# The Gaming Den

Welcome to the Gaming Den.

Skip to content

## [Politics/Wonkish]Leakers!

Mundane & Pointless Stuff I Must Share: The Off Topic Forum

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

- Print view

151 posts

- Page 6 of 7
  - Jump to page:
- Previous
- 1
- …
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next

Maxus
  Overlord
  Posts: 7645
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Maxus » Sat Aug 10, 2013 3:52 am

Snowden's a real charmer.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
Top

Whipstitch
  Prince
  Posts: 3657
  Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:23 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Whipstitch » Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:19 am

Fuck that guy and fuck his metric bashing.
bears fall, everyone dies
Top

Ed
  Apprentice
  Posts: 72
  Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:13 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Ed » Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:59 am

> Maxus wrote:Snowden's a real charmer.

I knew him when he was on Ars. Tremendous bag of shit. I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.
(Which isn't to say I think those leaks were wrong, I think they were a decent idea. I just hope he falls into a thresher.)
Top

Maxus
  Overlord
  Posts: 7645
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Maxus » Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:38 am

> Ed wrote:

> > Maxus wrote:Snowden's a real charmer.

> I knew him when he was on Ars. Tremendous bag of shit. I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.
> (Which isn't to say I think those leaks were wrong, I think they were a decent idea. I just hope he gets his balls kicked off )

There's just about one rule of discourse on the Den: Don't wish death on other people.
We had someone who kept telling people to go die in a fire, and, well, FBMF got sick of it.
Anyways, carry on.
Last edited by Maxus on Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
Top

erik
  King
  Posts: 5847
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by erik » Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:40 am

It takes a special kind of stupid asshole to piss off the most powerful country in the world like he did. It would be improbable for other forms of stupidity and assholery to not also have expressed themselves in him as well.
If he was a well-balanced non-retard then he probably never would have leaked or been let into a position to leak. There are good people who would do such things on principle, but they tend to get filtered out more easily I reckon, reporting the minor stuff which is wrong and winnowing down their chances of getting to the huge wrongs.
Top

Kaelik
  ArchDemon of Rage
  Posts: 14491
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Kaelik » Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:46 am

There is no particular reason to believe threshers are always lethal.
So for example, "Go burn yourself very severely and suffer agonizing pain" is not against the rules.

> DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?

The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Top

Ed
  Apprentice
  Posts: 72
  Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:13 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Ed » Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:51 am

> Maxus wrote:There's just about one rule of discourse on the Den: Don't wish death on other people.

Oh my, my first faux pas.
I was thinking along the lines of a non-lethal, fairly agonizing thresher with an affinity for his crotchular region, if that helps.
Top

Username17
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 29894
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Username17 » Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:29 am

You know, seeing Edward Snowden go into a rant about how racist the Swiss are and then immediately go into a racist rant about Muslims is the first thing I've seen that makes it look like Snowden isn't a foreign agent. The obvious conclusion when someone releases some heavily modified but possibly damning secret documents and then makes a long list of accusations some of which are demonstrably true, some of which are demonstrably false, and some of which are indeterminate, and then flees directly to the protection of a hostile foreign power or two is that the person is a foreign agent.
But seeing that the guy has been spouting bullheaded opinions and conspiracy theories for years makes this sort of erratic and obviously insane behavior seem more organic. I mean, it's still entirely possible that the tipping point for him to go rogue was getting a suitcase full of money from the Ministry of State Security. But seeing that he apparently thought it was a good idea to rant about how things worked better in the 19th century because we had no social safety net and used metal for barter exchange, I could see him going all in on an attack on his country just randomly.
-Username17
Top

PhoneLobster
  King
  Posts: 6403
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by PhoneLobster » Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:40 am

> erik wrote:It takes a special kind of stupid asshole to piss off the most powerful country in the world like he did.

