# The Gaming Den

Welcome to the Gaming Den.

Skip to content

## Lords of Waterdeep

Discussions and debates about video games

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

- Print view

7 posts • Page 1 of 1

K
  King
  Posts: 6487
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

### Lords of Waterdeep

- Quote

Post by K » Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:31 am

A DnD game for the iPad with no DnD rules in it.
Seems like the future of DnD licensing.
Top

Zinegata
  Prince
  Posts: 4071
  Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:33 am

### Re: Lords of Waterdeep

- Quote

Post by Zinegata » Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:58 am

> K wrote:A DnD game for the iPad with no DnD rules in it.
> Seems like the future of DnD licensing.

The trend has been there for a while. There was already an Axis & Allies retheme of D&D, followed by Lords of Waterdeep the boardgame (which was adapted to iPad) which was essentially Agricola or Stone Age.
Lords of Waterdeep is a fairly good game though, but it's undone by imbalanced secret objectives. If one player manages to snag an "unopposed" preferred quest type, he/she will likely run away with the game.
Top

Ice9
  Duke
  Posts: 1568
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Ice9 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:20 am

Yeah, after playing a few times, we banned the Builder (objective: do what you'd want to do anyway). The rest seem relatively even though. But it does rely on the players being proactive with noticing and foiling quest streaks.
Last edited by Ice9 on Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:22 am, edited 4 times in total.
Top

Doom
  Duke
  Posts: 1470
  Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:52 pm
  Location: Baton Rouge

###

- Quote

Post by Doom » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:06 am

Hey, that's the most playable of the boardgames WotC has put out. The builder is flawed, I certainly admit.

> Kaelik, to Tzor wrote: And you aren't shot in the face?

> Frank Trollman wrote:A government is also immortal ...On the plus side, once the United Kingdom is no longer united, the United States of America will be the oldest country in the world. USA!

Top

Zinegata
  Prince
  Posts: 4071
  Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:33 am

###

- Quote

Post by Zinegata » Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:34 am

> Ice9 wrote:Yeah, after playing a few times, we banned the Builder (objective: do what you'd want to do anyway). The rest seem relatively even though. But it does rely on the players being proactive with noticing and foiling quest streaks.

The rest are balanced, but the problem arises when someone has an "uncontested" objective.
Say the secret objective flop is as follows:
Player 1: Religious & Magic
Player 2: Magic & Commerce
Player 3: Commerce & Fighter
In this case Player 2 will tend to have a much more difficult game, because he's competing with both Player 1 and 2 over Magic & Commerce quests.
My house rule for the game is to "seed" the secret objectives a bit, wherein there is always an equal "overlap" between the different quest types.
Top

Doom
  Duke
  Posts: 1470
  Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:52 pm
  Location: Baton Rouge

###

- Quote

Post by Doom » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:09 am

There's some advantage there, but there's some disadvantage, too.
Suppose the quest flop is all Religious & Fighter...if player 2 wants a quest, he's going to muck the whole pile and get 5 new cards, screwing both other players out of (probably) desired quests. Neither other player will ever be in a position to do the same to him without denying themselves a sure quest card--and with no way to know "for sure" what quests the player 2 is going for, this just isn't going to happen.
I've grabbed/done a quest or two that wasn't a goal for my Lord and still won; there are a few cheaper quests with long term benefits that are totally worth it (especially if you consider there's also a denial factor).
Toss in many quests that are bad or bad if they come later in the game, and there's more of a general "luck is a factor" vibe to the game than a "player can be totally screwed from turn 1" factor.
Also, building buildings isn't good strategy in many situations, and it's quite possible to win without having a single one. This is the true problem with the builder, and she can easily be unopposed every turn. I bet they tossed her in because they wanted to encourage more building.

> Kaelik, to Tzor wrote: And you aren't shot in the face?

> Frank Trollman wrote:A government is also immortal ...On the plus side, once the United Kingdom is no longer united, the United States of America will be the oldest country in the world. USA!

Top

Zinegata
  Prince
  Posts: 4071
  Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:33 am

###

- Quote

Post by Zinegata » Mon Aug 19, 2013 1:47 am

> Doom wrote:Suppose the quest flop is all Religious & Fighter...if player 2 wants a quest, he's going to muck the whole pile and get 5 new cards, screwing both other players out of (probably) desired quests. Neither other player will ever be in a position to do the same to him without denying themselves a sure quest card--and with no way to know "for sure" what quests the player 2 is going for, this just isn't going to happen.

Sure, but the problem is that the deck is still composed of an equal number of quests of each type. So by mucking the Religious & Fighter quests he's going to make competition for the remaining Magic and Commerce quests even tighter for himself.

> I've grabbed/done a quest or two that wasn't a goal for my Lord and still won; there are a few cheaper quests with long term benefits that are totally worth it (especially if you consider there's also a denial factor).

One or two quests outside of your sphere is usually doable for the win, but the game more often than not is very, very tight. Except for games when someone was able to pull off a strong combo (e.g. an early quest that grants VP for doing certain actions) the secret objective scoring usually matters quite significantly.
Top
Post Reply

- Print view

Display:
Sort by:
Direction:

7 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to “I Gave the Mouse a Cookie...”

Jump to

- Main
- ↳ About the Gaming Den
- ↳ In My Humble Opinion...
- ↳ I Gave the Mouse a Cookie...
- ↳ In The Trenches
- ↳ It's My Own Invention...
- ↳ MPSIMS