# The Gaming Den

Welcome to the Gaming Den.

Skip to content

## A Cleric Domain For Everyone

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

- Print view

32 posts

- 1
- 2
- Next

JonSetanta
  King
  Posts: 5512
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: interbutts

### A Cleric Domain For Everyone

- Quote

Post by JonSetanta » Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:43 am

... Except for Clerics and Wizards. Because they're good enough.
Everyone else gets a Domain of their choice if they worship a matching deity.
Each spell slot is cast 1/day.
The Domain ability works as normal, granting Turn Undead if it would otherwise enhance it.
Top

Zaranthan
  Knight-Baron
  Posts: 628
  Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 3:08 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Zaranthan » Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:59 am

I'm just going to mentally add Druids to your exceptions. Along with everyone else that gets level 9 spells.

> Koumei wrote:...is the dead guy posthumously at fault for his own death and, due to the felony murder law, his own murderer?

> hyzmarca wrote:A palace made out of poop is much more impressive than one made out of gold. Stinkier, but more impressive. One is an ostentatious display of wealth. The other is a miraculous engineering feat.

Top

Tannhäuser
  1st Level
  Posts: 36
  Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:27 am

###

- Quote

Post by Tannhäuser » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:04 am

How about not just giving spells to everyone to try to fix people that don't get spells?
Top

Zaranthan
  Knight-Baron
  Posts: 628
  Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 3:08 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Zaranthan » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:32 am

It's a lovely thought, and one that gave us the Tomes. The catch is fixing fighters without just giving them spells is a lot of WORK, most of which will end up with at least some sort of ability that emulates the effect of one spell or another just because it's something you really can't live without. Be it death ward/mind blank, teleport/plane shift, or even just protection from evil, magic does everything, and not having magic in 3rd edition is just playing tag with your shoelaces tied together.
Even the ever-vaunted roles of being the strong guy, the agile guy, or the tough guy are supplanted by the Synthesist Summoner, the Beguiler, and the Psion. People WANT to play Boromir, but at the end of the day you die like a fucking chump to a bunch of orcs because one of them had a bow and you took Greater Weapon Specialization: Greatsword and thought you'd be okay.

> Koumei wrote:...is the dead guy posthumously at fault for his own death and, due to the felony murder law, his own murderer?

> hyzmarca wrote:A palace made out of poop is much more impressive than one made out of gold. Stinkier, but more impressive. One is an ostentatious display of wealth. The other is a miraculous engineering feat.

Top

JonSetanta
  King
  Posts: 5512
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: interbutts

###

- Quote

Post by JonSetanta » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:10 am

> Zaranthan wrote:I'm just going to mentally add Druids to your exceptions. Along with everyone else that gets level 9 spells.

Yes, I forgot. Those too.
Maybe just make a blanket list of "everyone that casts spells up to 9th level", which excludes Paladins and Rangers (and those other ones such as Bards)

> The Adventurer's Almanac wrote: ↑
> Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
> Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.

Top

Thaluikhain
  Prince
  Posts: 4994
  Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 3:30 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Thaluikhain » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:41 am

Hardly an expert, but that seems an interesting idea...also a good way of having religions involved beyond clerics if everyone got a benefit.
Though, isn't that a lot like telling everyone to multiclass, or giving them a free cleric level? Again, an interesting idea.
Top

radthemad4
  Duke
  Posts: 2072
  Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:20 pm

###

- Quote

Post by radthemad4 » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:53 am

Are you also doing a thing so the DCs are based on whatever your highest stat is? That way offensive spells would be usable.
Last edited by radthemad4 on Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
Top

JonSetanta
  King
  Posts: 5512
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: interbutts

###

- Quote

Post by JonSetanta » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:02 am

> radthemad4 wrote:Once per day abilities make me sad.
> Are you also doing a thing so the DCs are based on whatever your highest stat is? That way offensive spells are usable.

Sure. Not just Wisdom.
Although, a mana system would be perfect.
And standardized caster spell save DC stats.

> The Adventurer's Almanac wrote: ↑
> Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
> Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.

Top

Judging__Eagle
  Prince
  Posts: 4671
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada

###

- Quote

Post by Judging__Eagle » Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:38 am

An other option: Don't allow supernatural characters below level CR 6. Don't allow mundane characters beyond level 5.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.
While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
Top

Cervantes
  Journeyman
  Posts: 129
  Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 10:27 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Cervantes » Fri Sep 29, 2017 1:38 am

It's an interesting idea but I really don't think it goes far enough. As Judging__Eagle and Zaranthan note, just make everyone magic instead of trying to fix martials by throwing them a bone.
(Of course, you have to nerf the prime magic users in order to distribute the magic equally among the classes. Tear down the arcane bourgeois)
Top

phlapjackage
  Knight-Baron
  Posts: 649
  Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:29 am

###

- Quote

Post by phlapjackage » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:24 am

> Cervantes wrote:It's an interesting idea but I really don't think it goes far enough. As Judging__Eagle and Zaranthan note, just make everyone magic instead of trying to fix martials by throwing them a bone.

