, it's a tragedy that American and European Muslims in general are now going to suffer for the actions of these bastards, just as innocent Japanese Americans did during WW II.
Dare to be different... and make a difference.
To boldly go where no one in their right mind has gone before...

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby freyjaceleste862 » Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:46 pm

drawscore wrote:The people responsible have an 8th century mentality, but 21st century technology. And while many of my more liberal friends and acquaintances may disagree, these people need to be hit, and hit hard, very publicly. You know they are sub-human when even the leaders of Iran condemn them.

General Curtis LeMay, although long dead, has always been a pariah to liberals, but in this case, his words ring true: "When you kill enough of them, they'll quit." I am of the opinion that brutal violence is the only thing they will understand.

Of course, we could take the high ground, and sit by, while others do our dirty work - like the Russians. Several years back, some Russians were kidnapped in the Middle East, and a ransom demand was sent to the Russian embassy. The Russian intelligence service knew who the terrorists were, and where they lived, so they returned the favor by kidnapping the terrorist leader's adult son, and sent him to the terrorists stone cold dead, with his genitals removed, and stuffed in his mouth. The Russian hostages were released forthwith.

Probably the biggest damn fool mistake ISIS made, was to take credit for downing a Russian plane with 224 people aboard. I'm sure Russian retaliation will be swift and brutal, but also very covert. The Russians won't say anything, and the terrorists won't want to admit anything is wrong.

Drawscore

AK-47s are not 21st C technology. Neither are explosives.
love cooking, panty/knicker gags, nappies, handicapped.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby Jason Toddman » Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:37 am

freyjaceleste862 wrote: AK-47s are not 21st C technology. Neither are explosives.

But they are still widely used in the 21st century with no real-world replacements as yet, so until we invent something like phasers, plasma rifles, terminator robots and photon torpedoes it's close enough.
Dare to be different... and make a difference.
To boldly go where no one in their right mind has gone before...

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby .... » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:33 pm

As an habitant of Paris who herselfve lived that terifying moment i lost one known person in the croud and with sadness i preyed for his soul while i am not a beliver myself.

(this prayer aint for me but for him)

and some of us in france are really thinking of doing a new modern crusade againts the terorist fuckers... but in the mean time all we can do is be brave... like before: je suis charlie for an exemple.

so if you support france: Vive la Franc Libre!
liberte égalité fraternité!

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby Lake Lover » Wed Nov 18, 2015 8:48 am

bondagefoxgirl wrote:As an habitant of Paris who herselfve lived that terifying moment i lost one known person in the croud and with sadness i preyed for his soul while i am not a beliver myself.

(this prayer aint for me but for him)

and some of us in france are really thinking of doing a new modern crusade againts the terorist fuckers... but in the mean time all we can do is be brave... like before: je suis charlie for an exemple.

so if you support france: Vive la Franc Libre!
liberte égalité fraternité!



I agree with everything you said. The United States leadership, in my opinion, made an expensive mistake by failing to wipe out as many Isis members as possible when Isis first reared its ugly head. We have to crusade against them now. God help civilization if Isis gets a nuclear capability. God Bless France.

Vive la Franc!

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby misterg792000 » Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:20 am

Lake Lover wrote:I agree with everything you said. The United States leadership, in my opinion, made an expensive mistake by failing to wipe out as many Isis members as possible when Isis first reared its ugly head.


A year and a half of fighting them and over 20,000+ dead not enough for you? Please tell me what they should have done instead, how it was going to be paid for, and how many dead Americans would have been acceptable.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby .... » Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:06 am

i shall tell you what they have done! as a great War and Historical comflict proffesor i am... (just call me Proffesor scientist Von Fox) the main error was from the part of the U.S.A killing Alkahida with the Delta force deployement in 2006 (i think... what!? i dont spend my time on wikipidia and dates... i prefer facts so deal with it...). Anyway... if we just would have left thoses small contries fighting eachothers to destruction and leave them in dictature under a supreme leadership: non of this would have happened!

trust me... it fells crual to say that we should have left them kill eachother in dictature or Annarchy like in somalia but they would be to much occupied to kill themselves than us!