... wait... Snowden pissed off China now?
Last edited by PhoneLobster on Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Phonelobster's Self Proclaimed Greatest Hits Collection : (no really, they are awesome)
Phonelobster's Latest RPG Rule Set
The world's most definitive Star Wars Saga Edition Review
That Time I reviewed D20Modern Classes
Stories from Phonelobster's ridiculous life about local gaming stores, board game clubs and brothels
Australia is a horror setting thread
Phonelobster's totally legit history of the island of Malta
The utterly infamous Our Favourite Edition Is 2nd Edition thread
Top

Koumei
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 13796
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: South Ausfailia

###

- Quote

Post by Koumei » Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:51 am

> PhoneLobster wrote:

> > erik wrote:It takes a special kind of stupid asshole to piss off the most powerful country in the world like he did.

> ... wait... Snowden pissed off China now?

> Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.

Top

DSMatticus
  King
  Posts: 5271
  Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am

###

- Quote

Post by DSMatticus » Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:58 am

I just want to say called it. When I found out this college-educated, relatively well-off twenty-something was a Ron Paulite, I knew he would prove to be a gold mine of rationalized crazy. He did not disappoint.
Top

Maj
  Prince
  Posts: 4705
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: Shelton, Washington, USA

###

- Quote

Post by Maj » Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:45 pm

Why didn't Snowden wait until he was someplace "safe" before releasing this shit? Or revealing his name to the world?
My son makes me laugh. Maybe he'll make you laugh, too.
Top

Username17
  Serious Badass
  Posts: 29894
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Username17 » Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:34 pm

> Maj wrote:Why didn't Snowden wait until he was someplace "safe" before releasing this shit? Or revealing his name to the world?

Because he's an attention whore who has really poorly thought out opinions. And because he's an internet tough guy who dreams of punching hippies and overthrowing the state.
I mean, this is a guy who was tearing his hair out because it was some kind of betrayal that Leon Panetta was appointed head of the CIA. Because, get this, he was a politician. As opposed to being a general or a lawyer. Now, leaving aside the fact that Leon Panetta is in fact a lawyer, someone on that board immediately pointed out that President H. W. Bush was in fact director of central intelligence. That should have shut him up, but Snowden did not back down. He doubled down and said it didn't count because that was 25 years ago. Then he went about insulting people.
Hell, at the end of the Bush administration, he was literally calling for leakers who interfered with covert programs of the United States government to have their nuts shot off. That might seem like it's a 180 degree turn, but actually it's totally consistent. He has incredibly immature and poorly thought out opinions and has hyperbolic and violent fantasies about how they should be implemented.
You know his plan for dealing with the high unemployment of 2008 was that vulture capitalists should shut down all the distressed companies and the American people should go work for themselves like they did before 1900. Seriously. That was his actual plan. We all go become homesteaders and blacksmiths and stuff and then we stop trying to work for "money". Problem solved. If you happen to be a hot headed idiot. Like Edward Snowden.
-Username17
Top

hyzmarca
  Prince
  Posts: 3909
  Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:07 pm

###

- Quote

Post by hyzmarca » Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:24 am

How the fuck does such an obvious attention-whoring asshole get access to classified data, anyway? That's the worst possible indictment of the system. It isn't what they did, it's that they let this guy into their clubhouse.
The most cohesive argument against large-scale data collection isn't that the government is evil and malignant, it's that some employees of the government are assholes with personal agendas who will abuse that information for their own pleasure. And Snowden is pretty much a poster child for that.
This is pretty much the same reason why we don't trust 4Chan with our detailed personal data.
Top

Ed
  Apprentice
  Posts: 72
  Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:13 pm

###

- Quote

Post by Ed » Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:39 am

> hyzmarca wrote:How the fuck does such an obvious attention-whoring asshole get access to classified data, anyway?

Nobody pays a lot of attention to the IT grunts, especially not when they come in through a contractor (Snowden worked for Booz Allen Hamilton).
Top

erik
  King
  Posts: 5847
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by erik » Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:52 am

> hyzmarca wrote:How the fuck does such an obvious attention-whoring asshole get access to classified data, anyway? That's the worst possible indictment of the system. It isn't what they did, it's that they let this guy into their clubhouse.

