# The Gaming Den

Welcome to the Gaming Den.

Skip to content

## Are the 90s the "lost age" rules-wise ?

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

- Print view

24 posts • Page 1 of 1

Guts
  Master
  Posts: 211
  Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 5:10 pm

### Are the 90s the "lost age" rules-wise ?

- Quote

Post by Guts » Thu Jul 04, 2019 4:34 pm

70s - the pioneers. Wonky unintuitive rules. Simple - but solid - play structures and premises (the dungeon). DIY because the official rules won't cover everything, or cover but badly.
80s - the engineers. Reaction to pioneers turns into seek for coherent rules turns to obsession with simulation. Also, diversification of play structures and premises (life out of the dungeon).
90s - the storytellers. The Fluff-age. Reaction to engineers mean a focus on flavor, aesthetics, atmosphere and stories. Poor rules and structures paradigms lead to incoherent products rules-wise.
00s - the designers. System matters. Drop of legacy concepts for conscious use of rules as tools to reach thematic/functional goals. Also, first strong genre-emulation.
10s - the refiners. First non-rupture to previous age. Refinement of that paradigm into simplicity and easiness of play - even revisiting and applying it to older ages. Wild diversification of structures and premises.
From all those, I think the 90s were a lost decade rules-wise. Even the 70s and 80s had more though put into rules.
Makes sense?
Top

Whipstitch
  Prince
  Posts: 3657
  Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:23 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Whipstitch » Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:27 am

The 2010s are waaaay worse than the '90s, by my reckoning. The '90s games their flaws but they had Shadowrun, Earthdawn and Feng Shui which at least feature some interesting failures.
Last edited by Whipstitch on Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
bears fall, everyone dies
Top

Lago PARANOIA
  Invincible Overlord
  Posts: 10555
  Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

###

- Quote

Post by Lago PARANOIA » Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:33 am

What the hell are you talking about? Shadowrun and WoD were in the nineties. With some interpretation, WH40K as we know it only truly got started in the nineties what with its paradigm shift to being a Space Marines-driven wargame.

> Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
> In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.

Top

John Magnum
  Knight-Baron
  Posts: 826
  Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:49 am

###

- Quote

Post by John Magnum » Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:38 am

Why do people keep responding to silva threads? He's even resumed his old habit of filling the board with a billion barely-distinguishable Grand Theory topics. It's just that he's now a bit more circumspect about calling TGD favorites the worst-designed RPGs ever and hailing PBTA as the system that finally properly structured play.
-JM
Top

Whipstitch
  Prince
  Posts: 3657
  Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:23 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Whipstitch » Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:41 am

> John Magnum wrote:Why do people keep responding to silva threads? He's even resumed his old habit of filling the board with a billion barely-distinguishable Grand Theory topics. It's just that he's now a bit more circumspect about calling TGD favorites the worst-designed RPGs ever and hailing PBTA as the system that finally properly structured play.

Who else are we going to dunk on?
bears fall, everyone dies
Top

Guts
  Master
  Posts: 211
  Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 5:10 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Guts » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:55 am

> Whipstitch wrote:The 2010s are waaaay worse than the '90s by my reckoning

Wut? If anything, 2010's games at least address their central premises with coherent rules, something most 90s games didn't (most of the time). Look again: Pathfinder, Fiasco, Fate Core, The One Ring, Nights Black Agents, Icons, Smallville, Marvel Heroic, Dungeon World/PbtA, Hillfolk, 13th Age, Mutant Year Zero, Tales from the Loop, Feng Shui 2, Beyond the Wall, Adventurer Conquerer King, The Black Hack, etc.
The average game here is faster, simpler and more coherent than it's 90s counterpart.

> Whipstitch wrote:The '90s games their flaws but they had Shadowrun

..with it's unplayable hacking & rigging subsystems and opaque variable target numbers?

> Whipstitch wrote:Earthdawn and Feng Shui which at least feature some interesting failures.

Here we agree.