Aaaaaaaaaand we're back at Earthdawn again. For all the things it didn't get right, still, what a great game...
Koumei: and if I wanted that, I'd take some mescaline and run into the park after watching a documentary about wasps.
PhoneLobster: DM : Mr Monkey doesn't like it. Eldritch : Mr Monkey can do what he is god damn told.
MGuy: The point is to normalize 'my' point of view. How the fuck do you think civil rights occurred? You think things got this way because people sat down and fucking waited for public opinion to change?
Top

Judging__Eagle
  Prince
  Posts: 4671
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada

###

- Quote

Post by Judging__Eagle » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:11 pm

An other factor is that in D&D's own in-game mechanics and subsequent narrative, "human" (even Olympic/genius level) achievements are about the same as those of a level 5 human character. Once a human reaches level 6+, nothing they're doing is able to pass as "natural."
Furthermore, by level ten, a fighter can pummel granite with their pinky finger, and are undeniably somewhere within "supernatural" territory.
So, if the basic combat mechanics of the d20 engine say: "level 1-5 is 'human'; level 6+ is superhuman; level 10+ is superheroic"; then the rest of the game should keep that in mind throughout the rest of its design.
One caveat on "no supernaturals below level 5": just because "spellcasters" should be "mundane" at level 1-5 doesn't mean they can't have a wide variety of "mundane" abilities and options that looks like magic to the ignorant & uneducated. D&D does support this theme by the fact that the arcane focus or regents for many arcane spells are basically chemistry & science in-jokes means that there could very well be lots of things that a "mundane wizard" should be able to contribute towards helping the party.
Making all level 1-3 spells into "techniques" that characters get access based off of their skill ranks might help giving non-arete characters ways to contribute until they can create dimension portals with their minds, and walls of iron out of a pile of 50 gp.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.
While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
Top

deaddmwalking
  Prince
  Posts: 3343
  Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 11:33 am

###

- Quote

Post by deaddmwalking » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:35 pm

I don't think you need to avoid having 'spells' at low levels. I think you need to think carefully about what those spells do and how they work. Since anything can be justified by 'magic', everything IS. There is no skill in the game that cannot be completely replaced by a low-level spell and that's probably a shame.
I think D&D needs a much stronger 'metaphysical' description of what magic is and what it can do. Wish is the worst offender. Is magic intelligent and capable of understanding (or MISunderstanding) a request? A spell like 'dancing sword' seems to imply an intelligence 'controlling' the magic - those types of spells ought to be explicitly based on the caster's concentration or controlled by an elemental force. Magic probably shouldn't be able to make you smarter or wiser. It probably shouldn't make you more easily able to influence people. If it is, it should be very clear how it does it. If 'glibness' is only unlocking abilities you already possess then there should be a non-magical way to unlock that ability (like drinking copious amounts of alcohol).
-This space intentionally left blank
Top

Dogbert
  Duke
  Posts: 1123
  Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:17 am
  Contact:
  Contact Dogbert
  Website

###

- Quote

Post by Dogbert » Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:47 am

> Tannhäuser wrote:How about not just giving spells to everyone to try to fix people that don't get spells?

Aaaand that was quick, it only took three posts for someone to AGAIN making this into yet another Fighter thread. Does that mean he "lost" considering Fighters threads are the Den's Godwin?
Top

Omegonthesane
  Prince
  Posts: 3625
  Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:55 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Omegonthesane » Sat Sep 30, 2017 7:15 am

> Dogbert wrote:

> > Tannhäuser wrote:How about not just giving spells to everyone to try to fix people that don't get spells?

> Aaaand that was quick, it only took three posts for someone to AGAIN making this into yet another Fighter thread. Does that mean he "lost" considering Fighters threads are the Den's Godwin?

Not in the least, since Godwin's law only stipulates that Hitler comparisons will eventually happen in any thread that lasts long enough. There are vague rumours that LiveJournal had another law in which invoking Hitler made you lose the argument, but I happen to disagree rather strongly with it after someone tried to shut me down for comparing a foreign policy of "kill all drow and all descendants of drow on sight with no attempt at negotiation or even intimidation or brainwashing" to the Nazi regime (instead of trying to nitpick the flaws in said comparison).
But I digress. Yeah I think advocating against the very concept of the thread is inherently not helpful.

> Kaelik wrote:Because powerful men get away with terrible shit, and even the public domain ones get ignored, and then, when the floodgates open, it turns out there was a goddam flood behind it.

Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath, Justin Bieber, shitmuffin
Top

Tannhäuser
  1st Level
  Posts: 36
  Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:27 am

###

- Quote

Post by Tannhäuser » Sat Sep 30, 2017 4:42 pm

> Dogbert wrote:Aaaand that was quick, it only took three posts for someone to AGAIN making this into yet another Fighter thread. Does that mean he "lost" considering Fighters threads are the Den's Godwin?

Any thread about giving spells to people that don't cast spells is already a Fighter thread.
I'm not seeing how handing out domains to everyone is going to be better than all the SLA feats people were making, and I thought that those were a poor idea to begin with. I doubt there is going to any easy solution that makes weapon-based characters scale with the rest of the party that actually holds up in play.
There's an entire forum here for getting opinions on new classes, instead of repeatedly spitballing ONE WEIRD TRICK to fix a big problem in the game.
Top

deaddmwalking
  Prince
  Posts: 3343
  Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 11:33 am

###

- Quote

Post by deaddmwalking » Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:18 am

The fact is, under D&D 3.x rules it's a little bizarre that only wizards get magic. I mean, obviously they get 'spell slots' and that powers their spells, but the explanation for it is that they study rituals. If you move your hands *thus* and utter these incantations *thus* the previously 'prepared portion' is triggered and is cast. Anyone should be able to study a spell book and learn SOME spells.
Spell slots may be a sacred cow, but that's probably the worst explanation. My kids were watching Kung Fu Panda 3 last night (and honestly, the whole series is pretty solid - you could do worse) and those movies already figured out that 'chi' is something that everyone has and it can be used to 'superpower' martial attacks and it can do 'magical' things. If you make magic a resource that everyone has access to in greater or lesser degrees (like feats are in 3.x) and you provide martial powers and magical power, martial characters will have high-level martial abilities. And if they opt for a 'straight magic ability', SO WHAT? If they've already got 'leap of the clouds' then it's not nearly such a huge leap for the players to accept 'dimensional step' and later 'plane shift'. In fact, in Kung Fu Panda 3, dimensional travel to the Spirit Realm is a major plot-point.
-This space intentionally left blank
Top

JonSetanta
  King
  Posts: 5512
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: interbutts

###

- Quote

Post by JonSetanta » Sun Oct 01, 2017 2:50 am

> deaddmwalking wrote: Spell slots may be a sacred cow, but that's probably the worst explanation. My kids were watching Kung Fu Panda 3 last night (and honestly, the whole series is pretty solid - you could do worse) and those movies already figured out that 'chi' is something that everyone has and it can be used to 'superpower' martial attacks and it can do 'magical' things. If you make magic a resource that everyone has access to in greater or lesser degrees (like feats are in 3.x) and you provide martial powers and magical power, martial characters will have high-level martial abilities. And if they opt for a 'straight magic ability', SO WHAT? If they've already got 'leap of the clouds' then it's not nearly such a huge leap for the players to accept 'dimensional step' and later 'plane shift'. In fact, in Kung Fu Panda 3, dimensional travel to the Spirit Realm is a major plot-point.

I saw "the Sorcerer and the White Snake" starring Jet Li and it's a prime example of blending Asian martial arts with spell casting.
Western neckbeards all want to be Gandalf and that's that.

> The Adventurer's Almanac wrote: ↑
> Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
> Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.

Top

hyzmarca
  Prince
  Posts: 3909
  Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:07 pm

###

- Quote

Post by hyzmarca » Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:27 am

> JonSetanta wrote:

> > deaddmwalking wrote: Spell slots may be a sacred cow, but that's probably the worst explanation. My kids were watching Kung Fu Panda 3 last night (and honestly, the whole series is pretty solid - you could do worse) and those movies already figured out that 'chi' is something that everyone has and it can be used to 'superpower' martial attacks and it can do 'magical' things. If you make magic a resource that everyone has access to in greater or lesser degrees (like feats are in 3.x) and you provide martial powers and magical power, martial characters will have high-level martial abilities. And if they opt for a 'straight magic ability', SO WHAT? If they've already got 'leap of the clouds' then it's not nearly such a huge leap for the players to accept 'dimensional step' and later 'plane shift'. In fact, in Kung Fu Panda 3, dimensional travel to the Spirit Realm is a major plot-point.

> I saw "the Sorcerer and the White Snake" starring Jet Li and it's a prime example of blending Asian martial arts with spell casting.
> Western neckbeards all want to be Gandalf and that's that.