(btw... a new attack two streets away with a kamicaze lady who blew hersef up so yeah... it shure makes me think allot. but i wont go away because i am not affraid! fuck terrorisme!)

btw... crusades like i said are not a really good thing as the hate for Muslim pepole grow bigger everyday in france and europe...

And calm your blooy asses down because like said in the previous message (that i am to lazy to Quote) we had over 20 000 victims who for a part are not only terrorists but civilians probably dead in their sleep. so what we shall have now is the acctual bombing of the Zones sitted between the gost contry frontiers of The Islamic terorist nation.

i think it is as good for the moment because if how ever the islamic terrorist acheve the Nuclear device then WW3 is inevitable... and it will be a termohnucklear war. (again still thinking of somthing in the futur witch means this is a theory)

anways... see you:

proffesor scientist Von Fox

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby misterg792000 » Wed Nov 18, 2015 3:19 pm

If you want to indiscriminately bomb anywhere ISIL may be located, there's a man named Bashar al-Assad already doing that. It's...working out great. Yeah.

If you're actually, seriously, worried about "islamic terrorists with a nuclear weapon", please turn the TV off and pick up a book.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby .... » Wed Nov 18, 2015 3:38 pm

hey! books wont save your soory ass... btw i cant read under the rafle shoots and all the shit exploding outside theises last days... (i guess maybe in a few days i wont give a fuge anymore so hey...) and on the bright side if i'm nuked i guess death will be faster than a boner...)
but still..not scared... just really pissed.

oh right..for the "sensitive" people i might scared with the Nucklear weaponry:
-1 : they dont have the plans and are far form acheving it...
-2: They have too low uranium reserves on their operative soil...
-3: there is no strategical long point of nucking a rival contry due to desastrous world wide consequences...

!!! oh! btw... books are overated... try a nice video game with bondage for you kinks out there and stilstay alerted times to times to not be a derp...

grettings from Proffesor scientist Von Fox
Last edited by .... on Tue Dec 08, 2015 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby misterg792000 » Wed Nov 18, 2015 3:43 pm

bondagefoxgirl wrote:hey! books wont save your soory ass...


They won't save you from a nuclear weapon, but they will show you why worrying about a nuclear-armed and delivery-capable ISIL is about as valid as worrying about Santa Claus shooting you.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby .... » Wed Nov 18, 2015 3:53 pm

true! i agree on that... but wait... santa acctualy could you shoot you... you dont know him!

Dahhhdaaaadahhh!

(see the exemple in futurama... even though its a robot... doses meca.e.x.e santa count?)

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby Chloé The Librarian Extraordinaire » Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:02 am

bondagefoxgirl wrote:!!! oh! btw... books are overated... try a nice video game with bondage for you kinks out there and stilstay alerted times to times to not be a derp...

grettings from :Proffesor scientist Von Fox


Dear Prof Scientist Von Fox.
I just read your comment about books being overrated. We, members of E.V.I.L. (Extraorinarly, Vigilant, International Librarians) disagree
It is in books that you will find the recipe of that soo sweet smelling chloroform i'm going ti use on you before tying you up with nice knots i learned to tie, not in front of my playstation but in books...
See ?
Oops sorry you can't your sleeping...
:evil:

Des bisous.
You friend
Chloé D. Vile
Supreme Leader of E.V.I.L.

Re: Terror in Paris.

Postby .... » Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:14 am

Hey! Shut up! Ps3 Xbox and PC's are awsome and eat better than books! I can learn faster the clorophorm recipie by watching a tuto on YouTube than reading an instruction manual. Besides for a girl like me who has a peanut for a brain its better anyways!

The E.V.I.L is not better than the MLG® and the paper is useless compared to technology!

So yes: Books are overated !!!!

And:

YES

I can find sweet sweet clorophorm recipie on my Ps3!

Don't F*ck with my consoles EVIL!

Your Deer-est: Professor Scientist Von Fox
Last edited by .... on Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.