> Lago PARANOIA wrote:..WoD was in the nineties

You mean the game that nobody until this day know how is supposed to be played, a fact that made the very authors come out and whine that "nobody plays our game as we intended" ?
Oh, come on.
Top

Libertad
  Duke
  Posts: 1299
  Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 6:16 am

###

- Quote

Post by Libertad » Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:17 am

Masturbatory fixation on metaplot and wannabe-novelists are some other major defining features of the 90s.
Level 5 Catgirl Bard
Top

Leress
  Prince
  Posts: 2767
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

### Re: Are the 90s the "lost age" rules-wise ?

- Quote

Post by Leress » Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:45 am

> Guts wrote:70s - the pioneers. Wonky unintuitive rules. Simple - but solid - play structures and premises (the dungeon). DIY because the official rules won't cover everything, or cover but badly.
> 80s - the engineers. Reaction to pioneers turns into seek for coherent rules turns to obsession with simulation. Also, diversification of play structures and premises (life out of the dungeon).
> 90s - the storytellers. The Fluff-age. Reaction to engineers mean a focus on flavor, aesthetics, atmosphere and stories. Poor rules and structures paradigms lead to incoherent products rules-wise.
> 00s - the designers. System matters. Drop of legacy concepts for conscious use of rules as tools to reach thematic/functional goals. Also, first strong genre-emulation.
> 10s - the refiners. First non-rupture to previous age. Refinement of that paradigm into simplicity and easiness of play - even revisiting and applying it to older ages. Wild diversification of structures and premises.
> From all those, I think the 90s were a lost decade rules-wise. Even the 70s and 80s had more though put into rules.
> Makes sense?

What in the fuck do you mean by "lost age"?
1989 Shadowrun
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadowrun
World of Darkness was 1991:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampire:_The_Masquerade
Ars Magica 1987:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Magica
Rifts 1990:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifts_(role-playing_game)
EABA 2003:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EABA
GURPS 1986
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GURPS
Hero System 1990:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hero_System
BESM 1997:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Eyes,_Small_Mouth
Sword World 1989:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword_World_RPG
West End's d6 system 1996
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D6_System
Come on, look shit up before saying nonsense.
Last edited by Leress on Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:55 am, edited 2 times in total.

> Koumei wrote:I'm just glad that Jill Stein stayed true to her homeopathic principles by trying to win with .2% of the vote. She just hasn't diluted it enough!

> Koumei wrote:I am disappointed in Santorum: he should carry his dead election campaign to term!

> Just a heads up... Your post is pregnant... When you miss that many periods it's just a given.

> I want him to tongue-punch my box.

]

> The divine in me says the divine in you should go fuck itself.

Top

erik
  King
  Posts: 5847
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by erik » Fri Jul 05, 2019 4:13 am

I was gonna reply to this threads premise but then decided no, it is a return to classic Silva thread. Bullshit classifications formed of ignorance and the end goal is likely to lead back to garbage bearworld mentions even though there is literally nothing of value to consider there.
I guess what I can say regarding arbitrary decade groupings of rpgs is that interesting games came out in all the decades. Of this current decade the most interesting thing about them isn’t the games themselves but the shift in how they are produced. If the 90’s were a dark age then the 10’s are prehistory. Rocks and sticks, motherfuckers.
Top

Whipstitch
  Prince
  Posts: 3657
  Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:23 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Whipstitch » Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:03 am

> erik wrote:I was gonna reply to this threads premise but then decided no, it is a return to classic Silva thread. Bullshit classifications formed of ignorance and the end goal is likely to lead back to garbage bearworld mentions even though there is literally nothing of value to consider there.

Pretty much. I'm basically just taking a moment to remind him that no matter how butthurt he gets that proportional damage codes and the magic system alone makes Shadowrun more interesting than pretty much anything he purports to actually like.
bears fall, everyone dies
Top

Leress
  Prince
  Posts: 2767
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Leress » Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:23 am

> 10s - the refiners. First non-rupture to previous age. Refinement of that paradigm into simplicity and easiness of play - even revisiting and applying it to older ages. Wild diversification of structures and premises.

What is this word salad? Give bloody examples of what you mean.
You are just putting words together. There are no definitions or context to what you are saying. What I can gleam from this is that there were various systems, but that existed before the 2010s. Simplicity and ease of play, nope that existed before 2010s as well.

> Koumei wrote:I'm just glad that Jill Stein stayed true to her homeopathic principles by trying to win with .2% of the vote. She just hasn't diluted it enough!

> Koumei wrote:I am disappointed in Santorum: he should carry his dead election campaign to term!

> Just a heads up... Your post is pregnant... When you miss that many periods it's just a given.

> I want him to tongue-punch my box.

]

> The divine in me says the divine in you should go fuck itself.

