# The Gaming Den

Welcome to the Gaming Den.

Skip to content

## [Politics]The Right to Arm Bears in a Crowded Theater

Mundane & Pointless Stuff I Must Share: The Off Topic Forum

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

- Print view

658 posts

- Page 21 of 27
  - Jump to page:
- Previous
- 1
- …
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- …
- 27
- Next

Username17
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 29894
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Username17 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:42 pm

An Assault Weapon is one where you can move 6" and then fire it the full number of attacks out to its maximum range.
A Presidential Memorandum is basically just a letter from the office of the President to one or more agencies that tells them what the President's opinion on something is. These can either affect policy or not. The President could issue a Memorandum stating that the head of an agency is doing a heck of a job (or not). The President could also issue a Memorandum that had lasting impacts.
Existing law gives the office of the President a lot of power with certain types of Memoranda. For example: the list of state sponsors of terrorism is drawn up by Presidential Determinations. Obama could get up tomorrow morning and issue a Presidential Memorandum that Belgium was a state sponsor of terrorism, and then the profits from the Smurfs, Asterix, and Tintin movies would be frozen automatically. Many agencies are given broad if vague mission statements, and Presidential Memoranda can be used to define them within whatever existing law allows. For example: Congress threatened to suspend the CDC's funding in the 90s unless they discontinued research into gun violence (causing the agency to discontinue those studies), but the CDC is not actually forbidden by law from researching gun deaths. Obama just declared that they should go back to doing so, and being the President - he can do that.
Executive Orders, on the other hand, are Presidential decrees that are based somewhat fuzzily on the non-explicit powers of the President as (un)defined in the Constitution.
To bring this into perspective: if Obama decided to mint the trillion dollar platinum coin, he'd be issuing a Presidential Memorandum. Because existing law unambiguously gives the treasury department the authority to do that, so he'd simply write a letter to the Treasury Secretary saying that in the opinion of the Office of the President, actually minting the coin would be a good idea. Going for the Constitutional Option, where Obama unilaterally declares the Debt Ceiling unconstitutional in light of the 14th Amendment, would require an Executive Order.
-Username17
Top

Koumei
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 13796
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: South Ausfailia

###

- Quote

Post by Koumei » Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:54 pm

> FrankTrollman wrote:An Assault Weapon is one where you can move 6" and then fire it the full number of attacks out to its maximum range.

Cute. I'm ashamed I didn't leap to that conclusion.

> Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.

Top

Blasted
  Knight-Baron
  Posts: 722
  Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 5:41 am

###

- Quote

Post by Blasted » Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:17 am

This may be a stupid question, but does nobody bring up the issue that encouraging armed resistance to the government gives carte blanche to crazies who believe that the gov't is the antichrist/communist/hitler?
It's not like there aren't any attempted political assassinations.

> King Francis I's Mother said wrote:The love between the kings was not just of the beard, but of the heart

Top

Lago PARANOIA
  Invincible Overlord
  Posts: 10555
  Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

###

- Quote

Post by Lago PARANOIA » Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:21 am

Why do they need to be armed crazies? The SA and KKK show us that 'sane' armed government resisters are a widespread social problem and a direct threat to democracy.

> Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
> In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.

Top

Kaelik
  ArchDemon of Rage
  Posts: 14491
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Kaelik » Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:24 am

> Blasted wrote:This may be a stupid question, but does nobody bring up the issue that encouraging armed resistance to the government gives carte blanche to crazies who believe that the gov't is the antichrist/communist/hitler?
> It's not like there aren't any attempted political assassinations.

Since the only people who even think their armed resistance has a non-zero chance of success are crazies who think the gov't is the antichrist/communist/hitler, no, they rarely bring up that issue.

> DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?

The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Top

K
  King
  Posts: 6487
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by K » Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:24 am

Am I a terrible person for enjoying the fact that five people were accidentally shot at Gun Appreciation Day events?
It's almost like being around a number of armed people is dangerous or something.
Top

Koumei
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 13796
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: South Ausfailia

###

- Quote

Post by Koumei » Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:35 am

I didn't enjoy it, but I felt that it was sort of bound to happen, and really hurting their stupid argument.

> Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.

