Recently some news about their ''work'' has been discovered. Aperantly they think its fun to hack into the celphone of a missing and later killed girl so they can view her messenges and delete them. Because the parents could see that their messages where read and deleted they had some hope their daughter was still alive...it turned out to be some sick journalist looking for a story.
Was there any reason for this? i don't believe the content of those mesages was ever revealed if it been posted in the paper we would have known this sooner. Did they think it was fun? Did they want to give the parents hope and then dash it again simply because (understandeble) emotional parents give a much ''better'' response for a newpaper?
And after the terorist bombing in London they tried to hack the cellphone of the friends and family of many victims probably so they could use those reactions in ''the news''. Does anyone want to guess what they did to the widows of fallen soldiers in Irak?

I find it incredibly sick! all three examples are disgusting!

Everyone lets grab our torches and pitcforks!

(Not trying to be funny with that last part)