# The Gaming Den

Welcome to the Gaming Den.

Skip to content

## One thing that bugged me about Idiocracy

Mundane & Pointless Stuff I Must Share: The Off Topic Forum

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

- Print view

212 posts

- Page 9 of 9
  - Jump to page:
- Previous
- 1
- …
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9

tzor
  Prince
  Posts: 4266
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by tzor » Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:29 pm

> Maj wrote:The free market doesn't apply to the current health care system because the insurance model doesn't allow price transparency.

Agreed. I don't think we can ever solve healthg care without price transparency.
Top

tzor
  Prince
  Posts: 4266
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by tzor » Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:38 pm

> DSMatticus wrote:

> > tzor wrote:that procedure for X and another selling that procedure for less than X they won't choose the later.

> This is historically not what happens. Competing with big name companies is hard. As a matter of fact, it's damn near impossible.

You can argue for Broadband, I can argue for Fast Food. Once a fast food resturant appears in the place, a dozen others will because the first resturant already did the demographics to show they can be supported and the others save on the cost.
But then again, Broadband sort of is. Actually your broadband argument is a little outdated as well, but broadband is so lame it's stupid. (One key stupidity is customer unloyalty. Your customer is shit until he actually does change to the competition and then when he does you offer him the gold package. So he switches again and again.) The point is that broadband, for the most part is a base utility, variations on the theme are cosmetic at best.
In the free market of health care, there is a plethora of choices, a gadzillion of niches, and a ton of potential plurality. Specialization is common, even in the crap system we have today. (Have cancer? You better go to Hospital X. Have burns? Go to hospital Y. You can get the complete 21st century preventative care checkup from Z (I heard that on the satelite radio).)
So yes, it's not like the mega corps pwn the scene.
Top

Neeeek
  Knight-Baron
  Posts: 900
  Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:45 am

###

- Quote

Post by Neeeek » Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:59 pm

> tzor wrote: In the free market of health care, there is a plethora of choices, a gadzillion of niches, and a ton of potential plurality. Specialization is common, even in the crap system we have today. (Have cancer? You better go to Hospital X. Have burns? Go to hospital Y. You can get the complete 21st century preventative care checkup from Z (I heard that on the satelite radio).

Hmm. There is the problem that the patient may not know what is wrong with them under a lot of circumstances.
Top

tzor
  Prince
  Posts: 4266
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by tzor » Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:36 pm

> Neeeek wrote:Hmm. There is the problem that the patient may not know what is wrong with them under a lot of circumstances.

That's been a problem with health care for a very long time; sometimes they don't know even after seeing a doctor. I'm not sure that is a problem with any specific health care system as the same is true for most people not knowing what is wrong with their automobiles. I think the problem reduces somewhat as more and more diagnosis aids pop up on the internet.
Top

DSMatticus
  King
  Posts: 5271
  Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am

###

- Quote

Post by DSMatticus » Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:01 pm

> Tzor wrote:dozen others will because the first resturant already did the demographics to show they can be supported and the others save on the cost.

Differences between this and that:
1) Fast food is a saturated market. Everywhere there is enough demand for a fast food chain, there are fast food chains. The explosion is a result of finding new corners of the market that are unsaturated.
2) People do not use the same fast food service for months at a time. They will eat at different places pretty much every day. They routinely switch services. People do not and cannot easily switch broadband services (the broadband companies go to great lengths to stop you from doing just that, with their atrocious contracts).
Edit: 3) Also, the infrastructural costs for fast food chains is per establishment, not per person.
If fast-food was sold in half-year long contracts to be fed so many meals a week, it would look more like broadband.
Last edited by DSMatticus on Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top

sabs
  Duke
  Posts: 2347
  Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:01 pm
  Location: Delaware