Following 9/11 the U.S. began using contractors because they had hugely expanded mission demands and not enough people.
It had been acknowledged years ago even by an Intelligence Director among others as a problem that we had been using way too many contractors, but like so many acknowledged problems nobody has the will to fix them.
Relevant reporting:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-history ... d=19366914
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =200104716
http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/500000_ ... ta_hoards/
I think I recalled hearing on the radio that finally the government is significantly scaling back on use of contractors for intelligence, something like planning to cut access back by 90% or near to that level. Couldn't find a link tho, and I don't know if I heard the whole segment or even recall it accurately.
Top

zugschef
  Knight-Baron
  Posts: 821
  Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:53 pm

###

- Quote

Post by zugschef » Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:19 am

What is this discussion actually about?
Top

K
  King
  Posts: 6487
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by K » Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:10 pm

> erik wrote:
> Following 9/11 the U.S. began using contractors because they had hugely expanded mission demands and not enough people.

The government has been switching over to contractors since before Bush era because you don't have to pay pensions or decent wages to contractors and they don't have a union.
In fact, the federal government has had a "hiring freeze" for decades. Even senior staff in departments like Health and Human Services simply don't get replaced, and this means that the overall tactic has been to age out government workers and replace them with contractors.
I know all of this because I used to work for Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the corporations that makes all of it's profit by providing contractors to the Fed. They provide everything from secretaries to high-level military intelligence to the government.
"Not enough people in the federal government" is a design. Instead of hiring qualified people into government, we've been hiring them into massive corporations that make a tidy profit from the government. Basically, it's a way for a small number of people to get rich off other people's service to the government by milking no-bid government contracts.
Top

Chamomile
  Prince
  Posts: 4632
  Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 10:45 am

###

- Quote

Post by Chamomile » Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:02 pm

Every day you learn something new. These days the new thing seems to come with the suffix "and that's why Blade Runner is the future" more often than not.
Top

hyzmarca
  Prince
  Posts: 3909
  Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:07 pm

###

- Quote

Post by hyzmarca » Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:12 pm

In La Femme Nikita, Section One's solution to their IT problems was to impregnate one of their Abeyance Operatives and raise the resulting child to be the ultimate IT guy with absolutely no life outside of the organization. It's a strategy that worked out pretty well for them and I don't see why the NSA couldn't implement something similar. They probably wouldn't want to impregnate one of their suicide operatives, but there are plenty of kids out their who could be adopted and brought into the organization at a oung age and conditioned for loyalty.
And the best part is you don't have to pay them outside the cost of basic room and board.
There are solutions, even with a hiring freeze.
Top

infected slut princess
  Knight-Baron
  Posts: 790
  Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:44 am
  Location: 3rd Avenue

###

- Quote

Post by infected slut princess » Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:56 pm

> DSMatticus wrote:Your drunk and blind (why not) neighbor gets in his car. There is no victim unless he hits someone, but we do not call that a victimless crime because his actions are clearly dangerous and have the real possibility of ending in someone's harm or death. Victimless crimes are things like gambling, prostitution, or drug use - none of which pose a potential risk to other people's property or life. Forcing people around you to play russian roulette, whether through malice or neglligence, is not victimless even if in any particular round everyone happens to get lucky.

Being an imminent danger to someone does create a victim. So dangerously driving around in public streets while drunk and blind could very easily create "victims" even if the driver did not smash into someone or their property or wahtever.
Of course, we could imagine situations in which a drunk/blind guy could drive around without creating a victim. For example, someone with a big empty field might allow the drunk/blind guy to do donuts in it.

> So here's a hypothetical for you: one of the informants Manning outed is murdered tomorrow and made an example of by the insurgents he outed. Is Manning culpable? If no, why not?