Top

Ignimortis
  Journeyman
  Posts: 101
  Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:50 am

###

- Quote

Post by Ignimortis » Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:45 am

Even the 1990s developers, as focused on their pseudo-narrative bullshit as they were, tried to put more thought into rules than the guys from the 2010s. 2010s are all GM wankery and "oh it's not badly designed or non-existent, you're SUPPOSED to ask your GM about that, not the book".
1990s games had bad rules, 2010s games have no fucking rules. With bad rules, you can find something that doesn't work properly and fix it. With no rules, you either have to trust in your GM to be a very good GM (not just a mediocre GM, but a very good one), or write the rules yourself.
Top

maglag
  Duke
  Posts: 1912
  Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:17 am

###

- Quote

Post by maglag » Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:56 am

> Ignimortis wrote:Even the 1990s developers, as focused on their pseudo-narrative bullshit as they were, tried to put more thought into rules than the guys from the 2010s. 2010s are all GM wankery and "oh it's not badly designed or non-existent, you're SUPPOSED to ask your GM about that, not the book".
> 1990s games had bad rules, 2010s games have no fucking rules. With bad rules, you can find something that doesn't work properly and fix it. With no rules, you either have to trust in your GM to be a very good GM (not just a mediocre GM, but a very good one), or write the rules yourself.

Just because the rules are fewer doesn't mean that there's no rules. And even in the 1990s the rules never covered every possible scenario and sooner or later you had to ask the DM about something.
Nowadays the designers who do care about lots of rules just went digital. In the 2010s there's plenty of cheap if not free tools to make your own game where the computer takes care of all the boring calculations and rules checking and also a lot more artificial memory to play with.

> FrankTrollman wrote: Actually, our blood banking system is set up exactly the way you'd want it to be if you were a secret vampire conspiracy.

Top

deaddmwalking
  Prince
  Posts: 3343
  Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 11:33 am

###

- Quote

Post by deaddmwalking » Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:23 pm

One of the things the 3.x designers were responding to was a proliferation of rules in AD&D that covered a variety of similar things in very different way.
3.x is accused of 'system bloat', but most of that was piles of character options that nobody could really use, not whole new major subsystems for anything new.
In some ways it's fun to characterize a decade in a particular way like saying 'people in the 70s had bad hair'. It doesn't have to be universally true if it was more often true and was significantly more common than the decade that preceded it and the decade that followed, but there are enough exceptions that ultimately you're using the statement for your own convenience.
-This space intentionally left blank
Top

saithorthepyro
  Master
  Posts: 265
  Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:39 pm

###

- Quote

Post by saithorthepyro » Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:43 pm

Are those list of 2010 great hits that Guts posted actual RPGs? Because I only recognize maybe a fourth of them, and of the ones I recognize, classifying Pathfinder as what he considers as 2010 design is not correct given its essentially DnD 3.75
Top

Dean
  Duke
  Posts: 2059
  Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 3:14 am

###

- Quote

Post by Dean » Fri Jul 05, 2019 11:01 pm

I am very confident that Guts is Silva. Others have stated it too and I would bet actual money on it. Guts has posted exclusively about Apocalypse world games since his first post and only mentions D&D/Shadowrun/Pathfinder to offhandedly namecheck them while talking about *world. His punctuation and capitalization patterns are the same and he regularly starts threads with some kind of broad sweeping question or statement about all RPG's ever and then exclusively talks about *world after the first post. He has started multiple threads claiming that the *world games are the future of all gaming and that everything has lead up to them and finally he does the silva thing of multi-quoting someone and starting with an affirmative ("Definitely", "I agree") before finishing the sentence of him just writing whatever he was writing unrelated to what the person before him said.
Basically everything from the content to the style of writing is identical and indicates Silva got bored after a year and a half of just reading and made a sock puppet account to write more about how bearworld is the future of everything.

> DSMatticus wrote:Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. I am filled with an unfathomable hatred.

Top

erik
  King
  Posts: 5847
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by erik » Sat Jul 06, 2019 12:00 am

I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt that he was restarting a clean slate. He really has been improved. But I reckon it is hard to not revert to one’s old tricks. Why i tended to ignore silvacarnations in the past was the posting style more so than the interest in a niche system that only provides game design lessons as a cautionary tale. Chain threads chain posts chain quotes. They become a gish gallop that gets annoyingly out of hand.
Keep the garbage contained and it becomes more tolerable.
Top

tussock
  Prince
  Posts: 2937
  Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:28 am
  Location: Online
  Contact:
  Contact tussock
  Website Twitter

###

- Quote

Post by tussock » Sat Jul 06, 2019 6:39 am

Let's see if there's anything in the concept.