###

- Quote

Post by sabs » Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:20 pm

I'm not really sure that people are rationally able to make good decisions on health care. They can make informed decisions when the Doctor takes time to explain the options in simple terms. But most people are NOT doctors, they don't understand the jargon, or the ramifications of everything, unless it's spelled out.
But really, if you don't have someone with your interests who is able to translate from medical jargon and double talk into plain english. It's impossible to tell how good for you a course of medical care is going to be.
It's also impossible for you as a consumer to tell which specialist, if any you need to contact, and if your Primary care is any good, or a quack.
Add to that the Health Insurance desire to have you pay as many premiums as possible without actually having to pay anything for your care, and you have a mess.
Health Insurance wants you to not get sick, and if you get sick, they want you to get better cheaply, or die quickly.
Top

tzor
  Prince
  Posts: 4266
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by tzor » Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:06 am

My point DSMatticus is that your notion of a broadband provider is not the only model. I don't wish to imply that medical facilities are bunched together like fast food resturants (although where I live we have two hospitals within blocks of each other, not to mention how doctors often accumulate in "professional building" complexes on the major strip mall routes) but that there are a number of choices that will develop over time and the best hospital will get the patients. This is happening today, and it would certainly happen under a free market. (Note that the market is not free in a number of ways, your favorite doctor might not have rights at your favorite hospital, for example.)
Transparency is the key to everything, and the more information that is available, the more informed people can become. Note the word "can" as you can always lead a horse to water. Some just won't drink. Frankly, it's not the job of government to take money from the horses that want to drink the water to force the horses not drinking the water to drink.
I can't see how the computer generation would want to remain medically ignorant of their own conditions. And people will always be there to explain it to them for a profit.
Top

Datawolf
  Journeyman
  Posts: 137
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Datawolf » Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:42 pm

> tzor wrote:Transparency is the key to everything, and the more information that is available, the more informed people can become. Note the word "can" as you can always lead a horse to water. Some just won't drink. Frankly, it's not the job of government to take money from the horses that want to drink the water to force the horses not drinking the water to drink.

Hopefully increased transparency would change this over time.

> tzor wrote:I can't see how the computer generation would want to remain medically ignorant of their own conditions. And people will always be there to explain it to them for a profit.

The concern I have with this is those people might be on the take from specific hospitals, and would send people there for procedures they might not necessarily require.

> Psychic Robot wrote:

> > Pathfinder is still a bad game

> but is it a bad enough game to rescue the President?

Top

tzor
  Prince
  Posts: 4266
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by tzor » Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:45 pm

> Datawolf wrote:

> > tzor wrote:I can't see how the computer generation would want to remain medically ignorant of their own conditions. And people will always be there to explain it to them for a profit.

> The concern I have with this is those people might be on the take from specific hospitals, and would send people there for procedures they might not necessarily require.

In any system you always need an active "press" to expose fraud, abuse and conflicts of interest. These problems exist with all systems.
Top

Lago PARANOIA
  Invincible Overlord
  Posts: 10555
  Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

###

- Quote

Post by Lago PARANOIA » Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:24 am

DSMatticus, I hope you learned your lesson about trying to talk to Psychic Robot about anything.

> Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
> In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.

Top

Datawolf
  Journeyman
  Posts: 137
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Datawolf » Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:15 am

> Lago PARANOIA wrote:DSMatticus, I hope you learned your lesson about trying to talk to Psychic Robot about anything.

> Psychic Robot wrote:

> > Pathfinder is still a bad game

> but is it a bad enough game to rescue the President?

Top

Psychic Robot
  Prince
  Posts: 4607
  Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Psychic Robot » Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:17 am

> DSMatticus, I hope you learned your lesson about trying to talk to Psychic Robot about anything.

yeah don't do it or else you'll be proven wrong
free market wins again
Last edited by Psychic Robot on Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

> Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.

> Ant wrote:

> > Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?

> You do not seem to do anything.

Top
Post Reply

- Print view

Display:
Sort by:
Direction:

212 posts

- Page 9 of 9
  - Jump to page:
- Previous
- 1
- …
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9

Return to “MPSIMS”

Jump to

- Main
- ↳ About the Gaming Den
- ↳ In My Humble Opinion...
- ↳ I Gave the Mouse a Cookie...
- ↳ In The Trenches
- ↳ It's My Own Invention...
- ↳ MPSIMS