Gandalf used a sword.
He stabbed people.
He stabbed people more often than he cast spells.
He stabbed people so often that he even gave his sword a name, Glamdring, which means Foe-hammer.
He also had a magic horse, Shadowfax, the Lord of all Horses.
Also, he's literally an angel.
Gandalf wasn't a D&D Wizard.
He's a Solar with Paladin with a long beard and a staff who likes to smoke something called pipe-weed who uses his SLAs powers to fake being a wizard.
Last edited by hyzmarca on Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top

angelfromanotherpin
  Overlord
  Posts: 9691
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by angelfromanotherpin » Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:40 am

> hyzmarca wrote:He's a Solar with Paladin with a long beard and a staff who likes to smoke something called pipe-weed who uses his SLAs powers to fake being a wizard.

Well he's definitely not a Paladin; he blithely lies and cheats and disrespects legitimate authority. Also, a lot of what he does seems to involve legitimately arcane knowledge of the world acquired through study, it's just that the distinction between when he's doing that and when he's using angel powers and when he's using the Ring of Fire is rarely clear.
Top

Dogbert
  Duke
  Posts: 1123
  Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:17 am
  Contact:
  Contact Dogbert
  Website

###

- Quote

Post by Dogbert » Sun Oct 01, 2017 4:14 am

> deaddmwalking wrote:The fact is, under D&D 3.x rules it's a little bizarre that only wizards get magic.

It's not an edition problem because d&d's problem is not on a mechanics level, but a conceptual one. The whole concept of d&d revolves around the game that the world must have both Haves and Have Nots (i.e fighters and wizards).
You have two ways to change it, either "Magic for everyone" (exalted) or "Magic for no one" (4E, ass world), but regardless of which route you take, the resulting narrative is no longer going to be d&d.
Top

Voss
  Prince
  Posts: 3912
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Voss » Sun Oct 01, 2017 4:32 am

> angelfromanotherpin wrote:

> > hyzmarca wrote:He's a Solar with Paladin with a long beard and a staff who likes to smoke something called pipe-weed who uses his SLAs powers to fake being a wizard.

> Well he's definitely not a Paladin; he blithely lies and cheats and disrespects legitimate authority. Also, a lot of what he does seems to involve legitimately arcane knowledge of the world acquired through study, it's just that the distinction between when he's doing that and when he's using angel powers and when he's using the Ring of Fire is rarely clear.

I'd argue more that it doesn't matter when he's doing which thing, since he predates D&D by decades and the author had a very different mindset (to put it kindly).
Just like attaching Hong Kong cinema tropes or or just bolting on spells to everything, it's an argument that is obviously going to be horrendously dissatisfying and contentious.
Top

JonSetanta
  King
  Posts: 5512
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: interbutts

###

- Quote

Post by JonSetanta » Sun Oct 01, 2017 4:50 am

> Voss wrote: Just like attaching Hong Kong cinema tropes or or just bolting on spells to everything, it's an argument that is obviously going to be horrendously dissatisfying and contentious.

psssssssssssh

> The Adventurer's Almanac wrote: ↑
> Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
> Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.

Top

Username17
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 29894
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Username17 » Sun Oct 01, 2017 11:34 am

A more pressing issue for this idea specifically is that individual domains are rarely balanced, and pretty much never balanced across multiple levels. There are no domains I can think of that give level appropriate abilities at low, medium, and high levels. Clerics are able to be effective by voltroning "builds" where they use domains that provide good abilities at level X to cover for holes in their other domains.
The Animal Domain gives the monster slaying antilife shell at 6th, and fucking shapechange of all things at 9th, but the first level spell is calm animals, which is a spell I have never seen or heard of being cast to any effect. On the other end of the scale, the fucking Plant Domain gives you entangle at 1st and Wall of Thorns at 5th, but it gets way worse after that, and the capstone spell summons 4 Shambling Mounds, which is something you don't actually wipe your ass with as 17th level characters.
-Username17
Top

Chamomile
  Prince
  Posts: 4632
  Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 10:45 am

###

- Quote

Post by Chamomile » Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:07 pm

There is no quick fix for 3.X's balance issues. If you want balanced classes, you have to pick a balance point, copy however many classes from core there are that actually hit that balance point and whose flavor you're okay with, and then you need to write new classes to fill in all the conceptual gaps and beef up the class list back to the neighborhood of twelve classes. There is no fix for the Fighter that will also work on the Bard and the Monk.
I have a blog
Also a Discord channel
I will run that one game you always wish you could play if you pay me dollars for it
Top
Post Reply

- Print view

Display:
Sort by:
Direction:

32 posts

- 1
- 2
- Next

Return to “In My Humble Opinion...”

Jump to

- Main
- ↳ About the Gaming Den
- ↳ In My Humble Opinion...
- ↳ I Gave the Mouse a Cookie...
- ↳ In The Trenches
- ↳ It's My Own Invention...
- ↳ MPSIMS