70's is inventing RPGs. You go from the Fantasy suppliment for Chainmail in 1969 to AD&D plus Holmes Basic in 1979. A lot of it is just figuring out how anything can even work at all, and AD&D is basically a couple thousand post-it note concepts stuck together trying to answer that, which is why it's all so inconsistent.
80's is fixing AD&D. Like, everything is "AD&D, but ...". You get self-consistent systems, bell curves, almost dice pools, terminology changes, new Basic D&D editions trying to explain how to play, and also get into crazy system bloat with big books covering relatively minor edge cases in the rules. Then 2nd edition in 1989 and AD&D didn't adapt any of it, at all, and still outsold them massively.
90's is fixing Roleplaying itself. As a hobby, every book said everyone else was doing it wrong. If you weren't there, you can't imagine how fucking oppressive the whole thing was with every fucking little splat book telling you how to feel about orating a hit roll and how the GM should punish you for failing, berk. New systems tended toward forcing you into a new "feel" rather than fixing anything, and generally failed at it.
00's is 3rd edition D&D, and it's d20 system. Your favourite game got converted to d20, and you bought it, and it didn't really work all that well because d20 is just built to do dungeon crawls and not anything else. It totally fixed (low to mid level) D&D, and kinda fucked everything else up.
The reaction to "oh, right, we do actually need mechanics of our own" picked up steam right into 4th edition D&D, which tried that and shat the bed, much like everyone else had, because it turns out making your own mechanics is very hard to do. Instead of all that, Pathfinder just carried on doing 3e in 2009.
10's is surrender. It's basically Cargo Cult game design. You run a playtest and polling like 3e did, but ignore it all and just use push polls. You make a consistent resolution system like 3e did, but don't fill in the results bit because bears attack. Then you slap together a couple thousand post-it notes like AD&D did; and when that doesn't work you tell people they're doing it wrong like 2nd edition did. Message boards are all carefully manicured passive-aggressive nightmares where you may not deny the success of the new edition, but really they weren't even trying.
Remember when Monte said he was no longer going to make rules for assholes? Yeah, that's just him giving up, deciding that rules which work aren't worth making, because the players he's willing to listen to will coddle him with stories of having fixed it themselves.
20's? Cargo cults only go away when the real thing turns up again. Someone needs to make a decent base game for everyone else to copy, or this will just continue. Nothing is on the horizon, to my eye.

That is extremely over-generalised, it is every RPG ever in 500 words after all, but it's consistent enough within my experience.
PC, SJW, anti-fascist, not being a dick, or working on it, he/him.
Top

erik
  King
  Posts: 5847
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by erik » Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:03 am

There's a lot more to the 80's than riffing on D&D/AD&D. Paranoia, GURPS, Toon, Marvel Superheroes, WH40k, Call of Cthulhu... those are just some that I remember playing in the 80's and early 90's. Lots of branching out. Palladium came out in 80's too, but that one legit falls into your category of trying to fix AD&D. Ditto for Rolemaster. I'd classify the 80's as when things really started branching away from D&D in earnest.
GURPS I think started the trend towards trying to get a universal system for different settings. Palladium later tried to do the same with their bastardized D&D engine. I think the 90's defining feature in roleplaying is when other RPGs finally supplanted D&D/AD&D.
If I had to classify the 00's then it would be the dawn of OGL, and rise of d20/DnD, and the end or serious decline of a lot of competitors. Palladium, White Wolf, FASA.
Cargo cult 10's sounds on point. That, and the ability for lone individuals to produce works above 90's production values. Art, layout, printing, even funding.
Shit. There's wikipedia articles already written on this garbage. Nice to see that my memory wasn't totally off on some of the major games of the periods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_o ... ying_games
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_ ... ying_games
Top

tussock
  Prince
  Posts: 2937
  Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:28 am
  Location: Online
  Contact:
  Contact tussock
  Website Twitter

###

- Quote

Post by tussock » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:24 am

Paranoia's a low-level AD&D hack, pure and simple, everything in it is playing on AD&D tropes.
I mean, the 80's were hating on classes and trying anything but a d20 to hit (ironic), and some of them loved result tables just way too much, but just about everyone was still playing where you rolled up a PC, went into some tunnels, dealt with the problems therein, and recovered the McGuffin. Yeah, your reward in CoC is insanity and death rather than levels, but there's a random disease table and an insanity table in AD&D and if you use them (don't though) then the same basic thing happens.
The 90's told you to feel the angst of your Vampire as you sat around being sad together about how unfair it was to just exist in this plight of not being the adults in the room yet. Not that most people did, but some people did, and the 90's was comparatively full of it. And unlike the OP, they totally also tried a bunch of new rules. Amber Diceless was a revolution all on it's own, and still carries influence in the hobby.
PC, SJW, anti-fascist, not being a dick, or working on it, he/him.
Top

