GentleDom wrote:LONG LIVE THE US ARMY!!!
Fesselfan wrote:I wonder if this is really the truth. after all, they claim they have already disposed the remains in the sea.
Maybe he is really dead now?
Maybe he is still alive?
Maybe he died already years ago and was just too usefull for the US to be officially declared dead?
I wonder if we will ever know.
cheers
FF
zanev wrote:Fesselfan wrote:I wonder if this is really the truth. after all, they claim they have already disposed the remains in the sea.
Maybe he is really dead now?
Maybe he is still alive?
Maybe he died already years ago and was just too usefull for the US to be officially declared dead?
I wonder if we will ever know.
cheers
FF
Apparently the reason is due to Muslim tradition of burrying a body within 24hours of death. He was a saudi and they refused to take his body, so I guess they just threw it in the ocean.
zanev wrote:I take back my comment, because a friend pointed out to me that even though he killed a lot of people its still a life. In my personal view, if I'm against abortion for the reason of life and if I'm against the death penalty for the same reason then I shouldn't be happy when someone dies in war.
GentleDom wrote:LONG LIVE THE US ARMY!!!
dreadnaught3200 wrote:The point I'm trying to make is that while al-Qaeda is definitely still alive and ticking, they can only be worse off without bin Laden, without his money, without his charisma and without his leadership. Unfortunately there will be many more terrorists and terrorist attacks, but I think this is definitely a point for the good guys!
aielen wrote:jay wrote:Just found out he is dead:
He killed 3,000+ in 9/11
He killed 202 in 2002
He killed 15 in 2000
He killed 268 in 1998
The US hs murdered thousands from its illegal invasion of Iraq.
jay wrote:What in your mind tells you that wartime deaths is illegal especially since USA had permission to invade?
jay wrote:First of, in order to start a war, you need approval, which is what they got.
SamanthaBoundx wrote: If you look at the standard conventions as to what constitutes as "just" war, there are several criteria that the invasion of Iraq completely failed to meet.
dreadnaught3200 wrote:Well, if there is such a thing as a "just" war. Personally I think the term "just" is better replaced by necessary.
Fesselfan wrote:Maybe he died already years ago and was just too usefull for the US to be officially declared dead?
1000 Points for you.Fesselfan wrote:You mean, a war started without an UN resolution to wipe-out fictional, non-existing weapons of mass destruction makes killing people legal?
jay wrote:It had to be done. He showed no remorse for the murder of innocent people. In the spiritual level, God will forgive him. However, that does not change the fact that he killed thousands of people using his followers. He deserves to die. If you told the victim close family, relatives, and friends that he needs to die, they will agree with his death.
jay wrote:Just found out he is dead:
He killed 3,000+ in 9/11
He killed 202 in 2002
He killed 15 in 2000
He killed 268 in 1998