This thread is for janitor fan art. Post janny art.
>>9462>2048x1152
>>9493this image makes me sad
>>9493>this is how mods actually see themselvespathetic
26 songs.Happy Halloween!Link: https://mega.nz/file/mxJnSC5L
Decryption key: On Discord under #music or ask me for it.DM me for the other albums.
meow.
>>9569
I propose a new chatfilter for the word 'chud'.It's become probably one of the most commonly used words I see used in troll posts and I think its become some kind of trigger word that immediately derails every single thread into culture war bullshit. It's like clockwork.I'm not sure what we should change it to, but the word has become too powerful.
>>9021Filter it to cannabilistic humanoid underground dweller. That's what C.H.U.D means anyway.
>>9021Remove ALL chatfilters
>>9187i second this, besides ones actually used for moderation of sensitive info
>>9187>>9188disagree. I think they are funny
It's not nearly as common as other words were at their peaks. This seems like a big overstep imo.
Is there a reason why when I click on images, they don't open right away? It sometimes takes minutes, not to even load but just to open (which loads almost instantly). It's not always like this but it has been recently, on either wifi or mobile data my connection is fineOn an android system, latest OS and update
>>9495File server domain is sharded into multiple subdomains, but is2.4chan.org is slow.Replacing it with i.4cdn.org can speed it up.The following one-liner does that> $.qsa('a[href^="//is2.4chan.org"]').forEach((a) => { a.href = a.href.replace('is2.4chan.org', 'i.4cdn.org'); })I don't know what's causing this though.
>>9496thanks anonso you're having trouble as well? I noticed this is now happening on my desktop as well
>>9495Files on mobile have been bricked for whatever reason. Unironically can't janny images because I can't open them unless it's from the report queue.
26 songs, you know the drill.Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!Download link: https://mega.nz/file/PlQiHLAQ
Thank you for your hard work and for putting this together!
thanks really nice job merry christmas and happy new year!
first 2023 post lole
excellent album! :D
>>8923WTF WTF A 5TH EDITION JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE!!11!111!!!Check the Discord's #music channel for the announcement, /j/ lurkers.Submissions this year will be done in a thread under the #music channel.
The link in the /sci/'s sticky is dead because the guy who hosted the sites.google.com wiki has been banned by Google for violating ToS. The link used to lead to a (dead) wiki which was never worked on or finished.I suggest that it's replaced with a new sticky that has:>explanation how to use MathJAX>reminder to go to /adv/ and /wsr/ for career advice and homework requests respectively>useful resources (such as nLab (a well known math wiki), arXiv (a well known prepublication website), MathJaX documentation etc.) like there are on other boards such as /fit/ and /int/Here, I made a example sticky combining the /g/ and /int/ stickies that would work as a drop-down replacement for the sticky on /sci/:>This board is for the discussion of science and math> >If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to >>>/adv/ - Advice.>If you want help with your homework, go to >>>/wsr/ - Worksafe Requests.>>To use MathJaX, put your TeX code between [math] ... [/math] tags (inline equations) or [eqn] ... [/eqn] tags (block equation).Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Note that the sites.google.com link in the >>>/diy/ sticky is dead too, but for unrelated reasons.
I would recommend putting some more info in there which was previously included in the sites page. In particular, the link to the wiki, some of the tutorials, and other resources. If possible, most of the content (which is still accessible on web.archive.org) could just be transferred over to the wiki in order to keep the sticky short and concise.
>>9472fuckin' magnets, how do they work?
>>9475I think the OP of the sticky should be exactly what I posted as it contains the most pertinent information (how to use TeX, rules reminder, links to resources) but the sticky can have additional posts and doesn't have to be short. I would not be against creating a temporary sticky asking the users what to add to the sticky since /sci/ has made a lot of infographics about "which book to read on such-and-such topic" (for example, /3/'s sticky has like 60 posts of infographics)>pic rel one such infographicThis is literally what /lit/ sticky has.nLab and arXiv should be put into OP as they are the primary drivers of discussion about math and science respectively on /mg/ and /sci/ as a whole (for example, LK99 most recently) but they are not resources to *learn* about science or math as a beginner/undergrad. That's why the posts in the sticky could also contain links to such resources ("how to start learning calculus, how to start learning algebra, how to start learning physics..."). Sure, you can also add the web.archive.org of the wiki to the OP, /fit/'s sticky does exactly that.
