# The Gaming Den

Welcome to the Gaming Den.

Skip to content

## A modest proposal: Iterative Spellcasting

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

- Print view

7 posts • Page 1 of 1

Lago_AM3P
  Duke
  Posts: 1268
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

### A modest proposal: Iterative Spellcasting

- Quote

Post by Lago_AM3P » Thu Jun 17, 2004 10:28 am

Since buffs are holding the game by its throat and wizards never cast even a mighty web past level 9, why not do this instead:
Add iterative spellcasting. And by this I mean that when a wizard or anyone gets 4th level spells, they can cast a 1st level spell, too.
When they get 6th level spells, they can cast up to a third level spell EXTRA.
When wizards get 9th level spells, they can cast up to a 6th level spell AND cast up to a 3rd level spell.
Soforth. At a -3 block. As for spells that have a duration of concentration, they can be maintained simultaneous. (So if a 15th level wizard casts telekinesis as an iterative spell, the next round he can throw out a polymorph any object and a web while maintaining contact on the telekinesis).
This means that full-round action spells would suck (even more) as-written, but who cares?
What do you think?
Top

Sma
  Master
  Posts: 273
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

### Re: A modest proposal: Iterative Spellcasting

- Quote

Post by Sma » Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:09 am

I fail to see how this would remove the usefullness of buffing.
This would aloow you to power up in one turn instead of two, or three.
What multiclassed fighter/caster need on the other hand is a way to attack and cast in the same round
Sma
Top

MrWaeseL
  Duke
  Posts: 1249
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

### Re: A modest proposal: Iterative Spellcasting

- Quote

Post by MrWaeseL » Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:20 am

Or you could fold all spell levels into a single level of them (as has been proposed before on this forum) and have a singel spells have the effects of multiple lower-level spells.
Top

Count Arioch the 28th
  King
  Posts: 6172
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

### Re: A modest proposal: Iterative Spellcasting

- Quote

Post by Count Arioch the 28th » Thu Jun 17, 2004 1:49 pm

I have an idea.
Why not have the spells and attacks interchangable.
For example, if you get both multiple spells and multiple attacks, you may switch them around.
For example, a 10th level fighter/10th level wizard would (suck, and) have a BaB of 15/10/5 and cast spells at 5th level/2nd level, if I understand Lago's proposal correctly.
So, maybe that fighter mage coudl attack at +15/cast 2nd level/attack +5, or cast a 5th spell/attack +10/attack +5, or maybe even spell 5th/ spell 2nd/ attack +5?
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
Top

User3
  Prince
  Posts: 3974
  Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

### Re: A modest proposal: Iterative Spellcasting

- Quote

Post by User3 » Thu Jun 17, 2004 3:16 pm

Wizard don't need a power-up. They never have. They are only somewaht balanced by the fact that they use higher level spells vs the fighters more attacks.
To be honest, fighters need less of the "-5,-10,-15" attacks" and more full BAB attacks.
Top

Username17
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 29894
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

### Re: A modest proposal: Iterative Spellcasting

- Quote

Post by Username17 » Thu Jun 17, 2004 5:38 pm

Well, if you want to be a burner, you do need a power up. But that's neither here nor there.
I suspect that the whole idea of differing amounts of BAB for different classes was a bad idea to begin with. It causes lots of problems with multiclassing and epic play, why not drop it altogether?
Your BAB could just be your level, spells and attacks could be interchangeable, spell slots and buff spells could go away, and the more powerful save-or-die type spells could be full-round spells.
That's not a modest change, but properly managed it could make an evoker rather balanced with a berserker, and also make the fighter/mage archetype viable.
-Username17
Top

RandomCasualty
  Prince
  Posts: 3506
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

### Re: A modest proposal: Iterative Spellcasting

- Quote

Post by RandomCasualty » Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:36 pm

Wizards would need a nerf to compensate, first you'd probably have to take away save or die spells entirely, and you'd have to remove all spell scaling.
The problem with save or dies is that it's always worth throwing more of them in the mix just for a crap shoot where you hope to get lucky. If you can cast 2-3 of them around you get a lot more powerful.
Spell scaling quite simply would produce far too powerful effects. Buffs especially. I would hate to see what a divine favor + divine power + righteous might combo would do in a single round of casting.
The advantage to iterative casting is that it would cause wizards to cast several weaker spells, which would in turn make spell slots available more of a real concern. That's generally a good thing. It also takes away part of the caster's versatility, because he's forced to memorize more combat spells, which is also probably a good thing.
The disadvantage of course is that you're hosing metamagic using sorcerers and 1 round casting time spells. You'd probably need to improve the 1 round casting time spells.
You're also opening up the door for tons of uber combos, especially with time stop. The old forcecage + damage over time spell is going to become a common occurence under this system.
Top
Post Reply

- Print view

Display:
Sort by:
Direction:

7 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to “In My Humble Opinion...”

Jump to

- Main
- ↳ About the Gaming Den
- ↳ In My Humble Opinion...
- ↳ I Gave the Mouse a Cookie...
- ↳ In The Trenches
- ↳ It's My Own Invention...
- ↳ MPSIMS