Based on my extensive experience of dealing with, talking to and arguing with jews. I thought I would briefly systemise the jewish response to disagreement. I have done this by categorizing the various stages that jews go through in a discussion or argument. It should be noted that this is a general system and won’t cover every individual’s response, but it will be true in most cases
Firstly we must note that jews are an incredibly verbal people with a tendency for both extreme histrionics and extraordinary levels of professed self-belief. I say professed self-belief because jews are not infrequently doubtful of their own capabilities, but have been raised in a culture where the showing a lack of self-belief is considered a serious personal and professional failing.
Hence jews who fail in this are subject to social ostracism and negative sanctions both by their communities and not infrequently their own families resulting in the propagation of chutzpah type behaviour (i.e., brazen lying/misrepresentation combined with histrionic outrage with apparent massive self-belief).
This combines with the similar application of schmoozing behaviour (i.e., brazen lying/misrepresentation combined with seductive platitudes as to the benefits of doing X with apparent massive self-belief) to form the essence of how jews behave in discussion and debate.
Dealing with these behaviours is easier than most think. It simply requires you to stand your ground and not get drawn into their traps.
To wit:
Kvetch Stage 1: Histrionic Outrage
The jew in question become extremely aggressive either verbally or in writing. They frequently use ‘Stop Words’ (for example ‘racist’, ‘anti-Semitic’, ‘bigot’, ‘Nazi’ etc) and attempt to utilize social shaming to force a retraction or force their opponent from the contest.
If there are other people in (or near) the conversation then the jew will try to engage them in the conversation to reinforce this social stigmatization. For example they will ask whether the other people think ‘X or Y comment is racist’ and try to present it as an unacceptable answer within the context of the discussion or debate.
Answering Behaviour: You simply stand your ground and challenge the jew to disprove what you have said rather than just spouting ‘Stop Words’.
Likely Outcomes: Jewish Rage Quit (you have won and should maximise this by intellectually shaming and provoking your jewish opponent) or Kvetch Stage 2.
Kvetch Stage 2: Intellectual Grandstanding and Diversion
The jew in question continues to act extremely aggressively either verbally or in writing. They switch from purely using ‘Stop Words’ to the use of intellectual-sounding rhetoric (for example ‘Science has long disproved race exists as there is more genetic variation within ‘racial groups’ than between them’ [aka Lewontin’s fallacy]), NAXALT (‘Not All of X Are Like That’) type arguments and false equivalency (for example ‘Well since you are a racist Nazi then you clearly believe that the Holocaust is lie’) in varying combinations.
If there are other people in (or near) the conversation then the jew concerned will try to engage them in the debate further by asking their opinion after stating his or her own comments. They are also likely to attempt in increase their own social standing by showing off their ‘intellectual abilities’.
Answering Behaviour: Stand your ground and use your knowledge of the subject matter (which you should know reasonably well) to call out and rebut intellectual rhetoric, pointing out the statistics which disprove NAXALT type arguments and point out that they haven’t answered your contention when they use false equivalency.
Likely Outcomes: Jewish Rage Quit (you have won and should maximise this by intellectually shaming and provoking your jewish opponent) or Kvetch Stage 3.
Kvetch Stage 3: Friendliness and Entryism
The jew in question stops his or her histrionic aggressiveness and instead tries to ‘reason with you’. They schmooze and suggest that maybe you could be friends if you’ll just concede X, Y or Z point. Another possibility is that they will claim that you should allow them membership in some group of which you are part, because without a jew like them then you ‘won’t succeed’ or they will claim in some form that showing ‘inclusivity’ (i.e., letting them in) will allow your group to get a lot more support.
If there are other people in (or near) the conversation then the jew concerned will try to engage them in the conversation. This will be by asking their opinion about whether jews should be allowed into some group of which you are part or whether you should concede X, Y or Z as form of social pressure and sanction.
Answering Behaviour: Stand your ground and insist that they rebut your arguments directly.
Likely Outcomes: Kvetch Stages 1 or 2.
This is a cycle of behaviour and as such jews can go through these stages on multiple occasions within the course of a single debate or discussion, but if you stand your ground then they will eventually become extremely angry and rage quit.
This will allow you to maximize the propaganda value of the encounter as when a jew rage quits they will often make death threats, make some stupid statement about ‘evil racists’ (who only cited statistics and behaved reasonably) or cast nasty aspersions about non-jews/Christians/White people etc.
Understanding the kvetch levels will allow you to troll, discuss and debate jews more easily, because it allows you to keep calm and know exactly what your opponent is likely to do next. Keeping calm will also allow you to maximize the benefit of the consequences of rage quit when it comes.