The sticky should contain a guide like pic rel although this one is made by an old tripfag.>>9478>infographicsThere are a lot of them listed in this thread>>>/sci/15676370
What is the point of these? Let us consider "False Report or Announcing Report [Warn]" for instance. Janitors cannot distinguish between repeat offenders, so if someone repeats this offense, I assume they will just keep getting the same warn messages?Curiously, "Announcing Sage" is a ban template.
>>9312Announcing sage was a larger problem when sage was first made invisible. In ye olde days, the options field was the email field, its contents were visible to other users in case you wanted to leave contact info, and it served dual purpose of allowing for options like sage (don't bump), noko (returned you to the thread after posting; the default behaviour was that after posting you'd be returned to page 1 of the index).At some point in our history, the email field got repurposed as the options field, because who the FUCK leaves their email address on 4chan, and that had the side effect of hiding sage. Users began announcing sage more frequently.
It's best to understand the ban request templates as basically boxes we're supposed to sort things into. And by "we", I include mods in this. While they can custom warn/ban as needed, ultimately we're all just putting the round peg in the round hole.
>>9315>he doesn't put the round peg in the square hole
>>9323She always gets upset when I try that.
>>9378>she
This is for the Dev since I noticed that there were changes made to the report queue:1) In .report-controls you're setting the display to flex but you don't seem to know what flexbox is capable of (https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/). What do I mean by this? I mean that there's no reason to give the clear button margin-right: auto !important when flexbox is perfectly capable of keeping the clear button away from the BR button. The same goes for the other margins on the buttons since gap: is perfectly capable of automatically setting those for you without you having to say that buttons have a 2px horizontal margins. display: flex actually means that you're using the default values for flexbox (row, nowrap, flex-start, etc.) without actually knowing that you can change some of those and thus not need to use margins to do what you're trying to do. Simply putting each group of buttons into their own separate divs and then using justify-content: space-between to put each div at opposite ends of the report yields the same results without having to use margins. The same can be said for centering the buttons without having to use padding.2) From a UI standpoint this is actually worse than before because the smaller and closer together the buttons are the easier it is to make mistakes due to miss clicks. Particularly the File Deletion button is only 20 x 25px which is pretty small and on top of that it has a 1px margin with the Delete button. Having 4 or 5px wide gaps between the buttons doesn't impact the aesthetics at all and makes everything less prone to mistakes. The same can be said for putting the full words back in rather than shorthands. Functionality is way more important than fancy 1px shadows killing posts that only needed file deletion.3) The Delete button has no mouse hover labels and the BR button uses the browser built in labels rather than the custom black ones that the File and Clear buttons have.
>>9270Seconding this.
>>9270>warn request toggleI don't think this is a good idea. It's a "quick BR" menu. If you need to do something more involved than BRing something for off-topic, NWS, racism, evasion, etc, just pull up the BR menu. If you try to overextend a feature, it quickly loses its usefulness because it becomes just as complex as the thing it's meant to replace.Pending requests notifier feels absolutely necessary, >though.
>>9275>press one key to turn from BR to WRtell me how this doesn't save time
>>9276Ctrl+click for warn would be cool
>>9242>I also agree with the GR9>it's not used that often and it can be 99% of the time be substituted for other rules
Is there any reason why us janitors are still not allowed to autosage threads without asking a mod in the discord?
kek that pic is so true(verification not required)
Where did you find this picture of me?
>>9331This is inaccurate. Mod would say "sec ... no way to tell"
Permasages are less visible to the site posters. A mod is more trusted to use the tool correctly and not shape the board with it. If a janitor is deleting a bunch of threads that becomes obvious.
Because it is not a tool for janitors, simple as.
TEL AVIV - An online forum "www.4chan.org" recently made changes to its report queue and have sparked controversy among users and experts alike, with some calling into question the motives and expertise of the developers behind the update.According to a post by a 4chan janitor, the changes made to the report queue were flawed and unnecessary. The janitor pointed out several issues with the update, including the use of the "display: flex" property without fully utilizing the capabilities of flexbox, and the small and close together buttons making it prone to mistakes due to miss clicks.Furthermore, the janitor suggested that the changes were not optimized for the capabilities of the technology and were not user-friendly enough. The janitor even pointed out some specific issues with the Delete and BR buttons, including the lack of mouse hover labels for the Delete button and the use of labels for the BR button.The janitor's post quickly gained traction among other users, with many voicing their concerns and criticisms of the update. Some even went so far as to suggest that the changes were part of a larger conspiracy to undermine the functionality and usability of the forum.Hotpocket Daily reporters were able to confront the developer in question outside a Fresno 7-11 earlier this evening. When pressed for comment, had this to say: "aww shiet that's a long post". However, he did not provide any further comment or explanation regarding the concerns raised by the janitor and other users.As the controversy continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether the developers will address the concerns raised by the community and take steps to improve the report queue. In the meantime, users are advised to exercise caution when using the report function and to report any issues or concerns to the appropriate channels.Subscribe to the Hotpocket Daily for future updates on this breaking story.