Manning would not be culpable. This is because the government should not have any secrets, and it is not his fault someone committed a murder because of something discovered when those secrets are revealed. Instead, it is the murderer's fault.

> Kaelik wrote:DSM, you are wasting your time.

That's what I tried to tell him. But he seems to be all agitated about the idea that anyone could oppose all government secrecy.

> Oh, then you are an idiot. Because infected slut princess has never posted anything worth reading at any time.

Top

K
  King
  Posts: 6487
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by K » Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:46 pm

Here is a link to a NYT opinion where they link to data showing that contract worker for the government are generally underpaid.
There is even a link in there showing that hiring contractors is often more costly than hiring actual government workers.
Last edited by K on Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top

sabs
  Duke
  Posts: 2347
  Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:01 pm
  Location: Delaware

###

- Quote

Post by sabs » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:48 pm

Government contractors tend to be
a) Underpaid
b) Non-Union
c) Pressured to garner more billable hours, instead of doing a good job.
d) The high paid ones are ex-government/military wonks who are hired not to do work, but to keep the contract and to schmooze, and to talk to the current Government interface in a comfortable way.
Hiring contractors costs more than government workers, AND leads to a poorer working class. It's a win win situation.
There are spots where civilian employees/civilian contractors are cheaper. There are certain jobs that used to be done by military, but didn't really need military training to be done. Your average military just costs much more to train, that wasting them on paperpushing jobs is a bad plan. But in the civilian government it's bad. Add to that the problem that for a lot of government agencies, government workers have incentive to play ball with the contractors, because that's where they can get high paying jobs after they leave government service, and it's just a bad combo.
Top

Josh_Kablack
  King
  Posts: 5317
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
  Location: Online. duh

###

- Quote

Post by Josh_Kablack » Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:02 am

I've got a pretty firm belief that we are living in an era with technological changes which are are continuously making secrets harder and harder to keep than they were in the past.
There are basically two rational governmental responses to that:
1. Try a whole lot harder to keep things secret.
this is the path we are currently on
OR
2. Be a lot more selective about which things need to be kept secret.
this is probably a more rational and cost-effective approach
I also believe that some of the collateral damage of my government's recent efforts to retain secrets has been severe enough that some degree of civil-disobedience lawbreaking is likely justifiable in efforts to effect change.
However, Manning and Snowden's disclosures don't really conform to the usual notions of civil disobedience -- or at least they wouldn't if our government wasn't being so heavy-handed with them. They should have just been criminals, but overzealous pursuit and prosecution has made them into criminals who are legitimate examples of how our government mistreats suspects when cases have political ramifications.
"But transportation issues are social-justice issues. The toll of bad transit policies and worse infrastructure—trains and buses that don’t run well and badly serve low-income neighborhoods, vehicular traffic that pollutes the environment and endangers the lives of cyclists and pedestrians—is borne disproportionately by black and brown communities."
Top

K
  King
  Posts: 6487
  Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

###

- Quote

Post by K » Wed Aug 14, 2013 10:51 am

I think the thing that disturbs me most about the leaking has been the revelation of "parallel construction" where the NSA can spy on everyone and then give information to the DEA that the DEA could never get a warrant to find. The DEA then lies about where they got the information and so it can't ever be challenged in court or used to help defendants find evidence that helps them.
We have laws about lawful searches because of a long history of abuse and false convictions, and those laws have been rendered useless.
Last edited by K on Wed Aug 14, 2013 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Post Reply

- Print view

Display:
Sort by:
Direction:

151 posts

- Page 6 of 7
  - Jump to page:
- Previous
- 1
- …
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next

Return to “MPSIMS”

Jump to

- Main
- ↳ About the Gaming Den
- ↳ In My Humble Opinion...
- ↳ I Gave the Mouse a Cookie...
- ↳ In The Trenches
- ↳ It's My Own Invention...
- ↳ MPSIMS