Guts
  Master
  Posts: 211
  Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 5:10 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Guts » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:23 am

Yep, but how popular or influential was Amber to the 90s as a whole? Or Everway and Over the Edge for that matter? I think the fact those games began to pop in the 90s (and they began to pop exactly because the hobby was saturated by the simulatiomist-complexity-madness of the 80s engineers) dont mean they were influential to the design trends of the 90s. On the contrary, I would say it was only in the 00s that the indie-crowd looked back to those games to refine and expand on them.
Top

erik
  King
  Posts: 5847
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by erik » Mon Jul 08, 2019 2:02 pm

> Guts wrote: the hobby was saturated by the simulatiomist-complexity-madness of the 80s engineers

No no no! Bad puppy! Not on the carpet! Those aren’t even terms anyone agrees to. Some aren’t even words! The hobby wasn’t saturated by shit. It was still growing. I dispute everything you just wrote in parts and as a whole.
The 80’s saw lots of novel designs and genres and the 90’s continued it. There was lots of room for development and new ideas. I recall hearing about Amber diceless and seeing it in stores but nobody i knew played it and I wasn’t gung ho enough to push it on my friends since “diceless” was a turn-off for me.
As for “indie” just about every TTRPG started as an indie. And to wit all the designers began as amateurs. Modestly successful rpgs often still fail to function as an adequate day job for its creators. Indie is nothing new. What is a more recent development is that there are game design veterans and companies with history now.
Top

Guts
  Master
  Posts: 211
  Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 5:10 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Guts » Mon Jul 08, 2019 2:49 pm

> erik wrote:

> > Guts wrote: the hobby was saturated by the simulatiomist-complexity-madness of the 80s engineers

> No no no! Bad puppy! Not on the carpet! Those aren’t even terms anyone agrees to. Some aren’t even words!

If you don't know what simulation and complexity is, I don't know what to say.

> erik wrote:The hobby wasn’t saturated by shit. It was still growing.

Those are not excludents.

> erik wrote:The 80’s saw lots of novel designs and genres and the 90’s continued it.

No one said the contrary. Ghostbusters and Pendragon in the 80s, and Everway and Castle Falkenstein in the 90s, are examples. That doesn't mean they were popular though. AD&D, Traveller, GURPS and WoD were popular.

> erik wrote:As for “indie” just about every TTRPG started as an indie.

Sorry, I referred to the specific crowd at The Forge there, which called their products indie-games. But "Forge crowd" would be more accurate, I agree.
Last edited by Guts on Mon Jul 08, 2019 2:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Top

WiserOdin032402
  Master
  Posts: 175
  Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:43 pm

###

- Quote

Post by WiserOdin032402 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 3:23 pm

Honestly it feels like the 10's are going to be the era of lost rules. While more TTRPGs than ever are coming out, very few of them are well put together or well organized. Tussock is right in that it's all cargo cult. But I don't think anything's going to hit it big enough to break it.
Unless I'm completely wrong, which I might be. The only TTRPG that I can think of that would even be in a position to break the cargo cult is the upcoming Cyberpunk RED and that's only because Cyberpunk 2077 is also coming out, which will definitely get it a lot of attention. But then again if that does happen we still aren't moving forward design-wise, we'd be falling back to late 80's early 90's style game design, so it might be a lose-lose situation.
Last edited by WiserOdin032402 on Tue Jul 09, 2019 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

> Longes wrote:My favorite combination is Cyberpunk + Lovecraftian Horror. Because it is really easy to portray megacorporations as eldritch entities: they exist for nothing but generation of profit for the good of no one but the corporation itself, they speak through interchangeable prophets-CEOs, send their cultists-wageslaves to do their dark bidding, and slowly and uncaringly grind life after life that ends in their path, not caring because they are far removed from human morality.

> DSMatticus wrote:Poe's law is fucking dead. Satire is truth and truth is satire. Reality is being performed in front of a live studio audience and they're fucking hating it. I'm having Cats flashbacks except now the cats have always been at war with Eurasia. What the fuck is even real? Am I real? Is Obama real? Am I Obama? I don't fucking know, man.

Top
Post Reply

- Print view

Display:
Sort by:
Direction:

24 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to “In My Humble Opinion...”

Jump to

- Main
- ↳ About the Gaming Den
- ↳ In My Humble Opinion...
- ↳ I Gave the Mouse a Cookie...
- ↳ In The Trenches
- ↳ It's My Own Invention...
- ↳ MPSIMS