the italics made my GPU heat up :(
we need text to speech in the report queue
>>9290N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
>>9290JOHN MADDEN
>>9293aeiou
Real question, why are these captchas necessary? I propose that they actual stifle many posters who want to participate in simple mindless conversation. I've been on the internet my whole life and even I still struggle sometimes to do these captchas. They look weird on mobile (which makes up the majority of all internet traffic in the world), it takes a couple tries to get my finger on the slider button and half the time my phone tries to "swipe back" when I try to grab the slider, and even when I type the 6 character captcha I still sometimes get it wrong because they are just too weird. I'm not retarded but I seriously encounter a problem with the captcha like 30% of the time.
>>9045>robot arms race stumped by hands
>>9045Also, the sliding puzzle piece captchas work great for this, I think
>>9045AI is pretty bad at negatives. If you do a google search for "shirt without stripes", you get shirts with stripes.
>>8905Slashdot has required an account for anonymous posting for a couple of years now.
>>9218Damn. Times have changed.
OK guys, what if... hear me out... users had to register to post on the site?From my point of view, the single biggest problem with the site from the moderation perspective is that it's too easy to evade bans, especially in the phoneposting world. I've been jannying for years now and am constantly dealing with both overt ban-evaders and people I'm pretty sure are only shitposting because they're confident they can evade a ban easily.Suppose that in order to post on the site, you first had to register a username and password using a unique e-mail address. We could even build in a delay of, say, 24 hours to the registration. Posting would be exactly the same - the username has no bearing on what displays on your post, it's just required for you to log in to post.Outwardly, the site would be identical, but with this new barrier to posting, all of a sudden a ban evader needs a new e-mail address every time they want to shitpost again, and/or an additional wait time. The pain of doing this would make the number of ban evaders drop dramatically and post quality would skyrocket as a result - not because ban evaders make up a large proportion of posters, but because their constant shitposting fosters a culture of shitposting.Think about it. Tell me I'm crazy.
Stop calling it autosage. They're called unbumparoos.
>>9213no, it's called "bumplocking"
>>9214perish in hellfire
It's called Benjamin Buttoning a thread, because it causes the thread to do the opposite of age.
>>9216I'll stick my dick up your benjamin butthole. stut the fuck up
I've seen some grumbling the last week or so on /tg/ about the thread lifetime / whatever the proper name for "duration-based autosage" instead of bump limit is. As far as they can tell, it's been set to 7 days, somewhat recently.Reactions to this have not been particularly egregious, but anons have noticed it and seem nonplussed as to why it's been done. A few of the slower generals have wondered what they did to get put on autosage.Anyway, I don't really give a fuck, but I figured that the mods might want to know, and this seemed like the best way to leave consolidated feedback I've observed from boardwide discussion, rather than the fast-moving discord or clogging one or two mods' inboxes.
>>9186sure but dafuq happened to those stairs mate
>>9189anon..
what scripts does /j/ recommend with tampermonkey?
>>8781Hotpocket helper is kino >>7036I also use https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/28486-tripcolor and https://ponepaste.org/raw/683
>>87814chanX, HPH, Oneechan, "4chan External Sound" or other sound scripts and there's more scripts you could get online.Without going super deep into any one thing, if the script was made by someone who's adversarial to our moderation it's safer to run it in a completely separate environment from any janny shit (namely a separate browser, some schizos use virtual machines but that's a nuclear option to a problem that geriatrics easily solve on a daily basis by accidentally installing multiple browsers on their machines [and then asking you to remove them]). With that said it's entirely possible to neutralize MOST if not all attack vectors by editing the script's header or auditing the code for spooky shit, most importantly, doing all of that AND NOT POSTING will also go a long way in preventing ANY FORM of communication with the outside world if the script did manage to sniff you out as a concierge sans salaire. So keep in mind what it says it does, what it actually does and what you want it to do.Too retarded to read code? No problem!>Don't want scripts to run on janny stuff?Remove/edit @match and @include or add @exclude for certain domains (actually check if the websites listed are the actual websites you think they are, don't fall for gmaiI.com tier shit [that was an uppercase i, not an l]).>Don't want scripts to talk to spooky websites? Remove @connect (definitely remove "@connect * " [which means "connect all " in plain English]), check what websites the script wants to access before clicking any pop-ups like an ADDfag or block those websites in the script's exceptions.>Don't want your scripts doing spooky shit? Remove @grant, namely unsafeWindow, look up what the others do if you're ever in doubt.>Don't want to place your trust in some faggot that might maliciously edit the code down the line? Remove @updateURL.
