drawscore wrote:Just heard that she may not be completely free. There seems to be a lesser known investigation into the financial dealings of the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. Something about the foundation receiving funds in the millions of dollars from foreign governments, then using the foundation to funnel that money to Hillary's campaign.
Yawn. Twenty years of the noise machine's manufactroversies is leaving them looking like the boy who cried wolf.
Jason Toddman wrote:Oh, Hillary would likely have won anyway even had she not done everything in her power to cheat. But the fact that she did cheat in so many ways
Nope. When even Bernie concedes that she won it fair and square, maybe you need to look at your assumptions.
drawscore wrote:Most of them have political axes to grind. Probably the most objective source, is BBC America. It leans left, too, but not nearly as far left as much of the American media.
American media is stunningly pro-corporate and "leans left" only in the fevered imaginings of the right-wing echo chamber, whose only criteria seems to be "if it says I'm wrong, it's biased". Not that I expect you to ever recognize your own confirmation bias.