Top

Maxus
  Overlord
  Posts: 7645
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Maxus » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:07 am

I've been seeing a lot of junk claiming Hitler outlawed guns.
Facts? Links? Frank said something once about armed gangs supporting him.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
Top

Koumei
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 13796
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: South Ausfailia

###

- Quote

Post by Koumei » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:23 am

Before Hitler was in charge, they were actually quite strict with gun control (during one period even having a gun was punishable by death). Hitler actually relaxed the laws a lot for German citizens.
He certainly made sure such rights were not extended to foreigners residing in the country (much as I couldn't buy a gun on holiday in America), and Jews were considered to automatically not be German citizens under Nazi rule, so they were very much disarmed. But yes, as with almost anything anyone tells you about Hitler when trying to make a political point, the opposite is true: he was basically addicted to eating meat*, he hated communists and actual socialists, and yes, he relaxed the gun laws.
Also, regarding "armed gangs supported him", that's how he "won" the election. He was vastly unpopular for the longest time, was put in prison for hate-filled rants and opposing the government, had his own army of thugs protecting him (hiding behind them in a shootout with police), and in the end, when he finally got into power, it wasn't because "Democracy is what led to Hitler running a country", it was "his personal army literally occupied the area and informed people that you can vote Hitler or get shot".
*He actually went to see a doctor about his chronic flatulence at one point, and the doctor suggested he consume less meat (particularly German sausage), which he flat-out ignored.

> Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.

Top

name_here
  Prince
  Posts: 3346
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:55 pm

###

- Quote

Post by name_here » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:43 am

Wikipedia on the armed gangs supporting him
You've probably heard of one of their branches.

> DSMatticus wrote:It's not just that everything you say is stupid, but that they are Gordian knots of stupid that leave me completely bewildered as to where to even begin. After hearing you speak Alexander the Great would stab you and triumphantly declare the puzzle solved.

Top

Username17
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 29894
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Username17 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:07 am

Wikipedia on the 1938 gun laws Hitler passed:

> Wikipedia, Gun Laws in Germany wrote:The 1938 German Weapons Act, the precursor of the current weapons law, superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. Furthermore, the law restricted ownership of firearms to "...persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a (gun) permit." But under the new law:
> - Gun restriction laws applied only to handguns, not to long guns or ammunition. The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as was the possession of ammunition."[4]
>   The legal age at which guns could be purchased was lowered from 20 to 18.[5]
>   Permits were valid for three years, rather than one year.[5]
>   The groups of people who were exempt from the acquisition permit requirement expanded. Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. Prior to the 1938 law, only officials of the central government, the states, and employees of the German Reichsbahn Railways were exempted.[4]
>   Jews were forbidden from the manufacturing or dealing of firearms and ammunition.[4]
> Under both the 1928 and 1938 acts, gun manufacturers and dealers were required to maintain records with information about who purchased guns and the guns' serial numbers. These records were to be delivered to a police authority for inspection at the end of each year.
> On November 11, 1938, the Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick, promulgated Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons. This regulation, which only applied to newly conquered Austria and Sudetenland, effectively deprived all Jews living in those locations of the right to possess firearms or other weapons.

And yeah, the SA and SS were originally armed citizen's militias. The thing where Right Wingers claim that hitler banned all the guns is just weird. I'm really not sure how extending the lengths of handgun permits and deregulating rifles entirely counts as banning all the guns.
-Username17
Top

ishy
  Duke
  Posts: 2404
  Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:59 pm

###

- Quote

Post by ishy » Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:31 am

> K wrote:Am I a terrible person for enjoying the fact that five people were accidentally shot at Gun Appreciation Day events?
> It's almost like being around a number of armed people is dangerous or something.

You probably are. What confuses me though is this:

> the same day that thousands of gun advocates gathered peacefully at state capitals around the U.S. to rally against stricter firearm limits.
> [ . . . ]
> Loaded personal weapons aren't allowed inside the show.

If they don't think people having loaded weapons is safe, why aren't they adviocating for stricter gun control then?

> Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game

> Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.

Top

Cynic
  Prince
  Posts: 2776
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Cynic » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:59 pm

The actual quote isn't anything about disarming a population to rule them. It's about disarming the populace after you conquer them. Hitler was talking about parts of german-controlled Russia during WW2.

> 5 hurt in accidental shootings at 3 U.S. gun shows wrote:Emory L. Cozee was loading his .45-caliber semi-automatic when he shot himself in the hand as he was leaving the Indy 1500 Gun and Knife show at the state fairgrounds, state police said. Loaded personal weapons aren't allowed inside the show.

