## M/M's?

Post by Scottstud94 » Tue Feb 22, 2011 1:12 pm

You guys do know m/m stories without getting... "physical" so to speak is ok right?
Even the "non-intimate" ones are getting unenjoyable.

### Re: M/M's?

Post by SamanthaBoundx » Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:34 pm

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but are you saying that you disapprove of intimacy in M/M TUG stories?
If that IS the case then you should realise that people are entitled to write whatever kind of stories they choose to. If you don't like them, then don't read them. It isn't your place - or anyone else's for that matter- to dictate what experiences people can share on this board.
If that isn't the case, then I apologise. I must have gotten the wrong end of the stick

### Re: M/M's?

Post by Jason Toddman » Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:45 pm

> Scottstud94 wrote:You guys do know m/m stories without getting... "physical" so to speak is ok right?
> .

Sure. But a lot of the time they're also boring without the 'physical' aspects included.
Dare to be different... and make a difference.
To boldly go where no one in their right mind has gone before...

### Re: M/M's?

Post by snobound » Tue Feb 22, 2011 6:25 pm

> Scottstud94 wrote:You guys do know m/m stories without getting... "physical" so to speak is ok right?
> Even the "non-intimate" ones are getting unenjoyable.

I would have to delve deep into my childhood to be able to separate bondage from its intimate aspects. To me, they're one and the same. I understand what you mean, though. It's just that with my time so limited, what little chance I get to write, I use writing about what I like.
Just my two cents...
Try out the TUGs chat! http://chat.mibbit.com/#tugsnet

### Re: M/M's?

Post by Scottstud94 » Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:20 pm

I can see a little bit, just saying some recent posts are stretching it alot. I came to this site as a young one because it was innocent. So have alot of people.

### Re: M/M's?

Post by SamanthaBoundx » Wed Feb 23, 2011 5:08 am

> Jason Toddman wrote:Sure. But a lot of the time they're also boring without the 'physical' aspects included.

Agree completely

### Re: M/M's?

Post by xtc » Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:57 am

Have you tried the "TUG stories" site? Or have I misunderstood your initial point?
Xtc
Boxer shorts are cool,
but little speedos rule!
More by the same author: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=22729