>>8783I'm mostly writing this because:1) The userscript enjoyer experience is the superior moderation and end-user experience;2) I can't agree with some people outright saying that you shouldn't use any userscripts even on VMs out of ignorance and even others who'll say to only use them on VMs or separate browsers only (again, some of these SHOULD be used this way, especially those written by malicious actors, but not all of them);3) Rather than our opsec policy being "don't do X" it should probably be "you can do X, here's how to safely do X, here's our homegrown safe copy of X you can use with most of the dangerous shit already neutered out". I'd even go so far as saying that maintaining and distributing safe versions of the most popularly user scripts should be done and there's definitely a lot of janitors that use them and have an interest in digging into these even the ones that people think might be malicious, so more eyes on something is better than no one looking at it and everyone just nodding along with one person saying "okay well there's like 20k lines of code so I'm not reading all that shit, let's say it's malicious forever". For example, I don't believe that PEE is malicious because ~15K of those lines of code are actually publicly available libraries and the actual portion of code written by the guy did not seem to be doing anything malicious, the permissions of the script were the actual biggest offender but they seem to be set for functionality rather than malicious intent, so upon removal of said permissions it should be safe to lurk with (THIS IS NOT AN ENDORSEMENT TO USE THIS SCRIPT WITHOUT A SEPARATE BROWSER OR A VM). Point being that we shouldn't be as lazy to say that something is malware forever because that'll actually stifle our understanding of it and how to combat newer versions of it.
>>8781does anyone have a one click ban for [reason] script? there is a serial evader that shows up from time to time and i'd like to make my job a little easier
>>9087It's called keyboard shortcuts, you click the button, press 9 and enter.
/op/ - OPost/Random=-=-=-=-=Concept=-=-=-=-=No set topic, the purpose of the board is an alternate thread mode I'll call OPost for now:In OPost, whoever makes the OP has the ability to enable/disable optional thread features at post time, like those found in threads on other boards. The OP can also modify certain, superficial CSS values of any individual post made in the thread, or the CSS of the thread as a whole. These changes have no effect outside the thread, but within the thread they override browser cookie settings where applicable.OPost takes the idea of the OP setting the stage and tone of a thread and gives it some aesthetic trappings to make use of and enjoy, whether for other anons or for their own sake. It doesn't fundamentally change the relationship between OP posts vs. replies, but rather adds a new aspect to it, and none of the settings could be used to modify the actual contents of other anons' posts. As since OP is the only one who has access, everybody in the thread knows who is responsible if some change does occur, making a unique interaction in the thread between the OP and other posters should they identify themselves.It is a board I would be very interested in using, and I imagine the thread mode could complement different topics and posting styles better than the default thread mode.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=Suggestions=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Concerning development, I would look at dogfooding customizations already implemented in other boards (/s4s/, etc)- Probably best as a red board with the rule for no porn dumps, since GR5 enforcement that would only take away from the OP's agency. Otherwise it would make more sense as a blue board.- In the same way you get an autogenerated code for post deletion, the thread creation prompt should have one so that the OP canmake modifications on other devices. - The OP should be able access the individual post options in the usual post drop-down and pop out like the BR/WR forms we have for desktop and mobile. When the changes are set they are immediately changed on the OP's page while the changes will appear on refresh for everyone else.- Only one post or the whole thread can be set at one time, and a cooldown for any OP changes per thread would be present to keep everyone in relative synch=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Pre-Thread Customization Ideas=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Images (/news/)- Spoilers- SJIS (/jp/)Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
This would be neat. Inside this special board, give each OP or thread-comment an upvote and downvote button like reddit and see how the community reacts
>>9032Boy if you're going to bring about that kinocringe at least do it 4chan style.For example, let the OP hide individual posts by default for other anons, so anons know exactly which posts get OP's goat.
>>9034now THIS is an idea