I do find it hilarious that it's okay to have loaded guns in school but having a loaded gun at a gun show...
Last edited by Cynic on Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

> Ancient History wrote:We were working on Street Magic, and Frank asked me if a houngan had run over my dog.

Top

fbmf
  The Great Fence Builder
  Posts: 2588
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by fbmf » Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:45 pm

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/rea ... ke-it-seem
Game On,
fbmf
Top

nockermensch
  Duke
  Posts: 1896
  Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 1:11 pm
  Location: Rio: the Janeiro

###

- Quote

Post by nockermensch » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:20 pm

> FrankTrollman wrote:Executive Orders, on the other hand, are Presidential decrees that are based somewhat fuzzily on the non-explicit powers of the President as (un)defined in the Constitution.

Goddamn MTP.
@ @ Nockermensch

> Koumei wrote:After all, in Firefox you keep tabs in your browser, but in SovietPutin's Russia, browser keeps tabs on you.

> Mord wrote:Chromatic Wolves are massively under-CRed. Its "Dood to stone" spell-like is a TPK waiting to happen if you run into it before anyone in the party has Dance of Sack or Shield of Farts.

Top

Lago PARANOIA
  Invincible Overlord
  Posts: 10555
  Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

###

- Quote

Post by Lago PARANOIA » Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:32 am

So what's a good projectory for getting a total gun ban in the United States?
I can't even begin to imagine how to make it politically feasible. The only things I can really think of is to throw open the doors to immigration and give tax breaks to people living in cities. That would build a political base to make a gun ban feasible in about 30 years, I think.
Smaller victories can be achieved in the meantime, though. 1994 had the Brady Bill and American liberalism was in a much weaker position now than then. The difference is that we've been letting the NRA spew their propaganda for two decades unopposed. That shit ain't going to be reversed overnight. And as far as I know, only Bloomberg is really serious about a propaganda counterattack.

> Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
> In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.

Top

Username17
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 29894
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Username17 » Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:35 pm

Very little is going to happen on firearms right now.
The issue right now is that the Senate rules have become completely insane, such that you need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything. 85% of the people want universal background checks and it probably isn't going to happen.
What's going to flip this thing around is the NRA becoming toxic. Right now you have enough Senators in there who got NRA money that we can't have any real gun reform at all. But the NRA is actually incredibly unpopular. NRA money was a giant bust in the 2012 election campaign. Robin Kelly just won a special election in Illinois after running in the primary as being the only person with an "F" from the NRA. If this continues, if a couple election cycles down the line the NRA continues to be toxic waste, we'll have senators competing to get negative reviews from the NRA. The moment that happens, we'll actually see a lot of gun control coming down the road. The instant we see 60 senators who are trying to piss off the NRA in order to score points for reelection, we'll get an assault weapons ban, a magazine limit, and all kinds of other stuff.
-Username17
Top

Lago PARANOIA
  Invincible Overlord
  Posts: 10555
  Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

###

- Quote

Post by Lago PARANOIA » Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:40 pm

Oh, some same gun control laws would definitely be an improvement, but I'm talking about a total weapon ban.
At the very least we're going to have to get a better federal judiciary that is willing to throw out the conservatard rulings on the Second Amendment like DC v Heller. That's going to take a few election cycles.

> The instant we see 60 senators who are trying to piss off the NRA in order to score points for reelection, we'll get an assault weapons ban, a magazine limit, and all kinds of other stuff.
> -Username17

I don't see that happening anytime soon or even ever sort of some kind of rural/urban overhaul. The small states love them some exploding dildoes.
Last edited by Lago PARANOIA on Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

> Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
> In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.

Top

name_here
  Prince
  Posts: 3346
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:55 pm

###

- Quote

Post by name_here » Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:47 pm

Yeah, but an awful lot of the pro-gun people are coming around to universal background checks and magazine limits being good sense. A majority of NRA members support at least some of the gun control laws proposed.

> DSMatticus wrote:It's not just that everything you say is stupid, but that they are Gordian knots of stupid that leave me completely bewildered as to where to even begin. After hearing you speak Alexander the Great would stab you and triumphantly declare the puzzle solved.

Top

MGuy
  Prince
  Posts: 4665
  Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:18 am
  Location: Indiana

###

- Quote

Post by MGuy » Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:01 pm

I don't know how well people are coming around to that idea. I have a friend who will NOT let go of the idea that having guns allows we the people to protect ourselves from tyranny, going as far as to site insurgents as inspiration.
The first rule of Fatclub. Don't Talk about Fatclub..
If you want a game modded right you have to mod it yourself.

> MGuy wrote:Finally a thread about fighters!

Top

Lago PARANOIA
  Invincible Overlord
  Posts: 10555
  Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

###

- Quote

Post by Lago PARANOIA » Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:26 pm

> MGuy wrote:I don't know how well people are coming around to that idea. I have a friend who will NOT let go of the idea that having guns allows we the people to protect ourselves from tyranny, going as far as to site insurgents as inspiration.

Well, first things first is that we need to propagate a counter-meme which paints these kinds of people as dangerous tyrants-in-waiting rather than patriots. That is, private citizen militias and mass gun ownership are the tool of authoritarian, discriminatory murderers rather than the plucky defenders of democracy. Otherwise, we'll continue to get bullshit like 'hundreds of thousands people dead a decade is a small price to pay for LIBERTY'.
Fortunately, history makes this pretty easy. All we have to do is relentlessly paint 2nd Amendment-tards as foot soldiers of future incarnations of the KKK/American Indian genociders/SA. Because they are.

> Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
> In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.

Top

Maxus
  Overlord
  Posts: 7645
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Maxus » Thu Apr 18, 2013 4:45 pm

"Sometimes we go for a long time without catching a black man by himself in our neighborhood.
But for when the moment is right, we have guns."
Last edited by Maxus on Thu Apr 18, 2013 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
Top

MGuy
  Prince
  Posts: 4665
  Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:18 am
  Location: Indiana

###

- Quote

Post by MGuy » Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:33 pm

> Lago PARANOIA wrote:

> > MGuy wrote:I don't know how well people are coming around to that idea. I have a friend who will NOT let go of the idea that having guns allows we the people to protect ourselves from tyranny, going as far as to site insurgents as inspiration.

> Well, first things first is that we need to propagate a counter-meme which paints these kinds of people as dangerous tyrants-in-waiting rather than patriots. That is, private citizen militias and mass gun ownership are the tool of authoritarian, discriminatory murderers rather than the plucky defenders of democracy. Otherwise, we'll continue to get bullshit like 'hundreds of thousands people dead a decade is a small price to pay for LIBERTY'.
> Fortunately, history makes this pretty easy. All we have to do is relentlessly paint 2nd Amendment-tards as foot soldiers of future incarnations of the KKK/American Indian genociders/SA. Because they are.

Won't work. They already pulled the "Look at what these Terrorists can do" unironically. I've brought up the KKK, WACO, appealed to their common sense by carefully explaining how pulling out an assault rifle when the SWAT team raids their house for 'liberty' is a sure fire way to get themselves killed. Some people just love guns and there is no way to reason with'em.
Last edited by MGuy on Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The first rule of Fatclub. Don't Talk about Fatclub..
If you want a game modded right you have to mod it yourself.

> MGuy wrote:Finally a thread about fighters!

Top

fectin
  Prince
  Posts: 3760
  Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:54 am

###

- Quote

Post by fectin » Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:10 pm

Every war fought on American soil has been triggered by a government trying to seize weapons. Granted, that's only like four wars, but still. It's been a fundamental issue for a very long time here, much like free speech.

> Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.

Top

MGuy
  Prince
  Posts: 4665
  Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:18 am
  Location: Indiana

###

- Quote

Post by MGuy » Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:22 pm

I thought all the wars were fought over money.
The first rule of Fatclub. Don't Talk about Fatclub..
If you want a game modded right you have to mod it yourself.

> MGuy wrote:Finally a thread about fighters!

Top
Post Reply

- Print view

Display:
Sort by:
Direction:

658 posts

- Page 21 of 27
  - Jump to page:
- Previous
- 1
- …
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- …
- 27
- Next

Return to “MPSIMS”

Jump to

- Main
- ↳ About the Gaming Den
- ↳ In My Humble Opinion...
- ↳ I Gave the Mouse a Cookie...
- ↳ In The Trenches
- ↳ It's My Own Invention...
- ↳ MPSIMS